Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08HALIFAX36, URANIUM MINING IN ATLANTIC CANADA: PROTESTS VERSUS PROFIT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08HALIFAX36.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08HALIFAX36 2008-05-28 11:59 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Halifax
VZCZCXRO4856
RR RUEHGA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHHA #0036/01 1491159
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 281159Z MAY 08
FM AMCONSUL HALIFAX
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1283
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0529
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHHA/AMCONSUL HALIFAX 1371
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HALIFAX 000036 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR WHA/CAN AND EB/ESC/IEC 
USDOE FOR IA (DEUTSCH) 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EMIN ENRG ETRD PGOV PHUM CA
SUBJECT: URANIUM MINING IN ATLANTIC CANADA: PROTESTS VERSUS PROFIT 
 
REF: A. 07 OTTAWA 001201; B. HALIFAX 0013 
 
HALIFAX 00000036  001.2 OF 003 
 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1.  Considering there is a vociferous and devoted anti-uranium 
lobby in Canada's Atlantic Provinces, it appears unlikely that 
the region will be joining the world uranium club any time soon. 
 There are identified commercial quantities of uranium in three 
of the four provinces that could be developed to meet growing 
global demand for fuel for nuclear power plants.  However, 
mining companies have run up against government bans and hostile 
citizen groups which could keep the uranium in the ground. 
Although this is not the stated policy of any of the governments 
involved, politicians are faced with weighing the cost of either 
saying no to the anti-uranium forces or to the companies that 
want to invest millions in their jurisdictions.  END SUMMARY 
 
--------------------------------------------- --------------- 
OVERVIEW: URANIUM MINING (OR THE LACK OF) IN ATLANTIC CANADA 
--------------------------------------------- --------------- 
 
2.  Skyrocketing prices and increasing global demand for clean 
energy sources have sparked much interest in Atlantic Canada's 
uranium deposits.  Except for Prince Edward Island which has 
only trace amounts of uranium, there are known commercial 
quantities in the other Atlantic Provinces: 
Newfoundland-Labrador, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.  The full 
size of these deposits is still being determined, but several 
companies are keen to start planning for development.  At 
present there is no mining underway in the region. If the 
anti-uranium forces get their way, there never will be. 
 
3.  Environmentalists, conservationists and a slew of community 
and farming groups in each of the provinces have mounted vocal 
protest campaigns against mining companies and business leaders 
who want to realize the economic potential from the resource. 
Coming down in the middle in the debate are the respective 
provincial governments and one newly-established aboriginal 
government.  So far the politicians have walked a fine line 
between the two sides:  acknowledging the concerns of the 
anti-mining forces, while at the same time endorsing the 
industry's assertions that modern technology has lessened the 
potential environmental and health impacts of uranium mining. 
While the debate shares these commonalities across the region, 
the situation in each province is unique and has forced each 
government to come up with its own strategy for dealing with the 
issues. 
 
--------------------------------------------- --------------- 
NEWFOUNDLAND-LABRADOR - STYMIED BY A NEW REGIONAL GOVERNMENT 
--------------------------------------------- --------------- 
 
4.  The Labrador region of the province holds the most promise 
of any potential uranium development in Atlantic Canada.  Since 
2005 Aurora, a private company owned by Vancouver and St. John's 
interests, has been exploring in what is known as the Central 
Mineral Belt of Labrador, part of the newly designated Inuit 
territory of Nunatsiavut.  (Detailed information about the 
location and Aurora's activities is available on the company's 
web site www.aurora-energy.ca).  In 2006 the company identified 
a substantial amount of uranium at two locations on the Belt, 
Michelin and Jacques Lake.  The company followed up those 
discoveries with another drilling program in 2007 which saw four 
additional satellite deposits identified.  Aurora estimates that 
the combined deposits contain 133 million pounds of uranium, 
making the area one of the largest deposits outside 
Saskatchewan, the province where all of Canada's active uranium 
mines are currently located (Ref A). 
 
5.  Aurora's original development plan called for the company to 
begin the regulatory process by the end of 2007 with an expected 
start-up date in 2014.  However, after a spirited backlash from 
the Inuit community, the company postponed filing its plan in 
order to provide residents more information on how it would deal 
with the problem of drilling waste.  But before they could 
provide the information, the issue ended up with the Members of 
the Territorial Assembly, who were forced to act to stop a 
growing rift between those wanting a ban on uranium activities 
and those wanting to see the multi-million dollar economic 
benefits accrue to the region from mining the ore. The Assembly 
failed to resolve the issue.  On April 8 the members voted eight 
to seven in favor of implementing a three-year moratorium on 
uranium mining in the territory, but in consideration of the 
exploration activities already underway, the moratorium only 
targets development, not exploration. 
 
6.  The Nunatsiavut government officials plan to use the 
 
HALIFAX 00000036  002.2 OF 003 
 
 
moratorium to develop expertise on how to evaluate the impact of 
such a large scale project.  According to our local contacts, 
however, the Assembly could revisit the issue before the end of 
the moratorium, especially given the narrow margin of the vote. 
Aurora is pledging to work collaboratively with government and 
community leaders on assessing the impact of a development 
program, which could go a long way in addressing the concerns of 
the anti-mining side.  For its part, the Newfoundland-Labrador 
provincial government is not getting involved in the issue other 
than to endorse the Nunatsiavut assembly's right to enact the 
ban under the terms of its establishment in 2005.  They also 
stress that the current federal and provincial regulatory 
regimes (which would still apply to any development plan) are 
stringent enough to ensure that any drilling project will get a 
full environmental assessment. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
NOVA SCOTIA - UNDER PRESSURE TO SCRAP A 25-YEAR BAN 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
 
7.  The province of Nova Scotia has had a moratorium on uranium 
exploration and mining since 1982, when a small but influential 
protest group convinced the government of the day to stop a 
company from mining in a location in central Nova Scotia. 
Subsequently, world uranium prices slumped and the issue 
remained dormant until 2005 when a new local company called 
Tripple Uranium Resources (www.capellaresources.com) started 
prospecting on acreage near the abandoned site.  Despite having 
the word "Uranium" in its name, the company (a subsidiary of 
Vancouver-based Capella Resources) asserts that it is not 
looking for uranium at all, but iron ore, copper and gold.  In 
fact, the company readily acknowledges that under the terms of 
the 1982 ban, it will have to stop its exploration work if it 
encounters any mineral deposits exceeding 100 parts per million 
of uranium. 
 
8.  Coincident with the resurrected interest in uranium was the 
revival of the anti-uranium protestors who are now asking the 
question of what will happen to the ban if Tripple hits a large 
amount of uranium.  The protestors allege that Tripple is 
already pressuring the provincial government to lift the ban in 
anticipation of finding commercial quantities of uranium.  The 
government has made no secret that senior officials have met 
with Tripple representatives, but as one of our senior 
government contacts told us officials are always willing to meet 
with any company interested in developing the province's mineral 
resources.  For now the government's policy is an expressed 
desire that both sides engage in an informed debate on the 
issue; however, an all-party committee of the provincial 
legislature recommended that the government maintain the ban. 
The committee recommendation reinforces the lobbyists' position 
that the government should enshrine the ban in legislation. 
Currently it is contained in a cabinet decision which mining 
opponents assert could be easily be rescinded. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ---------------- 
New Brunswick - Demands for a Ban in a Nuke-Friendly Province 
--------------------------------------------- ---------------- 
 
9.  Tripple Uranium is also one of the companies involved in 
uranium exploration in New Brunswick, along with CVRD-Inco.  The 
two companies are in competing prospecting activities in 
southern New Brunswick.  Both are keeping the results of their 
respective exploration programs secret for proprietary reasons, 
but the anti-uranium forces in that province have already 
started pushing the provincial government for a ban on further 
exploration and future development.  That appears unlikely given 
the province already has signed exploration agreements with the 
companies involved.  Furthermore, New Brunswick has the region's 
only nuclear power station and is actively considering building 
another one (Ref B).  Nonetheless, the government is attempting 
to respond to the opposition forces by holding public 
information sessions beginning in June. That announcement on May 
8 did little to placate the lobbyists who have already condemned 
the province for deciding to hold the sessions after various 
exploration programs are already underway. 
 
----------------------------------- 
COMMENT - OH THE POLITICS OF IT ALL 
----------------------------------- 
 
10.  In the end it will no doubt be politics, not exploration 
results, which will determine the speed of development of the 
region's uranium resources.  As our senior Nova Scotia 
government contact commented, there is a certain political 
timidness in governments even talking about these issues, and 
for good reason.  Any government leader who comes down on the 
wrong side of the issue could expect to pay a heavy political 
 
HALIFAX 00000036  003.2 OF 003 
 
 
price at the ballot box.  On the other side, companies have 
already invested millions of dollars in exploration work so far 
and will want to do more than just look at prospecting results. 
Also, the governments are cognizant of how barriers to uranium 
development might be perceived in the mining industry as a 
whole, given that there is growing demand for the region's other 
minerals. 
 
11.  For the immediate future, areas to watch will be:  how 
Aurora fares in its consultative work with the Nunatsiavut 
Assembly in Newfoundland-Labrador and if that will result in 
another vote on a ban; whether there are any moves to make Nova 
Scotia's ban permanent; and in New Brunswick, how the government 
fares in its upcoming information sessions.  As these events 
unfold, they should shed some light on when Atlantic Canada 
might be joining the world uranium club, if at all.  END COMMENT 
FOSTER