Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07KAMPALA1785, HUMAN RIGHTS NGO CRIES FOUL; ACCUSES INGOS OF MISTREATING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07KAMPALA1785.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07KAMPALA1785 2007-11-20 13:14 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Kampala
VZCZCXRO1136
RR RUEHGI RUEHRN RUEHROV
DE RUEHKM #1785/01 3241314
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 201314Z NOV 07
FM AMEMBASSY KAMPALA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9658
INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE
RUEHXR/RWANDA COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KAMPALA 001785 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL UG
SUBJECT:  HUMAN RIGHTS NGO CRIES FOUL; ACCUSES INGOS OF MISTREATING 
WORKERS IN NORTHERN UGANDA 
 
 
1.  (U) Summary:  Human Rights Focus (HRF), a widely respected local 
human rights organization, reported the dissatisfaction of some 
Ugandans working for international non-governmental organizations 
(INGOs) in northern Uganda.  In the report released in September 
2007, workers reportedly complained of mistreatment and intimidation 
in the workplace and said that incidents of sexual and financial 
exploitation in the hiring process were prevalent.  The report, 
however, does not specifically name individuals or organizations in 
connection with the alleged abuse.  Several respected human rights 
advocates, international aid workers, and even one outspoken local 
politician have questioned the report's lack of supporting evidence, 
and cautioned against going after the INGOs.  The GOU has remained 
largely silent on the issue since the press reports broke on October 
29.  While we do not believe there to be a widespread problem with 
workers' rights violations within the INGO community, the HRF stands 
firmly behind the report.  End Summary. 
 
------------------------- 
HRF Report Causes Ripples 
------------------------- 
 
2.  (U) Human Rights Focus (HRF) surprised the international 
non-governmental community (INGO) with allegations of worker and 
civil rights violations by INGOs in Gulu, northern Uganda in a 
September 2007 report.  Local INGO workers interviewed for the 
report complained of "unfair" and "abusive" hiring practices, citing 
incidents of corruption, extortion, and sexual exploitation.  The 
55-page document, "Fostering the Transition in Acholiland:  From War 
to Peace, from Camps to Home," dedicated only a few pages to the 
issue, but media coverage and discontent over the severity of the 
allegations and the lack of specific examples has overshadowed the 
report's primary focus. 
 
3.  (U) Local INGO employees told HRF that their foreign employers 
were often disrespectful and dismissive.  They complained of low 
wages in comparison to their equally qualified foreign counterparts, 
poor working conditions, and a failure to comply with Ugandan labor 
laws.  Attempts to raise concerns within the unnamed INGOs have been 
met with warnings or even termination of employment, the report 
alleged.  The HRF noted, however, that unspecified steps were taken 
by some INGOs to create a more inclusive and positive work 
environment. 
 
4.  (U) The "most directly exploitive and abusive" were the 
high-ranking Ugandan male INGO workers who often demand financial 
and sexual favors as compensation for employment, the report 
alleges.  Personnel changes and informational campaigns, according 
to the report, have helped to reduce the number of more egregious 
cases.  Some evangelical INGOs reportedly demanded that employees 
alter their religious belief for employment. 
 
5.  (U) The report called for more local government involvement and 
support, specifically urging Gulu District Chairman Norbert Mao to 
intervene.  Greater support from local NGOs and the Gulu District 
Forum was also mentioned as avenues for protecting INGO workers' 
rights. 
 
------------------------------------------ 
Gulu District Chairman Seeks Clarification 
------------------------------------------ 
 
6.  (SBU) Outspoken Gulu District Chairman Norbert Mao admitted to 
EmbOff on November 6 that he had not read the report, but noted that 
he was aware of prior reports that some faith-based INGOs 
implemented a "do what you are told" policy in the north.  He said 
that the report's lack of details had unfairly "demoralized" the 
entire INGO community, and vowed to meet with the INGO community to 
discuss the allegations.  The NGOs must operate within the confines 
of Ugandan law, Mao affirmed. 
 
------------------------------------------ 
NGO Community Questions Validity of Report 
------------------------------------------ 
 
7.  (SBU) The former Gulu-based coordinator for the United Nations 
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance (UNOCHA), 
Esteban Saco, questioned the validity of the report in a November 13 
meeting with Emboff.  Saco said that the report was vague, and 
lacked the statistical data needed to give scope to the alleged 
problem.  He dismissed the possibility of a widespread pattern of 
abuse, adding that he had not heard of any major workers' rights 
violations in the INGO community during his tenure in Gulu.  Saco 
said that INGO representatives in Gulu shared his concerns over the 
report, but added that the GOU had not pushed the issue.  Gulu 
District Chairman Mao, however, had raised the issue and was 
reportedly investigating the claims, he commented. 
 
8.  (SBU) Foundation for Human Rights Initiative Executive Director 
Livingstone Ssewanyana called the report "biased" and "one-sided". 
 
KAMPALA 00001785  002 OF 002 
 
 
He said that it was not constructive, and that he had urged 
policymakers to investigate the charge fully before taking action. 
UNICEF Child Protection Office Chief Cornelius Williams, a Sierra 
Leonean national with extensive experience in the north, agreed with 
Ssewanyana.  He expressed concern that the report might undermine 
"legitimate" human rights work in the region.  Williams said that 
abuse was unlikely in the "larger more established" INGOs, but 
suggested that such activity might have occurred in the lesser known 
entities. 
 
9.  (SBU) Father Carlos Rodriguez, a Catholic priest with 18-years 
of experience in the north, was also concerned over the report's 
lack of detail on specific incidents of abuse.  He said that there 
were a number of reliable INGOs working in the region, both 
faith-based and secular, whose activities might be unfairly 
scrutinized.  Father Rodriguez noted, however, that some 
organizations "take advantage" of the poor, and stressed the need 
for a common ethical code of conduct within the NGO community. 
 
------------------------ 
HRF Stands Behind Report 
------------------------ 
 
10. (SBU) HRF Executive Director James Otto in a November 15 meeting 
with EmbOff stood firmly behind the accusations made in the 
September report.  Otto expressed his disappointment that the INGO 
criticism overshadowed the more important issue of getting northern 
Ugandans home from IDP camps.  He admitted that HRF struggled with 
whether it would be prudent to include the criticism in the report, 
but said that if HRF had not raised the issue, "who would?"  Otto 
did not give EmbOff the names of the organizations or individuals 
believed to be involved in the alleged activity, but said that he 
would help us to investigate further by talking directly to 
individuals who had made the accusations.  "You will be shocked by 
some of the accounts of sexual and financial exploitation," Otto 
affirmed. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
11. (SBU) There is no indication of a widespread pattern of gross 
civil and worker rights violations by INGOs operating in northern 
Uganda.  Though Otto would not share the names of his sources, his 
credibility and dedication in the North lends weight to his 
concerns, and merits our consideration.  Meanwhile, the GOU has 
remained largely silent on the HRF report, even though it has its 
own concerns about INGOs and NGOs in the north.  End Comment. 
CHRITTON