Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08TOKYO127, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 01/16/08
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO127.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08TOKYO127 | 2008-01-16 08:35 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO3239
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0127/01 0160835
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 160835Z JAN 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1009
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7906
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5512
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 9177
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 4185
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6118
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1119
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7186
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 7840
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 14 TOKYO 000127
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA;
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 01/16/08
INDEX:
(1) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new antiterror law
(Tokyo Shimbun)
(2) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new antiterror law
(Asahi)
(3) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new antiterror law,
permanent SDF dispatch legislation (Nikkei)
(4) Sense of alarm spreading in ruling camp over policy of keeping
provision tax rate, given declining public support for Fukuda
cabinet (Yomiuri)
(5) Cornered ruling parties to once again apply measure of last
resort: Determined to adopt amendment to gas tax in second vote in
Lower House; Passage of bill within current fiscal year uncertain
(Tokyo Shimbun)
(6) 2008 Hokkaido Lake Toya Summit: NGOs to assemble in Hokkaido to
provide policy proposals to G-8 leaders (Mainichi)
(7) Seiron (Opinion) column by Hisahiko Okazaki: Hope for DPP-led
government to bring peace to the Taiwan Strait (Sankei)
(8) Koga, Tanigaki factions to formally agree today to merger plan;
Factional realignment to be accelerated with eye on Lower House
dissolution (Mainichi)
(9) Extraordinary session of divided Diet closes without breaking
away from 1955 political framework (Asahi)
ARTICLES:
(1) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new antiterror law
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Abridged)
January 13, 2008
Questions & Answers
(Figures shown in percentage. Parentheses denote the results of the
last survey conducted Dec. 15-16 last year.)
Q: Do you support the Fukuda cabinet?
Yes 41.4 (35.3)
No 42.8 (47.6)
Don't know (D/K) + no answer (N/A) 15.8 (17.1)
Q: (Only for those who answered "yes" to the previous question)
What's the primary reason for your approval of the Fukuda cabinet?
Pick only one from among those listed below.
The prime minister is trustworthy 20.5 (22.9)
Because it's a coalition cabinet of the Liberal Democratic Party and
New Komeito 8.4 (7.5)
The prime minister has leadership ability 4.3 (4.4)
Something can be expected of its economic policies 5.6 (3.2)
Something can be expected of its foreign policies 6.2 (5.9)
Something can be expected of its political reforms 3.3 (2.3)
Something can be expected of its tax reforms 1.9 (1.9)
TOKYO 00000127 002 OF 014
Something can be expected of its administrative reforms 3.3 (2.4)
There's no other appropriate person (for prime minister) 45.1
(46.6)
Other answers (O/A) 0.3 (0.9)
D/K+N/A 1.1 (2.0)
Q: (Only for those who answered "no" to the first question) What's
the primary reason for your disapproval of the Fukuda cabinet? Pick
only one from among those listed below.
The prime minister is untrustworthy 7.9 (12.5)
Because it's a coalition cabinet of the Liberal Democratic Party and
the New Komeito 9.8 (8.4)
The prime minister lacks leadership ability 19.6 (16.5)
Nothing can be expected of its economic policies 25.9 (21.6)
Nothing can be expected of its foreign policies 3.6 (2.7)
Nothing can be expected of its political reforms 12.6 (13.5)
Nothing can be expected of its tax reforms 8.3 (8.4)
Nothing can be expected of its administrative reforms 4.7 (8.7)
Don't like the prime minister's personal character 6.5 (5.2)
O/A 0.7 (1.7)
D/K+N/A 0.4 (0.8)
Q: The Diet has now enacted a new law that replaces the
Antiterrorism Special Measures Law. This law is for the Maritime
Self-Defense Force to back up U.S. and other foreign naval vessels
in the Indian Ocean with fuel and water supply. Do you appreciate
this law?
Yes 44.1
No 43.9
D/K+N/A 12.0
Q: This law was voted down in the House of Councillors with the
opposition bench voting against it, and it was enacted in a second
vote of the House of Representatives with the ruling coalition of
the Liberal Democratic Party and New Komeito voting for it with a
majority of two-thirds. Do you think the lower chamber's overriding
of the upper chamber's decision was appropriate?
Yes 41.6
No 46.7
D/K+N/A 11.7
Q: (Only for those who answered "no" to the foregoing question) Why?
(One choice only)
Because there's no need for refueling activities 25.0
Because the Diet did not fully deliberate on it 48.8
Because it should have been scrapped without the House of
Representatives' second vote 22.3
O/A 1.4
D/K+N/A 2.5
Q: Would you like the current LDP-led coalition to remain in office,
or would you otherwise like it to be replaced with a coalition
centering on the Democratic Party of Japan (Minshuto)?
LDP-led government 35.0 (28.5)
DPJ-led government 41.5 (44.7)
D/K+N/A 23.5 (26.8)
TOKYO 00000127 003 OF 014
Q: The House of Representatives' current membership is up until
September 2009. When would you like the next election to take place
for the House of Representatives?
During the first half of this year 22.9
During the latter half of this year 29.6
During the first half of next year 8.4
Upon the current term's expiry in September next year 31.8
D/K+N/A 7.3
Q: Which political party do you support?
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 32.0 (25.2)
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 27.0 (28.5)
New Komeito (NK) 4.4 (3.1)
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 2.3 (3.6)
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 1.5 (1.5)
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0.6 (0.3)
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0.4 (0.2)
Other political parties, groups --- (---)
None 30.5 (36.0)
D/K+N/A 1.3 (1.6)
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted across the nation on
Jan. 11-12 by Kyodo News Service on a computer-aided random digit
dialing (RDD) basis. Among randomly generated telephone numbers,
those actually for household use with one or more eligible voters
totaled 1,470. Answers were obtained from 1,027 persons.
(2) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new antiterror law
ASAHI (Page 2) (Full)
January 13, 2008
Questions & Answers
(Figures shown in percentage, rounded off. Bracketed figures denote
proportions to all respondents. Figures in parentheses denote the
results of the last survey conducted Dec. 19-20, 2007.)
Q: Do you support the Fukuda cabinet?
Yes 34 (31)
No 45 (48)
Q: Why? (One reason only. Left column for those marking "yes" on
previous question, and right for those saying "no.")
The prime minister is Mr. Fukuda 19(6) 4(2)
It's an LDP-led cabinet 32(11) 36(16)
From the aspect of policies 21(7) 50(22)
No particular reason 26(9) 8(4)
Q: Which political party do you support now?
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 26 (27)
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 25 (25)
New Komeito (NK) 3 (3)
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 1 (2)
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 1 (1)
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0 (0)
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0 (0)
Other political parties 0 (1)
TOKYO 00000127 004 OF 014
None 37 (33)
No answer (N/A) + don't know (D/K) 7 (8)
Q: The U.S. and other countries have sent naval vessels to the
Indian Ocean for antiterror operations in Afghanistan. The
Antiterrorism Special Measures Law, which was for the Self-Defense
Forces to back up their naval operations in the Indian Ocean,
expired on Nov. 1, and the SDF discontinued its activities there. Do
you think Japan should resume SDF activities there?
Yes 34 (37)
No 48 (48)
Q: The Diet has now enacted a new law that replaces the
Antiterrorism Special Measures Law. This law limits SDF activities
in the Indian Ocean to fuel and water supply for a period of one
year, and it does not require the government to ask the Diet for its
approval of SDF activities there. Do you support this law?
Yes 36
No 40
Q: This law was enacted in a second vote of the House of
Representatives with a majority of two-thirds after it was voted
down in the House of Councillors. Do you think the ruling
coalition's overriding of the upper chamber's decision was
appropriate?
Yes 41
No 41
Q: A bill voted down in the House of Councillors is passed in a
second vote of the House of Representatives for enactment into law
with a majority of two-thirds. Do you support this way of doing
things for other bills?
Yes 18
No 35
Can't say which 44
Q: The Diet has now enacted a law to provide across-the-board relief
to all hepatitis C victims of government-approved blood products
over their class action lawsuits against the government. Do you
support Prime Minister Fukuda's response to this issue?
Yes 71
No 19
Q: Do you appreciate the Fukuda cabinet for its way of handling the
pending issue of unaccounted-for pension records?
Yes 26 (36)
No 55 (46)
Q: Do you think the House of Representatives should be dissolved as
soon as possible for a general election, or do you otherwise think
there is no need to do so?
Dissolve as soon as possible 34 (39)
No need to do so 54 (48)
Q: If you were to vote now in a general election, which political
TOKYO 00000127 005 OF 014
party would you like to vote for in your proportional representation
bloc?
LDP 25 (23)
DPJ 36 (38)
NK 3 (3)
JCP 3 (3)
SDP 3 (1)
PNP 0 (0)
NPN 0 (0)
Other political parties 0 (1)
N/A+D/K 30 (31)
Q: Would you like the current LDP-led coalition government to
continue, or would you otherwise like it to be replaced with a
DPJ-led coalition government?
LDP-led coalition government 27 (28)
DPJ-led coalition government 35 (41)
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted Jan. 11-12 over the
telephone on a computer-aided random digit dialing (RDD) basis.
Respondents were chosen from among the nation's voting population on
a three-stage random-sampling basis. Valid answers were obtained
from 956 persons (60 PERCENT ).
(3) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, new antiterror law,
permanent SDF dispatch legislation
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full)
January 13, 2008
Questions & Answers
(Figures shown in percentage. Parentheses denote findings from the
last survey conducted in December last year.)
Q: Do you support the Fukuda cabinet?
Yes 42 (43)
No 46 (46)
Can't say (C/S) + don't know (D/K) 12 (11)
Q: Which political party do you support or like now?
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 36 (38)
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 30 (34)
New Komeito (NK) 4 (4)
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 3 (4)
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 3 (2)
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0 (1)
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0 (0)
Other political parties 1 (0)
None 16 (12)
C/S+D/K 6 (5)
Q: The Diet has now enacted a law to resume the Maritime
Self-Defense Force's refueling mission in the Indian Ocean. A bill
for this law was voted down in the House of Councillors, and the
ruling coalition passed it in a second vote of the House of
Representatives for enactment into law. Do you support this
legislation?
TOKYO 00000127 006 OF 014
Yes 43
No 38
Q: The LDP and the DPJ have plans to create a permanent law for
Japan to send the Self-Defense Forces for overseas missions whenever
necessary. Do you support this legislative initiative?
Yes 35
No 46
(Note) The total percentage does not become 100 PERCENT in some
cases due to rounding.
Polling methodology: The survey was taken on Jan. 11-12 by Nikkei
Research Inc. over the telephone on a random digit dialing (RDD)
basis. For the survey, samples were chosen from among men and women
aged 20 and over across the nation. A total of 1,277 households with
one or more eligible voters were sampled, and answers were obtained
from 744 persons (58.3 PERCENT ).
(4) Sense of alarm spreading in ruling camp over policy of keeping
provision tax rate, given declining public support for Fukuda
cabinet
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full)
January 16, 2008
The latest opinion poll by Yomiuri Shimbun found a drop in public
support for the Fukuda cabinet. Even while showing a cool response
to the survey result, the government and the ruling camp are
becoming nervous about future moves by the opposition camp over the
government's bill amending the Special Taxation Measures Law and
public reactions to it.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Machimura said in a press conference
yesterday: "Without being affected by public support rates for the
cabinet, we will continue to do our best. This basic stance remains
unchanged."
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) Secretary General Ibuki said the same
day: "If the public opinion survey results lead politicians to
determine politics, the result would be that lawmakers will lower
themselves." On the approach taken by the ruling camp of using its
two-third lower chamber overriding vote to pass the new
antiterrorism bill, the ayes and nays are equally divided among the
public. In reference to this, Ibuki commented: "Criticism of both
ruling and opposition camps for leading to the use of an overriding
vote is included in negative replies."
Learning that about 60 PERCENT said they were against the ruling
coalition's policy of keeping the current provisional high tax rate
on gasoline, many in the government and the ruling camp harbor a
sense of alarm. A first-time-elected lawmaker of the LDP grumbled:
"If the party takes a wrong step on this issue, public support for
the cabinet may plummet at one stroke."
In this connection, LDP Diet Affairs Committee Chairman Tadamori
Oshima told reporters in the Diet building: "(If asked,) (the
people) are expected to say that it is desirable to see (the prices
of) gasoline drop, but such replies are different from their
comprehensive judgment." He then stressed that the government will
give a full explanation to the opposition bloc and the public to
TOKYO 00000127 007 OF 014
have them understand the ruling camp's policy.
Speaking before reporters at party headquarters, Democratic Party of
Japan Secretary General Hatoyama spoke of the public opinion survey
result on the provisional gas tax rate and indicated that his party
will step up its attack on the government over the issue in the
ordinary Diet session to open on Jan. 18. He said: "The result
showed that most respondents think that the provision tax rate
naturally should be scrapped when it expires. Our party, together
with the public, will fight against the ruling camp to protect the
people's livelihood."
(5) Cornered ruling parties to once again apply measure of last
resort: Determined to adopt amendment to gas tax in second vote in
Lower House; Passage of bill within current fiscal year uncertain
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full)
January 16, 2008
The ruling parties yesterday decided to pass a bill amending the
Special Tax Measures Law, including the maintaining of the
provisional rate added to the gasoline tax, out of a sense of alarm
that the Fukuda Cabinet would suffer a major blow if it fails to
maintain that tax. However, it will not be an easy task for the
government and the ruling parties to maintain the provisional tax
and prevent gasoline prices from falling even resorting to using its
last card, putting the bill to a second vote in the Lower House.
Liberal Democratic Party Diet Policy Committee Chairman Tadamori
Oshima speaking to a meeting of secretaries general and Diet Affairs
Committee chairmen of the ruling parties yesterday, appealed that
the provisional tax rate be maintained, "Let's tackle it with
resourcefulness and solidarity so that we can resolve the issue by
the end of March."
The ruling parties even decided to resort to a second vote in the
Lower House, which could bring about a backlash from the public.
They made the judgment that giving up on maintaining the
provisional tax would deal a greater blow to the Fukuda cabinet than
approving the bill again in the Lower House. The government and the
ruling parties intend to maintain the provisional tax for another
decade as special-purpose road construction resources. They are
concerned that failure to obtain Diet approval for the bill amending
the Special Tax Measures Law would affect various fields in such a
way as to cause commotion in the financial market, triggered by a
drop in gasoline prices.
However, their last resort of approving the bill again in the Lower
House backed by the overwhelming two-third majority of the ruling
parties could not be used unless the bill is voted down in the Upper
House or 60 days pass after the bill was sent to the Upper House.
As such, the ruling parties want to submit the bill around Jan. 25,
although it used to do so in February in the past. It intends to
finish deliberations in about 20 days so that the measure clears the
Lower House in mid-February instead of early March as has been the
pattern in the past. This is in order to secure sufficient
deliberation time in the Upper House so that conditions for the DPJ
to take a vote on the bill within the current fiscal year can be
set.
The DPJ yesterday formed a gasoline price cut force consisting of
TOKYO 00000127 008 OF 014
junior lawmakers with eye on even applying physical resistance in
the Diet.
Deputy President Naoto Kan during the inauguration ceremony
encouraged members, "Do your best in a clean-slate state with the
determination to press hard when necessary."
LDP Secretary General Bunmei Ibuki during a press conference
yesterday sought to check the DPJ from increasingly becoming
hard-lined, noting, "It is strange for the Upper House to spend 50
days on deliberations on the bill, when the Lower House can take a
vote on it in some 20 days." However, the DPJ is increasingly
turning up its voltage. The ruling parties' troubles will likely
continue for some time to come.
(6) 2008 Hokkaido Lake Toya Summit: NGOs to assemble in Hokkaido to
provide policy proposals to G-8 leaders
Mainichi online (Full)
January 12, 2008
? G-8 summit a test case for central and Hokkaido governments to
establish ties with NGOs
Various groups, including nongovernmental organizations (NGO), are
proactively pushing ahead with preparations to have civic voices
reflected in the upcoming Lake Toya Summit (the annual major
industrialized countries' summit to be held on July 7-9). In recent
G-8 summits, NGOs demonstrated their enhanced presence, for
instance, by presenting policy recommendations to the G-8 leaders. A
number of groups, including the G-8 Summit NGO Forum, a community
composed of domestic NGOs based in Tokyo, have decided to gather
together in Hokkaido in conjunction when the Lake Toya Summit and
send a message to the world. Administrative organizations are
remotely related to civic groups in Japan, compared with those in
Western countries. The upcoming summit will serve as a test case for
the central and Hokkaido governments to establish relations with
NGOs.
The G-8 Summit NGO Forum was set up in January of last year, with an
eye to the Lake Toya Summit, as the nation's first cross-sectional
organization with 103 NGOs and other groups addressing international
tasks as its members. The forum plans to compile a package of
recommendations covering the areas of (1) the environment; (2)
poverty and development; and (3) human rights and peace. The group
will present the report to the governments of the G-8 countries. The
group is preparing to hold an alternative summit (tentative name) in
Sapporo on July 6-8 in cooperation with the G-8 Summit Civic Forum
Hokkaido in Sapporo - composed of 40 groups inside and outside
Hokkaido.
Plans have also been made to hold a summit of indigenous peoples
across the world and another summit of religious leaders from about
20 countries, both in Sapporo, in order to offer opinions to the
leaders.
NGOs - well versed in the actual state of assistance for developing
countries - have increased their influence in the international
community recently. In the Cologne Summit in Germany in 1999, the
G-8 leaders agreed to relinquish their loan claims on poor countries
in response to a call from NGOs. In the St. Petersburg Summit in
2006 in Russia and the Heiligendamm Summit in 2007 in Germany,
TOKYO 00000127 009 OF 014
representatives from NGOs met government representatives from the
G-8 countries and also met even with the president and the prime
minister of the host nation in each summit. The G-8 Summit NGO Forum
Secretariat has continued negotiations with the Foreign Ministry in
SIPDIS
hopes of being given an opportunity to make policy advice directly
to the Japanese prime minister this time, too.
In Heiligendamm, 100,000 persons linked to NGOs assembled in
neighboring towns. During the session, camping grounds were opened
for NGO members, and admission cards to the International Media
Center (IMC) were issued to 100 members of 50 groups. Although there
was a scene in which an anti-globalism demonstrative gave rise to
confusion, International Cooperation NGO Center President Masaaki
Ohashi said: "Only violent demonstrations were focused on in
reporting, and most were peaceful activities."
An official of the Foreign Ministry's G-8 Summit Preparation Office
said: "Since there are geographical restrictions, unlike Europe, we
cannot forecast how many people will gather this time." But the
secretariat expects several thousand people to enter Hokkaido.
SIPDIS
In the Kyushu / Okinawa Summit in 2000, the Foreign Ministry
provided NGOs a base of operations but did not allow them to enter
the IMC. An NGO member claimed: "We were isolated diplomatically."
President Ohashi stated: "Most NGOs are against the use of violence.
We want the government to give us a chance to make an appeal in
Hokkaido, without becoming too nervous."
Major events planned by NGOs in Hokkaido:
? Alternative summit (July 6-8) to be co-sponsored by the G-8 Summit
NGO Forum and the G-8 Summit Civic Forum Hokkaido. Symposiums on
"the environment," "poverty and development," and "human rights and
peace" will be held during the session.
? Summit of indigenous peoples: (from June 28 through July 4) to be
sponsored by the Indigenous People Summit Ainu Mosir 2008, inviting
about 20 natives from the United States, Latin America, and Asia.
Reports with recommendations will be compiled on three themes: "the
environment;" "the recovery of rights;" and "education and women."
? G-8 summit of various religious leaders: (July 1-4) to be
sponsored by the World Conference on Religion and Peace (WCRP). More
than 100 representatives of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and other
religions from about 20 countries will participate in the summit to
work out action programs on the environment, poverty, nuclear
nonproliferation, and other issues.
? G-8 summit of university presidents: (from June 29 through July 1)
to be sponsored by Hokkaido University, bringing together more than
30 university presidents inside and outside Japan to draw up a
statement focusing on both efforts for environment protection and
economic development, with "sustainability" as the buzzword. It will
also hold symposiums intended for citizens.
The university summit will be held at a Sapporo hotel, and other
meetings are planned to be held at the Sapporo Convention Center.
(7) Seiron (Opinion) column by Hisahiko Okazaki: Hope for DPP-led
government to bring peace to the Taiwan Strait
SANKEI (Page 13) (Slightly abridged)
TOKYO 00000127 010 OF 014
January 11, 2008
Hisahiko Okazaki, former ambassador to Thailand
Proposal for abandonment of arms?
The following passage, which was not given wide press coverage, was
included in a report President Hu Jintao made to the 17th National
Congress of the Communist Party of China last fall.
"We would like to make a solemn appeal: On the basis of the
one-China principle, let us discuss a formal end to the state of
hostility between the two sides, reach a peace agreement, construct
a framework for peaceful development of cross-Strait relations, and
thus usher in a new phase of peaceful development."
Since the moment I heard of that passage, I have considered it an
important proposal.
Taiwan has previously called on China to abandon the option of using
armed force, but China rejected Taiwan's call. If a peace agreement
as stated in Hu's report means renouncing the use of armed force, it
is a landmark proposal and meets the Japanese and American policy
goals of seeking a peaceful solution of the Taiwan Strait issue.
Neither the reunification of two Chinas nor Taiwan's acceptance of
"one country, two systems" is made a condition. What (Hu) made a
basis is the "one-China principle." "One China' is indeed the very
basis of the Taiwan issue and an adaptable concept.
When both sides across the Taiwan Strait decided in 1992 to hold a
dialogue, China made it a condition for (Taiwan) to accept the
"one-China principle." But the result was that without reaching a
clear agreement on what one China actually means, bilateral talks
between Koo Chen-fu and Wang Daohan took place in April 1993.
Afterwards, China noted that Taiwan accepted the "one-China
principle," while Taiwan asserted: "Both sides of the Taiwan Strait
have not reached any specific conclusion about the expression 'one
China' neither in the Hong Kong talks set by the (Beijing-based)
Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait and the
(Taiwan-based) Straits Exchange Foundation, both of which were
authorized by their respective governments to arrange the talks, nor
in the development that followed the talks.'" (Taiwan Weekly Review
issued on May 5, 2005)
Kuomintang would follow China's lead
Reportedly, the Taiwanese side suggested that both China and Taiwan
interpreted one China in their own ways respectively. At any rate,
the talks between both sides of the Taiwan Strait were held, setting
aside China's assertion that the condition for the talks to be held
is for both sides to reach agreement on one China.
My conclusion is that if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) wins
in the next presidential election, it will be good for Taiwan to
start negotiations with Beijing on the basis of Hu Jintao's
proposal. Why the DPP? The reason is that negotiations with China
will be delicate as seen in the question of one China, so I believe
persons who have principles about Taiwan's identity like those
members of the DDP should engage in negotiations.
TOKYO 00000127 011 OF 014
This does not mean I do not trust Ma Ying-jeou. In fact, Ma
reportedly states he does not favor reunification and that it is no
problem that China and Taiwan have their respective interpretations
of one China.
What Ma has said, however, is different from what the Kuomintang has
asserted in the past. And I also can't sweep away the worry that the
Kuomintang-led government may follow the lead of China.
Tough negotiator necessary
Hu Jintao declared a one-China principle, but because of complex
domestic circumstances, China has yet to spell it out. It would do
so but only after discussing it with Taiwan in the future and
coordinating views at home. Until then, China and Taiwan can be
expected to engage in tough-minded, fierce negotiations. Given this,
I think it is necessary for a person with a strong beliefs about
Taiwan's identity to engage in such talks.
If the DPP serves as a negotiator with China, I think it is not a
bad idea for Taiwan to come to terms with China on the term "one
China."
Specifically, the best policy is that Taiwan will add the condition
that China must agree to Taiwan's membership in the United Nations
in return for Taiwan conceding on the one China principle. If that
is realized, a number of principles stated in the U.N. Charter, such
as sovereign equality, noninterference in internal affairs, and a
peaceful solution of the dispute, would come true.
If that condition is set as an absolute condition, I do not care if
someone backed by Kuomintang assumes the post of the president of
Taiwan. It would be good if no such unnecessary conditions as "being
neutral" or "future reunification" are added. In the case of Hong
Kong, "one country, two systems" has been introduced. As a result,
no popular election has taken place for the past 10 years (after
Hong Kong's reversion to China). What has made me worry is the fact
that there are only 40 years in which Hong Kong can enjoy a free
society.
Hu Jintao is rumored to be flexible in his political approach toward
other countries.
Hu may come to seek to settle the cross-strait issue in a couple of
years upon judging that it would be unavoidable that the Taiwanese
public would become more Taiwan-oriented year after year. If he does
so, Taiwan will have an upper hand. Taiwan will not have to
compromise at all on the issue of obtaining UN membership.
If Hu is such an insightful person and has strong political power
enough to be flexible in political approach, East Asia can realize
the dream of bringing peace to the region after a half century of
hostility.
(8) Koga, Tanigaki factions to formally agree today to merger plan;
Factional realignment to be accelerated with eye on Lower House
dissolution
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full)
January 16, 2008
The Koga and Tanigaki factions in the ruling Liberal Democratic
TOKYO 00000127 012 OF 014
Party (LDP) will formally agree on a merger in May in a meeting
today of their heads, Makoto Koga, chairman of the LDP Election
Committee, and Sadakazu Tanigaki, chairman of the party's Policy
Research Council. The two factions were derived from the former
Miyazawa faction (Kochikai). The move is in anticipation of a
possible dissolution of the House of Representative for a snap
general election. It is apparently aimed at the group becoming a
force to support Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda. The new faction will
advocate that it is a liberal force and that its policy will be to
give priority to the daily lives of people. There is a move in
conservative forces to support the policy line of former Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe. As a result, the trend of factional realignment
is now accelerating.
"As showed in former Prime Minister Hayato Ikeda's income-doubling
plan, the mission of Kochikai is to focus on the daily lives of
people," Tanigaki stressed in a speech delivered on Jan. 12 in Ayase
City, Kyoto.
The membership of Koga and Tanigaki factions totals 61, making it
the third largest LDP faction, following the second largest Tsushima
faction (membership of 68).
Kochikai was founded by former Prime Minister Ikeda in June 1957. As
former Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida's following, it followed a
dovish policy line of placing more priority on the economy than on
Japan arming itself.
Kochikai later changed its name to the Miyazawa faction. The
Miyazawa faction was divided into two groups -- one headed by Koichi
Kato and the other led by Yohei Kono. The Kono group is now called
the Aso faction. Because of the so-called Kato rebellion in November
2000, in which he called on then Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori to step
down, the Kato faction split into the Koga and Tanigaki factions.
The factions have been prevented from recommending their members for
cabinet posts since the inauguration of the Koizumi government.
Seiwakai, the Machimura faction, from which the past three premiers
and the incumbent prime minister hailed, has sharply grown in its
strength. The political presence of the former Kochikai has been on
the decline.
The aim of the merger of the two factions is to restore their
assertiveness in the LDP. It is difficult for them to secure public
support by advocating the principle of being "liberal." Tanigaki
indicated in his remarks that he wants to promote instead a policy
of giving priority to the daily lives of people, which the Fukuda
government has underscored, and use this principle to realign the
LDP. Former Vice LDP President Taku Yamasaki said in a meeting of
his faction: "The new core of forces giving consideration to the
daily lives of people will definitely rise up." Meanwhile, the
conservative force, which suffered a setback due to Abe's
resignation, aims at recovering its position. Shoichi Nakagawa, a
member of the Ibuki faction, launched last December a
cross-factional study group. Although the group includes many
lawmakers who support former Secretary General Taro Aso, it
generally gives favorable consideration to Abe's policy of building
a "beautiful country." One member said: "When it is time to find a
candidate to succeed Prime Minister Fukuda, I will move to support
Aso." As a result, LDP members supporting Fukuda feel alarmed by
such a development.
(9) Extraordinary session of divided Diet closes without breaking
TOKYO 00000127 013 OF 014
away from 1955 political framework
ASAHI (Page 4) (Abridged)
January 16, 2008
The divided Diet, in which the opposition Democratic Party of Japan
(DPJ or Minshuto) is the largest party in the House of Councillors,
presented Japanese politics with a good opportunity to replace the
"1955 framework" of choosing postponement or the rule of majority,
symbolized by the Liberal Democratic Party's dominated system dating
back to 1955 when the party was formed, with a 2007 system. But in
handling the government-sponsored refueling support bill, neither
the ruling camp nor the opposition bloc took action to find common
ground, placing importance on managing the Diet. The Diet is
required to make concessions in order to find the answer, while
playing the role of making contentious points clear through
standoffs. The task of creating a new system for managing the Diet
by nurturing the move that emerged in the just-ended Diet session
has been carried over to the next regular session.
Enacting priority bills by the rule of majority and postponing less
important legislation is the basic style that has been widely
accepted by the ruling and opposition blocs under the 1955
framework. The opposition camp has constantly played up its
opposition to taking votes on bills by protracting Diet
deliberations. One example was the enactment in 2006 of the Basic
Education Law with a majority vote of the ruling parties after a
total of 190 hours of deliberations in the two houses of the Diet.
The 1955 framework has been effective in highlighting priority
bills' contentious points, while avoiding the abuse of numerical
superiority. But it has failed to prompt the ruling and opposition
camps to join efforts to enact good laws by finding common
denominators.
People had been hopeful that the divided Diet would bring change to
the political scene, with National Graduate Institute for Policy
Studies Professor Jun Iio calling it a great chance to fundamentally
review the established practice and precedents. Specifically, they
expected that the ruling camp's adoption of the opposition bloc's
viewpoint would result in fiscal and security policies reflecting
popular will.
Nevertheless, the refueling support legislation, a top priority for
the government and ruling parties, followed a path typical of the
1955 system. In November, DPJ President Ichiro Ozawa sealed off
inter-party talks, saying, "We will not use any means that looks
like rigging a bid between political parties." The ruling coalition,
too, decided to readopt the legislation in the Lower House soon
after the talks with the DPJ on forming a grand coalition fell
through. As a result, despite 86 hours of Diet deliberations, the
two sides endeavored only to play up their respective standpoints to
the public and failed to search for common ground.
Buds of revision talks and change
There were some signs of change toward a 2007-model management of
the Diet, while being tied to the 1955 political system.
Some government-initiated bills were enacted after incorporating the
ruling block's viewpoint into them. For instance, the opposition
bloc had fiercely objected to a Broadcast Law revision including
TOKYO 00000127 014 OF 014
administrative measures against television broadcasters, presented
under the former Abe cabinet. Before the Diet was divided, the
ruling parties planned steamroller it, but during the latest Diet
session, the ruling camp sounded out the DPJ on substantially
revising the legislation and successfully enacted it in cooperation
with the largest opposition party in the end.
The DPJ had also called for the retroactive application of the
lawmaker-initiated revision of the Law to Support the Rebuilding of
Lives of Disaster Victims as well as for direct support. The ruling
parties opposed the DPJ's requests in line with the government's
wishes, but it managed to enact it during the latest Diet session
owing to concessions by the largest opposition party.
It was particularly epochal that the ruling parties and the DPJ
established a panel in a committee to discuss the legislation.
Another inter-party council was set up to discuss subsidies to those
who contracted hepatitis C after being administered with
contaminated blood products. Those panels might result in a system
of establishing subcommittees or regularly using upper- and
lower-house councils.
The previous Diet, however, was undoubtedly marked by face-offs
between the ruling and opposition blocs with Lower House dissolution
in mind. Cooperation between the two camps on the aforementioned
legislations owed much to personal ties between lawmakers of the two
sides who were responsible for the subjects. Many challenges must be
overcome before realizing a 2007-model Diet of facing off over
controversial bills and making visible concessions on legislations
containing common denominators.
For separating the political situation from deliberations on bills,
aiming at an agreement through talks between the two camps and
identifying unattainable challenges beforehand is one idea.
Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda in a press conference yesterday said: "I
had to use the trial-and-error method in the Diet session that
closed today. I would like to see the opposition parties harbor a
sense of crisis as well." The ruling and opposition camps share a
sense of crisis now. This is a good opportunity for the buds that
emerged in the latest Diet session to burst into bloom.
26 bills enacted
The 128-day extraordinary Diet session closed yesterday after two
extensions and enacting a total of 26 bills. Of them, the government
endorsed 14, fewer than the 18 enacted in the 85-day extraordinary
Diet session in the fall of 2006. This comes from the government's
cautious stance with the divided Diet in mind.
At the same time, the ruling and opposition blocs jointly submitted
many lawmaker-initiated relief bills. A bill revising the Law to
Support the Rebuilding of Lives of Disaster Victims and legislation
offering blanket relief to people with hepatitis C caused by tainted
blood products were enacted one after another.
The bill to establish a Japanese National Security Council (JNSC),
submitted by the former Abe cabinet, was the only
government-sponsored bill that was scrapped.
DONOVAN