Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08HANOI422, ADOPTION FRAUD SUMMARY - VIETNAM
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08HANOI422.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08HANOI422 | 2008-04-11 10:00 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Hanoi |
VZCZCXRO3619
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHHI #0422/01 1021000
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 111000Z APR 08 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY HANOI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7597
RUEPICA/USCIS WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEHPNH/NVC PORTSMOUTH
RUEHHM/AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH 4572
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK 6301
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 HANOI 000422
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR CA/FPP CA/VO, CA/OCS/CI AND EAP/MLS; DEPT ALSO PASS TO KCC
POSTS FOR FRAUD PREVENTION MANAGERS
NVC FOR FPU/LARRY GRUBB
BANGKOK FOR USCIS
UNCLASSIFIED
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS CPAS CMGT KFRD ASEC VM
SUBJECT: ADOPTION FRAUD SUMMARY - VIETNAM
REF: (A)05 State 205073 (B)06 State 151145 (C) Hanoi 005, (D) Hanoi
007, (E) Hanoi 026, (F) Hanoi 027, (G) Hanoi 79, (H) Hanoi 106 (I)
Hanoi 113 (J) Hanoi 117 (K) Hanoi 132 (L) Hanoi 226 (M) Hanoi 291,
(N) Hanoi 323, (O) Hanoi 331, (P) Hanoi 343, (Q) Hanoi 347, (R)
Hanoi 351 (S) 2007 Hanoi 1299 (T) 2007 Hanoi 1465 (U) 2007 Hanoi
1820 (V) 2007 Hanoi 1834 (W) 2007 Hanoi 1843 (X) 2007 Hanoi 1856 (Y)
2007 Hanoi 1893 (A) 2007 Hanoi 1912 (AA) 2007 Hanoi 1928 (AB) 2007
Hanoi 1977 (AC) 2007 Hanoi 1979 (AD) 2007 Hanoi 2082 (AE) 2007 Hanoi
2109 (AF) 2007 Hanoi 2118
HANOI 00000422 001.8 OF 008
¶1. Summary : Adoption related fraud in Vietnam is a large and
growing problem. The combination of a decentralized administrative
system, a legal framework that lacks procedures for oversight and
accountability, and an unregulated donation system have combined to
produce an adoption system rife with fraud and child selling. In
interviews with consular officers, 75% of parents have stated that
they received payment from the orphanage in exchange for placing
their child in the orphanage. On average this payment was six
million Vietnamese Dong, which is the equivalent of 11 months salary
at minimum wage in Vietnam. Throughout Vietnam, officials at
orphanages connected with international adoptions report that the
number of deserted children has increased by up to 1700% since 2005,
the year that the adoption agreement with the United States was
signed. Vietnamese officials have told the Embassy that "these
desertions would not occur if the United States stopped issuing
visas for the adoption of Vietnamese children." Embassy
investigations have uncovered multiple cases of children being
offered for international adoption without their birth parents
consent, after the birth parents failed to pay hospital bills for
the children. Despite the documented abuses, the Department of
International Adoption has acknowledged that it has not taken any
action, criminal or administrative, against any individual or
organization for any violation of Vietnamese law or regulation
concerning adoption. End Summary
----------------------
Country Fraud Profile
----------------------
¶2. Vietnam is considered to be a high risk country for immigration
fraud according to the Department of State. Fraudulent documents
are routinely submitted by Vietnamese applicants in both
non-immigrant and immigrant visa applications. These include both
documents that have been fabricated outright and official documents
issued improperly or based on incorrect information. Birth
certificates, household registry documents, and marriage
certificates can easily be purchased from corrupt local government
officials or brokers. Marriage fraud, in order to obtain
immigration benefits, is common and has resulted in multiple arrests
in the United States. Vietnam ranks 123 out of 180 countries on
Transparency International's 2007 Corruption Index , with 1 being
the least corrupt.
--------------------------------------------- -----
Adoption Legislation and Administrative Structure
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶3. International adoption in Vietnam is regulated by two decrees:
Decree 68/2002 and Decree 69/2006. These decrees divide
responsibility for adoption between the Department of International
Adoption (DIA) in the Ministry of Justice, and the Ministry of
Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) at the national level.
Most of the actual administration of adoptions, however, is handled
at the provincial or district level, with minimal oversight from DIA
or MOLISA. For example, the matching of children and adoptive
parents is the responsibility of the district-level Department of
Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs. In reality, it is often
delegated to the orphanage director. If DIA feels that a child is
not eligible for international adoption, they can request the office
that made the match review the file, but they cannot block the match
or prevent the completion of a full and final adoption.
¶4. The definition of an adoptable orphan is provided in Decree
68/2002 Article 44, which states that a child cannot be released for
adoption without "the written voluntary agreement of the father
and/or mother of that child." The decree lists only three
exceptions to this rule. The first is if both parents are deceased;
the second is if the child "has been abandoned or left at a medical
establishment;" and the third is if "the child's parents have lost
their civil act capacity" [sic]. Decree 69/2006 clarifies that the
orphanage or People's Committee must prove that a child is covered
by one of these exceptions. Otherwise, the child is still
HANOI 00000422 002.8 OF 008
considered to be under its parents' custody, and their consent is
required prior to any adoption being authorized. Decree 68/2002 and
Decree 69/2006 also establish that in the case of a child who has
been abandoned or left at a medical facility, a 30 day search must
be made for the birth parents, and in all cases a separate 30 day
search must be made for domestic adoptive parents. These searches
are conducted by the orphanage or local People's Committee.
----------------------------------
Links between ASPs and Orphanages
----------------------------------
¶5. Vietnamese law requires that an Adoption Service Provider (ASP)
sign a donation agreement with an orphanage before the ASP can
arrange adoptions from the orphanage. These agreements are
generally kept secret by the ASP. However, several orphanage
directors have told the Embassy that they will actively bargain with
multiple ASPs, and will only work with the ASP that offers them the
highest donation per child referred. While, in theory, these
donations are a mechanism to assist in the care of the children at
the orphanage, in practice they can have a distorting effect on the
adoption system.
¶6. Orphanage directors in four provinces have reported to the
Embassy that there is a strong financial incentive for them to
maximize the number of children available for foreign adoption in
their centers. The donation provided per child (available for
international adoption) can be up to 10 times the standard
government funding. Hospital and social workers have reported that
orphanage directors offer them financial incentives for each child
sent to their orphanage. There is also a disincentive to provide
care to children who are not available for international adoption.
In many developing countries, including Vietnam, a large number of
children living in orphanages are children "in care," or children
whose families have temporarily placed them in an orphanage due to
difficult times but hope to regain custody of their children in the
future. Nevertheless, orphanages (some privately run) have been
established exclusively to serve the needs of children destined for
international adoption.
¶7. As a result of the autonomy given to orphanage directors by
MOLISA, individual orphanage directors, in conjunction with
representatives of their sponsoring ASP, have broad latitude in
determining how donations will be made, what the amount will be, and
whether applications from prospective domestic adoptive parents will
be processed. For example, one orphanage in Hanoi, which is
entirely funded by an American ASP, submits expense reports and
receipts to the ASP on a monthly basis. The ASP then transfers
funds to reimburse the orphanage for its expenses. The number of
infants in this orphanage has remained steady for the past three
years. The orphanage is clean, well stocked with medicine and has
an RN on duty. This orphanage prioritizes reuniting children with
their biological parents, and processes equal numbers of domestic
and international adoptions. By contrast, another Hanoi orphanage
receives most of its funding on a per internationally adoptable
child basis and the payment is made in cash directly to the
orphanage director. This orphanage has seen the number of infants
in its care increase by over 2000% in the past year, but it has not
made significant increases in staff and does not have an RN. MOLISA
recently investigated this orphanage when unsanitary conditions led
to the deaths of several infants in its care. This orphanage has
never processed a domestic adoption.
¶8. According to the DIA, the donation system is further complicated
when ASPs make a donation in kind or finance a project for the
orphanage rather than paying a cash donation. According to DIA,
this is because the orphanage is required to refer one child for
foreign adoption for every x dollars donated by the ASP. Thus, if
the ASP funds a $10,000 project and the per child donation is set at
$1000 per child, then the orphanage would be required to refer 10
children for international adoption to the ASP. Should the
orphanage not have 10 children who are qualified for international
adoption, then, according to DIA, the orphanage director is required
to find the additional children to complete his side of the
agreement. Two orphanage directors have confirmed to consular
officers that they are feeling pressure to find more children for
their orphanage to "compensate" ASPs for their donations. These
arrangements result in orphanages that are focused on finding
children for foreign families, rather than providing the best
possible care to children in need.
¶9. Another distorting effect of the donation system is that it
HANOI 00000422 003.8 OF 008
undermines protections in Vietnamese law which requires a 30 day
search for birth parents and/or domestic adoptive parents as
described above. Since, in most cases, the ASP has a close
relationship with the orphanage, the ASP rep is informed as soon as
a potentially adoptable child enters the orphanage. This frequently
results in the issuance of a "soft referral," where adopting parents
are notified that they have been matched with a child before the
completion of the two consecutive 30 day search periods listed
above. The DIA has stated that such pre-referrals are illegal.
Nonetheless, in over 40 documented cases, DIA has taken no action to
punish or prevent the issuance of soft referrals, noting that all
they can do is to inform provincial or district officials of the law
and request their compliance.
¶10. The problem of soft referrals is compounded by the donation
system. Local officials throughout Vietnam have reported that they
have never received any calls in response to ads run seeking the
birth parents of a deserted child. In fact, officials at the
Ministry of Justice acknowledge that such advertisements are
ineffective as many families in these provinces have no access to TV
or radio and are often illiterate. Vietnamese social workers also
note that if a child is abandoned, the birth family is most likely
to reclaim the child 3-6 months after the abandonment. However, the
ads are run only one week after the abandonment, further decreasing
their effectiveness. Further, provincial officials have stated that
the advertisements are made in a manner that significantly decreases
the likelihood that they will be heard or seen by the birth
families. Investigations by the Embassy have also confirmed that
the ads are not effective. In 6 cases where investigations by the
Embassy have located the birth family of allegedly deserted
children, the birth families said that they never heard or saw any
ads seeking the parents of the child.
¶11. The search for domestic adoptive parents, is, by design,
ineffective. Orphanage directors in two provinces have confirmed to
the Embassy that while they receive applications from families
interested in domestic adoption, they do not process these
applications. The reason that applications by Vietnamese families
to adopt Vietnamese children are not processed is because the
orphanages will receive a donation from an ASP if the baby is
adopted internationally, while they will not receive these funds if
the child is adopted domestically. Another orphanage director
stated that he would need "permission" from the ASP funding his
orphanage in order to release a child for domestic adoption, noting
that the monthly support payments the ASP made for the children gave
the ASP the "authority" to decide the child's future.
-----------------------
Types of Adoption Cases
-----------------------
¶12. Under US Immigration law, Vietnamese children can be adopted if
they are orphans due to the whereabouts of their birth parents being
unknown (desertion) or if one or both birth parents have permanently
relinquished custody of their child to the orphanage, (termed
"abandonment" by US Immigration law, but commonly referred to as
relinquishment). Prior to the suspension of adoption in 2002, 80%
of cases were relinquishments, and 20% were abandonments. Since the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) went into effect in 2005, those
figures have flipped with over 85% of the cases involving
desertions. Orphanages not involved in international adoption,
however, have reported to the Embassy that they have not seen any
increase in the number of deserted children, and the vast majority
of children in these facilities are children in care. For example,
in the Hanoi orphanage previously mentioned, only 4 of 29 children
(2 with special needs) were available for international adoption -
the agreement that this orphanage has with the American ASP is not
based on cash in kind for referrals. Post has received multiple,
credible reports from orphanage officials and Americans connected
with ASPs that facilitators are deliberately staging fraudulent
desertions to conceal the identity of the birth parents. According
to these individuals, this phenomenon is a byproduct of the 2002
shutdown, which occurred as a result of United States Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS) interviews in which many birth
parents told the agency that they had sold their children or that
their children had been released for adoption without their
knowledge or consent.
---------------
Relinquishments
---------------
HANOI 00000422 004.8 OF 008
¶13. Cases where one or both birth parents have permanently
relinquished their child to an orphanage account for 15% of cases
filed under the Orphan First program. In interviews with consular
officers, 75% of parents have stated that they received payment from
the orphanage in exchange for placing their child in the orphanage.
On average this payment was six million Vietnamese Dong, which is
the equivalent of 11 months salary at minimum wage in Vietnam. Many
of these families cited these payments as the primary reason for
placing their child in an orphanage. The majority of these parents
also state that they had not considered placing their child in an
orphanage until a health care worker or orphanage official suggested
to them that they should do so and informed them that they would
receive a payment for doing so. Many of these parents also report
that orphanage officials told them that the child will visit home
frequently, will return home after they reach a certain age (often
11 or 12), or will send remittance payments from the United States.
In these cases, the majority of birth parents have said they do not
consent to the adoption if any of these conditions are not kept.
¶14. The Ministry of Labor Invalids and Social Affairs has stated
that the payments described above are unauthorized and not funded by
government sources. The Ministry of Justice has likewise confirmed
that such payments are illegal under Vietnamese law. MOLISA has
stated, however, that there are absolutely no regulations on how
orphanage directors can spend the money given to them by ASPs and
that orphanage directors can give this money to anyone they wish, as
long as the recipient did not have to take any action, such as
relinquishing a child, in order to receive the "gift." Accordingly,
while MOLISA can confirm that the reported payments from orphanage
officials to biological parents must have come from ASP funds, they
do not have the ability to take action or to investigate reports of
child buying.
----------
Desertions
----------
¶15. Throughout Vietnam, officials at orphanages connected with
international adoptions report that the number of deserted children
has increased by up to 1700% since 2005, the year that the adoption
agreement with the United States was signed. Officials at
orphanages not connected with international adoption, however, have
not seen an increase in desertions. A statistical review of child
desertions reveals a series of facilities that have an unexplained
high rate of child desertions. For example, one small medical
clinic in Hanoi, which reported an average of 50 live births per
year, had a desertion rate of 8%, while a nearby hospital, with an
average of 3,600 live births per year, had a desertion rate of
0.005%. Since there is no difference in the cost of delivery or
maternity care at the two facilities, this discrepancy can not be
explained by cost or other economic data.
¶16. When Embassy officials spoke with officials at these two
institutions, other significant discrepancies appeared. In the
hospital, the desertion of a child was recorded, as required by
Vietnamese law, in the mother's medical record. Hospital staff was
familiar with the number of desertions and the children were
referred for domestic adoption. By contrast, at the clinic, the
desertions were not recorded in the main medical log. Instead they
were only recorded in a private log kept in a locked safe to which
only the director had access. The nurses at the facility all gave
sworn statements that no child had ever been deserted at the clinic,
yet the director had signed paperwork purportedly documenting
multiple desertions. These children were all offered for
international adoption.
¶17. Provincial records also document this unusual pattern of
"desertion pockets." For example, in Tuyen Quang province in 2007
there were 77 cases of child desertion. Of these, 76 occurred at
one particular orphanage. The director of this orphanage told the
Embassy that before he signed an agreement with an American ASP in
April 2006, the orphanage was home to 10 children, most of whom had
been relinquished. By January 2007, the orphanage was home to 23
children, of whom fifty percent had been deserted. By January 2008,
the orphanage was home to 70 infants, with over 90% of them having
been deserted. The orphanage director attributed the growth in the
number of children and the number of desertions to the fact that the
orphanage was receiving funding from the American ASP. The
orphanage guards also confirmed that desertions were extremely rare
before 2006, but now they find five infants per month on average.
¶18. In one province in northern Vietnam province, the director of
the largest hospital in the province acknowledged that since 2005
HANOI 00000422 005.8 OF 008
his hospital had an unusually high rate of desertions. He told the
Embassy that "these desertions would not occur if the US stopped
issuing visas for the adoption of Vietnamese children." In another
province, an ASP official complained to USCIS that because the
average processing time for I-600 petitions has increased from 10
days to 45, the number of referrals his agency could receive had
decreased. He said that there were children ready to be adopted,
but the orphanage could not accept them until the current cases were
processed. Given that the majority of children in this province
have purportedly been deserted, the comment raises serious questions
about actual origin of these children, since the orphanage should
not be able to schedule desertions.
¶19. In other cases, individuals report finding children in a field
or by the side of the road. Often the individual who purportedly
found the child (child finder) is a police officer, a village
official or a member of their immediate family. This results in a
very close relationship between the child finder and the officials
certifying their reports. Embassy investigations have shown that
many of these reports are fraudulent. These include cases in which
those individuals, who only months or weeks before had signed
statements claiming to have found a deserted child, told consular
officers that they had never in their lives found a deserted child.
In one case, the child finder could not remember finding a child,
even though the purported event had happened the day before. In
another case, the child finder stated that the police told her if
she did not sign a fraudulent statement claiming that she had found
a child in 2007, they would arrest her for kidnapping in connection
with a child finder statement that she signed in 2006.
¶20. In over 10 cases, Embassy investigations have discovered the
identity of the birth mother in cases where a child was purportedly
deserted. In all of these cases, the birth mother was known to
orphanage or hospital officials, but these institutions decided to
fraudulently document the case as a desertion. In some cases, this
was to conceal payments to the birth family. In others, children
were declared to be deserted with unknown parents after the birth
parents failed to pay outstanding hospital bills.
¶21. The following cases highlight the effects of fraudulent
documentation and corruption in desertion cases. According to
official Vietnamese documentation the child was born at Hospital X
and then the birth mother left the hospital and was untraceable. An
Embassy investigation showed that the child was born by C-section at
a different hospital. The child was pre-mature and had significant
respiratory problems and thus was transferred to Hospital X. Based
on information from the hospital director, the Embassy located and
interviewed the birth mother, who stated that she had visited her
son at the hospital several times, but that the hospital director
would not let her hold the child until she paid a 12 million Vietnam
Dong hospital bill. She stated that she applied to have the bill
reduced due to her low income, but the director refused to consider
the application. Additionally, she stated that she had been told
that her child would require lifelong treatment for water on the
brain and that, as a result, her son had been transferred to
Orphanage Y for care. She was shocked to hear that the medical
report from the U.S. panel physician stated that the child was
healthy. After considerable pressure from the U.S. Mission, this
adoption was canceled and the child is now back with its birth
parents.
----------
Safehouses
----------
¶22. In five provinces, the Embassy has discovered "safehouses" for
pregnant women. These are unlicensed, unregulated facilities that
provide free room and board to pregnant women in return for their
commitment to relinquish their children upon birth. None of these
facilities openly advertises its services, and women learn of the
homes existence solely by word of mouth. While the facilities are
open and the women are free to come and go as they please, they
incur a debt for each night that they stay at the safehouse that
they have to pay if they do not relinquish their child. Recent
Vietnamese media reports of such facilities have revealed that women
often live in squalor and in many cases are forced to labor during
their stay. Investigations by consular officers have revealed
allegations of possible abuse by safehouse staff against the female
residents. In several of the safehouses, there is a policy that the
birth mother cannot see her child after delivery, in order to
prevent bonding. Women in these facilities report receiving up to 6
million Vietnam Dong as payment for their children. While the
HANOI 00000422 006.8 OF 008
source of funding for these safehouses is unclear, they appear to
have close connections with nearby orphanages whose operating costs
are exclusively funded by donations from ASPs.
¶23. When the Embassy visited these safehouses, we saw up to 20
women living in a single home. These women reported that orphanage
officials came to the house in order to have them sign paperwork
relinquishing their children. The women would then receive the
promised payments. Often, the child is then taken to a nearby
hospital or orphanage where a second set of paperwork is produced
stating that the child was deserted. This is the paperwork that is
submitted to the DIA and to the Embassy to support the claim that
the child is an orphan.
------------------------------------------
Vietnamese Documents - Issuance Procedures
------------------------------------------
¶24. Documents relating to adoptions in Vietnam are generally issued
by orphanage directors, local People's Committees, Provincial
Departments and the Department for International Adoptions (DIA).
These officials do not independently verify the facts asserted in
these documents. Further, verifications conducted by U.S. officials
in a significant number of cases have uncovered evidence that while
these documents have been validly issued, they are based on
fraudulent information. As a result, these documents are of
questionable veracity and thus cannot be considered reliable for
immigration purposes. These documents cannot and should not be
regarded as conclusive proof of the facts they purport to certify
because of the potential for fraud or error in their issuance.
Fraud or mistake may reasonably be suspected in any case where the
facts cited in the document are contradicted by other evidence.
¶25. In cases involving the desertion of a child, local officials
usually issue birth certificates and reports of abandonment at the
request of orphanage or hospital officials without speaking to the
individuals involved. For example, the People's Committee in one
southern province told the Embassy that they issue whatever
documents a local midwife requests without verifying the accuracy of
the statements. This is done to "help her with her business with
the orphanage." In a different province, village officials issued
an official statement that a birth mother was single, even though
their own registry book showed she was married and had four
children. Further, MOLISA has confirmed that for deserted children
a birth certificate can be issued showing the date and time of
desertion as the date and time of birth and listing the birth
parents as unknown, even if the true facts have been previously
recorded in official documents.
¶26. The Embassy has received credible reports that some ASPs pay
$10,000 per referred child to local facilitators. According to one
of these facilitators, a significant portion of this money goes to
the orphanage director, who is responsible for finding children.
The facilitator and orphanage director then work together to create
a false advertisement claiming that the child was abandoned,
regardless of the child's true origins. This ad is then used to
obtain the necessary paperwork from local officials and DIA. The
facilitator noted that as long as the right fee is paid, no one
tries to verify the facts of the case, and the documents are issued
with no questions asked.
¶27. Fraudulent police reports have also been submitted to the
Embassy in connection with adoption cases. For example, in one
adoption case the original file stated that the birth mother was
unknown. However, hospital records revealed the mother's name and
address. When the Embassy requested an explanation as to why DIA
approved the adoption case without a police search for the
biological mother as required by Vietnamese law, DIA blamed the
omission of the birthmother search report on the village police and
provided a document dated March 21, 2007, stating that a police
check had been done and they could not find the birth mother.
However, the police officer who purportedly did the check stated he
had not actually done a physical search, and that the date on the
document was inaccurate. He stated that "about 20 days ago" the
police chief in another village visited his office with a prepared
backdated report about the search and asked him to sign, which he
did.
--------------------------------------------- -
Vietnamese Documents - Verification Procedures
--------------------------------------------- -
HANOI 00000422 007.6 OF 008
¶28. Once a child has been matched with a prospective adoptive
parent, the provincial level Department of Justice conducts a review
of the file to ensure that it contains the proper documents required
by Vietnamese law. According to provincial Department of Justice
officials, in all cases the review consists of physically verifying
that the child is in the orphanage and verifying that each required
document is signed, sealed and in the file. There is no requirement
to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the file.
Further, there is no requirement to verify that a birth parent
intended to relinquish their child or to verify the circumstances of
a child's desertion. According to DIA, even if this review were to
uncover any discrepancies, DIA and provincial Department of Justice
officials are prohibited from conducting an independent review of
the facts or speaking directly with the witnesses in the case.
Instead, they are required by Article 45 of Decree 68/2002 to return
the case to the official who prepared the original report. If this
individual recertifies that his original report is correct, then the
case is allowed to proceed.
¶29. As a result of this limited authority, DIA has informed the
Embassy that it does not conduct field verification of adoptions in
Vietnam. Indeed, DIA's explicit position is that, as long as the
appropriate papers have been signed by the correct officials, DIA
will certify that the adoption complies with Vietnamese law.
Further, it should be noted that DIA has stated that it does not
actually have the authority to declare an adoption illegal, revoke a
Giving and Receiving Ceremony, or cancel a referral. The lack of
verification and accountability regulations in Vietnamese adoption
law creates a situation where an unscrupulous orphanage director or
local official who fabricates a "desertion" or "relinquishment." is
also the only official who can investigate the alleged fraud in the
case.
¶30. A provincial Department of Justice official told the Embassy of
cases where under Vietnamese law children had been matched with
American adopting families and the cases were referred to her office
for verification. In one case, hospital records stated that the
birth mother had registered at the hospital under an assumed name
and then died shortly after the birth. The child was listed as
deserted. However, the DOJ official found a reference in the
hospital file that the woman's family had come to the hospital to
claim her body. As a result the official contacted the family, who
stated that the hospital had transferred the child to the orphanage
without their consent and that the orphanage had denied them
visitation rights. The family has now been reunited with the child,
who is being raised by its maternal grandparents. However, she
noted that under Vietnamese law no one had technically done anything
wrong in separating this child from his family, and that the
adoption would normally have been allowed to be completed had it not
been for this particular official's independent decision to go a
step further then required by Vietnamese law. Only her personal
interest in the case and her ability to persuade other local
officials to do the right thing prevented this child from being
permanently separated from its family.
----------------------------------------
Reports of Corruption in Adoption System
----------------------------------------
¶31. The Embassy has received credible reports from current and
former employees of ASPs working in Vietnam regarding corruption in
the adoption system. These begin with the licensing procedures.
Several ASPs have reported that they were told they had to fund
tours to the United States for DIA and other government officials in
order to receive their licenses. One described taking a Vietnamese
delegation to a large U.S. shopping mall and then using his credit
card to pay for all of their purchases. Others have reported being
asked for cash payments in order to obtain provincial licenses.
¶32. In addition, statements from adopting parents and ASP employees
show that many ASPs ask adopting parents to pay cash donations to
orphanage directors and staff. These payments are illegal according
to the Vietnamese Ministry of Justice, but the Ministry acknowledges
that they are widespread and that they are a key factor in the
irregularities seen in the adoption system in Vietnam. Further,
ASPs have reported that cash and in-kind donations have been
diverted by orphanage officials and used to finance personal
property, private cars, jewelry and, in one case, a commercial real
estate development.
--------------------------------------------- --
Official Response to Reports of Irregularities
HANOI 00000422 008.6 OF 008
--------------------------------------------- --
¶33. The DIA has acknowledged that it has not taken any action,
criminal or administrative, against any individual or organization
for any violation of Vietnamese law or regulation concerning
adoption, despite its being made aware of the information developed
regarding fraud. They have also stated that they have taken no
action to address concerns or allegations of wrongdoing submitted to
them by individuals, ASPs or the U.S. Embassy. To the contrary, DIA
has stated that it is in the "humanitarian" interest of the
Government of Vietnam to ensure that every proposed adoption is
completed as quickly as possible. They note that the ASPs have made
a donation for the child, and thus, even if they had the authority
to revoke a referral or an adoption, they would not do so because
they could not break their contract with the ASP.
¶34. In fact, DIA has acknowledged that when it receives reports
from the Embassy regarding fraud in adoption cases, they meet with
the ASP or local facilitators to develop a strategy to refute the
Embassy's evidence. Frequently this consists of a second
investigation where child-finders are notified in advance that they
will be re-interviewed in front of the People's Committee and
reminded that they had previously signed statements saying they
could be punished if the original statements they gave to the
People's Committee were untrue. Under this pressure, child-finders
have recanted the statements they had made to consular officials.
¶35. In other cases, birth mothers from rural provinces who had told
the Embassy they did not agree to relinquish their children were
summoned to Hanoi at their own expense and ordered to appear before
DIA to sign new relinquishment papers. In another case, after an
Embassy investigation determined that hospital officials had
fraudulently declared a child deserted and concealed the identity of
the birth mother, the ASP contacted the birth mother and obtained a
certificate of relinquishment signed by her. Upon further
questioning of both the birth mother and the ASP official, the
Embassy learned that the ASP took the birth mother to the police
station and told her that if she signed the paperwork she would
receive 200,000 dong and would be allowed to see her son. The birth
mother, who is illiterate, signed the paperwork even though she did
not know what it said because she wanted to see her son.
¶36. When ASP employees have given statements to the Embassy
detailing corruption in Vietnamese adoptions, they have been
pressured by DIA and local officials in an effort to recant these
statements. In one case an American citizen left Vietnam after
local officials made it clear she would be arrested for reporting an
orphanage director's misuse of ASP donations.
MICHALAK