Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07WELLINGTON805, NEW ZEALAND - 2008 NATIONAL TRADE ESTIMATE REPORT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07WELLINGTON805.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07WELLINGTON805 | 2007-11-08 02:14 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO0921
PP RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0805/01 3120214
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 080214Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4868
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 5020
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND PRIORITY 1529
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY PRIORITY 0594
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC PRIORITY 0361
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY 0186
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 WELLINGTON 000805
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EB, STATE PASS TO USTR BWEISEL, GBLUE
AND DBELL, COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC/AP/OSAO, TREASURY FO OASIA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN ETRD NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND - 2008 NATIONAL TRADE ESTIMATE REPORT
REF: STATE 119765
¶1. Following is Post's submission for the 2008 National Trade
Estimate Report (NTE) regarding New Zealand per request
reftel. We assume that Washington agencies will provide
updated trade and investment data.
¶2. Begin text of NTE submission:
IMPORT POLICIES
In general, tariff rates in New Zealand are low as a result
of several rounds of unilateral tariff cuts that began in the
mid-1980s and continued until the current Labour government,
elected in 1999, froze further reductions until July 2005.
The New Zealand government announced in September 2003 that
it would resume unilateral tariff reductions starting July 1,
¶2006. Under this unilateral tariff reduction program, New
Zealand has begun implementing gradual reductions of its
highest tariff rates (currently 17 percent), which will
reduce tariffs to 10 percent by July 1, 2009. These top rates
apply mostly to clothing, footwear and carpet. Ad valorem
tariffs on all other dutiable goods will be reduced to 5
percent by July 1, 2008.
STANDARDS, TESTING, LABELING AND CERTIFICATION
Biotechnology Regulations
New Zealand's Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA),
an independent body, reviews applications for the release of
new organisms, including biotechnology products that contain
living organisms. ERMA assesses applications on a
case-by-case basis and can issue four types of approvals:
initial development in containment (such as in a laboratory
or glass house outdoor development or field test (in
containment), conditional release, and full, unconditional
release (with no controls). Biosecurity New Zealand, part of
the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), carries out
compliance and enforcement of all indoor and outdoor
containment and conditional release approvals. When
assessing a containment application, ERMA focuses on the
adequacy of containment to mitigate any potential effect of
the organism on the environment.
Since 1998, ERMA has granted approximately fifteen approvals
for contained field trials of genetically modified crops. Of
these, approximately five have been completed, six are still
ongoing, and the remaining approvals have either ceased or
were unused for various reasons. To date, there have been no
applications for either a conditional or a full release of
products derived by the use of biotechnology in New Zealand.
The most recent approval granted by ERMA was in May 2007 for
Crop and Food Research to conduct a contained field test for
broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower and forage kale derived by the
use of biotechnology and engineered for pest resistance.
Three years ago, ERMA approved an application from the same
organization to field test onions derived by the use of
biotechnology.
Release approvals include both conditional release, where
controls can be placed on the organism to manage risks, and
full release where no controls are imposed. The process for
outdoor containment, conditional and full release of
biotechnology products is much more onerous than for an
indoor containment application. Among other things,
applicants must provide ERMA with detailed information and
analysis that enables them to conduct a full-scale risk
assessment that takes into account a broad range of
scientific, economic, cultural and ethical factors in the
decision making process. This includes the possible impact
of a release on New Zealand's clean, green image and the
potential impact on the Maori culture. All outdoor
containment, conditional and full release applications must
be publicly notified. In addition, a Maori consultation is
required.
Until October 2003, New Zealand maintained a voluntary
two-year moratorium on the introduction of all biotechnology
products, which precluded applications for the commercial
planting of biotechnology crops, the commercial importation
of seeds derived by the use of biotechnology, the release
into the environment of animals derived by the use of
WELLINGTON 00000805 002 OF 009
biotechnology and, to a lesser extent, some human and
veterinary medicines containing biotechnology products. The
moratorium, however, did not apply to the use and sale of
processed foods and ingredients derived by the use of
biotechnology. With the moratorium's expiration and the
report of the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification,
Parliament amended the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms
Act 1996 to make the regulation of biotechnological research
more workable and to facilitate controlled release of
biotechnology products. The amendment, the New Organisms and
Other Matters Bill of 2003, introduced the conditional
release category for approval of new organisms.
Biotechnology Food Approval
Foods with genetically modified content can be offered for
sale and consumption in New Zealand after being assessed and
approved by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ),
which is the bi-national food regulatory authority for New
Zealand and Australia. FSANZ is responsible for the
development of regulations in the Australia - New Zealand
Food Standards Code (Code). The New Zealand Food Safety
Authority (NZFSA) is responsible for implementation and
enforcement within New Zealand.
A mandatory standard for foods produced using modern
biotechnology came into effect in mid-1999. The standard,
which was established under the Food Act of 1981, prohibits
the sale of food produced using genetic modification unless
such food has been assessed by FSANZ and listed in the food
code standard. As of November 2007, FSANZ has received a
total of 39 applications for assessment of genetically
modified foods. Of these, thirty-three applications have been
approved and four are under assessment. Two requests have
been withdrawn.
Biotechnology Food Labeling
Mandatory labeling requirements for genetically modified
foods took effect in December 2001. With few exceptions, a
food in its final form that contains detectable DNA or
protein derived from genetic modification must be so labeled.
Meeting New Zealand's food labeling regulations for
genetically modified foods can be extremely burdensome and is
especially relevant for U.S. agricultural exporters who deal
primarily in processed food. New Zealand wholesalers and
retailers frequently demand GM-free declarations from their
suppliers. This effectively places liability for any GM
labeling non-compliance on the importer. New Zealand food
legislation requires businesses to exercise due diligence in
complying with food standards, which usually is defined as
maintaining a paper or audit trail similar to a quality
assurance system.
The NZFSA conducts periodic compliance audits. Violators of
food labeling requirements can be assessed penalties under
the Food Act 1981. As part of the Domestic Food Review, the
New Zealand Government is reviewing the entire Food Act and a
new version is expected to be introduced to parliament in the
first quarter of 2008.
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
New Zealand maintains a strict regimen of sanitary and
phytosanitary (SPS) controls for virtually all imported
agricultural products. The United States and New Zealand
continue to discuss specific SPS issues that negatively
impact trade in products supplied by the United States as
part of our annual Trade and Investment Framework Agreement
(TIFA) dialogue and in other fora.
In 2006, New Zealand implemented new processes for
undertaking risk analyses and developing import health
standards. This initiative is intended to streamline
existing processes and provide consistency in the way New
Zealand undertakes these tasks. As of July 1, 2006, New
Zealand also implemented a new system for funding and
managing the development of import health standards. The new
system is intended to be more transparent, direct government
resources to the highest priorities and increase the
resources available for developing import health standards.
During the 2006 U.S.- New Zealand TIFA discussions, the
WELLINGTON 00000805 003 OF 009
United States Government requested that New Zealand develop
an import standard for Pacific Northwest stone fruit (plums,
peaches, nectarines and apricots). In response to the US.
request, New Zealand has added Pacific Northwest stone fruit
to its import health standard development work program. The
work program also includes a review of import requirements
for citrus from the United States.
New Zealand completed a risk assessment of U.S. high-value
pork in June of 2006. To date, this product has been subject
to a pre-cooking requirement because of the presence of
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in the
United States. While the analysis confirmed that there is a
risk of PRRS disease entering New Zealand, the Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) is recommending that high
value cuts of pork be allowed entry without any sanitary
treatment. In response to the risk assessment, MAF received
forty-four submissions, including two from the United States.
MAF completed the review of submissions in June 2007 and is
expected to announce the draft import health standard by the
end of the calendar year.
The New Zealand Food Safety Authority (NZFSA) requires
case-by-case assessment of U.S. bovine products before
importation due to concerns over Bovine Spongiform
Encephalopathy (BSE). In February 2007, NZFSA announced a
move to modernize its food safety importing requirements for
beef and beef products in light of the new science that
surrounds BSE. Among other things, the new measures will
enable New Zealand to categorize the BSE risk status of
countries exporting to New Zealand. Once these measures are
finalized, the current requirement to assess U.S. products on
a case-by-case basis is expected to be eliminated.
New Zealand continues to suspend imports of U.S. poultry meat
(except canned product) due to its restrictions on countries
that have infectious bursal disease.
(Note: New Zealand makes a functional distinction between the
use of the terms biotechnology and genetic modification. End
note).
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION (IPR)
Copyright Protection
The New Zealand government introduced the Copyright
Amendments Bill at the end of 2006, which passed its first
reading. In 2007, the legislation was sent to Select
Committee for a comment period. The Bill was again taken up
by Parliament in November 2007 for a second reading but it is
uncertain whether the Bill in its current form has sufficient
votes to pass. If the current Bill form does not pass the
second reading before the end of this year's legislative
term, then it is unlikely to be dealt with again until after
the election period, i.e., 2009. In March 2007, during the
comment period to the Select Committee, industry argued that
the draft legislation would put New Zealand at odds with the
growing international consensus with respect to protection of
copyright in the on-line environment. The international
standards for protection of copyrightable material are
currently set by the WIPO Internet Treaties (the WIPO
Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms
Treaty) of which New Zealand is not a signatory. Industry's
main concerns regarding the draft legislation relate
primarily to the following:
The Bill fails to adequately protect Technological Protection
Measures (TPMs) that prevent unauthorized access to digital
content. The viability of many existing and prospective
business models depend on such TPMs, but the Bill excludes
protection for the very types of access controls most in need
of it. In order to meet the minimum level of protection
required by the WIPO treaties, both access and copy
protection TPMs must be protected, separate and apart from
the remedies available for infringement. There is inadequate
protection against the sale of circumvention (hacking)
devices. In its present form, the Bill would allow the sale
of circumvention devices as long as the device is capable of
any "significant application" other than circumvention. Thus
the provider of a circumvention device could avoid liability
so long as the tool performs some other function. Moreover,
the Bill only prohibits trafficking in circumvention devices
WELLINGTON 00000805 004 OF 009
where the trafficker has knowledge or reason to believe that
the device will, or is likely to be, used for infringement.
This allows any trafficker to hypothesize a non-infringing
use for the tools of his trade as a defense. In this way, a
proliferation of such devices would be encouraged, thus
eviscerating any protections for TPMs.
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are provided a "safe
harbor" from liability without requiring them to apply a
repeat-infringer termination policy. The Bill also allows
ISPs to escape liability even if they have "reason to know"
that infringing activity is taking place on their networks,
yet fail to act. The only requirement is that they have
"actual knowledge or awareness" of infringement - which
constitutes a high burden of proof for right holders, and
would encourage unlawful activity. Also of significant
concern, is the addition of a provision that would make it an
offense to provide inaccurate information to ISPs regarding
illegal content on their networks. This provision further
adds to the burdens of content owners, who already take care
and incur significant expense to monitor the use of their
content on third party networks.
Patent Protection
In 2000, the Government initiated a review of the Patents Act
of 1953. Although an initial draft Bill was released in
early 2005 for consultation, it has yet to have its first
reading in the legislature. The stated purpose of the Bill
is to ensure that New Zealand's patent regime takes account
of international developments. One such development is the
international trend for countries to strengthen intellectual
property protection through patent term restoration. On
average, the patent and regulatory approval processes for new
drugs in New Zealand take about twelve years. As a result,
many drugs have very few years of patent protection remaining
after the regulatory authority grants marketing approval.
Many countries, including the U.S. and EU, have established
mechanisms to restore patent terms for pharmaceutical
products to recover time lost due to regulatory delays. The
research-based industry has urged the New Zealand legislature
to amend the current bill to include patent term restoration
in keeping with international best practices.
The issue of the patent term protection for pharmaceuticals
was the subject of a consultation exercise by the Ministry of
Economic Development in 2003. After considering all
submissions and available information, the Ministry decided
that it was not possible to determine whether the benefits of
extending the patent term for pharmaceuticals would exceed
the likely costs, and proposed that an economic study be
carried out to gather more information on the subject. After
considering the terms of reference for such a study, the
government decided in 2004 that no further work needed to be
done on this issue.
Changes to IPR Enforcement
In the copyright legislation currently under Parliamentary
consideration, there are provisions to strengthen enforcement
of trafficking in counterfeit goods and pirated works by
empowering the Ministry of Economic Development to be able to
investigate and prosecute the criminal offenses for
manufacturing, importing and selling of counterfeited goods
and pirated works. The Government is also reviewing New
Zealand Customs' border powers to prevent importation of
counterfeit goods and pirated works. Additionally, the New
Zealand has agreed to join negotiations on the
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), proposed by the
U.S. and Japan.
SERVICES BARRIERS
Local Content Quotas
Radio and television broadcasters have adopted voluntary
local content targets, but only after the New Zealand
government made it clear that it would otherwise pursue
mandatory quotas. Although New Zealand government officials
have said they are sensitive to the implications of quotas
under the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS),
they reserve the right to impose them.
WELLINGTON 00000805 005 OF 009
Telecommunications
In September 2007, the New Zealand government announced that
it was going ahead with its plan to split Telecom New Zealand
into three separate operational units to provide retail,
wholesale and network services. The determination sets
requirements for Access Network Services (ANS) to provide
services over existing copper, and future fiber and wireless
access networks, ensuring comprehensive service coverage and
ensuring that the unit is forward-looking.
Telecommunications Regulatory Environment
In November 2005, the Government commenced an assessment of
the telecommunications sector. The purpose of the assessment
was to consider developments of the telecommunications sector
as a whole over the medium term (three to five years). The
stock take found that the local loop (subscriber line, i.e.,
customer to carrier connection) remains an access bottleneck
that restricts the development of effective competition. New
entrants require access on fair and non-discriminatory terms
to Telecom's network to be able to provide high quality, cost
effective and differentiated services.
"Last-mile" access for the majority of New Zealand consumers
is likely to rely heavily on the local copper network for
sometime. The stock take analysis also indicated that an
improved Unbundled Bitstream Service (UBS) would help close
the gap with other OECD countries on broadband uptake, price
and quality.
The assessment resulted in the Telecommunications Amendment
Act 2006. The Act was passed through Parliament in December
¶2006. The main parts of the Act are requiring the
operational separation of Telecom; extending the range of
services subject to regulation; enhancing the ability of the
Commissioner to implement regulated services; and empowering
the Commissioner to monitor compliance in the sector.
The key features of the Act are:
-- Operational separation of Telecom New Zealand in order to
promote competition in the telecommunications market (see
below).
-- Regulating for greater access to Telecom's local loop by
competitors by introducing new regulated Unbundled Local Loop
ULL and Unbundled Bit stream Access (UBA), naked DSL services
and unbundled backhaul services.
-- Improving transparency of Telecom's costs and pricing via
regulating for the accounting separation of Telecom.
-- Enhancing the Telecommunications Commissioner's ability to
implement services by ensuring that service providers can get
effective and timely access to regulated services.
-- Standard terms determination introduced allowing the
Commerce Commission to set terms of supply for regulated
services by providing a multilateral process for setting
these terms. This will allow the Commerce Commission to
resolve supply terms for regulated services once, rather than
for each access seeker individually.
-- Giving the Telecommunications Commissioner the ability to
initiate multi-network determinations where the Commissioner
will be empowered to initiate a determination of the terms
and conditions of regulated multi-network services, rather
than relying on access seekers to apply.
The Act requires:
-- The separation of Telecom into separate Access Network
Services, Wholesale and Retail business units;
-- A requirement for Access Network Services to be operated
on a stand-alone basis and for Telecom Wholesale to be
operated at arms-length from any retail business units;
-- The establishment of an Independent Oversight Group,
backed up by Commerce Commission enforcement, to ensure
Telecom faithfully implements its Separation plan; and
WELLINGTON 00000805 006 OF 009
-- A requirement that relevant products, especially Local
Loop Unbundling and Unbundled Bit stream Access, are
available to all market participants on equivalent terms.
-- As part of the operational separation process, the
Minister of Communications issued a Determination on 26
September 2007 of further requirements with which Telecom's
undertakings must comply. Telecom has 20 working days from
the Determination date to prepare their draft separation
plan.
Mobile Termination Rates
At the end of April 2007, the Economic Development Minister
announced that he would accept voluntary, and separate
binding deeds from Vodafone and Telecom New Zealand. The
deeds provide for each company's performance in passing
through reductions in mobile termination rates to fixed
calling customers to be independently audited each year. Each
deed also contains measures to ensure the independence of the
verification process.
Under the deeds, Telecom will reduce its mobile termination
rate from 20 cents per minute (cpm) to 12 cpm and Vodafone
has offered to reduce its mobile termination rate from 20 cpm
to 14 cpm, both over the next five years. These are in line
with the Commerce Commission's estimate that the cost of
mobile termination in New Zealand would be 15 cpm trending
down to 12 cpm in five years time.
INVESTMENT BARRIERS
Investment Screening
New Zealand's Overseas Investment Office (0I0) screens
foreign investments in: business investments that exceed
NZ$100 million and represent 25% equity or more and;
investments in land defined as sensitive within the Overseas
Investment Act 2005 (the Act); and investment in Fishing
Quota. The New Zealand government enacted The Overseas
Investment Act in August 2005, which liberalized the
investment screening regime by refocusing screening on assets
of critical interest. The review also strengthened the
monitoring and enforcement of conditions of consent made
under the Act.
The screening threshold for investments of over 25%, or a
control interest in, non-land business investments was raised
from NZ$50 million to NZ$l00 million. Investors are required
to satisfy the "investor test" that requires investors be of
good character, are not excluded from entering New Zealand
under the Immigration Act and be able to display both
financial commitment and business acumen. Significantly, no
business investments have been declined since 1984.
The purchase of land defined as sensitive within the Act
requires approval. Examples of sensitive land could include:
non-urban land of over five hectares, land on certain
offshore islands, or land that includes or adjoins foreshore
and seabed. Most urban land is not screened at all unless
deemed to be sensitive for other reasons. Investments by
overseas persons who are not intending to reside in New
Zealand are required to pass the "investor test" and show
that the investment will create a benefit for New Zealand.
In considering whether this benefit exists, consideration is
required to be given to a range of economic and non-economic
factors included within the Act. Where the investor has
undertaken to generate these benefits (e.g. through
significant development or investment) the realization of
these benefits may be included as conditions of consent and
progress may be periodically monitored.
The United States has raised concerns about the continued use
of this screening mechanism. New Zealand's maintain that its
commitments under the WTO General Agreement on Trade in
Services are reflected in the OIO screening program.
OTHER BARRIERS
Government Price Controls and Reimbursement for
Pharmaceuticals
The U.S. Government continued to raise concerns about New
WELLINGTON 00000805 007 OF 009
Zealand's support for innovation in the research and
development of innovative pharmaceutical products. New
Zealand's Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC), a
stand-alone Crown entity, administers a Pharmaceutical
Schedule that lists medicines subsidized by the New Zealand
government. The schedule also specifies conditions for
prescribing a product listed for reimbursement. PHARMAC
accounts for 73 percent of New Zealand's expenditures on
prescription drugs. The New Zealand government also supports
hospitals' pharmaceutical expenditures, bringing its share of
total spending on prescription drugs in the country to about
80 percent.
With respect to accountability, PHARMAC (as a Crown Entity)
is accountable to the Minister of Health and has a Board of
Directors appointed by the Minister. PHARMAC also operates
in practice as an agent of the District Health Boards (DHBs)
and its capped (notional) pharmaceutical budget is funded by
the DHBs.
PHARMAC reports both monthly and quarterly to the Ministry of
Health (acting on behalf of the Minister of Health). In
addition, the Minister of Health may at any time ask the
PHARMAC Board for a "please explain," and has the power to
dismiss Board Members. PHARMAC staff members are accountable
to its Board of Directors who scrutinize not just the
substance of their actions, but also ensure a rigorous
adherence to the Operating Policies and Procedures (OPPs).
New Zealand does not restrict the sale of non-subsidized
pharmaceuticals in the country. However, private medical
insurance companies will not cover the cost of non-subsidized
medicines and doctors are often reluctant to prescribe them
to patients who would have to pay the cost themselves. Thus,
PHARMAC's decisions have a major impact on the availability
and price of non-subsidized medicines and the ability of
pharmaceutical companies to sell their products in the New
Zealand market.
PHARMAC continues to operate stringent cost containment
strategies, and issues of transparency, predictability and
accountability remain unresolved in industry's opinion. New
Zealand has created a commercially difficult market for
innovative medicines. In October 2005, the United Future
Party announced that it had secured an agreement from the
Labour Party to develop a national medicines policy as part
of Labour's coalition negotiations to form a Government.
This is tantamount to a review of the Government's
pharmaceutical policy, and includes three areas of focus:
Access to Medicines; Quality Use of Medicines; and the
Rational Use of Medicines. The national medicines policy will
be released through the Ministry of Health and is anticipated
to be released as a consultation document in December 2007
with some principles and possible solutions proffered. There
will follow a consultation period from the time of release,
with changes expected to be implemented later in 2008.
Market Access for Pharmaceuticals
The innovative pharmaceutical industry is advocating for the
following key policy reforms in New Zealand:
-- Patient Outcomes - The National Medicines Strategy (NMS)
should ensure the provision of quality medicines in a way
that is responsive to people's needs and achieves optimal
health outcomes.
-- Comparable Access - The NMS should ensure that New
Zealanders have at least comparable access to medicines as do
citizens in other OECD countries.
-- A Core Health Strategy - Medicines play a vital role in
the prevention, amelioration and treatment of disease and as
such the NMS is integral to the achievement of all national
health strategies and should have equal standing and
priority.
-- Integrity and Public Confidence - The current bundling of
clinical assessment and procurement decisions creates
incentives to subordinate clinical judgment to budget
imperative. For these decisions to have integrity and
improve public confidence in the system, determinations about
which medicines are cost effective and are of clinical merit
WELLINGTON 00000805 008 OF 009
must be conducted independently before being used to form
decisions about which products can be funded.
-- Transparency and Rigor of Processes and Decision Making -
Public confidence will be enhanced if decision making
processes are underpinned by openness, fairness, timeliness
and high standards of consultation and review. All
stakeholders must be able to understand the true basis of
decisions and rationing should be explicit. What is
considered 'value for money' should comparable to other OECD
countries and meet WHO recommendations. Health Technology
Assessment (HTA) methodologies must be rigorous and up to
world standards.
-- Recognition of the Value of Innovation - The NMS should
recognize the value of innovation and innovative
pharmaceuticals through the adoption of procedures that
appropriately value the objectively demonstrated therapeutic
significance of the pharmaceutical.
-- Responsive Budget Management - The pharmaceutical budget
should be determined by need and access benchmarks. Rather
than conduct health technology assessments (HTA) of products
after the capped budget has been set, thus simply creating a
priority list of new products competing for the limited
funding available, horizon scanning and HTA should be used to
establish budget estimates on an annual basis.
-- Partnership - The achievement of timely access to
medicines, quality use of medicines and other NMS objectives
is greatly enhanced by the maintenance of a responsible and
viable industry in New Zealand. Coordination of health and
industry policies and a consistent and more welcoming
environment will better enable the industry to effectively
partner the government and other stakeholders to achieve
improved health and economic outcomes.
-- Whole of System - The NMS must be a whole of system
approach. Meaningful and sustainable improvements will only
be achieved by a comprehensive, system wide, review.
Selecting and pursing only a limited range of issues will not
meet public expectations for reform and would negatively
impact the relevance and effectiveness of the National
Medicines Strategy.
Therapeutic Products and Medicines Bill
The New Zealand and Australian governments signed a treaty on
December 10, 2003, with the intent to create a joint agency
to regulate medical devices, prescription and
over-the-counter medicines, dietary and nutritional
supplements, and cosmetics such as sun creams. Aside from
prescription pharmaceuticals, New Zealand does not currently
regulate market entry of these products, but would have done
so under proposed regulations. Implementing legislation
known as the Therapeutic Products and Medicines Bill was
introduced at the end of 2006 and barely passed its first
reading. After a prolonged political battle, on July 16,
2007, the State Services Minister put the highly contentious
Bill "on hold." The New Zealand Government has shelved the
legislation, ending any near term prospects of a joint New
Zealand - Australia agency to regulate prescription and
over-the-counter medicines and medical devices. After
lengthy contentious political debate, the Government could
not secure enough votes in Parliament to ensure the bill's
passage into law. This almost certainly means the Bill's
prospects of passage are dead until after the 2008 election.
The bill was expected to grandfather products that were
already lawfully on the market at the time of the
implementation of the legislation. The Bill would have
granted an interim license valid for a transition period of
three years. It was expected that the new agency would have
charged full cost-recovery fees to register products and
require additional documentation and assessments for certain
products, even if they already have U.S. Food and Drug
Administration approval.
GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
New Zealand is not a signatory to the WTO Government
Procurement Agreement and is not an observer to the Committee
on Government Procurement. It is important to note that New
WELLINGTON 00000805 009 OF 009
Zealand has a unilateral open market procurement policy, and
does not use government procurement measures as trade
barriers. The position regarding participation in the
Government Procurement Agreement is kept under review. END
TEXT.
McCormick