Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08OTTAWA529, TORY "BRAND" SUFFERS ETHICAL BLOW

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08OTTAWA529.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08OTTAWA529 2008-04-16 19:03 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ottawa
VZCZCXRO9995
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0529/01 1071903
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 161903Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7697
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 OTTAWA 000529 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV CA
SUBJECT: TORY "BRAND" SUFFERS ETHICAL BLOW 
 
REF: A.  OTTAWA 305 
 
-    B.  OTTAWA 452 
 
1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) officers 
executed a search warrant at federal Conservative Party headquarters 
in Ottawa on April 15, apparently related to an ongoing legal case 
involving possible Conservative election spending violations in the 
2006 federal election.  The incident thrust a media spotlight on an 
issue that had previously gained scant traction with the public. 
The politically loaded visuals of a police "raid" on a party that 
had vowed to deliver "clean" government likely will dent the 
Conservative "brand," but this is unlikely to be the catalyst that 
will force a new election in the near future.  End Summary 
 
Bad Press 
--------- 
 
 
2. (SBU) With extensive coverage both by the media and by 
representatives of the opposition Liberal Party, the RCMP -- acting 
on behalf of Elections Canada, the independent federal election 
administration -- entered the Ottawa federal headquarters of the 
Conservative Party of Canada on April 15 with a search warrant and 
left with a quantity of unspecified documents.  It was unclear who 
tipped off the press and the Liberals to cover this event. 
 
3.  (SBU)  In Question Period in the House of Commons later on April 
15, Prime Minister Stephen Harper  deflected opposition charges of 
"scandal," insisting that not only had his party cooperated fully 
with all requests by Elections Canada for documents, but also 
emphasizing that the Conservatives had initiated the civil case 
against Elections Canada, not vice versa.  He maintained that "our 
legal position is rock solid."  Liberal members tried to imply that 
RCMP involvement suggested the possibility of a separate criminal 
investigation, which Conservative members flatly denied. Liberal 
leader Stphane Dion commented that PM Harper "needs to answer very, 
very serious allegations and a behavior that is beyond what we have 
seen for a long time."  The heated exchanges continued in Question 
Period on April 16. 
 
Complicated case 
---------------- 
 
4.  (SBU)  Under Canadian law (ref a), political parties and 
candidates are subject to separate election campaign spending 
limits.  Elections Canada believes that the Conservatives in the 
2006 federal election operated a complex and so-called "in-and-out" 
scheme in which the party allegedly transferred more than C$1 
million in national campaign funds to 67 Tory candidates who were 
under their personal election spending limits in their ridings.  The 
candidates allegedly booked the money as local campaign advertising 
expenses, but then wired it back to the party, while applying to 
Elections Canada for reimbursement of the same funds under 
taxpayer-funded election spending rules. 
 
 
5. (SBU) After Elections Canada disallowed the claim by ruling that 
the expenses were actually incurred by the national party, the 
Conservatives filed a civil suit in the spring of 2007 to overturn 
the ruling.  The case is ongoing in the Federal Court of Canada.  If 
the Court rules in favor of Elections Canada, the disputed 2006 
expenses would be added to the Conservative Party's national 
campaign expenses and would put the party well over its spending 
cap, in violation of the election law, which prescribes a maximum 
penalty of C$25,000 for the offense.  However, if the Court convicts 
the party of the more serious charge of "willful collusion" to 
exceed spending limits, the party could lose its legal registration. 
 Opposition parties have also alleged that the candidates' claims 
for reimbursement amounted to election fraud as well. 
 
6.  (SBU)  Comment:  The Conservatives campaigned in 2006 on a 
pledge to deliver "clean," transparent, and accountable government, 
Qpledge to deliver "clean," transparent, and accountable government, 
riding a wave of public revulsion over the Liberals' "sponsorship" 
scandal of 2005.  The Conservative "brand" will likely take a 
beating from the unflattering video footage, and even more so if the 
Federal Court rules against the party.  Until now, the opposition 
had been stymied in its attempts to have a parliamentary committee 
investigate the "in-and-out" affair, nor had the public paid much 
attention.  The scheduled parliamentary recess during the week of 
April 21 will provide temporary relief for the Conservatives. 
However, the Liberals will undoubtedly try further to chip away at 
Conservative ethics and the party "brand," and to gain fresh 
traction with their hitherto unsuccessful attempts to link the 
government to other "scandals," such as an inquiry into connections 
between former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and a 
German-Canadian lobbyist, and allegations that the Conservatives 
tried to "buy" the vote of independent MP Chuck Cadman (now 
deceased) in order to bring down the former Liberal government. 
Despite their glee at the Conservatives' latest discomfiture, the 
Liberals are probably still not ready to fight a national campaign 
(ref b), so they will try to embarrass the Conservatives without 
 
OTTAWA 00000529  002 OF 002 
 
 
actually bringing the government down in the near future.  For the 
Conservatives, the fallout could be most damaging in vote-rich 
Quebec, where voter disgust over the sponsorship scandal was 
strongest and where the Conservatives hope to add seats in the next 
election.  At a minimum, the latest developments will make it harder 
for the Conservatives to play the ethics card in the next campaign, 
whenever that may be. 
WILKINS