Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07TOKYO5355, READOUT OF US-JAPAN TRADE FORUM
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO5355.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07TOKYO5355 | 2007-11-28 04:36 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO7461
RR RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #5355/01 3320436
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 280436Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9815
INFO RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4609
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 3385
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7012
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8274
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5271
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 TOKYO 005355
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR AUSTR WCUTLER
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECONETRDEAGRJA
SUBJECT: READOUT OF US-JAPAN TRADE FORUM
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: An array of bilateral trade
issues were addressed and policy discussions on FTAs
held in the fourth meeting of the U.S.-Japan Trade
Forum in Tokyo on October 18. Assistant U.S. Trade
Representative Wendy Cutler led the U.S. delegation,
while Director General for Economic Affairs Yoichi
Otabe led the Japanese side. In the talks, both
sides agreed to continue their information exchanges
on free trade agreements (FTAs) with third countries
and engaged in candid discussions of U.S. and
Japanese approaches and policies with respect to
FTAs with other countries. Bilateral issues
covered included Japan's continuing restrictions on
exports of U.S. beef; a review of an Expert Level
dialogue on public works, barriers to trade in Japan
for marine craft; and impediments to U.S. rice cake
flour exports to Japan. Japan raised U.S. import
and labeling procedures for organic products and
meat extract from Japan, as well as highlighted its
concerns with the 100 percent cargo scanning
provisions established in the recently enacted so-
called "9/11 Act." END SUMMARY.
----------
BACKGROUND
----------
¶2. (U) On October 18 the United States and Japan
held their fourth set of Trade Forum talks in Tokyo.
The Trade Forum was established under the 2001
Economic Partnership for Growth (EPG). Assistant
U.S. Trade Representative (AUSTR) Wendy Cutler led
the U.S. delegation and MOFA Director-General for
Economic Affairs Yoichi Otabe led the Japanese side.
Immediately prior to the start of the Trade Forum,
Cutler and Otabe exchanged recommendations under our
bilateral Regulatory Reform Initiative, which the
two governments carry on a separate track under the
EPG.
---------------
OPENING REMARKS
---------------
¶3. (SBU) Otabe congratulated Cutler on the
successful conclusion of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade
Agreement. He asked that Cutler now refocus her
energies on Japan, joking that this year, unlike in
years past, the Japanese Government could honestly
say that it was pleased by her visit to Japan.
Otabe expressed satisfaction that this year's
Regulatory Reform Initiative agenda included a
number of new items, reflecting the evolution that
the process has undergone. He later stated that
success of this Initiative has led Japan to
implement a similar dialogue with the European Union
(EU) and possibly launch another such dialogue with
Canada. He emphasized the importance of U.S.
Government action on zeroing, which he said had been
judged to be inconsistent with U.S. obligations
under the World Trade Organization (WTO).
¶4. (SBU) Cutler agreed the U.S.-Japan relationship
was changing and improving. Noting that a number of
items in our Regulatory Reform Initiative took on
"urgent significance," she emphasized the following
three areas: 1) the importance of valuing
appropriately and rewarding innovative medical
devices and pharmaceuticals; 2) ensuring a level
playing field for the banking, insurance, and
express delivery sectors during the privatization of
Japan Post, and 3) the liberalization of bank sales
of insurance products. She said she also was happy
to be discussing new issues under the Initiative.
-------------------------------------------
REPORT ON PUBLIC WORKS EXPERT-LEVEL MEETING
-------------------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The Japanese delegation described as
"productive" the July 31 bilateral public works
expert-level meeting. A representative from the
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation
(MLIT) announced that his ministry had advanced
TOKYO 00005355 002 OF 008
recommendations concerning licensing for
construction work in the United States. On U.S.
concerns regarding bidding practices in Japan, he
said that his delegation explained Japanese thinking
as much as it could during the meeting.
¶6. (SBU) Cutler expressed her disappointment that
the U.S. market share in Japanese public works is
still less than one percent. She said she was
pleased that the July 31 technical meeting produced
progress on several issues and the hope that we can
see the U.S. market share break the one percent
level through continued work. She noted three areas
where she wished to see more progress and urged
Japan to publish all definitive criteria in
procurement notices as per the action plan so that
U.S. firms could bid on projects. She also asked
that MPA procedures be used for all procurements
associated with the Chubu airport, which although
completed is still awarding contracts. She urged
the GOJ ensure design firms are compensated
appropriately for their work.
¶7. (SBU) Commerce Department Japan Office Director
Nicole Melcher noted progress since the 2005 Trade
Forum in: streamlining of foreign engineers'
registration requirements, increasing the use of
mixed-type procurements, addressing unreasonably
high business evaluation scores, simplifying
documentation requirements for Public Invitation
Proposal Procedures, providing information on Toshi
Saisei and PFI projects, and increasing efforts to
implement Construction Management procurements. She
also outlined two additional areas of concern: the
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, and the
three-company rule for joint ventures.
¶8. (SBU) Otabe thanked Melcher for her report and
said that in the wake of any progress made with the
United States to open market access to public
procurement, Japan experiences strong pressure from
South Korea to receive the same treatment. He
emphasized the importance of regulatory transparency
to foreigners. Otabe described the classification
of the Chubu airport as a future project, which may
have had an impact on how the procurement procedures
were implemented. The MLIT representative suggested
a lack of mutual understanding still remains in
certain respects and looks forward to adding on the
improvements that have already been made.
¶9. (SBU) Cutler urged Japan to be more flexible
regarding the timing of future Expert-Level Meetings
on Public Works and noted that MLIT and the
Department of Commerce would hold informal
consultations the next day to discuss some of the
topics raised in the day's session.
-----------------
U.S. AGENDA ITEMS
-----------------
-- Marine Craft:
¶10. (SBU) With respect to marine craft, Cutler
expressed strong frustration with having discussed
this issue for nine years and urged Japan to adopt
more transparent and less burdensome regulations
that would still ensure the safety of vessels and
engines imported to Japan. She said she was pleased
with Japan's adoption of certain International
Standards Organization (ISO) standards and expressed
the hope that Japan would adopt future international
standards without modification.
¶11. (SBU) Melcher highlighted better understanding
of regulations that had been achieved through a
digital video conference (DVC) with MLIT, and that
there was agreement to continue holding DVCs at the
rate of three to four per year. The topics agreed
upon for the next DVC focus included ISO standards
adopted by Japan and steps Japan has taken to ensure
the consistent application of regulations at all
ports. She said the USG had also agreed to include
MLIT's request to discuss U.S. adoption of ISO
TOKYO 00005355 003 OF 008
standards during the next DVC to be held in November
or December -- with exact dates would be worked out
soon. Cutler said we welcomed the agreement to
continue DVCs and encouraged both sides to approach
this issue with renewed energy and a commitment to
solve problems in this area.
¶12. (SBU) Otabe said Japan's view that the
discussion at the working level had covered seven
areas and had solved most issues, including plastic
fuel tank procedures. He noted the U.S.
delegation's references to ISO standards, quipping
that it had been his impression that the United
States did not attach a great deal of importance to
such standards. He said that Japan had tried to
incorporate as many ISO standards as possible into
its regulations, noting that 40 such standards had
been incorporated already. Otabe concluded by
pointing out that Japanese imports of marine craft
from the United States were growing.
-- Beef:
¶13. (SBU) Noting the upcoming visit of USTR Special
Envoy Richard Crowder and Deputy Undersecretary of
Agriculture Ellen Terpstra on October 22, Cutler
underscored the U.S. expectation that Japan reopen
its beef market consistent with World Animal Health
Organization (OIE) standards and implement trade
policies that were based on science.
¶14. (SBU) Otabe asserted that the Government of
Japan fully shared the U.S. view on the importance
of resolving this issue. He also emphasized that
Japan would work to resolve this issue in a manner
that was consistent with "science," as Former Prime
Minister Abe promised President Bush in September.
He noted the need to find a practical way of moving
the issue forward, stating that the Government of
Japan hoped soon to finalize the draft Technical
Working Group report on the issue.
¶15. (SBU) Cutler raised concern that when Japan ends
its BSE age restrictions and permits all imports of
U.S. beef, the resulting increase in imports would
likely trigger Japan's beef import safeguard,
raising tariffs from 38.5% to 50%. These safeguards,
which are intended as a means to mitigate the
effects of particularly dramatic import surges,
would be inappropriate in the case of U.S. beef
because normal market conditions do not currently
exist in Japan given its import restrictions.
Cutler asked that when the fiscal year regulations
are drafted (over the next month or two), import
safeguard measures be established in a manner that
allows trade to return to its pre-2004 levels
without triggering the safeguard. Shiro Inukai,
Deputy Director, Meat Marketing and Trade Policy
Division, MAFF and MOFA's Otabe assured Cutler that
her point, as well as several other factors, would
be taken into consideration. In fiscal years 2006
and 2007, Japan established a more lenient safeguard
calculation to account for an increase in imports.
Cutler pressed them several times for more
affirmative language ("positively"), to which they
settled on "in a fair manner".
-- Rice:
¶16. (SBU) Cutler expressed exasperation that she had
raised this issue at the last Trade Forum two years
ago in Seattle but had since seen little progress.
She noted when the Japanese rice stock release
program was approved, Japan had promised that it
would not disadvantage imports of U.S. rice cake
flour mix. However, she commented that trade data
to date showed that it was hurting rice cake flour
mix imports, not only from the United States, but
from other countries as well. Noting the exchange
of letters from Deputy USTR Bhatia/USDA U/S Keenum
with MAFF Vice Minister Murakami, she took issue
with Murakami's insistence that higher U.S. prices
for rice cake mix due to higher prices for sugar and
California rice are the factors leading to a decline
in U.S. rice cake imports into Japan. In contrast,
TOKYO 00005355 004 OF 008
she said, imports had declined because Japan was
flooding the domestic market with its release of MMA
rice stocks that were priced significantly below
what the product would otherwise cost in Japan.
USDA officials passed out data to demonstrate these
trends.
¶17. (SBU) Otabe responded with three points. First,
he asserted MAFF's policies were necessary to manage
the balance of supply and demand of a product that
is seen as having a "special nature" in Japan. He
noted the overall decline in consumption of rice and
processed rice products in Japan. Second, Otabe
stated the MMA system is a key component of Japan's
effort to balance supply and demand. He commented
the release system expands the domestic consumption
of MMA rice and that because this was the best use
of it, the U.S. Government should be happy with the
policy. Third, Otabe referenced Murakami's letter
and its explanation of prices as affecting Japanese
import levels. He also commented that high Chinese
and Indian consumption of commodities are causing
rising costs in general -- and are causing decreased
import levels as a result, and not exclusively for
rice flour cake mix.
¶18. (SBU) MAFF International Affairs Director
Tomaoki Uemura cited four factors as the primary
culprits behind the drop in U.S. rice cake flour mix
imports: 1) changes in foreign exchange rates that
have weakened the Japanese yen; 2) poor rice
harvests in California that have driven upwards the
cost of U.S. rice; 3) the increased cost of ocean
freight services; and 4) the increase in the price
of sugar in the United States. Uemura assured the
U.S. delegation that he would continue to watch
these trends.
¶19. (SBU) Tokyo Senior Agricultural Attache Spencer
noted prices for wheat, rice, corn, barley and other
commodities have also risen dramatically, but there
has not been a decline in Japanese imports.
Furthermore, information USDA had received from
traders indicated the price of released MMA rice was
the determining factor. An increase in unit prices
does not necessarily translate into corresponding
decreases in imports and that freight costs should
affect commodities equally, he said. He also
asserted Japan was confusing two of its WTO
obligations: first, its imports of MMA rice due to
the Uruguay Round negotiations, and second, the
status of rice flour cake mix as a bound tariff. He
noted MAFF's role as a state trader was impairing
market access, clarifying that he was referring to
Article XXIII of GATT.
¶20. (SBU) Otabe agreed Japan needs to honor its WTO
commitments and wondered about the demand elasticity
of other agricultural products. He commented on
MAFF's efforts to preserve traditional rice-based
products during an age of changing tastes. He asked
the USDA representative if his reference to Article
XXIII was implying a possible nullification and
impairment of U.S. market access rights, to which
the USDA representative responded affirmatively.
This sparked a few minutes of debate between Otabe
and Uemura that was not translated and seemed
moderately heated. Finally Uemura commented on the
impact of inflation on other commodities and said he
would have to look into why the effect of reduced
imports was only seen in imports of rice flour cake
mix. (NOTE: At a reception Otabe commented privately
he thought the rice cake flour issue presented WTO
problems for Japan. End Note.)
---------------------
JAPANESE AGENDA ITEMS
---------------------
-- Organic Farm Products
¶21. (SBU) Otabe commented on the fact that U.S.
regulators have not yet acted on Japan's application
for equivalent recognition with respect to organic
TOKYO 00005355 005 OF 008
product labeling practices. Agricultural products
had been identified as having high export growth
potential in Japan, he said, and the export of
organic products represented one of Japan's highest
priorities. He reminded the U.S. delegation that
Japan first submitted its application to U.S.
regulators in early 2006. He noted Japan had
already granted equivalency to U.S. labeling
procedures in this area.
¶22. (SBU) Cutler responded that this was a win-win
issue for both parties. Unfortunately, she had been
informed regulators in the U.S. have been very busy
making revisions to the United State's own organic
rules. Cutler acknowledged both sides were
frustrated and urged the Japanese delegation to
discuss this issue further within the Regulatory
Reform Initiative to try and seek a solution. The
Japanese responded that they would.
-- Meat-related Substitute
¶23. (SBU) Otabe introduced Japanese concerns that
U.S. import regulations with respect to meat extract
products, which are used as seasoning for processed
foods, are unnecessarily strict and inconsistently
applied. Occasionally imports of these products
from Japan are not authorized, Otabe said, but
sometimes they are. He asked for more clarity and
consistency with respect to U.S. import regulations
in this area. A MAFF representative noted this was
the most common complaint his agency heard from
Japanese importers in the United States. He said it
was his understanding beef extract products were
banned in the United States due to BSE concerns.
¶24. (SBU) The USDA representative responded Japan's
request was reasonable and promised to obtain more
information regarding import procedures for these
products. The USDA representative noted more
specific information on the products involved would
be needed and suggested the USG should be able to
review the request through the same channels as
those used to review Japan's beef exports to the U.S.
-- Other Issues (One Hundred Percent Cargo Scanning)
¶25. (SBU) Otabe raised the 100 percent scanning
requirements set out in the recently-enacted
"Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission
Act of 2007" ("9/11 Act"). He highlighted Japanese
cooperation with the U.S. on a variety of security-
related fronts since 9/11, such as the priority
given by PM Fukuda to ensuring the extension of the
law authorizing Japanese support to the Operation
Enduring Freedom mission in Afghanistan. He
reminded the U.S. delegation of Japanese concerns
with respect to the 100 percent scanning
requirements in the 9/11 Act, as were laid out in a
letter from Japanese Ambassador Kato to various U.S.
Cabinet-level Secretaries and Members of Congress.
Specifically, he said, the Japanese worry
implementation of the provisions would create severe
and unnecessary disruptions to global trade.
¶26. (SBU) Cutler responded by recognizing the
importance that the Japanese attach to this issue.
She said that U.S. agencies were in the process of
preparing a response to Ambassador Kato's letter,
and promised to relay Otabe's concerns to the
Department of Homeland Security and other key
players in the U.S. Government.
----------
FTA ISSUES
----------
-- Next Steps on FTA Information Exchanges
¶27. (SBU) Cutler and Otabe turned to discuss next
steps in the exercise to exchange information our
respective Free Trade Agreements with other
countries, an undertaking endorsed at the December
2006 Sub-Cabinet Economic Dialogue meeting and
reflected in the Bush-Abe April 2007 Summit joint
TOKYO 00005355 006 OF 008
statement. Otabe said so far exchanges of
information had been held on eight FTA chapters.
These exchanges had gone well and should continue
until all relevant chapters were covered, something
he considered a priority. The two governments had
some differences in their respective approaches, but
also shared many commonalities. Japan has engaged
in the model measure exercise in Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation (APEC), Otabe said, but the
country's bilateral exchanges with the United States
were of far more importance to Japan.
¶28. (SBU) Otabe then proposed broadening the
exchanges to cover specific issues or countries as
opposed to the chapter-specific exchanges that had
been conducted to date. He noted that Japan was
currently engaged in negotiations with certain
developing countries, such as India and Vietnam, and
that these talks had produced new types of
difficulties as these countries appeared to "care
more about their status as developing countries"
than did other trading partners with which Japan had
previously negotiated. It would be interesting,
Otabe said, to hear the United States' experience
addressing such problems. Japan was also very
interested to hear about the United States'
experience negotiating with Korea. He proposed we
report on our experiences to date during the
upcoming Sub-Cabinet dialogue scheduled in December.
¶29. (SBU) The U.S. Government had also found the FTA
information exchanges useful, Cutler told Otabe, and
agreed they should continue. She added that she
would like to see information exchanges on chapters
that the U.S. includes in its FTAs but that are not
present in the Japanese Economic Partnership
Agreements (EPAs, the preferred Japanese lexicon for
their agreements). Cutler listed as examples the
U.S. chapters on labor, environmental issues, and
pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
¶30. (SBU) Otabe agreed there was no reason to
exclude such chapters. Japanese EPAs may not
include specific chapters devoted to these issues,
but they are addressed in some manner, including
labor and environment. It would be interesting to
hear the U.S. experience in these areas, he said,
since they are likely to gain importance over time.
If the U.S. side was interested, Otabe proposed
sharing the Japanese experience with providing
environmental and labor cooperation within the
context of the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN).
¶31. (SBU) Cutler emphasized the importance of
deciding "how to report on our work." She said the
immediate concern was reporting to the Sub-Cabinet,
but expressed concerns such a report would not be
finished in time for its next meeting in December,
particularly given past experiences where such
documents had required protracted negotiations on
both sides. Both Cutler and Otabe agreed given time
constraints the best option would be to prepare a
short, factual paper (rather than a lengthy
analytical piece) identifying the similarities and
differences in our FTAs. Cutler suggested the
report could be even more ambitious, to which Otabe
agreed. Cutler said she would need to discuss the
proposal with her colleagues and provide an official
response at a later date. With respect to
developing countries that attempt to leverage their
developing status to obtain special and differential
(S&D) status, Cutler said that we look at metrics on
whether a trading partner is developing or developed.
¶32. (SBU) Otabe pointed out the U.S. had initiated
some FTA discussions with South Africa, a country
where Japan has had poor experience in negotiations.
He also noted one of Japan's current priorities is
in the development of activities in energy-rich
countries, an area where he would be interested to
hear the U.S. experience. A Ministry of Economy,
Trade and Industry (METI) representative pointed out
that the U.S. and Japan had both negotiated with
Malaysia, and it would be useful to compare and
TOKYO 00005355 007 OF 008
contrast their respective experiences there. With
respect to the report, she emphasized that she and
Otabe would need to be personally involved to ensure
that the draft does not become held up due to
procedural differences. She also noted no U.S. FTA
beyond NAFTA had included energy security issues.
-- Updates on FTAs with Third Countries
¶33. (SBU) Otabe began with an update on the status
of Japan's ongoing EPA negotiations. He noted two
new EPAs came into effect in 2007: one with Chile
and another with Singapore. (The Singapore EPA was
actually a revision of a prior EPA with that trading
partner; the revision grants additional tariff
concessions to Singapore in return for more
concessions from Singapore with respect to financial
services.) So far in 2007, Japan has signed EPAs
with Thailand, Brunei, and Indonesia. The EPA with
Thailand was approved by the Diet, but further
action remained on hold pending more progress
towards democracy in that country. Japan would like
to submit the Brunei and Indonesia EPAs to the Diet,
but the legislative priority at the moment remains
renewal of Japan's OEF mission. Those EPAs will
need majorities in both Houses of the Diet, but
Otabe noted this probably will not be difficult
because both political parties tend to support
Japan's negotiation of EPAs.
¶34. (SBU) Japan has started negotiations with
Vietnam and India, but the talks have encountered
problems. The two countries are insisting that, due
to their developing status, they can offer no more
than 80 percent trade liberalization (though they
are happy to accept Japan's 90 percent). Cutler
asked how Japan defines "substantially all trade"
for the purposes of GATT Article 24. Japan replied,
"[trade liberalization of] 90 percent and above."
Because India and Vietnam were offering only 80
percent trade liberalization, there were some
questions about whether Japan could continue
negotiations with those parties.
¶35. (SBU) With respect to Australia, Otabe indicated
two rounds of talks have taken place since their
launch, with the third round scheduled for November.
Otabe said his government had encountered strong
resistance from farmers and some Diet members, who
were pressuring MOFA not to proceed with the
negotiations given their strong agricultural
components. As such, Otabe said he was "not
optimistic" about the prospects for a speedy
conclusion.
¶36. (SBU) Japan has also begun EPA negotiations with
Switzerland, though Otabe admitted he was not sure
why that country was chosen as a partner.
Negotiations with Korea have been suspended since
March 2004. Japan successfully negotiated a
collective goods plus services agreement with ASEAN,
but Japan will now be required to negotiate
individually with each member country because ASEAN
lacks collective bargaining power. In response to a
question from Cutler, Otabe conceded the negotiation
with ASEAN included Burma. However, because most of
Burma's products already enter Japan duty-free due
to Burma's Least-Developed Country (LDC) status,
Otabe did not anticipate the agreement would yield
many further gains for Burma.
¶37. (SBU) With respect to the potential of an
FTA/EPA with a "large economy," Otabe said since the
successful conclusion of the Korea-U.S. FTA
negotiation, business associations such as Keidanren
have urged The GOJ to pursue EPAs with similar
"large economies." However, as a practical matter,
the Japanese Government recognizes it is not in any
position to pursue such negotiations at this time.
In response to a question from Cutler, Otabe said
discussions with the EU are being undertaken within
separate business sector study groups in Japan and
the EU, and are not to be considered government-to-
government.
TOKYO 00005355 008 OF 008
¶38. (SBU) Cutler then offered an overview of the
status U.S. FTA negotiations. Among other issues,
she discussed the successful conclusion of the
Korea-U.S. FTA. During this segment Otabe
interrupted her to ask whether non-tariff barriers
were a problem in Korea. Cutler responded there was
a whole range of barriers that had to be addressed
in the talks. In this respect, the U.S. - Japan
Regulatory Reform dialogue had been instructive in
advancing the KORUS agenda.
¶39. (SBU) Otabe then said he had heard German
Chancellor and EU President Merkel had wanted to
initiate FTA negotiations with the U.S, but had
found little support from her colleagues to do so.
He asked as well about the U.S.-EU Transatlantic
Economic Council and the work the U.S, and EU are
doing to remove regulatory barriers to economic
engagement. Embassy Tokyo EMIN reviewed the
development of the Transatlantic Economic Council
over the previous year. Otabe appreciated hearing
what the U.S. and EU had done to revitalize efforts
to remove barriers to economic engagement, to boost
transparency and find ways U.S. and EU regulators
could be aware of each other's work and goals, and
to improve the overall business climate to expand
transatlantic ties and prosperity. EMIN noted there
may be lessons to draw into the work between the U.S.
and Japan.
---------------
CLOSING REMARKS
---------------
¶40. (SBU) Cutler thanked Otabe and the Japanese
delegation and suggested using the Trade Forum as a
venue to discuss other cross-cutting trade policy
issues in the future.
¶41. (SBU) Otabe responded he too would like to see
the Trade Forum used to discuss other types of
issues such as intellectual property rights (IPR),
China, and climate change. In a theme he returned
to several times during the day, he said that in
contrast with the trade wars of the past Japan and
the United States today shared many interests and
objectives. He reiterated Japan was very pleased by
Cutler's visit, and expressed his hope that she
would come to Japan more often now that the Japan-
Korea FTA had been concluded.
This cable was cleared by USTR, Commerce and USDA.
SCHIEFFER