Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07PRAGUE1228, CZECH REPUBLIC: POST RECOMMENDS WATCH LIST FOR

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07PRAGUE1228.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07PRAGUE1228 2007-11-15 15:28 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Prague
VZCZCXRO7431
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHPG #1228/01 3191528
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 151528Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY PRAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9817
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PRAGUE 001228 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EUR/NCE AND EB/IPE JBOGER 
STATE PASS USTR FOR JCHOE-GROVES AND WMOORE 
COMMERCE FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/MROGERS 
COMMERCE PASS USPTO 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KIPR ETRD ECON PGOV EZ
SUBJECT: CZECH REPUBLIC: POST RECOMMENDS WATCH LIST FOR 
SPECIAL 301 OUT-OF-CYCLE REVIEW 
 
REF: A. 11/7 TLAPA-AMBASSADOR LETTER 
     B. PRAGUE 849 
     C. PRAGUE 742 
     D. PRAGUE 578 
     E. PRAGUE 457 
     F. STATE 56305 
     G. PRAGUE 399 
     H. PRAGUE 315 
     I. PRAGUE 274 
     J. PRAGUE 244 
 
1. (SBU) SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: Post recommends the 
Czech Republic be placed on the Special 301 Watch List at the 
upcoming out-of-cycle IPR review (OCR).  The Czechs have had 
seven months to develop and implement an action plan with 
limited progress to report.  The Czech IPR inter-ministerial 
committee developed and presented an action plan to the 
cabinet on October 3, and the committee has not initiated 
concrete actions to implement this plan.  The IPR violations 
at the border markets originally noted by recording industry 
watchdog groups in April have continued relatively free from 
prosecution, and the border markets have grown in size and 
permanence.  Post has visited the pirate markets on multiple 
occasions and viewed first-hand the scale of IPR violations 
and lack of legitimate business at the markets.  End Summary 
and Recommendation. 
 
Fair Warning Given 
---- ------- ----- 
2. (SBU) Since the April 30 announcement that the Czech 
Republic will face an out-of-cycle IPR review, Post has 
regularly engaged the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MIT) 
and the IPR inter-ministerial committee to explain 
Washington's position and press for the development and 
execution of an action plan to combat piracy at these 
markets.  In his July 17 meeting with Deputy Minister of 
Industry and Trade Martin Tlapa (ref H), Ambassador Graber 
reinforced the U.S. position, including the need to see 
measurable results for the CR to stay off the Special 301 
Watch List. (Note: Minister of Industry and Trade Martin 
Riman was unavailable for this meeting with Ambassador 
Graber, which Post believes was due to an unrelated political 
issue.  End Note.)  Tlapa got the message but noted that, 
"lots of people here think you won't put us on the Watch 
List." During each subsequent visit with Czech government 
officials, Emboffs made clear that both an action plan and 
measurable accomplishments were needed before the OCR, and 
failure to show results could result in Czech placement on 
the Watch List.  The Ambassador made a final appeal to Tlapa 
November 1, urging the Czechs to provide the USG with a 
statement for the Special 301 OCR, including evidence of 
enforcement actions taken and a timeline for the action plan 
items.  Post has not yet received a statement, and does not 
expect a response other than the November 7 letter from Tlapa 
to Ambassador Graber. 
 
Baby Steps in the Right Direction But Still Falling Short 
---- ----- -- --- ----- --------- --- ----- ------- ----- 
3. (SBU) The Czechs have held four inter-ministerial meetings 
since May to discuss the problem and possible solutions. 
Emboffs have been invited to three of these meetings, and 
representatives from the recording industry to two.  The 
action plan developed from these meetings includes about 60% 
of the suggestions made by the USG and industry, including a 
no tolerance policy, increased criminal regulations, higher 
penalties and training for judges and prosecutors.  However, 
the action plan lacks some items suggested by the USG, 
including increased law enforcement presence at the markets, 
legislating landlord liability and revocation of business 
licenses for IPR violators, and it is devoid of concrete 
implementation timelines for any of the items. 
 
4. (SBU) New legislation increased fines and punishments for 
IPR violations as expected, but the lack of consistent 
enforcement and quick judicial proceedings hobbles the 
usefulness of these changes. While the pace of progress has 
been limited, these legislative changes are positive and 
create a stronger future framework for IPR protection. 
Enforcement of existing laws remains the biggest problem.  To 
remedy this, Post and industry groups are coordinating 
training opportunities, including USPTO-sponsored courses, 
for the Czech Ministry of Interior on a number of IPR 
enforcement topics. 
 
5. (SBU) The positive trend in IPR enforcement at the border 
 
PRAGUE 00001228  002 OF 002 
 
 
markets in late 2006 and early 2007 did not continue into the 
summer.  Although 6,000 armed inspectors of the Customs 
Directorate were given authority to address the IPR issue, 
the number of confiscations and raids dropped in the first 
half of 2007.  According to MIT-provided statistics, the 
Czech Business Inspectorate performed twenty-eight raids in 
September and October and confiscated approximately $1.7 
million USD in pirated goods.  However, discussions with 
Customs officers indicates that these statistics are 
questionable, and that the raids were not as successful as 
MIT presented.  The Customs officers complained that the 
recent shift from occasional raids and inspections conducted 
by individual agencies to more infrequent, large-scale raids 
with participation from all agencies led to the market owners 
being tipped off ahead of time, with a resultant reduction in 
confiscations. 
 
Political Will Vacuum 
--------- ---- ------ 
6.  (SBU) Tlapa's November 7 letter to Ambassador Graber (ref 
A) is evidence of the continuing lack of political will. 
Despite his promise to Department of Commerce Assistant 
Secretary Bohigian to address IPR violations at the border 
 
SIPDIS 
markets after his March 8 visit to Washington, Tlapa failed 
to match his statements with actions.  His letter claims that 
public condemnation of the piracy problem is by itself a 
strong signal of government engagement.  It further explains 
his belief that the appropriate government role is high-level 
coordination and makes excuses for the lack of progress and 
for why a detailed action plan is not needed, including the 
ludicrous statement that GOCR cannot tell us what they are 
doing to fight IPR violations because this information is con 
fidential. 
 
7. (SBU) Industry watchdog groups feel the Czechs have 
dragged their feet developing and implementing their action 
plan and should be placed on the Priority Watch List.  One 
explanation, although hardly excusable, is that the action 
plan was developed over the summer vacation season, when many 
government employees are out of the office for long periods 
of time.  Consequently, the action plan was not approved by 
the Minister of Industry and Trade until September and 
finally presented to government in October.  While these 
difficulties do not fully mitigate the Czech government's 
lack of progress, the action plan is now in place and the 
GOCR needs time to demonstrate it will follow through.  While 
placement on the Special 301 Watch List will send a strong 
signal and give needed support to our allies in the Czech 
ministries, placement directly on the Priority Watch List 
could complicate efforts to constructively engage the Czech 
government in the future. 
 
Rollout Plan 
------- ---- 
8. (SBU) Post continues to sensitize Czech officials about 
the possibility of being placed on the Watch List and we are 
developing a rollout strategy to inform the relevant 
ministries about the upcoming OCR decision.  Any information 
Washington can provide on the timing of the OCR decision 
process will be greatly appreciated.  Despite our repeated 
warnings, we believe that most Czechs will be somewhat 
surprised if they are placed on the Watch List.  The GOCR has 
listed IPR issues (specifically in relation to China) as a 
priority during EU Presidency, and being placed on the Watch 
List could cause some embarrassment.  Although a handful of 
people with the most sober understanding of the situation and 
process are aware of this reality, most simply do not believe 
the USG will take this action because of other bilateral 
political considerations such as missile defense.  Placement 
on the Special 301 Watch List will provide political cover 
for our allies within the Czech government, allowing them to 
push through needed improvements to the IPR situation without 
alienating or leaving them feeling hopeless by jumping ahead 
to the Priority Watch List. 
Graber