Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08BANGKOK871, THAILAND'S VIEW OF THE PREAH VIHEAR TEMPLE ISSUE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08BANGKOK871.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08BANGKOK871 2008-03-19 10:27 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Bangkok
VZCZCXRO8991
RR RUEHCHI RUEHCN RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #0871/01 0791027
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 191027Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2326
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0848
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 4963
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 000871 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
PARIS PLEASE PASS TO USMISSION UNESCO 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 3/19/2018 
TAGS: UNESCO PREL TH CB
 
SUBJECT: THAILAND'S VIEW OF THE PREAH VIHEAR TEMPLE ISSUE 
 
BANGKOK 00000871  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) Thailand supports UNESCO's inscription of the Preah Vihear 
Temple as a World Heritage Site as long as   Thailand's territorial 
rights are preserved; the temple sits in Cambodian territory at a 
point where the Thai-Cambodian border is not demarcated.  As MFA 
Deputy Director General for East Asian Affairs Pisanu Suvanajata 
explained during a March 11 meeting, the RTG believes that to date 
UNESCO had considered only Cambodia's perspective of the issue. 
This was despite numerous attempts by the Thais to present their 
case to Cambodia and the international community, including a 
January 24 meeting in Paris with UNESCO's Assistant Director General 
for Culture Francois Riviere.  This lack of balanced information 
culminated in Thailand's formal protest of and "disassociation" with 
Cambodia's February 1 progress report to the World Heritage Center. 
The Thais described the report as downplaying numerous topographical 
and historical facts based solely on information provided by 
Cambodian authorities.  Throughout our meeting, Pisanu emphasized 
that Thailand wanted to avoid overt politicization of an issue the 
RTG currently viewed as relatively minor.  In advance of the World 
Heritage Center's vote on the matter in July, the RTG planned to 
launch a proactive information campaign targeting World Heritage 
Council members.  End summary. 
 
------------------------------- 
BACKGROUND: WHOSE BORDER IS IT? 
------------------------------- 
 
2. (U) Situated on the edge of a 1,700 foot cliff and straddling the 
Thai-Cambodia border, the Khmer temple of Preah Vihear has been a 
point of contention between the two countries for more than 100 
years.  The source of the dispute is the border demarcation in the 
immediate vicinity of the temple, an overlapping area of 4.6 square 
kilometers.  Cambodia relies on a 1907 map created by Thai and 
French colonial authorities (then ruling Cambodia) that follows the 
watershed line of the Dangrek mountain range, while Thailand prefers 
an updated map depicting a slightly different version of the 
watershed line south of the Cambodian boundary claim. 
 
3. (U) In June 1962 the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued 
a judgment acknowledging Cambodia's sovereignty over the temple 
complex.  MFA Deputy Director General for East Asian Affairs Pisanu 
Suvanajata stated that Thailand always respected the ICJ judgment on 
sovereignty, but that the ICJ did not address the border dispute. 
Following the ICJ decision, Thailand redrew its boundary claim to 
put the actual temple (but not the supporting buildings and land 
that comprise the rest of the complex) in Cambodian territory.  But 
the two governments never finalized their overlapping border claims. 
 As recently as 2003 the bilateral development commission 
(established between Thailand and Cambodia following the January 
2003 anti-Thai riots in Phnom Penh) agreed to jointly develop the 
area of the Preah Vihear temple, but left resolution of the border 
issue for an undetermined future date. 
 
------------------------------------------- 
RTG'S OPPOSITION TO HANDLING OF INSCRIPTION 
------------------------------------------- 
 
3. (U) In a March 11 briefing, Pisanu, joined by colleagues from the 
MFA's Department of Treaties and Legal Affairs, presented a clear 
case as to why Thailand disagreed with Cambodia's approach to the 
inscription of the Preah Vihear temple complex as a UNESCO World 
Heritage site.  The RTG's primary argument is that Cambodia 
unilaterally submitted the nomination file to UNESCO without 
consulting or informing Thailand and without acknowledging the 
existence of conflicting border claims to the temple complex.  In 
July 2007, on the sidelines of the 31st session of the World 
Heritage Committee, a 'Special Task Force on the Inscription of the 
Temple of Preah Vihear as UNESCO World Heritage Site' met to discuss 
outstanding issues preventing the temple's successful inscription. 
The task force encouraged Cambodia and Thailand to develop an 
appropriate management plan to ensure the conservation of the 
temple. 
 
4. (SBU) According to Pisanu, Thailand immediately offered Cambodia 
several options for technical assistance and cooperation.  But 
instead of working together with Thailand, Cambodia independently 
solicited management plans and technical reports from French, 
Belgian, and U.S. specialists.  Not until December 2007 did Cambodia 
respond to Thailand's proposals by requesting a Thai version of a 
management plan for the portion of the temple complex located in the 
disputed and access areas.  Thailand dispatched a group of Thai 
experts to undertake a field survey at the temple site in early 
January. 
 
5. (SBU) Pisanu explained that Thailand's experts presented their 
 
BANGKOK 00000871  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
findings at a meeting convened by the Cambodian government for 
interested parties January 11-13.  The stated purpose of the meeting 
was to exchange views on the various technical reports prepared for 
the progress report Cambodia had to submit to the World Heritage 
Center.  The Thai experts concluded that the information used to 
prepare the French, Belgian, and U.S. reports derived solely from 
Cambodian authorities and that the findings of these foreign experts 
misrepresented important topographical and historical facts. 
Thailand felt this severely undermined the "universal value of the 
temple as a World Heritage Site," and could lead to "serious 
misunderstandings."  However, Cambodia did not include the views 
expressed by the Thai experts in the draft version of the progress 
report.  When Thailand complained, the UNESCO team and foreign 
experts maintained that they had no mandate to consider boundary or 
political issues. 
 
6. (SBU) In response, Thailand lodged a formal protest before 
Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An and disassociated itself from 
the report.  According to Pisanu, Cambodia went ahead and submitted 
the progress report to UNESCO with no mention of Thai opposition. 
The progress report also included a new claim that the temple's main 
entrance is not the primary staircase (which originates in Thai 
territory), but an access area from the west (which originates in 
Cambodian territory). 
 
------------------------------------ 
PRESERVING THAILAND'S LEGAL POSITION 
------------------------------------ 
 
7. (SBU) Thailand believed in the importance of making permanent 
arrangements for the proper development and conservation of the 
Preah Vihear temple, stated Pisanu.  The RTG's solution to the 
dispute would be to engage Cambodia to agree to a legal document 
that reserved each country's position on the border demarcation and 
detailed what could and could not be done in the disputed area.  The 
idea would be to continue development of the temple as a World 
Heritage site while the border issue was being resolved.  As such, 
rather than a unilateral inscription by UNESCO, Thailand would like 
to see the temple complex treated as a transboundary property, 
inscribed jointly by Thailand and Cambodia.  Pisanu claimed that 
this was the Thai position all along.  When asked what the 
Cambodians thought of this viewpoint, Pisanu responded he was 
"cautiously optimistic" his counterparts were open to the idea. 
 
8. (SBU) Thailand submitted a formal statement to the Cambodian 
government during the first week in March again clarifying the Thai 
position.  The RTG is now awaiting a response before follow-up 
meetings slated to occur later in the month.  In the meantime, 
Pisanu stated that the Thais are working hard to prevent the issue 
from blowing out of proportion.  The inscription decision is 
scheduled to be made during the 32nd session of the World Heritage 
Committee, to take place in Ottawa in July.  In the lead-up to this 
meeting, Pisanu explained that the RTG intended to treat this as a 
technical issue, and wanted to avoid stirring up national 
sentiments.  However, he expressed concern that with national 
elections to take place in Cambodia in late July, the Cambodian 
government or even opposition parties would try to politicize the 
issue to drum up support. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
9. (SBU) Thailand clearly supports UNESCO's inscription of the Preah 
Vihear temple as a World Heritage Site, and appears to espouse 
concern for proper management and conservation of the temple 
complex.  At the same time, in the past 100 years Thailand has not 
resolved this peculiar border dispute, and seems content to put off 
final resolution indefinitely.  Today, the vast majority of tourists 
to the temple complex access it from Thai territory.  UNESCO's 
pronouncement of the temple as a World Heritage Site located in 
Cambodia, and Cambodia's unilateral development of the site 
(including an alternative access point from Cambodia) may slightly 
diminish Thailand's tourism revenues.  Thailand feels snubbed by 
UNESCO officials, which the RTG claims are not taking Thailand's 
concerns seriously, and now plans to take its argument to member 
countries of the World Heritage Committee.  Our briefing was one of 
several Pisanu had scheduled this month.  These briefings were to be 
supported by an excursion trip the MFA's Department of International 
Organizations was organizing for later this week for Bangkok-based 
diplomats.  The trip was to have included a visit to the Preah 
Vihear temple.  However, after the Cambodian Embassy in Bangkok 
protested that the RTG planned the excursion without seeking prior 
authorization from the Cambodian government, the MFA canceled the 
planned visit to the Preah Vihear temple. 
 
John