Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08TOKYO1072, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 04/18/08
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO1072.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08TOKYO1072 | 2008-04-18 08:08 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO1558
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1072/01 1090808
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 180808Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3566
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 9724
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 7346
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 1018
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 5750
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 7940
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2883
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 8905
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 9422
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 TOKYO 001072
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA;
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 04/18/08
INDEX:
(1) Nagoya High Court finds Iraq airlift mission to be
unconstitutional; Decision casts pall on Japan-U.S. integration
policy; Unannounced conditions mentioned; May affect Indian Ocean
refueling operation as well (Tokyo Shimbun)
(2) Editorial: Discussion of right to collective defense now
necessary (Nikkei)
(3) Editorial: Court rejects peace cooperation? (Sankei) 4
(4) Revisions to SOFA not in sight; Municipalities dissatisfied with
improved administration (Asahi)
(5) Okinawa Prefecture asks U.S. Marine Corps to remove dropped
bombs and suspend drill (Okinawa Times)
(6) Editorial: President Bush can't read global trend on fight
against global warming (Asahi)
(7) UNICEF Japan calls for revision of child pornography law
(Mainichi)
ARTICLES:
(1) Nagoya High Court finds Iraq airlift mission to be
unconstitutional; Decision casts pall on Japan-U.S. integration
policy; Unannounced conditions mentioned; May affect Indian Ocean
refueling operation as well
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 3) (Abridged slightly)
April 18, 2008
The Nagoya High Court ruled yesterday that part of the Air
Self-Defense Force's airlift mission in Iraq is a breach of Article
9 of the Constitution. The decision threw cold water on Japan's
security policy of promoting SDF integration with the U.S. military
and shifting weight to overseas missions. Touching on some
activities that have not been revealed by the government, the court
determined that the ASDF's mission to airlift armed U.S. troops
constitutes the "use of force." This has put a question mark over
the overseas dispatch of the SDF, which have been providing
rear-area support to the U.S. military under the Iraq Special
Measures Law, the Antiterrorism Special Measures Law, and the
Japan-U.S. agreement on U.S. force realignment.
80 PERCENT of flights for U.S. military
Some 210 ASDF personnel and three C-130 cargo planes are now
stationed in Kuwait. They fly four to five times a week to southern
Iraq, Baghdad, and Arbil in the north. Over 80 PERCENT of the
flights are for airlifting U.S. military personnel and supplies, and
only once a week for the UN, which is engaged in reconstruction
assistance in the country.
The government has insisted that the ASDF activities are
constitutional by indicating that they are mostly for humanitarian
and reconstruction assistance without revealing their specific
activities and by explaining that the airports and flight paths are
in noncombat zones, despite the deteriorating security situation in
Baghdad.
TOKYO 00001072 002 OF 009
The court ruled that the airlifts are largely security support
activities (that constitute rear-area support for the U.S.
military), a decision contradictory to the government's view. The
court also determined that the mission is a breach of Article 9 of
the Constitution, which prohibits the use of force, concluding that
airlifting armed soldiers to Baghdad, a combat zone, is an act
integral to the use of force.
Flights often cancelled
In reaction to this ruling, a senior Defense Ministry official
noted: "The overall security situation in Baghdad is irrelevant. The
airport and flight paths are in noncombat zones." Administrative
Vice-Defense Minister Kohei Masuda categorically said: "We will not
review the activities."
When the ASDF's C-130s flew over Baghdad from last year through this
year, alarms often rang out indicating that missiles were targeting
them. Calling off a flight due to worsening security is not
uncommon.
In light of (the Nagoya court's decision that) airlifting military
personnel and supplies to a combat zone is unconstitutional, it is
inevitable that the Maritime Self-Defense Force's refueling mission
in the Indian Ocean under the Antiterrorism Special Measures Law,
whose term once expired, will also be found unconstitutional. Before
the House of Representatives Budget Committee on October 10, 2007,
Foreign Minister Masahiko Koumura admitted that MSDF fuel had been
used in the war, saying, "(The MSDF also provided fuel) to U.S.
vessels that staged air strikes in Afghanistan."
Review of SDF overseas missions inevitable
In the talks on U.S. force realignment held in May 2006, Japan and
the United States agreed to expand the close cooperation between the
U.S. military and the SDF to a global level under the banner of
improving the international security environment, going beyond the
defense of Japan and responses to contingencies in areas surrounding
Japan. In December 2006, the SDF Law was amended and the SDF's
overseas activities were upgraded to primary duties, paving the way
for integration of the U.S. military and the SDF in various parts of
the world.
(The Nagoya court's) decision that found the ASDF's logistical
support to U.S. forces in combat zones to be unconstitutional is
likely to press the government for a review of the SDF's overseas
activities. Although joining UN peacekeeping operations in
compliance with UN requests may cause only a few problems, Japan is
required to use extra caution in providing effective support to the
U.S. military, such as the Iraq mission, which Japan has notionally
carried out independently.
(2) Editorial: Discussion of right to collective defense now
necessary
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full)
April 18, 2008
The Nagoya High Court said in its ruling that some Air-Self Defense
Force's (ASDF) airlifting activities conducted in Iraq violated the
Constitution.
TOKYO 00001072 003 OF 009
The above account was given when the court explained the reasons for
its verdict on an appeal filed by some 1,100 plaintiffs across the
country demanding an injunction against the Self-Defense Forces'
(SDF) dispatch to Iraq. The plaintiffs claimed that the SDF's
activities in Iraq violated Article 9 of the Constitution. The
judgment rejected all claims filed by the plaintiffs, and it does
not legally restrict the SDF's activities now going on in Iraq.
The court's ruling this time is noteworthy in terms of pointing to
ambiguity in the definitions of a combat zone and a noncombat zone,
as well as on the government's far-fetched interpretation of the
Constitution over the question of the right to collective
self-defense.
The court said that the SDF's airlifting of armed soldiers in the
multinational force to Baghdad is unconstitutional.
So far the government has noted that the region where the ASDF
operates in Baghdad is a noncombat zone, but the ruling, judging
from reports on the current situation in Iraq, recognized "Baghdad
as a combat zone as defined under the Iraq Special Measures Law." It
concluded that transport of armed soldiers to a combat zone comes
under "cooperation that could be identified as being involved in the
use of force by other countries," an act that is not allowed
constitutionally.
Our position has been that the SDF should broadly take part in
logistic support for United Nations peacekeeping operations (PKOs)
or peace-building activities by a multinational force, but that the
SDF should not participate in combat operations.
That is why we have insisted on the need for the government to shift
its previous interpretation of the Constitution over the right to
collective self-defense.
The reason the government had to leave the definitions of a "combat
zone" and a "noncombat zone" ambiguous was because it had to allow
the SDF to be engaged in their missions in Iraq without violating
the government's interpretation of the Constitution. Former Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe, who was aware of the need to make this point
clear, established a panel of advisors to do so. The panel is headed
by former Ambassador to the United States Shunji Yanai.
The panel has never met, however, since Yasuo Fukuda took office as
prime minister. Fukuda appears to have in effect suspended debate on
the matter. Meanwhile, Fukuda has instructed his staff to draft
permanent legislation intended to allow the government to dispatch
the SDF abroad as needed, and make preparations in the ruling bloc
so that the bill will be submitted to the current session of the
Diet.
If permanent legislation of this kind is established without
touching on the government's previous interpretation of the
Constitution regarding the right to collective self-defense, the
confusion will continue. The Nagoya High Court's verdict may be a
criticism of the Fukuda administration's incoherent stance.
(3) Editorial: Court rejects peace cooperation?
SANKEI (Page 2) (Full)
April 18, 2008
TOKYO 00001072 004 OF 009
A high court ruled yesterday that the Air Self-Defense Force's
mission in Iraq is unconstitutional. The court ruling, however, is
extremely questionable, since it denigrates the ASDF's activities in
Iraq for peace building and reconstruction assistance.
The Nagoya High Court has rejected the plaintiffs' demand to suspend
the SDF deployment to Iraq. The high court sided with a district
court's rejection of claims for an injunction against the SDF
dispatch and demands for compensation. However, the court ruling
said the ASDF's airlifting of U.S. troops and other multinational
forces violated the first paragraph of Constitution Article 9.
The plaintiffs have decided not to appeal the ruling, so the state
cannot appeal. It is the first court ruling to find the SDF dispatch
to Iraq unconstitutional, and the decision will be finalized. This
court judgment of unconstitutionality was shown in an obiter dictum
that has nothing to do with the text of judgment.
The high court raised a question in an obiter dictum. This deviates
from constitutional law litigation.
Moreover, the state, which is a defendant, is blocked from making a
final appeal to the Supreme Court. We must point out that this
denies Japan's court system of determining constitutionality, for
which the Supreme Court serves as a court of last instance to judge
constitutionality under Japan's three-instance judicial system.
The high court judgment of unconstitutionality is also questionable
in itself. The court ruling said the ASDF's airlifting of
multinational force troops to Baghdad is an act integral to other
countries' use of force and can unavoidably be taken as being
tantamount to its own use of force.
A Kuwait-based ASDF detachment has been tasked with airlifting
troops and goods, including Ground Self-Defense Force members, to
Iraq's southern districts on its C-130 transport planes. After the
GSDF's pullout two years ago, the ASDF extended the scope of its
airlifting activities to cover Baghdad and other localities in that
country. The ASDF is currently engaged there in the task of
airlifting personnel and supplies for the United Nations and
multinational forces. The government maintains that Baghdad meets
the Iraq Special Measures Law's requirement of SDF activities to be
carried out outside a combat zone, and the ASDF has been only
carrying out backup activities.
We must not forget that the ASDF's Iraq mission is also based on a
U.N. Security Council resolution on the stationing of multinational
forces.
Japan thereby shares the international community's determination not
to let Iraq become a breeding ground for terrorists.
The "threat or use of force," which is prohibited in Constitution
Article 9, can be interpreted to refer to a war of aggression. The
court ruling takes the position that Japan's international
cooperation for peace is unconstitutional. This judgment is hard to
understand when considering the international surroundings of
Japan.
The SDF was once ruled unconstitutional in a court judgment 35 years
ago. This judgment, however, was dismissed in a higher court's
ruling. The court ruling this time is probably aimed at overruling
TOKYO 00001072 005 OF 009
the theory of governing, namely, a high-level political act
pertaining to the fundamentals of government is beyond the power of
court judgment. An obiter dictum is not legally binding.
The government says it will continue the ASDF's Iraq mission. We
take that for granted.
(4) Revisions to SOFA not in sight; Municipalities dissatisfied with
improved administration
ASAHI (Page 3) (Abridged slightly)
April 17, 2008
In the wake of a string of incidents committed by U.S. service
members in Japan, the governments of Japan and the United States
have drawn up a set of measures to improve the administration of the
Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). Although the two
governments are already in accord on having the United States
provide Japan with the number of U.S. military personnel living
off-base and information on deserters, Tokyo and Washington had
aimed from the beginning at settling the matter by just improving
the administration of the SOFA instead of making revisions to it.
Base-hosting municipalities are dissatisfied with such a stance.
Limited effects expected from notification of deserters
Foreign Minister Masahiko Koumura announced on April 11 that Japan
and the United States would share information on deserters. He
said:
"In the event the U.S. declares a service member as a deserter, it
immediately will ask prefectural police departments for
(cooperation) in arresting him. This applies to all deserters. At
the same time, the U.S. will notify the Japanese government."
A taxi driver was killed in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture (on March
19). A U.S. sailor has been arrested on charges of murder and
robbery. He was a deserter. Criticism erupted about the fact that
the U.S. did not notify Japan about him before the incident
occurred. Taking this seriously, the governments of Japan and the
United States repeatedly discussed the matter and made the
announcement speedily just eight days after his arrest.
U.S. Forces Japan Commander Maj. Gen. Edward Rice, who took command
this past February, shortly before the incident occurred,
commented:
"An agreement has been reached with the Japanese government. What
was specifically determined will be announced in the near future. I
think this is good news for the two countries."
Effects of the measures are likely to be limited, however. According
to the Foreign Ministry, a U.S. deserter is defined as any missing
service member: (1) whose clear intent is to abandon the military;
or (2) who has left his or her post for 30 days or more. In the case
of (2), there is a possibility that a person might commit a crime
before being declared as a deserter.
Heads of base-hosting municipalities and others are calling for
stronger measures. Kanagawa Governor Shigefumi Matsuzawa said: "We
have repeatedly called for tighter discipline among U.S. service
members, a review of educational programs and other measures, but
TOKYO 00001072 006 OF 009
there has been no end to heinous crimes by U.S. service members." He
has also called for a revision of the SOFA to establish a
consultative council involving local governments under the
Japan-U.S. Joint Committee, a consultative body based on the SOFA.
But neither Japan nor the United States has considered revisions to
the SOFA. Their view is that improved administration will be
sufficient. A U.S. service member was arrested in connection with a
case in Okinawa in which a local girl was allegedly sexually
assaulted in February. (The accusation was later withdrawn.) This
has led to the improved SOFA operation of annually notifying via the
Japanese government the base-hosting municipalities of the number of
personnel connected with the U.S. military and of service members
living off-base. The U.S. also decided to hand the suspect of the
Yokosuka murder case over to the Japanese side as soon as Japan made
a request.
After the Yokosuka incident, U.S. Ambassador to Japan J. Thomas
Schieffer told the press:
"If you look at the record of the investigation into this case, you
will see that the United States and Japan have cooperated fully and
that the SOFA functioned extremely well. I don't think the SOFA
needs to be revised at this point."
(Japan-U.S. SOFA) more advantageous to host nation than pacts with
other countries
USFJ Commander Rice said on April 14: "The accord is advantageous to
the host nation (Japan) in comparison with similar documents (SOFA)
with other countries."
Foreign Minister Koumura noted on February 15: "In light of global
standards from the U.S. side, Japan is somewhat advanced."
True, Japan is the only country to which the United States has
agreed to hand over suspects before indictment. Still, the steps are
confined to improved administration of the SOFA, not revisions to
it.
Following the schoolgirl rape in Okinawa in 1995, the governments of
Japan and the United States agreed to improve the SOFA's
administration. The United States decided to give "sympathetic
consideration" to Japan's requests for pre-indictment handover of
suspects "in heinous crimes, such as murder and rape." Based on this
agreement, Japan has made requests in six cases, and the United
States complied with them in five. The United States did not accede
to the request in an attempted rape that occurred in Okinawa in
November 2002. Although the United States did not provide clear
reasons for refusing the request, there might have been such
circumstances as that: (1) the U.S. service member, the suspect,
strongly denied the charges (saying that the conduct was
consensual), and (2) the U.S. side decided that there was
insufficient evidence to indict him.
The SOFA concluded in 1960 between Japan and the United States was
modeled after the SOFA (general agreement) concluded in 1951 between
the United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
members. In Germany, investigations into crimes committed by U.S.
service members and trials for U.S. military personnel are governed
by the Germany-NATO treaty and the Bonn supplementary agreement. But
in most cases, Germany has abandoned primary jurisdiction.
TOKYO 00001072 007 OF 009
What about South Korea? Before the U.S.-ROK SOFA was revised in
2001, South Korean authorities were allowed to take into custody
U.S. suspects only after their sentences are determined. Today, they
can have the custody of any U.S. military personnel suspected of any
of 12 designated crimes, such as murder, kidnapping and arson, at
the point of indictment.
The United States originally concluded SOFAs soon after the end of
WWII when the host nations' legal systems were still insufficient
with the aim of defending the rights of U.S. service members who
became suspects in those countries.
Surugadai University Professor Emeritus Hiroshi Honma, who is
well-versed in SOFAs, pointed out: "Japan's system to respect human
rights is no less inferior to that of the United States. The time
has come to fundamentally review the SOFA."
In some aspects, the Japan-U.S. SOFA is lagging behind those with
Germany and South Korea when it comes to what is agreed upon on the
use of bases. Under the Bonn supplementary agreement revised in
1993, the armed forces stationed in the country are required to
conduct environmental assessments on their bases. An agreement was
also reached in 2003 with Seoul requiring the United States to clean
up the environment when returning its bases to South Korea.
The council of the governors of 14 prefectures hosting U.S. bases
presented to the government last year a petition calling for a SOFA
specifying the application of domestic laws, such as the Air
Pollution Control Law and the Clean Water Law, to U.S. bases in
Japan.
In the Japan-U.S. SOFA, there are no agreements on environmental
matters. Chances are high that once Futenma Air Station and other
bases are returned to Japan with the advancement of the realignment
of U.S. forces in Japan, environmental conditions surrounding U.S.
bases will become a focal point. The governments of Japan and the
United States must earnestly address tasks that cannot be resolved
with the U.S.'s "sympathetic consideration" alone.
(5) Okinawa Prefecture asks U.S. Marine Corps to remove dropped
bombs and suspend drill
OKINAWA TIMES (Page 2) (Full)
April 17, 2008
A U.S. Marine Corps AV-8 Harrier fighter dropped 500-pound bombs in
waters outside the designated zone for the Torishima firing range in
Kumejima Town. In this regard, Akira Uehara, the public relations
officer of the Okinawa prefectural government, on April 16 made an
oral request to the U.S. Marine Corps in Japan for the speedy
removal of dropped bombs and the suspension of the AV8 Harrier
fighters' drill until there has been an investigation to determine
the cause.
Speaking of the incident of a taxi driver being robbed and injured
in Okinawa City, Uehara asked Kadena Air Base to take disciplinary
steps and preventive measures. On the U.S. side, public affairs
officers handled Uehara's claims. The Okinawa government intends to
seek a reply from the U.S. side.
Pointing out the delay in the U.S. military's report of the dropped
TOKYO 00001072 008 OF 009
bombs, as well as mistakes in the initial report, Uehara called on
the U.S. side to clarify reasons for the confusion. He told the
Marine Corps public affairs officer: "It goes without saying that
sufficient consideration was not given to public safety, as well as
to the anxiety of prefectural residents."
Uehara also demanded that the U.S. take all possible measures to
SIPDIS
prevent a recurrence of similar incidents by creating a
communication system and toughing safety control.
Uehara told the Kadena Air Base public affairs officer:
SIPDIS
"It is a serious issue that a military police officer in charge of
discipline of military personnel and maintenance of order was
involved in the robbery while the Japanese and U.S. governments are
studying preventive measures."
Uehara made similar oral requests to the U.S. Consulate General in
SIPDIS
Okinawa, the Foreign Ministry's Okinawa Office, and Okinawa Defense
Bureau.
(6) Editorial: President Bush can't read global trend on fight
against global warming
ASAHI (Page 3) (Full)
April 18, 2008
The contents of the measures announced by U.S. President Bush were
hard to believe. We wonder what he is thinking.
President Bush said: "The U.S. will by 2025 halt the growth of
emissions" of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases that
cause global warming. This can be taken, however, as a declaration
that it will be unavoidable for the U.S. to continue to increase
emissions for the next 17 years.
Since the U.S. withdrew its commitment to the Kyoto Protocol, which
mandates industrialized countries to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, it has yet to set any target for emission cuts. Maybe the
U.S. wants to say that revising such a stance is significant.
Nonetheless, the international community has already presented
targets for stopping the growth of greenhouse gas emissions.
In the session of the Conference of the Parties to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change held late last year,
discussion was conducted on plans to "turn the growth of
global-scale gas emissions to the minus column within 10 to 15
years," and to "reduce gas emissions by the industrialized countries
by 25 to 40 PERCENT from 1990 levels by 2020." These figures are
based on an estimate by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC). Although they did not become official targets, they
are now important standards to be used in working out measures to
curb global warming.
What startles us is that the president is ignorant of such a
direction of discussions.
The U.S. is foremost among the industrialized countries. That is not
all. The U.S. is the world's largest CO2 emitter (according to
statistics in 2005). It is unbelievable that such a country has no
intention to meet the target for the industrialized countries and
TOKYO 00001072 009 OF 009
might continue to discharge an increase amount of greenhouse gases
for 15 years from now, until when the international community has
decided to have the growth of its emissions fall in negative
territory.
Don't forget that these targets are based on what was discussed in
the G-8 Summit last year. In the Summit, the leaders agreed to look
into the goal of "halving the world's greenhouse gas emissions by
2050" in a serious manner. The standards are a milestone on the road
to achieving the goal.
The U.S. government played a role in bringing about the agreement.
It also revised its stance to join talks under the United Nations on
forming a new framework following the 2012 expiration of the Kyoto
Protocol. There are now strong doubts about whether the government
was really serious about tackling this challenge.
A matter of serious concern in discussion on a post-Kyoto scheme is
whether China and India, major emitters, will join the new
framework, although the two countries are not obligated to cut
emissions as they are considered developing countries under the
Kyoto Protocol. It is undesirable that the U.S. indicated this
negative stance at such a time, because it will become difficult to
call on China and India to share in the burden.
There are high hopes that the U.S. will change after the end of the
Bush administration early next year. The three presidential
candidates certainly appear to be more eager to fight global warming
than the incumbent.
Even so, we cannot afford to waste time. How about inviting the U.S.
presidential candidates to the Lake Toya Summit, in which the issue
of global warming will take center stage?
(7) UNICEF Japan calls for revision of child pornography law
MAINICHI (Page 3) (Full)
April 18, 2008
The Japan Committee for UNICEF presented to six ruling and
opposition parties a petition with some 21,000 signatures calling
for amendments to the Law Punishing Acts Related to Child
Prostitution and Child Pornography. The petition calls for
criminalizing "simple possession" of pornographic images and
pictures of children under the age of 18, as well as animated
cartoons of sexual abuse. The ruling parties plan to criminalize
simple possession of images and pictures, excluding cases in which
such pornographic material was sent unsolicited, and forgo
criminalizing possession of cartoons.
SCHIEFFER