Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08LONDON475, NON-DOM TAX ISSUE HEATS UP

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08LONDON475.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08LONDON475 2008-02-14 16:59 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy London
VZCZCXRO8474
PP RUEHBL RUEHED
DE RUEHLO #0475/01 0451659
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 141659Z FEB 08 ZFR ZFR
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7435
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHBL/AMCONSUL BELFAST 0965
RUEHED/AMCONSUL EDINBURGH 0865
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 LONDON 000475 
 
SIPDIS 
 
ZFR ----PLEASE CANCEL THIS MESSAGE.  PARAGRAPHS MISNUMBERED 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN ETRD CASC EINV UK
SUBJECT: NON-DOM TAX ISSUE HEATS UP 
 
REF: A) 08 LONDON 74 B) 07 LONDON 004659 C) 07 LONDON 004547 D) 07 
 
LONDON 0004503 E) 07 LONDON 004342 
 
LONDON 00000475  001.4 OF 003 
 
 
1. This cable contains an action request. See paras 8 and 9. 
 
2. (SBU) Summary and Action Request: The proposed taxation of 
non-domiciled foreigners in the UK (including Americans) continues 
to roil the business world here.  Trade and Investment Minister Lord 
Digby Jones warned against implementing the proposed changes to the 
tax rules on the front page of the February 8 Financial Times (FT). 
David Lewis, Lord Mayor of London, also chimed in against the change 
as has the head of the American business association. On February 
12, Chancellor Darling, responding to public pressure, slightly 
modified the government's proposal, to allay fears that UK tax 
inspectors would probe into foreign assets, but without addressing 
the main concerns of U.S. taxpayers.  Resident Americans worry that, 
although the final legislation will not be approved by Parliament 
until summer 2008, the law will be effective as of April. This means 
that the U.S. Department of Treasury will not be able to determine 
if the new taxes are creditable against U.S. taxes until after the 
law is already in effect. An HM Treasury (HMT) official will be in 
Washington the week of Feb 19 to discuss this issue, among others. 
They have signaled their willingness to dialogue with U.S. 
counterparts about what might or might not be creditable. ACTION 
REQUEST: There are many competing U.S. interests entangled in this 
topic. We welcome the prompt consultations between U.S. and UK 
Treasury officials.  Meanwhile, post seeks clearance of talking 
points in paragraph 9. U.S. Department of Treasury Assistant 
Secretary Swagel and Deputy Secretary Kimmitt should be prepared to 
 
SIPDIS 
answer questions on the non-dom issue when they visit London in 
February and March respectively. (End Summary and Action Request) 
 
Background 
---------- 
 
3. (SBU) HMG intends to require non-domiciled residents of the UK, 
who have lived in the country seven of the last ten years, to either 
pay UK tax on their worldwide income, or a flat 30,000 GBP ($60,000) 
per person charge. Currently, non-domiciled residents only have to 
pay tax on their domestically earned income and whatever monies they 
remit to the UK. Domicile is unique British concept: determined by 
one's father's place of domicile and a theoretical intention to one 
day depart the UK. It is not related to nationality. The changes 
will take effect in April. The American business community, 
represented by British American Business, has opposed these changes 
since their announcement in the October 2007 pre-budget report, 
(Reftel B). 
 
Front Page News 
--------------- 
 
4. (U) In a February 8 Financial Times interview that attracted 
considerable attention, Trade And Investment Minister, Lord Digby 
Jones, said that the proposed non-dom tax changes make it harder for 
him to sell Britain as a destination for skilled foreign workers and 
inward investment,.  Jones said that many individuals from the 
financial industry had told him this is a serious issue for the 
industry. Jones said he had not been consulted on the change before 
it was introduced in October's pre-budget report. David Lewis, Lord 
Mayor of London, has also weighed in.  He told the Chancellor he 
found real anxieties over the proposed changes in many meetings with 
the financial industry. The front page of the Financial Times ran 
another story on February 11 with the misleading headline "U.S. in 
tax clash with UK over non-doms." The article contained a quote we 
supplied noting that the Embassy was passing concerns it had heard 
to HMT.  The Times also issued an editorial which strongly opposed 
the non-dom tax change. In addition, Bloomberg, Forbes and the BBC 
have contacted us seeking comment. 
 
Some Adjustments 
---------------- 
 
5. (U) To damp down the media frenzy, on February 12, Chancellor of 
the Exchequer Darling announced slight modifications to the 
proposal, without addressing the core concerns of the U.S. 
community.  Darling said anyone paying the flat GBP 30,000 levy 
'will not be required to make any additional disclosures about their 
income and gains arising abroad' and the changes to the taxation of 
trusts will not apply to gains before April 6.  Also, money brought 
into the UK to pay the GBP 30,000 levy will not itself be taxable, 
nor would art works brought in for public display. 
 
But Continuing Concerns 
----------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) These changes will help quiet some of the more alarmist 
news stories in the UK (although they immediately gave rise to 
another set of stories about the Labour government's dithering.) 
 
LONDON 00000475  002.4 OF 003 
 
 
They do not however address the chief concerns of American 
residents: double taxation and timing. As currently structured, the 
UK proposals would probably not meet a U.S. legal definition of an 
"income tax" and so payments would not be creditable under the 
U.S.-UK Double Tax Convention.  To our knowledge, Americans are only 
major community in the UK that also has to pay taxes to their home 
country. 
 
7.  The other major concern among expatriates in the UK, including 
Americans, is the timing of the proposed changes. In the draft 
legislation, the law would take effect in April 2008, the beginning 
of the UK's financial year. However, the final legislation will not 
be passed until late summer. U.S. Treasury officials are naturally 
reluctant to voice an opinion on creditability until the final 
legislation has been thoroughly analyzed. Post is concerned, 
however, that many American residents of the UK will be unable to 
properly adjust their financial affairs to account for the changes, 
because they will have incomplete information at the beginning of 
the tax year. British American Business (BAB), Germany Industry UK, 
and many other organizations have requested that if HM Treasury 
implements this law, it should at least give expatriates adequate 
time to prepare their financial affairs.  The head of BAB, Peter 
Hunt, told the press February 11 "We don't believe that it is the 
Government's objective... to reduce the attractiveness of investment 
in the UK to its largest inward investor.  Yet this is likely to be 
precisely the outcome ....  We shall be less likely to attract the 
current high levels of U.S. investment to the UK.  We shall reduce 
the attractiveness of the UK both to U.S. companies sending staff to 
the UK, and establishing headquarters operations here where such 
operations require long-term senior management assignments." 
 
6. (SBU) This is a multi-faceted issue with competing interests. 
Business people, academics and others highlight the advantages of 
maintaining the current high numbers of Americans in the UK, which 
they say facilitate trade, investment and much more between the two 
countries. The large number of Americans in the UK is also an 
integral part of the special relationship between the two countries 
and of our 'soft power'. Another side of the story is the importance 
of maximizing tax income to the U.S. government, which would 
militate against crediting the UK charges against U.S. taxes. 
 
Plans for Consultations 
------------------------- 
 
7. (SBU) Steven Effingham, the lead on this issue at HMT, told us 
his supervisor, Mike Williams, will travel to Washington the week of 
February 19 to discuss this and other issues with counterparts at 
U.S. Treasury.  Effingham insists that HMT is willing to consider 
altering the legislation in order to avoid double taxation of 
Americans. He has also volunteered to speak at a town hall meeting, 
where he can answer questions raised by American residents. 
 
Seeking Guidance 
---------------- 
 
8. (SBU) HMG, American citizens, tax experts, and the press are 
coming to the Embassy with questions in increasing numbers. We are 
not in a position to answer those queries and thus welcome the news 
that our respective Treasury experts to meet.  The issues being 
raised with us include: 
 
---How likely is it that this tax will be creditable against U.S. 
tax liability? 
Option A:  Will the 30,000 GBP ($60,000) charge be creditable? 
Option B: If Americans choose instead to declare their worldwide 
income to the UK, would taxes paid here be creditable? 
 
--- What is the result of U.S. Government engagement with HMT on the 
issue of creditability? 
 
--- If Americans choose to make their place of domicile the UK, 
would they then find relief from double taxation under the existing 
double taxation convention? 
 
Requesting Clearance 
-------------------- 
 
9. (SBU) Post also requests clearance of the following talking 
points for use with HMG. 
 
--- The U.S. government respects the right of the United Kingdom to 
tax its citizens and residents in any manner it sees fit. Many 
long-term, resident American citizens however have expressed 
concerns to us about the proposed timeline for implementation of 
changes to the tax code for non-domiciled residents. 
 
---The U.S. government supports its citizens' requests that they be 
given a reasonable amount of time between the publication of the 
 
LONDON 00000475  003.4 OF 003 
 
 
final legislation and the implementation of the law in order to 
arrange their financial affairs to suit the new tax rules. 
 
---A reasonable waiting period between the publication of the final 
legislation and its implementation would also give the U.S. Treasury 
time to analyze the changes fully and determine the creditability 
against U.S. taxes of any new UK tax charges. 
 
-- We are prepared to work with you discuss what kind of tax would 
be deemed income tax consistent with the spirit of the U.S. UK 
Double Taxation Convention, to mitigate adverse consequences on U.S. 
citizens. 
 
10. (SBU) Time is short.  If we are to advise American citizens of 
their likely tax exposure, they need to hear from us sufficiently 
before April 1 to make arrangements.  Also, U.S. Treasury Deputy 
Secretary Kimmitt and Assistant Secretary Swagel are planning trips 
 
SIPDIS 
to the UK within the next month. They are very likely to receive 
these same questions. 
 
TUTTLE