Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07TOKYO5355, READOUT OF US-JAPAN TRADE FORUM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO5355.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07TOKYO5355 2007-11-28 04:36 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO7461
RR RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #5355/01 3320436
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 280436Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9815
INFO RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4609
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 3385
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7012
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8274
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5271
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 TOKYO 005355 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR AUSTR WCUTLER 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: ECONETRDEAGRJA
 
SUBJECT: READOUT OF US-JAPAN TRADE FORUM 
 
1. (SBU) SUMMARY:  An array of bilateral trade 
issues were addressed and policy discussions on FTAs 
held in the fourth meeting of the U.S.-Japan Trade 
Forum  in Tokyo on October 18.  Assistant U.S. Trade 
Representative Wendy Cutler led the U.S. delegation, 
while Director General for Economic Affairs Yoichi 
Otabe led the Japanese side.  In the talks, both 
sides agreed to continue their information exchanges 
on free trade agreements (FTAs) with third countries 
and engaged in candid discussions of U.S. and 
Japanese approaches and policies with respect to 
FTAs with other countries.   Bilateral issues 
covered included Japan's continuing restrictions on 
exports of U.S. beef; a review of an Expert Level 
dialogue on public works, barriers to trade in Japan 
for marine craft; and impediments to U.S.  rice cake 
flour exports to Japan.  Japan raised  U.S. import 
and labeling procedures for organic products and 
meat extract from Japan, as well as highlighted its 
concerns with the 100 percent cargo scanning 
provisions established in the recently enacted so- 
called "9/11 Act."      END SUMMARY. 
 
---------- 
BACKGROUND 
---------- 
 
 
2. (U) On October 18 the United States and Japan 
held their fourth set of Trade Forum talks in Tokyo. 
The Trade Forum was established under the 2001 
Economic Partnership for Growth (EPG).  Assistant 
U.S. Trade Representative (AUSTR) Wendy Cutler led 
the U.S. delegation and MOFA Director-General for 
Economic Affairs Yoichi Otabe led the Japanese side. 
Immediately prior to the start of the Trade Forum, 
Cutler and Otabe exchanged recommendations under our 
bilateral Regulatory Reform Initiative, which the 
two governments carry on a separate track under the 
EPG. 
 
--------------- 
OPENING REMARKS 
--------------- 
 
3. (SBU) Otabe congratulated Cutler on the 
successful conclusion of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade 
Agreement.  He asked that Cutler now refocus her 
energies on Japan, joking that this year, unlike in 
years past, the Japanese Government could honestly 
say that it was pleased by her visit to Japan. 
Otabe expressed satisfaction that this year's 
Regulatory Reform Initiative agenda included a 
number of new items, reflecting the evolution that 
the process has undergone.  He later stated that 
success of this Initiative has led Japan to 
implement a similar dialogue with the European Union 
(EU) and possibly launch another such dialogue with 
Canada.  He emphasized the importance of U.S. 
Government action on zeroing, which he said had been 
judged to be inconsistent with U.S. obligations 
under the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
 
4. (SBU) Cutler agreed the U.S.-Japan relationship 
was changing and improving.  Noting that a number of 
items in our Regulatory Reform Initiative took on 
"urgent significance," she emphasized the following 
three areas: 1) the importance of valuing 
appropriately and rewarding innovative medical 
devices and pharmaceuticals; 2) ensuring a level 
playing field for the banking, insurance, and 
express delivery sectors during the privatization of 
Japan Post, and 3) the liberalization of bank sales 
of insurance products.  She said she also was happy 
to be discussing new issues under the Initiative. 
 
------------------------------------------- 
REPORT ON PUBLIC WORKS EXPERT-LEVEL MEETING 
------------------------------------------- 
 
5. (SBU) The Japanese delegation described as 
"productive" the July 31 bilateral public works 
expert-level meeting.  A representative from the 
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation 
(MLIT) announced that his ministry had advanced 
 
TOKYO 00005355  002 OF 008 
 
 
recommendations concerning licensing for 
construction work in the United States.  On U.S. 
concerns regarding bidding practices in Japan, he 
said that his delegation explained Japanese thinking 
as much as it could during the meeting. 
 
6. (SBU) Cutler expressed her disappointment that 
the U.S. market share in Japanese public works is 
still less than one percent.  She said she was 
pleased that the July 31 technical meeting produced 
progress on several issues and the hope that we can 
see the U.S. market share break the one percent 
level through continued work.  She noted three areas 
where she wished to see more progress and urged 
Japan to publish all definitive criteria in 
procurement notices as per the action plan so that 
U.S. firms could bid on projects. She also asked 
that MPA procedures be used for all procurements 
associated with the Chubu airport, which although 
completed is still awarding contracts.  She urged 
the GOJ ensure design firms are compensated 
appropriately for their work. 
 
7. (SBU) Commerce Department Japan Office Director 
Nicole Melcher noted progress since the 2005 Trade 
Forum in: streamlining of foreign engineers' 
registration requirements, increasing the use of 
mixed-type procurements, addressing unreasonably 
high business evaluation scores, simplifying 
documentation requirements for Public Invitation 
Proposal Procedures, providing information on Toshi 
Saisei and PFI projects, and increasing efforts to 
implement Construction Management procurements.  She 
also outlined two additional areas of concern: the 
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, and the 
three-company rule for joint ventures. 
 
8. (SBU) Otabe thanked Melcher for her report and 
said that in the wake of any progress made with the 
United States to open market access to public 
procurement, Japan experiences strong pressure from 
South Korea to receive the same treatment.  He 
emphasized the importance of regulatory transparency 
to foreigners.  Otabe described the classification 
of the Chubu airport as a future project, which may 
have had an impact on how the procurement procedures 
were implemented.  The MLIT representative suggested 
a lack of mutual understanding still remains in 
certain respects and looks forward to adding on the 
improvements that have already been made. 
 
9. (SBU) Cutler urged Japan to be more flexible 
regarding the timing of future Expert-Level Meetings 
on Public Works and noted that MLIT and the 
Department of Commerce would hold informal 
consultations the next day to discuss some of the 
topics raised in the day's session. 
 
----------------- 
U.S. AGENDA ITEMS 
----------------- 
 
-- Marine Craft: 
 
10. (SBU) With respect to marine craft, Cutler 
expressed strong frustration with having discussed 
this issue for nine years and urged Japan to adopt 
more transparent and less burdensome regulations 
that would still ensure the safety of vessels and 
engines imported to Japan.  She said she was pleased 
with Japan's adoption of certain International 
Standards Organization (ISO) standards and expressed 
the hope that Japan would adopt future international 
standards without modification. 
 
11. (SBU) Melcher highlighted better understanding 
of regulations that had been achieved through a 
digital video conference (DVC) with MLIT, and that 
there was agreement to continue holding DVCs at the 
rate of three to four per year.  The topics agreed 
upon for the next DVC focus included ISO standards 
adopted by Japan and steps Japan has taken to ensure 
the consistent application of regulations at all 
ports.  She said the USG had also agreed to include 
MLIT's request to discuss U.S. adoption of ISO 
 
TOKYO 00005355  003 OF 008 
 
 
standards during the next DVC to be held in November 
or December -- with exact dates would be worked out 
soon.  Cutler said we welcomed the agreement to 
continue DVCs and encouraged both sides to approach 
this issue with renewed energy and a commitment to 
solve problems in this area. 
 
12. (SBU) Otabe said Japan's view that the 
discussion at the working level had covered seven 
areas and had solved most issues, including plastic 
fuel tank procedures.  He noted the U.S. 
delegation's references to ISO standards, quipping 
that it had been his impression that the United 
States did not attach a great deal of importance to 
such standards.  He said that Japan had tried to 
incorporate as many ISO standards as possible into 
its regulations, noting that 40 such standards had 
been incorporated already.  Otabe concluded by 
pointing out that Japanese imports of marine craft 
from the United States were growing. 
 
-- Beef: 
 
13. (SBU) Noting the upcoming visit of USTR Special 
Envoy Richard Crowder and Deputy Undersecretary of 
Agriculture Ellen Terpstra on October 22, Cutler 
underscored the U.S. expectation that Japan reopen 
its beef market consistent with World Animal Health 
Organization (OIE) standards and implement trade 
policies that were based on science. 
 
14. (SBU) Otabe asserted that the Government of 
Japan fully shared the U.S. view on the importance 
of resolving this issue.  He also emphasized that 
Japan would work to resolve this issue in a manner 
that was consistent with "science," as Former Prime 
Minister Abe promised President Bush in September. 
He noted the need to find a practical way of moving 
the issue forward, stating that the Government of 
Japan hoped soon to finalize the draft Technical 
Working Group report on the issue. 
 
15. (SBU) Cutler raised concern that when Japan ends 
its BSE age restrictions and permits all imports of 
U.S. beef, the resulting increase in imports would 
likely trigger Japan's beef import safeguard, 
raising tariffs from 38.5% to 50%.  These safeguards, 
which are intended as a means to mitigate the 
effects of particularly dramatic import surges, 
would be inappropriate in the case of U.S. beef 
because normal market conditions do not currently 
exist in Japan given its import restrictions. 
Cutler asked that when the fiscal year regulations 
are drafted (over the next month or two), import 
safeguard measures be established in a manner that 
allows trade to return to its pre-2004 levels 
without triggering the safeguard.  Shiro Inukai, 
Deputy Director, Meat Marketing and Trade Policy 
Division, MAFF and MOFA's Otabe assured Cutler that 
her point, as well as several other factors, would 
be taken into consideration.  In fiscal years 2006 
and 2007, Japan established a more lenient safeguard 
calculation to account for an increase in imports. 
Cutler pressed them several times for more 
affirmative language ("positively"), to which they 
settled on "in a fair manner". 
 
-- Rice: 
 
16. (SBU) Cutler expressed exasperation that she had 
raised this issue at the last Trade Forum two years 
ago in Seattle but had since seen little progress. 
She noted when the Japanese rice stock release 
program was approved, Japan had promised that it 
would not disadvantage imports of U.S. rice cake 
flour mix.  However, she commented that trade data 
to date showed that it was hurting rice cake flour 
mix imports, not only from the United States, but 
from other countries as well.  Noting the exchange 
of letters from Deputy USTR Bhatia/USDA U/S Keenum 
with MAFF Vice Minister Murakami, she took issue 
with Murakami's insistence that higher U.S. prices 
for rice cake mix due to higher prices for sugar and 
California rice are the factors leading to a decline 
in U.S. rice cake imports into Japan.  In contrast, 
 
TOKYO 00005355  004 OF 008 
 
 
she said, imports had declined because Japan was 
flooding the domestic market with its release of MMA 
rice stocks that were priced significantly below 
what the product would otherwise cost in Japan. 
USDA officials passed out data to demonstrate these 
trends. 
 
17. (SBU) Otabe responded with three points.  First, 
he asserted MAFF's policies were necessary to manage 
the balance of supply and demand of a product that 
is seen as having a "special nature" in Japan.  He 
noted the overall decline in consumption of rice and 
processed rice products in Japan.  Second, Otabe 
stated the MMA system is a key component of Japan's 
effort to balance supply and demand.  He commented 
the release system expands the domestic consumption 
of MMA rice and that because this was the best use 
of it, the U.S. Government should be happy with the 
policy.  Third, Otabe referenced Murakami's letter 
and its explanation of prices as affecting Japanese 
import levels.  He also commented that high Chinese 
and Indian consumption of commodities are causing 
rising costs in general -- and are causing decreased 
import levels as a result, and not exclusively for 
rice flour cake mix. 
 
 
18. (SBU) MAFF International Affairs Director 
Tomaoki Uemura cited four factors as the primary 
culprits behind the drop in U.S. rice cake flour mix 
imports: 1) changes in foreign exchange rates that 
have weakened the Japanese yen; 2) poor rice 
harvests in California that have driven upwards the 
cost of U.S. rice; 3) the increased cost of ocean 
freight services; and 4) the increase in the price 
of sugar in the United States.  Uemura assured the 
U.S. delegation that he would continue to watch 
these trends. 
 
19. (SBU) Tokyo Senior Agricultural Attache Spencer 
noted prices for wheat, rice, corn, barley and other 
commodities have also risen dramatically, but there 
has not been a decline in Japanese imports. 
Furthermore, information USDA had received from 
traders indicated the price of released MMA rice was 
the determining factor.  An increase in unit prices 
does not necessarily translate into corresponding 
decreases in imports and that freight costs should 
affect commodities equally, he said.  He also 
asserted Japan was confusing two of its WTO 
obligations: first, its imports of MMA rice due to 
the Uruguay Round negotiations, and second, the 
status of rice flour cake mix as a bound tariff.  He 
noted MAFF's role as a state trader was impairing 
market access, clarifying that he was referring to 
Article XXIII of GATT. 
 
20. (SBU) Otabe agreed Japan needs to honor its WTO 
commitments and wondered about the demand elasticity 
of other agricultural products.  He commented on 
MAFF's efforts to preserve traditional rice-based 
products during an age of changing tastes.  He asked 
the USDA representative if his reference to Article 
XXIII was implying a possible nullification and 
impairment of U.S. market access rights, to which 
the USDA representative responded affirmatively. 
This sparked a few minutes of debate between Otabe 
and Uemura that was not translated and seemed 
moderately heated.  Finally Uemura commented on the 
impact of inflation on other commodities and said he 
would have to look into why the effect of reduced 
imports was only seen in imports of rice flour cake 
mix. (NOTE: At a reception Otabe commented privately 
he thought the rice cake flour issue presented WTO 
problems for Japan.  End Note.) 
 
--------------------- 
JAPANESE AGENDA ITEMS 
--------------------- 
 
-- Organic Farm Products 
 
21. (SBU) Otabe commented on the fact that U.S. 
regulators have not yet acted on Japan's application 
for equivalent recognition with respect to organic 
 
TOKYO 00005355  005 OF 008 
 
 
product labeling practices.  Agricultural products 
had been identified as having high export growth 
potential in Japan, he said, and the export of 
organic products represented one of Japan's highest 
priorities.  He reminded the U.S. delegation that 
Japan first submitted its application to U.S. 
regulators in early 2006.  He noted Japan had 
already granted equivalency to U.S. labeling 
procedures in this area. 
 
22. (SBU) Cutler responded that this was a win-win 
issue for both parties.  Unfortunately, she had been 
informed regulators in the U.S. have been very busy 
making revisions to the United State's own organic 
rules.  Cutler acknowledged both sides were 
frustrated and urged the Japanese delegation to 
discuss this issue further within the Regulatory 
Reform Initiative to try and seek a solution.  The 
Japanese responded that they would. 
 
-- Meat-related Substitute 
 
23. (SBU) Otabe introduced Japanese concerns that 
U.S. import regulations with respect to meat extract 
products, which are used as seasoning for processed 
foods, are unnecessarily strict and inconsistently 
applied.  Occasionally imports of these products 
from Japan are not authorized, Otabe said, but 
sometimes they are.  He asked for more clarity and 
consistency with respect to U.S. import regulations 
in this area.  A MAFF representative noted this was 
the most common complaint his agency heard from 
Japanese importers in the United States.  He said it 
was his understanding beef extract products were 
banned in the United States due to BSE concerns. 
 
24. (SBU) The USDA representative responded Japan's 
request was reasonable and promised to obtain more 
information regarding import procedures for these 
products.  The USDA representative noted more 
specific information on the products involved would 
be needed and suggested the USG should be able to 
review the request through the same channels as 
those used to review Japan's beef exports to the U.S. 
 
-- Other Issues (One Hundred Percent Cargo Scanning) 
 
25. (SBU) Otabe raised the 100 percent scanning 
requirements set out in the recently-enacted 
"Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission 
Act of 2007" ("9/11 Act").  He highlighted Japanese 
cooperation with the U.S. on a variety of security- 
related fronts since 9/11, such as the priority 
given by PM Fukuda to ensuring the extension of the 
law authorizing Japanese support to the Operation 
Enduring Freedom mission in Afghanistan.  He 
reminded the U.S. delegation of Japanese concerns 
with respect to the 100 percent scanning 
requirements in the 9/11 Act, as were laid out in a 
letter from Japanese Ambassador Kato to various U.S. 
Cabinet-level Secretaries and Members of Congress. 
Specifically, he said, the Japanese worry 
implementation of the provisions would create severe 
and unnecessary disruptions to global trade. 
 
26. (SBU) Cutler responded by recognizing the 
importance that the Japanese attach to this issue. 
She said that U.S. agencies were in the process of 
preparing a response to Ambassador Kato's letter, 
and promised to relay Otabe's concerns to the 
Department of Homeland Security and other key 
players in the U.S. Government. 
 
---------- 
FTA ISSUES 
---------- 
 
-- Next Steps on FTA Information Exchanges 
 
27. (SBU) Cutler and Otabe turned to discuss next 
steps in the exercise to exchange information our 
respective Free Trade Agreements with other 
countries, an undertaking endorsed at the December 
2006 Sub-Cabinet Economic Dialogue meeting and 
reflected in the Bush-Abe April 2007 Summit joint 
 
TOKYO 00005355  006 OF 008 
 
 
statement.  Otabe said so far exchanges of 
information had been held on eight FTA chapters. 
These exchanges had gone well and should continue 
until all relevant chapters were covered, something 
he considered a priority.  The two governments had 
some differences in their respective approaches, but 
also shared many commonalities.  Japan has engaged 
in the model measure exercise in Asia-Pacific 
Economic Cooperation (APEC), Otabe said, but the 
country's bilateral exchanges with the United States 
were of far more importance to Japan. 
 
28. (SBU) Otabe then proposed broadening the 
exchanges to cover specific issues or countries as 
opposed to the chapter-specific exchanges that had 
been conducted to date.  He noted that Japan was 
currently engaged in negotiations with certain 
developing countries, such as India and Vietnam, and 
that these talks had produced new types of 
difficulties as these countries appeared to "care 
more about their status as developing countries" 
than did other trading partners with which Japan had 
previously negotiated.  It would be interesting, 
Otabe said, to hear the United States' experience 
addressing such problems.  Japan was also very 
interested to hear about the United States' 
experience negotiating with Korea.  He proposed we 
report on our experiences to date during the 
upcoming Sub-Cabinet dialogue scheduled in December. 
 
29. (SBU) The U.S. Government had also found the FTA 
information exchanges useful, Cutler told Otabe, and 
agreed they should continue.  She added that she 
would like to see information exchanges on chapters 
that the U.S. includes in its FTAs but that are not 
present in the Japanese Economic Partnership 
Agreements (EPAs, the preferred Japanese lexicon for 
their agreements).  Cutler listed as examples the 
U.S. chapters on labor, environmental issues, and 
pharmaceuticals and medical devices. 
 
30. (SBU) Otabe agreed there was no reason to 
exclude such chapters.  Japanese EPAs may not 
include specific chapters devoted to these issues, 
but they are addressed in some manner, including 
labor and environment.  It would be interesting to 
hear the U.S. experience in these areas, he said, 
since they are likely to gain importance over time. 
If the U.S. side was interested, Otabe proposed 
sharing the Japanese experience with providing 
environmental and labor cooperation within the 
context of the Association of Southeast Asian 
Nations (ASEAN). 
 
31. (SBU) Cutler emphasized the importance of 
deciding "how to report on our work."  She said the 
immediate concern was reporting to the Sub-Cabinet, 
but expressed concerns such a report would not be 
finished in time for its next meeting in December, 
particularly given past experiences where such 
documents had required protracted negotiations on 
both sides.  Both Cutler and Otabe agreed given time 
constraints the best option would be to prepare a 
short, factual paper (rather than a lengthy 
analytical piece) identifying the similarities and 
differences in our FTAs.  Cutler suggested the 
report could be even more ambitious, to which Otabe 
agreed.  Cutler said she would need to discuss the 
proposal with her colleagues and provide an official 
response at a later date.  With respect to 
developing countries that attempt to leverage their 
developing status to obtain special and differential 
(S&D) status, Cutler said that we look at metrics on 
whether a trading partner is developing or developed. 
 
32. (SBU) Otabe pointed out the U.S. had initiated 
some FTA discussions with South Africa, a country 
where Japan has had poor experience in negotiations. 
He also noted one of Japan's current priorities is 
in the development of activities in energy-rich 
countries, an area where he would be interested to 
hear the U.S. experience.  A Ministry of Economy, 
Trade and Industry (METI) representative pointed out 
that the U.S. and Japan had both negotiated with 
Malaysia, and it would be useful to compare and 
 
TOKYO 00005355  007 OF 008 
 
 
contrast their respective experiences there.   With 
respect to the report, she emphasized that she and 
Otabe would need to be personally involved to ensure 
that the draft does not become held up due to 
procedural differences.  She also noted no U.S. FTA 
beyond NAFTA had included energy security issues. 
 
-- Updates on FTAs with Third Countries 
 
33. (SBU) Otabe began with an update on the status 
of Japan's ongoing EPA negotiations.  He noted two 
new EPAs came into effect in 2007: one with Chile 
and another with Singapore. (The Singapore EPA was 
actually a revision of a prior EPA with that trading 
partner; the revision grants additional tariff 
concessions to Singapore in return for more 
concessions from Singapore with respect to financial 
services.)  So far in 2007, Japan has signed EPAs 
with Thailand, Brunei, and Indonesia.  The EPA with 
Thailand was approved by the Diet, but further 
action remained on hold pending more progress 
towards democracy in that country.  Japan would like 
to submit the Brunei and Indonesia EPAs to the Diet, 
but the legislative priority at the moment remains 
renewal of Japan's OEF mission.  Those EPAs will 
need majorities in both Houses of the Diet, but 
Otabe noted this probably will not be difficult 
because both political parties tend to support 
Japan's negotiation of EPAs. 
 
34. (SBU) Japan has started negotiations with 
Vietnam and India, but the talks have encountered 
problems.  The two countries are insisting that, due 
to their developing status, they can offer no more 
than 80 percent trade liberalization (though they 
are happy to accept Japan's 90 percent).  Cutler 
asked how Japan defines "substantially all trade" 
for the purposes of GATT Article 24.  Japan replied, 
"[trade liberalization of] 90 percent and above." 
Because India and Vietnam were offering only 80 
percent trade liberalization, there were some 
questions about whether Japan could continue 
negotiations with those parties. 
 
35. (SBU) With respect to Australia, Otabe indicated 
two rounds of talks have taken place since their 
launch, with the third round scheduled for November. 
Otabe said his government had encountered strong 
resistance from farmers and some Diet members, who 
were pressuring MOFA not to proceed with the 
negotiations given their strong agricultural 
components.  As such, Otabe said he was "not 
optimistic" about the prospects for a speedy 
conclusion. 
 
36. (SBU) Japan has also begun EPA negotiations with 
Switzerland, though Otabe admitted he was not sure 
why that country was chosen as a partner. 
Negotiations with Korea have been suspended since 
March 2004.  Japan successfully negotiated a 
collective goods plus services agreement with ASEAN, 
but Japan will now be required to negotiate 
individually with each member country because ASEAN 
lacks collective bargaining power.  In response to a 
question from Cutler, Otabe conceded the negotiation 
with ASEAN included Burma.  However, because most of 
Burma's products already enter Japan duty-free due 
to Burma's Least-Developed Country (LDC) status, 
Otabe did not anticipate the agreement would yield 
many further gains for Burma. 
 
37. (SBU) With respect to the potential of an 
FTA/EPA with a "large economy," Otabe said since the 
successful conclusion of the Korea-U.S. FTA 
negotiation, business associations such as Keidanren 
have urged The GOJ to pursue EPAs with similar 
"large economies."  However, as a practical matter, 
the Japanese Government recognizes it is not in any 
position to pursue such negotiations at this time. 
In response to a question from Cutler, Otabe said 
discussions with the EU are being undertaken within 
separate business sector study groups in Japan and 
the EU, and are not to be considered government-to- 
government. 
 
 
TOKYO 00005355  008 OF 008 
 
 
38. (SBU) Cutler then offered an overview of the 
status U.S. FTA negotiations.  Among other issues, 
she discussed the successful conclusion of the 
Korea-U.S. FTA.  During this segment Otabe 
interrupted her to ask whether non-tariff barriers 
were a problem in Korea.  Cutler responded there was 
a whole range of barriers that had to be addressed 
in the talks.  In this respect, the U.S. - Japan 
Regulatory Reform dialogue had been instructive in 
advancing the KORUS agenda. 
 
39. (SBU) Otabe then said he had heard German 
Chancellor and EU President Merkel had wanted to 
initiate FTA negotiations with the U.S, but had 
found little support from her colleagues to do so. 
He asked as well about the U.S.-EU Transatlantic 
Economic Council and the work the U.S, and EU are 
doing to remove regulatory barriers to economic 
engagement.  Embassy Tokyo EMIN reviewed the 
development of the Transatlantic Economic Council 
over the previous year.  Otabe appreciated hearing 
what the U.S. and EU had done to revitalize efforts 
to remove barriers to economic engagement, to boost 
transparency and find ways U.S. and EU regulators 
could be aware of each other's work and goals, and 
to improve the overall business climate to expand 
transatlantic ties and prosperity.  EMIN noted there 
may be lessons to draw into the work between the U.S. 
and Japan. 
 
--------------- 
CLOSING REMARKS 
--------------- 
 
40. (SBU) Cutler thanked Otabe and the Japanese 
delegation and suggested using the Trade Forum as a 
venue to discuss other cross-cutting trade policy 
issues in the future. 
 
41. (SBU) Otabe responded he too would like to see 
the Trade Forum used to discuss other types of 
issues such as intellectual property rights (IPR), 
China, and climate change.  In a theme he returned 
to several times during the day, he said that in 
contrast with the trade wars of the past Japan and 
the United States today shared many interests and 
objectives.  He reiterated Japan was very pleased by 
Cutler's visit, and expressed his hope that she 
would come to Japan more often now that the Japan- 
Korea FTA had been concluded. 
 
This cable was cleared by USTR, Commerce and USDA. 
SCHIEFFER