Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07AITTAIPEI2550, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, TAIWAN'S UN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07AITTAIPEI2550.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07AITTAIPEI2550 2007-12-03 09:22 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0014
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #2550/01 3370922
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 030922Z DEC 07
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7488
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7484
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 8770
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 002550 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, TAIWAN'S UN 
 
REFERENDUM 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused news 
coverage December 1-3 on the controversy over the voting system for 
the January legislative elections; on China's refusal to allow the 
USS Kitty Hawk and its supporting vessels to dock in Hong Kong in 
late November; and on the 2008 presidential elections.  In terms of 
editorials and commentaries, an editorial in the pro-independence 
"Liberty Times" called the attention of both China and the United 
States to the results of a recent opinion survey conducted by the 
Straits Exchange Foundation, which showed that more Taiwan people 
preferred independence to unification with China.  The article also 
called on the United States to support Taiwan's bid to join the UN. 
With regard to the USS Kitty Hawk event, an editorial in the 
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" called China a 
country "that is chronically unable to understand its obligations as 
a responsible nation."  An editorial in the conservative, 
pro-unification, English-language "China Post" also said the even 
has "China in an unfavorable light."  A separate "Taipei Times" 
op-ed, on the other hand, commented on Taiwan's UN referendum and 
urged Washington not to penalize Taiwan for its "errant behavior" by 
withholding the sale of F-16 C/D fighter jets.  The article said 
"weakening Taiwan's defense will simply add to the U.S.' burden." 
End summary. 
 
2. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations 
 
A) "'Anti-Annexation' Is the Interests That Rise above [Those of 
the] Political Parties and Concern All People" 
 
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 720,000] 
editorialized (12/1): 
 
"The [results] of the 'National Poll on the Twenty Years of 
Exchanges between Both Sides of the Taiwan Strait,' which were 
recently published by the Strait s Exchange Foundation, showed that 
the Taiwan respondents supporting independence have risen to 44.9 
percent.  Twenty-three percent of those polled said they preferred 
maintaining the status quo, while 18.6 percent said they favored 
unification between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait; 13.5 percent 
of the respondents either declined to answer the question or said 
they have no ideas about it.  When asked [to choose between 
independence and unification] if the status quo cannot be 
maintained, 52 percent of the respondents preferred independence 
while 24.4 percent said they favored unification. ... 
 
"Not only the ruling and opposition parties in Taiwan, but also 
China, should pay attention to the results of this opinion.  The 
proposals raised by Hu Jintao at the 17th Chinese Communist Party 
Congress regarding 'both sides of the Taiwan Strait being of one 
China; 'both sides being of the same organismic community;' and 
'people of both sides of the Taiwan Strait jointly deciding on 
Taiwan's future' have been rejected by a majority of the public 
opinion in Taiwan.  Such an indication showed [Beijing's] so-called 
'placing hope in the Taiwan people' is nothing but a hollow slogan. 
If the Chinese leaders really attach importance to the Taiwan 
people, they should respect the choice made by Taiwan's mainstream 
public view. 
 
"In addition, we also hope other friendly countries, such as the 
United States, will see that to maintain Taiwan's status as an 
independent sovereignty and to turn the island into a fully normal 
country are the wishes of a majority of the Taiwan people rather 
than a false image created by the politicians.  Movements such as 
the writing of a new constitution, name change, and Taiwan's UN bid 
are those 'desired by the people' and a natural outcome when Taiwan 
moves toward becoming a democratic country.  If other friendly 
countries like the United States approve of Taiwan's democratic 
values and the Taiwan people's right to determine their own future, 
they should not oppose Taiwan's UN referendum.  Instead, they should 
assist Taiwan in becoming a UN member as early as possible. ..." 
 
B) "For the US, It's No Port in a Storm" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 
30,000] editorialized (12/1): 
 
"... Beijing's refusal to allow the Kitty Hawk and its supporting 
vessels to dock in Hong Kong was not a subtle dig between wordsmith 
diplomats; it made a mockery of the US Navy and -- worse -- on 
Thanksgiving, possibly the most important holiday for families in 
the US, let alone for sailors on active duty and loved ones who 
wasted good money to meet them in Hong Kong. ... 
 
"Describing the actions of the Chinese over refusing safe haven for 
the minesweepers, Admiral Tim Keating, the head of the US Pacific 
Command, said: 'It is not, in our view, conduct that is indicative 
of a country who understands its obligations as a responsible 
nation.  Strong language, indeed.  But it points to an even uglier 
truth, and that is that China -- on international relations, human 
 
rights, disease control and notification, environmental protection, 
quality control in trade and any other number of critical matters -- 
is a country that is, indeed, chronically unable to understand its 
obligations as a responsible nation. ...  Now, by gratuitously 
infuriating the most powerful military on the planet, we can see 
that even these fundamental tactics are beyond Beijing's 
capabilities, let alone explaining away the deep-seated hostility 
toward the US that prompted the saga.  It will be fascinating to 
chart the fallout." 
 
C) "Who's Coming to Dinner?" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" 
[circulation: 30,000] editorialized (12/1): 
 
"... But last week in Hong Kong, many Americans were disappointed 
when their loved ones failed to show up for dinner on Thanksgiving 
Day.  These Americans, about 8,000 servicemen aboard the USS Kitty 
Hawk and the carrier's battle group including submarines and 
escorts, were eager to spend their Thanksgiving holiday in Hong 
Kong, their favorite port of call and destination for rest and 
recreation. Many families of crew members had flown to Hong Kong to 
meet them, only to find at the last minute that their dream for a 
Hong Kong holiday was blighted. ... 
 
"In a sense, the GIs suffered a collateral casualty from China's 
diplomatic fire, and China did not emerge unscathed either. A 
four-day R&R vacation in Hong Kong -- Suzie Wong's world -- by 8,000 
U.S. servicemen and their families would have been a bonanza for the 
island's tourism industry. Turning them away was unwise at best. 
Besides, it was not that 'humanitarian' to deprive American navy men 
of the chance to meet with their families at the Thanksgiving dinner 
table. It put China in an unfavorable light. Few would applaud 
Beijing for 'teaching the Yankees a lesson' this way. In diplomacy, 
the creation of a win-win situation is the best choice. Or, if 
impossible, at least a win-loss outcome is better than a loss-loss 
result as the one created by Beijing's Thanksgiving flip-flop." 
 
3. Taiwan's UN Referendum 
 
"Lessons from the UN Referendum" 
 
Li Thian-hok, a commentator based in Pennsylvania, opined in the 
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 
30,000] (12/2): 
 
"... While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government may 
have failed to consult Washington in advance before it committed 
itself to the UN referendum, and thus deserves Washington's wrath, 
it would be rash to judge the referendum as merely an election ploy. 
The fact is the Taiwanese people are fed up with China's persistent 
efforts to isolate and denigrate Taiwan's status. ...  Meanwhile in 
Taiwan the number of signatures endorsing the UN referendum under 
the Taiwan name has now reached 2.7 million, way above the legal 
threshold. The two versions of the UN referendum will be held in 
conjunction with the presidential poll on March 22 next year. While 
the Central Election Commission is still working out the procedure 
for voting, the referendum will proceed. Neither the DPP nor the KMT 
can now abandon the UN referendum without committing political 
suicide. 
 
"So it is somewhat surprising that American Institute in Taiwan 
Director Stephen Young reiterated US objections to the referendum in 
a press conference on Nov. 9.  He complained that the referendum 
'poses a threat to cross-strait stability and appears inconsistent 
... with the spirit of President Chen's public commitments.' 
Washington and Taipei are now at an impasse. Neither side is willing 
nor able to change its position.  One or both of the referendums may 
well pass despite the high threshold (a majority of all eligible 
voters) if the turnout rate is high enough. The outcome is 
unpredictable because the KMT is playing a complex game of 
discouraging voting for both referendums while pretending to promote 
its own version. What is important, however, is not the outcome of 
the referendums but how to restore mutual trust between the US and 
Taiwan and how to prevent a similar quarrel from developing between 
the two long-standing democratic allies. ... 
 
"... Taipei should pay greater attention to the interests of the US 
and how those interests affect those of Taiwan.  Taipei must learn 
to work closely with Washington, since both share the same 
democratic values and strategic interests in peace and stability of 
East Asia. No effort should be spared to restore mutual trust. ... 
For Washington it is best to resist the temptation to penalize 
Taiwan for its errant behavior, for example, by withholding the sale 
of F-16 C/D fighter jets.  Weakening Taiwan's defense will simply 
add to the US' burden. 
 
"The status quo is changing every day as the People's Liberation 
 
Army develops ever greater capacity, not just to invade Taiwan, but 
eventually to challenge US dominance of Asia and beyond.  To deter a 
conflict, Washington must maintain a sufficient naval and air 
presence in the Western Pacific, as mandated by the Taiwan Relations 
Act. In the long run, the US must endeavor to persuade China to 
renounce the use of force against Taiwan and to respect the right of 
the Taiwanese to determine their own future without outside 
pressure, because a more democratic and peace-loving China is in the 
common interest of the US and Taiwan.  Taiwan's security is 
ultimately the US' security as well." 
 
YOUNG