Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TALLINN121, NORDSTREAM ROAD SHOW COMES TO TALLINN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TALLINN121.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TALLINN121 2008-03-28 15:25 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Tallinn
VZCZCXRO7555
RR RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN
RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHTL #0121/01 0881525
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 281525Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY TALLINN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0573
INFO RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 2589
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TALLINN 000121 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EUR/ERA, EUR/NB AND DAS BRYZA 
DOC FOR ITA LEAH MARKOWITZ 
DOE FOR TYLER TILLER 
MOSCOW FOR ALI JALILI 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ENRG EINV PREL ECON EUR EN
SUBJECT: NORDSTREAM ROAD SHOW COMES TO TALLINN 
 
Ref: Tallinn 28 
 
1. (SBU) Summary:  In a 3-hour presentation hosted by the 
German embassy in Tallinn, presenters from WinGas, BASF and 
the UN Economic Commission for Europe both promoted and 
defended the NordStream gas pipeline project.  They used a 
variety of arguments to claim that NordStream will be a 
cheaper, safer, cleaner and more reliable source of gas for 
Europe than the alternatives.  They dismissed renewable 
energy sources as a viable alternative to fossil fuels, and 
equally dismissed any on-shore alternatives to NordStream. 
Participants were skeptical, but the event was at the very 
least an effort by NordStream consortium partners to repair 
some of the PR 'disaster' they experienced here after last 
fall's rejection of the project by the Government of 
Estonia (GOE).  End Summary. 
 
2.  (U) At a March 19th seminar titled "Some Key Global 
Energy Issues and their Relevance for Europe" the German 
Embassy in Tallinn hosted speakers from several companies 
involved in the NordStream gas pipeline project.  In a 
format they have taken to the other Baltic countries 
several times in the past six months, speakers presented 
scientific literature, economic projections, and forecasts 
of future EU energy demands in support of the project's 
safety, viability, and long-term inevitability. 
 
RUSSIA: A MORE RELIABLE SUPPLIER THAN...IRAN? 
 
3.  (U) In addition to one Swiss Nordstream official, the 
consortium was represented at the dinner by Dr. Ernst 
Schwanhold, (former Economic Minister in the German state 
of Westphalia) now of BASF Corporation which is a 20 
percent owner of NordStream, and Dr. Gerhard KQnig of 
WinGas (a 50/50 joint venture with Wintershall and 
Gazprom).  (Note: WinGas plans eventually to be a 
downstream customer of NordStream.  End Note.)  The third 
speaker, a regular on the NordStream Road Show, was Dr. 
Sead Vilogorac of the UN Economic Commission for Europe 
(UNECE) in Geneva.  No one came from Gazprom. 
 
The team came prepared to address the gamut of concerns 
about the NordStream pipeline.  Their lines of argument 
basically went like so: 
 
-- NordStream is not just a Russo-German project, it's a 
European project; 
-- Building off-shore is cheaper, safer, and cleaner than 
building on-shore; 
-- An off-shore pipeline allows higher pressure (180-200 
bar) without building compressor stations every 100km, as 
needed for on-shore pipelines; 
-- Building compressor stations would add cost, and emit 
more CO2 in the construction process; 
-- Gas is cleaner than coal, oil, etc. for energy 
production; 
-- Projected future EU demand for gas is so great that 
Europe will need all the NordStreams it can get, and soon; 
-- Renewables are nice to talk about, but won't work, are 
too costly, are basically a pie-in-the-sky proposition; 
and: 
 
4. (U) In a new twist on the complaint that the undersea 
route will cut out countries such as the Balts and Poland 
from access to the pipeline or transit fees, the NordStream 
team argued that an off-shore route will be "free from 
individual national interests" and thereby safer.  Just for 
good measure, their final argument was repeated more than 
once: Where else will Europe get its gas from? Iran? 
Algeria? Iraq?  In the words of Dr. Vilogorac of UNECE, 
"Only OPEC and Russia are reliable suppliers." 
 
"WHAT'S IN IT FOR US?" 
 
5. (SBU) The audience was interested and lively; 
questioners emphasized the particular concerns of countries 
in the region.  The Polish embassy asked about Yamal II as 
an alternative to NordStream; the answer: twinning Yamal I 
on-shore would be more expensive than building NordStream 
off-shore (see above).  The Estonian MFA's energy director 
asked about the environment impact of possible spills or 
other accidents during construction.  The speakers had no 
answer other than to speculate that the same legal 
framework would apply as with any other pipeline in the 
 
TALLINN 00000121  002 OF 002 
 
 
North Sea or the Mediterranean.  (Note: The MFA contact 
later told us he heard no new information from this 
"propaganda" session, and was unconvinced that WinGas and 
BASF truly understand the scope of what the NordStream 
project will entail.  End Note.)  To the Lithuanian 
embassy's concern about possible supply interruptions, 
WinGas and BASF simply said that they have found Gazprom to 
be a very responsible partner.  (Note: WinGas is 50 percent 
owned by Gazprom.  End Note)  Finally, the British embassy 
asked simply: "What's in this for Estonia?"  With a 
straight face, Dr. Schwanhold of BASF replied that 
"European solidarity" was the main payoff for Estonia, 
adding that someday there might also be the possibility of 
a reverse pipeline to carry gas from the terminus at 
Griefswald back into the Baltics.  The sole NordStream 
official in the group added that there was not one project 
on the Trans European Network (TEN) list that equally 
benefits all member states, but nevertheless all should 
support them for the good of the Union. 
 
6. (SBU) Comment: For all the skepticism among the 
audience, the forum was productive, and was exactly the 
kind of open debate that had not happened in the run-up to 
Estonia's decision to decline permission for an 
environmental impact study in Estonia's economic zone. 
WinGas and BASF representatives freely admitted that 
NordStream badly fumbled the PR aspects of the project last 
year, and felt that with better optics and communication, 
could have lessened opposition to the project in Estonia. 
The companies' arguments - while note entirely convincing - 
were at least a step towards more dialogue on the issue. 
 
7. (SBU) Comment, cont'd: It was curious that BASF and 
WinGas did not seek more attention for the event, but 
instead cloaked it under the guise of an embassy-sponsored 
discussion of "energy security, energy efficiency and 
climate protection."  This may be an indication of their 
lingering wariness of public opposition to NordStream 
leftover from last fall.  The German Embassy's Commercial 
Counselor confirmed that this event went quite well from 
the German point of view. The questions in Tallinn mirrored 
the questions that had been asked on stops in Riga and 
Vilnius.  It remains to be seen if NordStream consortium 
partners, or even Gazprom itself, will continue to make 
similar, or more ambitious, attempts to address the many 
persistent concerns in the region with this project.  End 
Comment. 
 
DECKER