Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08LONDON981, IMO: LONDON CONVENTION REPORT - 29TH
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08LONDON981.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08LONDON981 | 2008-04-04 13:54 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy London |
VZCZCXRO3644
RR RUEHHM RUEHLN RUEHMA RUEHPB RUEHPOD
DE RUEHLO #0981/01 0951354
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 041354Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8156
INFO RHMFIUU/HQ EPA WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDC/NOAA WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
RUEHC/DEPT OF INTERIOR WASHDC
RHEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 LONDON 000981
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE PLEASE PASS TO IO/IOC FOR M. MORRISSEY
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHSA SENV AORC ASEC UK
SUBJECT: IMO: LONDON CONVENTION REPORT - 29TH
CONSULTATIVE MEETING, LONDON 5 -9 NOVEMBER 2007
¶1. SUMMARY: The International Maritime Organization
(IMO) combined annual meetings for both the 1972
London Convention on the Prevention of Marine
Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter
(the 'London Convention') and the 1996 Protocol to
the London Convention (the 'London Protocol') took
place in London, November 5 to 9, 2007. The
meetings, which were held concurrently, achieved
success in a number of key areas, including a
strong statement on the emerging and controversial
issue of ocean iron fertilization that urged
"States to use the utmost caution when considering
proposals for large-scale ocean fertilization
operations" and took the view that "given the
present state of knowledge regarding ocean
fertilization, such large-scale operations are
currently not justified." Parties agreed to
continue studying the scientific and legal
perspectives of ocean iron fertilization through
the London Convention/Protocol Scientific Groups
and a Legal Correspondence Group, with a view to
its eventual regulation. The London Protocol
parties approved a compliance mechanism (which the
United States helped to shape, even though we are
not yet Protocol members), and adopted guidelines
for sub-seabed carbon sequestration. The meetings
also agreed to implement a strategic project to
remove barriers to compliance with the Convention
and Protocol. Asked about our progress in ratifying
the London Protocol, the U.S. delegation informed
the meeting that the President has submitted the
Protocol to the Senate for its advice and consent.
END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------------------- ------
--
Overview and Status of London Convention and
Protocol
--------------------------------------------- ------
--
¶2. The Convention on the Prevention of Marine
Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter,
1972 (the London Convention) established a first-
ever global regime for the protection of the marine
environment from pollution caused by ocean dumping
and incineration at sea. It now has eighty-two
Parties. The United States became a Party in 1975.
¶3. The 1996 Protocol to the London Convention (the
London Protocol), a free-standing treaty,
represents the culmination of an intensive effort
to update the Convention to reflect current views
on protection of the ocean and scientific
improvements in environmental assessments. The
Protocol is intended to eventually supersede the
original London Convention. Unlike the London
Convention, which lists substances that may not be
dumped, the Protocol prohibits ocean dumping of any
waste or other matter except for those specifically
allowed to be considered for dumping (a "reverse
list"). The text of the Protocol was adopted by
Contracting Parties to the London Convention
parties in 1996, and the United States signed the
Protocol in 1998. The Protocol entered into force
March 24, 2006. Currently 32 states are Parties to
the 1996 Protocol, with at least seven more
(including the United States) actively working
towards accession. (NOTE: President Bush
transmitted the Protocol to the U.S. Senate
September 6, 2007, with his recommendation that the
Senate give early and favorable consideration to
this Protocol and give its advice and consent to
ratification. END NOTE.)
------------------------
Ocean Iron Fertilization
------------------------
¶4. Iron fertilization is a potential greenhouse gas
mitigation technique that works, in theory, by
adding iron to stimulate phytoplankton blooms that
LONDON 00000981 002 OF 007
sequester carbon dioxide in nutrient deficient
regions of the ocean. In the spring of 2007 a U.S.
company gained international attention when it
announced plans for an iron fertilization project,
for which it planned to sell carbon credits. The
Scientific Groups of the London Convention and
Protocol took up this controversial issue at their
June 2007 meeting, and issued a "Statement of
Concern" saying that the current knowledge about
the effectiveness and potential environmental
impacts of iron fertilization was "insufficient to
justify large-scale operations," and also forwarded
the issue to the general meetings of Convention and
Protocol parties to consider "with a view to
ensuring adequate regulation of such operations."
¶5. The November annual meeting of London Convention
and Protocol parties saw lively discussions on the
topic in plenary and break-out working group
sessions throughout the week. Several parties and
observers presented statements expressing their
opposition to a proposal by a U.S. company for a
ten-thousand square kilometer iron fertilization
experiment approximately 350 miles west of the
Galapagos Islands. Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia,
Ecuador, Italy, Spain, Panama, Peru and Greenpeace
International all expressed opposition to this
particular proposal, and in some cases, to the
concept of ocean iron fertilization in general. A
statement by Vanuatu that nations should focus on
reducing carbon dioxide emissions at the source
rather than looking for potentially dangerous
interim carbon sequestration solutions received
noticeable indications of tacit support in the
plenary session.
¶6. After considerable discussion about how to best
handle this issue, the London Convention and
Protocol parties endorsed the Scientific Groups'
June 2007 "Statement of Concern" and agreed that
the scope of work of the London Convention and
Protocol included ocean fertilization, as well as
iron fertilization, and that the London Convention
and Protocol were competent to address this issue
within the jurisdiction of these treaties.
Convention and Protocol parties also agreed that
the legal and scientific aspects of the issue
needed to be further investigated during the
intersessional period, in order to reach a more
informed decision on how to address this issue at
the next annual meeting in October 2008. The
meeting outcome that received the most attention in
the press was the agreed text that said:
"recognizing that it was within the purview of each
State to consider proposals on a case-by-case basis
in accordance with the London Convention and
Protocol, parties urged States to use the utmost
caution when considering proposals for large-scale
ocean fertilization operations. The governing
bodies took the view that, given the present state
of knowledge regarding ocean fertilization, such
large-scale operations were currently not
justified."
¶7. The United States joined this consensus, but in
numerous interventions also tried to balance the
concerns about the uncertain efficacy and potential
adverse side effects of iron fertilization with the
need for further scientific investigations to
explore the potential of iron fertilization as a
climate change mitigation strategy.
¶8. COMMENT: The emerging and controversial issue of
iron fertilization seemed to dominate the agenda,
and was the main topic of conversation during
coffee breaks and in the corridors. Throughout the
discussions on iron fertilization, the United
States strove to make the point that uncertainties
about the efficacy and potential adverse side
effects of iron fertilization should not be used as
reasons to rule out further scientific
investigations on a potentially powerful tool for
LONDON 00000981 003 OF 007
mitigating global warming. Nevertheless, when
voicing support for the final agreed text on iron
fertilization, the U.S. delegation noted to the
plenary that our concerns about allowing continued
research should not be misconstrued as endorsing
any particular ocean fertilization project,
proposal or entity, or promoting the concept in
general at this time. Despite the fact that the
only private companies with announced plans for
iron fertilization "experiments" are currently U.S.
firms, the negative attention garnered by the issue
did not detract from the U.S. delegation's ability
to help negotiate a balanced final outcome
statement, nor hinder our leadership on other
critical London Convention and Protocol issues. END
COMMENT.
-----------------
CO2 Sequestration
-----------------
¶9. At the 2006 annual meeting, London Protocol
parties agreed to the adoption of an amendment to
the Protocol that would amend Annex 1 (the "reverse
list") to explicitly allow sequestration of carbon
dioxide streams from carbon dioxide capture
processes into sub-seabed geological formations
(but not into the water column). That amendment
took effect on February 10, 2007; however certain
details of the carbon sequestration issue were left
for the Protocol's Scientific Group to resolve.
Earlier in 2007 the Scientific Group developed
specific guidelines for carbon dioxide
sequestration in sub-seabed geological formations,
and this meeting of the Contracting Parties adopted
these "Guidelines for Assessment of Carbon Dioxide
Streams for Disposal into Sub-seabed Geological
Formations" and agreed to keep them under review
and update them in five years or earlier, as
warranted in light of new developments. The meeting
also instructed the Scientific Group to develop an
appropriate uniform format for the reporting of
data, and to present this format at the next annual
meeting in October 2008.
¶10. London Protocol Parties also addressed the
potential issue of transboundary pollution
resulting from sub seabed injection of carbon
dioxide, and established a legal and technical
working group on transboundary carbon sequestration
issues. The Parties adopted the legal and technical
working group's terms of reference and accepted
Germany's offer to host the planned meeting of the
legal and technical working group in early 2008.
The terms of reference call for a legal evaluation
of whether Article 6 of the Protocol, regarding
export of wastes and other matter for disposal at
sea, might need to be amended to allow
transboundary transport of CO2 intended for
sequestration in sub-seabed geological formations.
They also call for consideration of the need for
additional monitoring, notification, reporting,
permitting, and other requirements.
-----------------------------------
Compliance Procedures and Mechanism
-----------------------------------
¶11. The meetings achieved progress on the London
Protocol's compliance procedures and mechanism and
related procedures, which had been under discussion
for many years and needed to be in place by March
¶2008. Parties adopted compliance procedures and
mechanisms pursuant to Article 11 of the Protocol.
While the United States (which was active in the
discussions even though not yet a Protocol party)
had long resisted establishment of a formal
compliance group with a set number of members and
preferred to have compliance handled on a case-by-
case basis as had been done under the London
Convention, the final result is less onerous and
has more procedural safeguards than some other
LONDON 00000981 004 OF 007
mechanisms that have been recently developed in
other multilateral environmental agreements. For
example, although the Compliance Group is limited
to 15 members, elected by the Meeting of
Contracting Parties and having equitable geographic
representation, the meetings of the Compliance
Group are open to any party or non-party observer
except when a Party whose compliance is in question
requests a closed meeting. In addition the
authority of the Compliance Group is limited and it
may not take measures directly against a party
having problems with compliance and instead can
only make recommendations to the Meeting of
Contracting Parties to this end. In addition,
safeguards were added to the "party-to-party"
submission in that the reporting party must first
undertake consultations with the subject party
before raising a compliance issue with the
Compliance Group. Further, notice of all
submissions shall be sent to all Parties for their
information, to increase transparency.
¶12. Finally, the United States also achieved
inclusion of language recognizing the competence of
the International Atomic Energy Agency over all
issues involving radioactive wastes and other
matter. This section (which recognized the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as the
competent international body for all issues
involving radioactive wastes and other radioactive
matter, and for radiation protection of humans and
the environment), was an item the U.S. delegation
specifically requested be reinserted back into the
compliance procedures document. It stated that for
compliance matters involving radioactive wastes and
other radioactive matter, the Secretariat shall
refer the matter to the IAEA for technical
evaluation and review, and the compliance group
will take the IAEA's evaluation into account in its
consideration of the matter. The U.S. delegation
took this position as it did not want the
compliance group to take independent action on
radiological issues without IAEA involvement and
advice. With these and other safeguards the
Compliance Group should be a useful addition to the
London Protocol regime. The United States will
remain actively engaged in the implementation of
the procedures and mechanisms.
------------------------------
Artificial Reefs and Placement
------------------------------
¶13. An ongoing discussion within the London
Convention concerns the placement of material into
the ocean for purposes other than disposal of that
material, e.g. the creation of artificial reefs. A
Correspondence Group had been working
intersessionally to develop "Guidance for the
Placement of Artificial Reefs." This group met
informally during the week of the London meetings
to discuss progress that has been made, and the
Chair of the Correspondence Group sought approval
of a revised and abbreviated document. The United
States noted that the proposed format was a useful
way forward but also noted that we will be able to
provide more substantive comments on the next
draft.
¶14. In plenary, Japan made an intervention
asserting that the Guidelines are legally non-
binding and intended only for "developing
countries." The Chair of the Scientific Groups (a
member of the U.S. delegation) responded by
agreeing that the Guidelines are legally non-
binding, but challenged the notion that they are
intended only for "developing countries," by
pointing out that they should be useful for a much
broader audience. The plenary concluded discussion
on the topic by urging Parties to provide comments
and relevant information to the Chair of the
Correspondence Group to assist with the
LONDON 00000981 005 OF 007
finalization of the Guidelines, and agreeing that
the final Guidelines should be submitted to the
Governing Bodies with a view to their adoption at
their next joint session in October 2008.
¶15. The issue of the ex-USS ORISKANY (a former
aircraft carrier the U.S. Navy used to create an
artificial reef off the coast of Florida), which
Greenpeace International raised at the 2006 annual
meeting, citing concerns over PCBs, was not
mentioned at the 2007 meeting.
----------------------------------------
Scientific Work Group Issues and Actions
----------------------------------------
¶16. The London Convention has a Scientific Group
that meets each spring and works intersessionally
on the technical issues of ocean dumping. The
London Protocol Scientific Group meets concurrently
with the London Convention's Scientific Group,
through an agreed arrangement that the offices of
Chair and Vice-Chair would consist of members
representing both Parties to the Protocol and to
the Convention.
¶17. The departing Chair of the London Convention
Scientific Groups provided an overview of the 30th
session of the Scientific Group (held in June
2007), and the meeting adopted the recommendations
of this 30th Scientific Group session including the
endorsement of the "Statement of Concern" on ocean
iron fertilization, adoption of the "Guidelines for
Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Streams for Disposal
into Sub-seabed Geological Formations", adoption of
the terms of reference for the legal and technical
working group on transboundary carbon sequestration
issues, and the adoption of a strategic approach
for implementing the barriers to accession,
implementation and compliance project. The
Contracting Parties adopted standing terms of
reference for both the London Convention and London
Protocol Scientific Groups. Among other things, the
two Groups are to work co-operatively in all
matters of joint interest and mandate, while
ensuring that matters of importance to the London
Convention and London Protocol are adequately
addressed. The Scientific Groups will hold their
next meeting May 19-23 in Guayaquil, Ecuador.
--------------------------------------------- ---
Technical Cooperation and Barriers to Compliance
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶18. Parties made note of various technical
cooperation projects over the past year to improve
compliance with the London Convention and Protocol.
They also noted a work group meeting in Spain last
May on implementation of an e-form for reporting of
dumping activities. The meeting discussed several
outreach activities to raise the profile of the
London Protocol and encourage additional countries
to join it, such as workshops on the Protocol
sponsored by the UNEP Regional Seas Programme, in
particular a workshop on ocean dumping in February
2007 in Bahrain for countries in the Middle East
and another outreach workshop on ocean dumping
given in Ecuador in October 2007.
¶19. The governing bodies reviewed and adopted a
Work Plan aimed at a strategic approach to helping
countries overcome barriers to accession,
implementation and compliance with the London
Convention and Protocol. This Work Plan will help
to prioritize support for States to overcome the
legislative, institutional, technical and socio-
economic barriers that have been identified towards
full compliance with the London Convention and
Protocol. The governing bodies noted with
appreciation the substantial contributions pledged
to execute this Work Plan by Canada (CS$25000),
France (US$250000), Italy (US$10000), United States
LONDON 00000981 006 OF 007
(US$20000), UNEP (US$8000) and Spain (amount yet to
be confirmed), while the Secretariat informed the
Meetings that US$63500 had been set aside in the
IMO-ITCP for this purpose, focusing on countries in
Eastern Europe and the CIS States for the period
2008 to 2009, as well as US$30000 for Africa in
¶2008. The governing bodies also noted with
appreciation the completion of the long-awaited
Waste Assessment Guidance Tutorial and progress
with communicating and distributing the Tutorial to
the various intended audiences.
---------------
BOUNDARY ISSUES
---------------
¶20. Certain issues related to marine environmental
protection that are, in part, also covered by other
international agreements such as MARPOL, are
referred to as "boundary issues." Canada reported
on the efforts of a joint working group between the
London Convention/Protocol and the IMO's Marine
Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) to
clarify boundary issues between the
Convention/Protocol and MARPOL, particularly with
respect to spoilt cargoes. Canada, the lead
country, is preparing a revised draft of "advice to
mariners" on managing spoilt cargoes under both
instruments, taking into account comments on an
earlier draft submitted by the United States and
the Netherlands. Canada intends to submit "final
draft" text for review by the London Scientific
Groups in May 2008 and later by the Convention and
Protocol governing bodies and MEPC 58 (October
2008).
¶21. The U.S. view is that the disposal of spoilt
cargo at sea is subject to regulation under MARPOL
only if it constitutes "garbage" as defined in
MARPOL Annex V, regulation 1. Otherwise, it is
subject to regulation as "dumping" within the
London Convention/Protocol. Whether the disposal of
a particular spoilt cargo is subject to the London
Convention/Protocol or MARPOL Annex V must be
determined on a case-by-case basis. Moreover, a
careful review of Annex V and its implementing
Guidelines led us to the conclusion that spoilt
cargoes in most if not all cases do not fall under
Annex V.
¶22. The United Kingdom reported on the development
of advice by the London Scientific Groups'
intersessional correspondence group on the
management of waste streams resulting from the
removal of anti-fouling systems from ships. The
volume of these waste streams is expected to
increase as a result of the impending entry into
force (September 2008) of the Anti-Fouling Systems
Convention (AFS). The Scientific Groups will
continue their work with the aim of submitting
advice to MEPC 58 and the next meeting of the
London Convention and Protocol governing bodies.
------------------------------
Elections and Meeting Dynamics
------------------------------
¶23. Similar to the 2006 annual meeting, this
combined London Protocol and London Convention
meeting was ably chaired by Mr. Victor Escobar of
Spain, who was particularly effective in guiding
the meeting through the discussions on the
controversial iron fertilization issue. The First
Vice-Chair, Ms. Chen Yue from China, took a less
active role, allowing Mr. Escobar to lead the
meeting. Mr. Escobar and Ms. Chen were unanimously
re-elected as Chair and First Vice Chair,
respectively, for the intersessional period and the
next meetings of the London Convention and London
Protocol, which will be held October 27 - 31, 2008,
in London. As no candidates have been nominated for
the post of Second Vice Chair, the Secretariat will
LONDON 00000981 007 OF 007
approach possible nominees via appropriate channels
and prepare a shortlist of candidates, focusing on
candidates from developing countries, for
consideration by member states before the next
meetings.
-------
Comment
-------
¶24. This meeting of the London Convention and
London Protocol parties was a success from the U.S.
perspective. All the attention received by iron
fertilization might seem to diminish the
significance of some of the achievements at this
meeting on other important issues covered by the
London Convention and Protocol. However, the
mainstay issues of the London Convention and
Protocol (dumping of dredged material and other
material at sea) will continue to be critical
issues for all coastal and maritime states,
especially given the increased overall concerns
about land-based sources of marine pollution, and
the upward trend of maritime trade resulting from
increased globalization. If and when the United
States ratifies the 1996 London Protocol (which is
currently before the Senate), our membership in the
Protocol will reaffirm our leadership role in
international efforts to control marine pollution
and protect the environment of the world's oceans.
TUTTLE