Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07TOKYO5099, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 11/02/07
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO5099.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07TOKYO5099 | 2007-11-02 08:04 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO6188
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #5099/01 3060804
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 020804Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9193
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 6570
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4162
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 7829
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 2993
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 4841
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9900
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 5956
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 6752
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 15 TOKYO 005099
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA;
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 11/02/07
Index:
(1) Dispatch of SDF overseas under a permanent law would be
"conditioned on a UN resolution," says Foreign Minister Koumura
(Yomiuri Online)
(2) Japan's calling-off of MSDF refueling activities: US irritated
at do-nothing policy; Japan urged to take next step (Mainichi)
(3) MSDF pullout from Indian Ocean (Part 1): SDF adrift over
international contributions; With series of scandals involving
Defense ministry, organizational reform being called for (Nikkei)
(4) Steep road ahead for resumption of refueling operation (Nikkei)
(5) MSDF pullout: Japan's role hardly replaceable with another
country (Yomiuri)
(6) Path to resuming refueling operation not in sight (Asahi)
(7) End of MSDF refueling mission: Enormous national interests to be
lost, including military intelligence, relationship of alliance;
crude oil, etc (Yomiuri) .
(8) Editorial: Prime Minister Fukuda should show resolve to pass new
refueling bill (Sankei)
(9) Futenma alternative: Gov. Nakaima proposed offshore relocation
up to 215 meters (Ryukyu Shimpo)
(10) Fukuda, Ozawa desperate to put cap on rumor on LDP-DPJ "grand
alliance" (Sankei)
ARTICLES:
(1) Dispatch of SDF overseas under a permanent law would be
"conditioned on a UN resolution," says Foreign Minister Koumura
(Yomiuri Online)
YOMIURI ONLINE (Full)
November 2, 2007
Meeting with the press after a cabinet meeting this morning, Foreign
Minister Koumura expressed his view that in case a permanent law
(regular law) for overseas dispatch of the Self-Defense Forces (SDF)
is enacted, the dispatch of the SDF should be conditioned on a
United Nations resolution.
The foreign minister said:
"Although there is a problem of setting the conditions so strict
that the law would actually never be used, it would be difficult to
create (a permanent law) without adding the condition of a UN
resolution. In case we wanted to send out the SDF without a UN
resolution, that would be done by a political decision at the time
(such as to enact a special measures law)."
On the other hand, Defense Minister Ishiba at his press conference
said: "For various reasons, there is not always a UN resolution
issued. The way Japan determines it fate is to entrust it to the
Diet, which represents the Japanese people. That seems to be way we
TOKYO 00005099 002 OF 015
do things." In his view, therefore, (SDF dispatches) should be
premised on the involvement of the Diet and not necessarily on a UN
resolution.
On this issue, Democratic Party of Japan President Ozawa has
indicated his view that in case a general law is enacted, the
condition should be a UN resolution.
(2) Japan's calling-off of MSDF refueling activities: US irritated
at do-nothing policy; Japan urged to take next step
MAINICHI (Page 3) (Full)
November 1, 2007
Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force has been tasked with refueling
operations in the Indian Ocean for about six years under the
Antiterrorism Special Measures Law. Today, the MSDF's refueling
mission there will end as the antiterror law runs out. The MSDF's
refueling in the Indian Ocean came up as a point of contention
between the ruling and opposition blocs in the Diet, with the
leading opposition Democratic Party of Japan (Minshuto) winning a
landslide victory in this summer's election for the House of
Councillors. Shortly thereafter, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe stepped
down. Japan will now lose the pillar of its activities in the war on
terror. Other countries are having a hard time of it. They are also
getting troubled. Even so, they are hanging in there on the
battlefield. Where will Japan go in its international cooperation?
The government has now introduced a new antiterror legislative
measure to the Diet in order for Japan to resume refueling
activities. The legislation, however, is not expected to get through
the Diet. In the Diet, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the
DPJ are trying to find a way out of the impasse.
"We hope all Japanese lawmakers will understand that this operation
is an international mission. This is an issue beyond political
parties."
On the morning of Oct. 13, the Canadian Embassy in Tokyo hosted an
international joint briefing. There were ambassadors from 11
countries, including the United States, Britain, Germany, and
France. Those 11 countries are participating in Operation Enduring
Freedom and Maritime Interdiction Operations (OEF-MIO) in the Indian
Ocean. The Afghan ambassador was also there. In the briefing were
about 70 Japanese lawmakers from the ruling and opposition parties.
In their presence, the diplomatic corps from those OEF-MIO
constituent members emphasized the need for Japan to keep up the
MSDF's refueling activities in the Indian Ocean. After the briefing,
US Ambassador to Japan Schieffer made the foregoing remarks as he
met reporters.
Even so, the war on terror is led by the United States. US oilers
are expected to reschedule their missions in order to make up for
the gap after Japan's pullout. Japan's breakaway will compel the
United States to bear the burden. This is the way the alliance
actually is. Meanwhile, US warships are suspected of having used
MSDF-supplied fuel for the Iraq war. This suspicion also irritates
the US government.
Any chance for Japan to resume its refueling activities at an early
date, or otherwise switch to something new? Japan will now call off
the MSDF's refueling mission. What is the next step for Japan to
rejoin the war on terror? The ruling and opposition parties are both
TOKYO 00005099 003 OF 015
tasked with such a challenge. On Oct. 30, Prime Minister Yasuo
Fukuda and DPJ President Ichiro Ozawa met in a hurry. That is also
because they were urged to do so for Japan's international
obligations.
"About the idea of creating a general (permanent) law, there were
proposals from DPJ people and many others in the process of
deliberating on the Iraq Special Measures Law. This is an important
challenge in store for the future. We will have to create an
opportunity as soon as possible (to discuss the idea)." With this,
Fukuda, in his parliamentary reply to a question asked by Akihisa
Nagashima from the DPJ, emphasized his view before the House of
Representatives Special Committee on Antiterror Measures during its
meeting right after his meeting with Ozawa. Nagashima, in his
interpellation, called the government's new antiterror legislation
"too shortsighted."
Fukuda was once in the post of chief cabinet secretary. In those
days, Fukuda asserted that Japan-instead of creating a time-limited
law each time-should have a permanent law that stipulates general
requirements for Japan to send the Self-Defense Forces for overseas
missions. His philosophy remains unchanged. This time around, Fukuda
came out of himself. "This is where we should discuss something like
that." So saying, Nagashima tuned in to Fukuda. Then, a big hand
arose from the LDP bench. Originally, the LDP and the DPJ are close
to each other in their respective mindsets for international
contributions. Now that Japan will actually discontinue its
refueling activities, the LDP and the DPJ are now finally in a mood
to talk.
In Diet discussions, Fukuda often said,
"I'm always thinking about what Japan can do on the land in
Afghanistan, as well." In this way, Fukuda strongly implied his
willingness to embark on civilian assistance and other activities in
addition to continuing the MSDF's refueling mission. Under the
current situation of public security in Afghanistan, however, Japan
will need to send SDF troops. In this case as well, the problem is
the government's conventional way of interpreting the Constitution.
Fukuda and Ozawa will meet tomorrow again. The United States and
other countries are also paying close attention to their meeting.
(3) MSDF pullout from Indian Ocean (Part 1): SDF adrift over
international contributions; With series of scandals involving
Defense ministry, organizational reform being called for
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full)
November 2, 2007
The Maritime Self-Defense Force's (MSDF) vessels wound up their
refueling operation in the Indian Ocean, which started in December
2001 as part of the antiterrorism campaign in Afghanistan, and began
heading home. The government is stepping up efforts to enact its new
legislation to quickly resume the MSDF mission, but the opposition
camp, which won a landslide victory in the recent House of
Councillors election, remains opposed to the bill. Under this
situation, the fate of the legislation remains uncertain. Also
affected by a series of scandals, such as the alleged cover-up of
MSDF-supplied fuel and cozy ties between a former vice defense
minister and a defense contractor, the Defense Agency and the
Self-Defense Force, which are responsible for national security
policy, are drifting around
TOKYO 00005099 004 OF 015
Yesterday afternoon, the crewmembers of the supply ship Tokiwa and
the destroyer Kirisame in the Indian Ocean got a video message by
Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba saying: "I want you to have
confidence and pride in having accomplished your mission." When the
refueling mission was halted at zero hours of Oct. 2, Tokiwa's 6th
escort division commander Toshitaka Ojima said in a speech: "I
believe that this was an important mission in which we participated
in the war against terrorism in a responsible way."
Japan loses symbol of alliance with US
MSDF Chief of Staff Eiji Yoshikawa boasted the results the SDF had
achieved over the past about six years, saying: "The mission helped
the MSDF build up its foundations." But the Antiterrorism Special
Measures Law, which can be called "the symbol of the alliance" with
the US and endorsed Japan's participation in the US-led war against
terrorism, became invalid on Nov. 1. Japan has lost the basis for
the international contribution that is as important as
reconstruction assistance operations in Iraq. The defense minister
said: "International contributions being made by the SDF at present
are only United Nations peacekeeping operations (PKO) on the Golan
Heights, transport service by Air Self Defense Force (ASDF) between
Kuwait and Iraq, and PKO in Nepal (monitoring by Ground Self-Defense
Force (GSDF) officials of the moves of weapons)."
Suspicions deepen
Chief Cabinet Secretary Nobutaka Machimura emphasized: "To shorten
the period of suspension of the MSDF refueling service as much as
possible, the government will make utmost efforts to have its new
antiterrorism bill passed in the Diet." Even so, such allegations as
cover-up of misreporting of the amount of MSDF-supplied fuel and
diversion of fuel for use in the Iraq war have come up. The
opposition camp, including the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), now
sees that suspicions have deepened. Under the present situation,
prospects are dim for a resumption of the refueling operation.
Collusive relations between former Vice Defense Minister Takemasa
Moriya and an interested party have also been exposed. A Liberal
Democratic Party member quipped, "The Defense Ministry should be
demoted to agency status." The nature of the ministry itself is
being questioned.
The issue of a data error left uncorrected and unreported took place
when Ishiba was defense minister. Defense Minister Ishiba had to say
in a meeting of the committee tasked with working out bold measures
to maintain the principle of civilian control last night:
"We will shed light on the truth without concealing anything. Taking
the series of scandals as stemming from structural problems, we will
also reform the ministry itself."
(4) Steep road ahead for resumption of refueling operation
NIKKEI (Page 3) (Abridged)
November 2, 2007
Japan is now under pressure to come up with a new plan for
contributing to the "war on terror," since it has just ended the
Maritime Self-Defense Force's (MSDF) refueling operations in the
Indian Ocean. The government and ruling parties aim to enact a new
bill to allow resumption of the refueling service, but it is
TOKYO 00005099 005 OF 015
difficult to resume the mission without the cooperation of the
opposition parties, which control the upper chamber of the Diet at
present. Will the second round of a one-on-one meeting between Prime
Minister Yasuo Fukuda (president of the ruling Liberal Democratic
Party (LDP)) and the major opposition Democratic Party of Japan's
(DPJ) President Ichiro Ozawa lead to a breakthrough in the
situation? Horse-trading between the two could be premised on the
dissolution of the Lower House for a snap general election and the
formation of a "grand alliance" of major parties.
Scenario 1: If party-head talks break down, it will be difficult to
enact new legislation during current Diet session
There is only a slim possibility that Ozawa, who has insisted that
the MSDF's operations in the Indian Ocean are in violation of the
Constitution, will turn around in the planned one-on-one meeting to
favor the new refueling bill. If Ozawa does not budge from opposing
the new bill, it will be difficult to enact it during the current
session of the Diet. But if the new bill is put aside for a lengthy
period, Japan will be give the impression to other countries that it
lacks the will to continue to fight in the war on terror.
The current Diet session will end on Nov. 10. Given the need to
discuss the new refueling bill, not to mention other legislation, it
is highly likely that the government will decide to extend the Diet
session for a month or so. The LDP's General Council Chairman
Toshihiro Nikai insists that "the ruling bloc should be more active
about the new refueling bill." He envisions applying the provision
that if a bill passed by the Lower House is rejected by the Upper
House it still can become law if passed a second time by the Lower
House by a majority of two-thirds or more of the members present."
On the other hand, many in the LDP are cautious about applying that
provision, because if the opposition bloc, which is opposed to the
new refueling bill, introduces a censure resolution against the
prime minister, the move could trigger a dissolution of the Lower
House.
If the new refueling bill fails to be enacted during the current
Diet session, the bill will be reintroduced in next year's ordinary
Diet session. But in such a case, debate on the bill is not likely
to begin before April, because the highest priority in the ordinary
Diet session will be passage of the fiscal 2008 budget bill. If Diet
deliberations on the refueling bill go smoothly in or after April,
Japan will be able to resume the refueling mission around June.
However, if the DPJ is adamant in opposing the new refueling bill,
there would be no other choice but to apply the abovementioned
provision on a second decision by the Lower House. The opposition
bloc may delay deliberations on the bill, but failure by the Upper
House to take action on the bill within 60 days after its receipt
may be determined by the Lower House to constitute a rejection of
the bill there, and the Lower House can then take a second vote on
the bill. In such a case, the refueling mission is likely to be
resumed in or after August.
Scenario 2: LDP, DPJ compromise, look for common ground by enacting
permanent legislation
If Fukuda and Ozawa were to be able to reach a compromise, it would
involve the ruling and opposition blocs shelving the refueling bill
during the current Diet session and holding some kind of
consultations in next year's ordinary Diet session.
TOKYO 00005099 006 OF 015
Such consultations could be on making revisions to the refueling
bill or the DPJ's counterproposal. In such a case, the focus of
debate will be on whether Japan would take part in the International
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan, about which Ozawa
is positive.
The question of whether to establish a permanent law allowing Japan
to dispatch the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) abroad as needed is now
drawing public attention. At a press briefing yesterday, Ozawa made
mention of a permanent law and suggested that he was ready to
discuss it if the prime minister brings it up during today's
one-on-one meeting.
Regarding a permanent law, Fukuda previously tried to bring the DPJ
into debate on it, saying in the Diet: "It is an important subject
when we look to our future. I think it is necessary to have an
opportunity to discuss the propriety of such a law." Chief Cabinet
Secretary Nobutaka Machimura, as well, indicated at a press briefing
SIPDIS
yesterday that (a permanent law) would be a future task to handle
after the passage of the new refueling bill, but that the government
wanted to have an arena for the ruling and opposition parties to
discuss it. The realization of a permanent law could become one
example of successful consultation between the ruling and opposition
parties at a time when the ruling bloc holds a majority of seats in
the Lower House but it lacks a majority in the Upper House. In such
a case, some may call for creating a gigantic coalition government
as often speculated.
Damage to Japanese diplomacy
The suspension of the MSDF's refueling mission could do a great deal
of damage to Japans foreign policy. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(MOFA) is worried about a possible decline of Japan's influence in
the international community and the possible ill effect on the
Japan-US alliance.
The prime minister's statement released yesterday and the
government's decision to boost economic assistance to Afghanistan
are both aimed at highlighting Japan's will to continue to fight
against terrorism. But a sense of crisis about a decline in Japan's
human contribution is growing in the government. Foreign Minister
Masahiko Koumura stressed in his Diet reply yesterday; "We should
remember that Japan received no appreciation in the Gulf war,
despite (its huge monetary contribution)."
Relations with the US, which stands at the front of the war on
terror, cannot be ignored. In fact, a high-level US government
official recently told a senior MOFA official: "One of the bonds
between the two countries is about to be lost." Fukuda intends to
ask President Bush to understand the domestic situation in Japan
during their upcoming summit meeting on Nov. 16.
(5) MSDF pullout: Japan's role hardly replaceable with another
country
YOMIURI (Page 9) (Full)
November 2, 2007
Keiichi Honma, reporting from the Maritime Self-Defense Force's
supply ship Tokiwa in the Indian Ocean's northern waters
TOKYO 00005099 007 OF 015
MSDF supply ships, which have been sent to the Indian Ocean for
nearly six years, are extremely important vessels that are
indispensable for the MSDF's seaborne task of backing up maritime
interdiction operations (MIO) for Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)
in Afghanistan. The multinational coalition forces are now
considering replacements. Among the major countries participating in
the coalition forces, however, there are few countries with supply
ships that can take over the MSDF's refueling mission. There is no
underestimating the strategic loss resulting from the MSDF's
pullout.
A supply ship replenishes friendly vessels at sea with materials
that are needed for them to carry out their missions. The naval
forces of major countries cannot operate without supplies, so a
supply ship is an integral part of their naval operations. For
example, a US carrier battle group boasts of its overwhelming
military power. What buttresses it up is the presence of a gigantic
supply vessel. This supply vessel makes it possible for the USS
Kitty Hawk, a US Navy aircraft carrier that was once sent on a
mission for the Iraq war, to operate at sea for about 20 days. The
MSDF has been participating in maritime interdiction operations
(MIO). OEF-MIO coalition vessels made about 140,000 radio inquiries
about suspicious ships and more than 10,000 ship inspections as of
the end of August this year. Behind the scenes, the Tokiwa and other
supply ships were on stage around the clock.
There are now four supply ships operating to back up MIO. They are
from Japan, the United States, and Britain. As it stands, an MSDF
ranking officer onboard the Tokiwa was concerned about repercussions
on MIO, presuming that other countries will be burdened with the
MSDF's refueling role after its withdrawal. In fact, one officer
from Pakistan's navy, which received the last refueling from the
Tokiwa on Oct. 29., asked Japan to continue its activities. At the
same time, though, this officer reportedly asked MIO headquarters in
Bahrain to have another country supply fuel.
However, none of the major countries engaging in MIO has enough
supply vessels. According to an MSDF source, only seven major
countries-including Japan, the United States, and Britain-have a
minimum necessary lineup of four or more supply ships for their
national defense. The source says none of these countries can afford
to actually send supply ships as a matter of fact. Defense Minister
Ishiba, in his video message yesterday, stressed: "Underway
replenishment requires high skills and capabilities. In the world,
only several countries can steadily carry it out over a long period
of time."
In the Indian Ocean, MIO covers a vast expanse of waters, at least 4
million square kilometers, centering on northern waters. The
Tokiwa's breakaway means so much. "The Tokiwa's operational
capability is very high," says Alex Neill, a chief researcher at the
Royal United Services Institute for Defense Studies (RUSI). "So,"
Neill went on, "the United States will now be compelled to increase
its supply costs." MIO headquarters seems to have plans to employ a
replacement after the Tokiwa's withdrawal. However, it does not seem
to be easy.
(6) Path to resuming refueling operation not in sight
ASAHI (Page 3) (Abridged slightly)
November 2, 2007
TOKYO 00005099 008 OF 015
The Maritime Self-Defense Force unit dispatched (to the Indian
Ocean) began pulling out yesterday, winding up its refueling
operation to support the US-led war on terrorism, due to the
expiration of the Antiterrorism Special Measures Law. The government
has come up with economic assistance in place of the refueling
operation that has been suspended. Although the coalition of the
willing taking part in the war on terrorism in and around
Afghanistan, for fear of a withdrawal domino effect, is hopeful that
the MSDF will resume its operation, there are no prospects for
resumption.
Government eager to come up with alternative plans
Akihiro Yamada, Keiichi Kaneko
Foreign Minister Masahiko Koumura expressed concern yesterday that
the discontinuation of the MSDF operation might have adverse effects
on the diplomatic front, saying: "The international community would
take it as Japan becoming less committed to the war on terrorism. It
would affect other countries' stances toward Japan."
The government yesterday came up with a number of alternative plans
to the refueling operation. The Council for Overseas Economic
Cooperation announced enhanced economic assistance to Afghanistan.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Nobutaka Machimura in a press conference
yesterday revealed a plan to incorporate in a supplementary budget
bull funds for vocationally training Afghan refugees. The government
also produced a plan to considering a large increase in financial
aid to Pakistan, which has relied on MSDF oil.
Regarding those diplomatic efforts intended to make up for the MSDF
withdrawal, a senior Foreign Ministry official said: "Economic
assistance will not be able to substitute the MSDF. Japan would be
criticized as trying to settle the matter with money." He also took
this view about the Democratic Party of Japan's (DPJ or Minshuto)
proposal for civilian assistance: "An improved security situation is
a prerequisite. At this point when the ministry's evaluation
recommendation is still alive, Afghanistan is not in a condition to
accept civilians (from Japan)."
Meanwhile, DPJ President Ichiro Ozawa, who has been opposed to the
new legislation, took this view: "It is unconstitutional to dispatch
SDF troops overseas to support some country's military operation.
It's not good. I have nothing to say about the withdrawal."
The government and ruling parties intend to resume the MSDF
operation as early as possible by swiftly enacting the new
legislation designed to allow providing fuel oil and water alone.
But there are no prospects that the legislation will clear the
Diet.
Severe views by Japan experts in US
Yoichi Kato, Washington, and Kitagawa Manabu, Islamabad
Regarding the discontinuation of the MSDF operation, US State
Department deputy spokesman Tom Casey said yesterday: "It is
regrettable. We hope to see Japan enact the new legislation swiftly
and resume the (SDF) operation as early as possible." His comment
clearly reflected Washington's effort to avoid criticism in
consideration of future Diet deliberations in Japan, though it is
feeling dissatisfied.
TOKYO 00005099 009 OF 015
Some Japan exerts in the United States regard the expiration of the
Antiterrorism Law as somewhat inevitable, with Center for Naval
Analyses Strategic Studies Director Michael McDevitt saying: "This
sort of policy change could occur in a democracy." At the same time,
Japan exerts take severe views about future developments.
Former Pentagon Japan desk director James Auer said: "If the new
legislation is enacted right away, there won't be any problem. But
if the government gives it up, Japan's credibility would be called
into question severely as an ally." Former White House National
Security Council Senior Asian Director Michael Green indicated that
in the event the new legislation was voted down in the House of
Councillors and the ruling camp consequently did not take a second
vote in the House of Representatives, many people in the world would
conclude that Japan has no intention of playing a leading role in
international security.
Royal United Services Institute for Defense Studies Director Michael
Clarke, now visiting Japan, indicated in an interview with the Asahi
Shimbun yesterday that the impact would be greater politically than
militarily, saying, "If Japan withdraws, that would be taken as
raising a question about the legitimacy of the Afghan operation;
such will not be welcomed."
A Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesman told the Asahi Shimbun
yesterday: "Japan is an important antiterrorism partner. The
discontinuation of the refueling operation will have a serious
impact on us. We ask Japan to resume the operation."
Explanation of need for the operation insufficient
Commentary
The MSDF's withdrawal from the Indian Ocean is attributable to
opposition to its operation by the DPJ, which has become the largest
party in the Upper House. But more fundamentally, it is because the
government has failed to offer a sufficient explanation of the need
for the refueling operation amid the deadlocked war on terrorism led
by the US military.
Once Japan's provision of oil dropped to one-tenth of that of the
peak time, the government, concluding that citing the war on terror
alone was not enough to try to convince the public, even brought up
the defense of sea lanes, with Foreign Minister Koumura saying, "The
operation is important for the transport routes of Japan, who
imports 90 percent of oil from the Middle East." The government's
failure to completely wipe out suspicions that Japanese fuel was
used in the Iraq operation by deviating from the objectives of the
Special Measures Law also caused the public to harbor doubts about
the "aim" of the refueling operation.
Preoccupied with the ruling camp's call for an extension of the
refueling operation, the Ozawa-led JDP's adamant opposition for a
lack of clear UN resolution, the United States, and the United
Nations, the government has not conducted full-fledged debates on
how Japan should strategically deal with that region. With no
prospect in sight for the enactment of the new "stopgap"
legislation, the government is set to increase economic assistance
to relevant countries to make up for the SDF withdrawal.
Although "independent commitment" to the eradication of terrorism is
TOKYO 00005099 010 OF 015
underlined in the new legislation, the government is not armed with
any clear rule on the overseas dispatch of the SDF or an exit
strategy. On the occasion of the law's expiration, the ruling and
opposition parties must discuss matters, including how special
measures laws should be, all over again.
(7) End of MSDF refueling mission: Enormous national interests to be
lost, including military intelligence, relationship of alliance;
crude oil, etc.
YOMIURI (Page 13) (Full)
November 2, 2007
By Hidemichi Katsumata, Yomiuri Shimbun Senior Writer
The Maritime Self-Defense Force (MSDF) has been continuing refueling
operations in the Indian Ocean as part of Japan's efforts to support
the war on terror. However, an order to end the mission was handed
down to the MSDF. The damage to Japan's national interests will be
huge with the ending of the MSDF operations.
A senior Air Self-Defense Force (ASDF) officer, who is engaged in
Kuwait-based airlift operations in Iraq, said, "I can only hope that
halting that mission will not affect our operations."
He made this comment because recently, just prior to an ASDF
airlifting of senior United Nations officials, the American military
stopped transmitting operational intelligence on Baghdad and nearby
areas. The intelligence was transmitted only to British and
Australian forces. An ASDF officer said, "We cannot engage in
airlift operations unless we know where the battles are going on."
The ASDF lodged a protest with the US Department of Defense. The
intelligence was disclosed three days later, and ASDF aircraft
resumed operations. However, as far as this ASDF officer is
concerned, "The SDF will now no longer be able to participate in
meetings of the troops of the various countries engaged in the war
on terror. The amount of Middle East-related intelligence we receive
will be considerably decreased."
The SDF under the Anti-Terrorism Special Measures Law and the Iraq
Assistance Special Measures Law has dispatched about 20 liaison
officers to four locations, such as the US Central Command in Tampa,
Florida, and the Multinational Naval Forces Central Command in
Bahrain. The purpose of the dispatches is to share various kinds of
intelligence with the US and members of the Coalition of the
Willing. However, Brigadier General Swift at the US Naval Forces
Central Command categorically said, "If the MSDF pulls out, the real
problem would be that Japan will lose the opportunity for dialogue
in the Middle East, which it is now enjoying."
It is a common military practice not to transmit intelligence to
countries that are not expending sweat together. But the damage to
national interests does not end with just being excluded from the
"intelligence community."
Japan's greatest threat now is North Korea's nuclear weapons and
ballistic missiles. A Nodong missile landed in the Sea of Japan in
ΒΆ1993. In 1998, a Taepodong missile passed over Japan. That country
carried out a nuclear test last year. If it succeeds in making a
miniaturized nuclear weapon that can be fitted on a missile warhead,
that nation's nuclear threat would become a reality. It can only be
TOKYO 00005099 011 OF 015
prevented from doing so by the military power of the US and a solid
Japan-US alliance.
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) Chairman Ichiro Ozawa
claims that it is not possible for Japan to cooperate in the war in
Afghanistan because it was started by the US independently. The UN
has acknowledged that the US fight against terror is a self-defense
war, and yet if Japan cannot help its ally fight a self-defense war,
what is the meaning of the alliance? The MSDF has been carrying out
refueling operations to support the US and cooperate for the
international community within the limits of the Constitution,
though such activities are not obligatory.
Since Japan has continued to provide such support to the US, it can
seek solid cooperation from the US in making North Korea totally
abandon its nuclear programs through the six-party talks, which
started in the summer of 2003. Japan can file a harsh complaint or
make requests to the US, if it takes an ambiguous stance in the
process of forcing North Korea to abandon its nuclear program.
Even though the ASDF is continuing transport operations in Iraq,
with the disappearance of the Hinomaru flag or Japan's presence in
the Indian Ocean, doubts will arise the value of the alliance and
Japan's national security will suffer a setback.
There is another blow coming to Japan's national interest. For
Japan, which relies on the Middle East for 90 PERCENT of the crude
oil it imports, it is vitally important to prevent the Indian Ocean
from becoming a sea of terrorists. This has not been discussed much,
because it has been considered that doing so is irrelevant in view
of the spirit of the special measures law. But it is whole different
story when the fact is taken into account that Japan's super-tanker
Takasuzu (280,000 tons) was attacked by terrorists in the Persian
Gulf and suffered damage.
Three persons, including US Marines, were killed in that suicide
bombing. Multinational naval forces have been on strict alert near
oil embarkation ports in the Persian Gulf since this incident.
Though the MSDF is unable to engage in such operations due to
constitutional restrictions, many countries have acknowledged its
refueling operations as activities to support part of such
international cooperation and appreciate them.
About 25 PERCENT of crude oil exported by Gulf countries is bound
for Japan. The Financial Times of Britain criticized Japan for
pulling out, calling it a "coward." This perhaps epitomizes how the
international community sees Japan.
How to continue the war against terror is a major theme for many
countries. Only countries taking part in antiterrorist operations
have the right to have their say. Japan's national interests gain
nothing by ending the MSDF operations.
(8) Editorial: Prime Minister Fukuda should show resolve to pass new
refueling bill
SANKEI (Page 2) (Full)
November 2, 2007
Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda posted an article titled "Finally
November 1" on the latest issue of the Cabinet's E-mail Magazine.
TOKYO 00005099 012 OF 015
With the expiration of the Antiterrorism Special Measures Law that
allowed the Maritime Self-Defense Force's refueling operations in
the Indian Ocean, two MSDF ships currently deployed -- the supply
vessel Tokiwa and destroyer Kirisame -- began heading back to Japan
after receiving their orders (from the defense minister).
Some members of the ruling coalition are even calling for putting
off the enactment of the new antiterrorism bill. It is highly
doubtful that the government and ruling parties put in their utmost
efforts prior to Nov. 1 to avoid a vacuum being created in the war
on terror. The law expired immediately before the second meeting of
the prime minister and Ichiro Ozawa, president of the largest
opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto). How will the
two party leaders take Japan's failure to respond to the
expectations of the international community by allowing the MSDF to
withdraw from the maritime interdiction operation (MIO), which has
dealt a blow to Japan's national interests? Fukuda and Ozawa should
frankly talk about not only the new antiterrorism bill but other
issues, as well.
It is extremely regrettable that Japan suspended its refueling
mission that was carried out for nearly six years. We highly praise
the MSDF operations that were appreciated by other countries
involved. We also should recall the SDF's other overseas activities
in Iraq and other areas.
The Bush administration has said that it is possible to cover the
MSDF refueling operation through alternative measures. But the time
for surveillance activities will be inevitably decrease because
vessels have to return to port to be refueled.
The US government released a comment that said the Japan-US alliance
would not be effected, but the Japanese government should consider
that the present situation requiring Washington to release the
comment might hamper the upholding and strengthening of the
bilateral relationship.
The DPJ has opposed to the refueling operation claiming that it is
aimed at supporting the US' war. Guessing at the meaning from the
context, the party does not seem to care about whether the United
States and the international community are disappointed at the MSDF
pullout.
Prime Minister Fukuda said in a statement that the war on terror is
still underway, and that he would do his best to enact a new
antiterrorism law as quickly as possible so that refueling can be
resumed.
In order to carry out its intention, the Fukuda cabinet has no other
choice but to pass the new legislation by extending the current Diet
session. Unless the DPJ changes its response to the legislation, the
bill should be put to a second vote after it is voted down in the
Upper House. The day has come for the prime minister to make a
decision on the new bill, without worrying about political arguments
in the ruling and opposition camps.
(9) Futenma alternative: Gov. Nakaima proposed offshore relocation
up to 215 meters
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 1 & 2) (Abridged)
November 2, 2007
TOKYO 00005099 013 OF 015
On the issue of relocating the US Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station
(in the city of Ginowan, Okinawa Prefecture, to a coastal area of
Camp Schwab, a US military base in the prefecture's northern coastal
city of Nago), Okinawa Prefecture's Governor Hirokazu Nakaima has
been calling for the government to move the site of a newly planned
facility to an offshore area as an alternative for Futenma airfield.
The government is now going through procedures with Okinawa
Prefecture to assess the possible impact of Futenma relocation on
its site and environs. In this process, Nakaima met with Chief
Cabinet Secretary Nobutaka Machimura on Oct. 31. On that occasion,
Nakaima asked the government to retouch its Futenma relocation plan.
Specifically, Nakaima proposed moving the relocation site to an
offshore area within the scope of a "slight change," sources
revealed. If the change is slight (up to 215 meters), the government
may revise the plan with no need for another environmental
assessment, according to the sources. On the other hand, Nakaima has
also told Machimura that a change to the extent of 50 meters or so
does not satisfy Okinawa's demand. This is the first time that
Okinawa Prefecture has disclosed a specific figure in its demand for
Futenma relocation to an offshore site.
Machimura came up with the Defense Ministry's view, saying the
government plan cannot be revised, according to the sources. Okinawa
Prefecture and the Defense Ministry have broken off in their talks
over the issue of Futenma relocation. However, the government is
expected to resume its consultative meeting with Okinawa on Nov. 7
after a hiatus of 10 months. Tokyo and Okinawa are now beginning to
move behind the scenes for new developments.
Nakaima, according to his aide, has also told the government that he
wants the alternative facility located within an offshore area that
is somewhat away from Hirashima, an island floating off Henoko
Point.
In the case of the Futenma alternative facility, its airstrips
portion is subject to Okinawa Prefecture's environmental assessment
ordinance. Regarding the scope of a "slight change" that is
allowable with no need to carry out another environmental
assessment, Okinawa Prefecture's environmental assessment ordinance
provides that the area of an airfield is less than 10 hectares.
The planned alternative facility has an overall length of 1,800
meters. Judging from this length, Okinawa Prefecture calculates that
the range of the alternative facility's move is less than 56 meters.
In the process of going through the procedures, Nakaima is expected
to come up with three statements about the government's relocation
plan. Okinawa Prefecture deems it possible to move up to 55 meters
each time.
A senior official of Okinawa Prefecture explained Nakaima's demand
and its background, saying: "Three 55 meters are 165 meters. In
addition to that, it's possible to move about 50 meters at the
governor's discretion through some adjustments, so the figures add
up to 215 meters. If the government is willing, it's possible to
move 200 meters or so without starting all over again. There are
scientific and rational reasons, so the governor will state his
views. If the government bases its plan on the governor's views,
it's possible to reach a settlement."
Commentary: Nakaima backs down
Tokyo and Okinawa have been at a deadlock in their talks over the
TOKYO 00005099 014 OF 015
pending issue of relocating Futenma airfield. Okinawa Prefecture's
Governor Hirokazu Nakaima has been calling for the government to
move the site of a planned alternative facility to an offshore area
for Futenma airfield. In this connection, Nakaima showed an upper
limit of the relocation site's move within a range of up to 215
meters. It can be taken as a revision in the process of going
through the procedures for an environmental assessment. This,
however, is the governor's de facto retraction of his call for the
site's pre-assessment move. In the eyes of local residents, the
governor undeniably backed down. Nakaima has been calling for the
government to move the Futenma alternative facility to an offshore
site. In the past, Nakaima was asked about the range of the
alternative facility's move. However, he has not specified anything
about it. If he comes out with a figure, he will be asked to account
for that figure. This was a matter of concern to him.
(10) Fukuda, Ozawa desperate to put cap on rumor on LDP-DPJ "grand
alliance"
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full)
November 1, 2007
The ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the main opposition
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) agreed on Nov. 31 to
hold a second meeting between their leaders -- Yasuo Fukuda and
Ichiro Ozawa. The second meeting between the prime minister and the
DPJ president will start at 3:00 p.m. on Nov. 2 in the Diet
building. A grand coalition concept of the LDP and the DPJ, which
has become a real possibility after the first Fukuda-Ozawa talks on
Oct. 30, will likely create quite a stir in the ruling and
opposition camps. All the more because their meeting was held behind
closed doors, the grand alliance concept, a speculation creates
another speculation. Turbulence seems to be continued in the ruling
and opposition blocs.
"What is a grand alliance? We can do anything in our minds. But I
wonder if it is realistically possible," Fukuda told the press at
noon yesterday, as if he didn't know. When asked by the press about
his meeting with Okinawa Gov. Hirokazu Nakaima, he cynically
responded: "The meeting was held for the first time. Is this a grand
alliance?"
Chief Cabinet Secretary Nobutaka Machimura south to check the grand
alliance concept that has wings, saying, "There are persons talking
about a grand alliance, but it is not that easy (to form such) under
the single-seat election system."
The reason for Fukuda and others being nervous about the grand
alliance concept is that response from the ruling and opposition was
bigger than expected. Lawmakers of the ruling and opposition parties
are now often talking about the grand alliance concept and early
Lower House dissolution as issues.
The New Komeito, the LDP's coalition partner, is especially alarmed.
Secretary General Kazuo Kitagawa expressed displeasure in a press
SIPDIS
conference, noting, "I wonder if parties that fight in elections can
form an alliance and think that the public can understand it." He
then played up his party's political presence, saying, "I think
there should be an opportunity for the New Komeito to make efforts
for consensus-building between the LDP and the DPJ."
DPJ lawmakers have become nervous. In a meeting yesterday afternoon
TOKYO 00005099 015 OF 015
of the "Next Cabinet" held in the Diet building, one member
questioned: "Did you talk about a grand alliance concept with the
prime minister?" Ozawa replied: "We did not at all talk about it.
Mr. Fukuda repeatedly said, 'I rely on you.' He seems to be in a
fix."
In a meeting of the DPJ secretary general and deputy secretaries
general, one deputy secretary general said, "I want to know what the
two party leaders talked about in their meeting yesterday."
Secretary General Yukio Hatoyama then responded with annoyance: "I
SIPDIS
don't know either."
At the Japan National Press Club yesterday, Japanese Communist Party
chairman Kazuo Shii criticized the Fukuda-Ozawa talks, saying, "The
LDP and DPJ violated the Diet rules and held the closed-door
meeting." In a meeting of the opposition parties' Diet Affairs
Committee chairmen, Yasumasa Shigeno of the Social Democratic Party
said, "I have to question why the largest opposition party suddenly
held the meeting."
Shizuka Kamei, deputy head of the People's New Party, which has
formed a parliamentary group with the DPJ in the Upper House,
expressed displeasure, noting, "It is outrageous that they held the
closed-door meeting, skipping the planned one-on-one meeting at the
Diet. The DPJ did not notify my party even though we have formed a
parliamentary group. I think such a political method is not good."
SCHIEFFER