Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07OTTAWA1954, GOC RESPONSE RE 2008 US-CANADA BILATERAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07OTTAWA1954.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07OTTAWA1954 2007-10-22 18:38 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ottawa
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHOT #1954/01 2951838
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 221838Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6749
INFO RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEILB/NCTC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY 0008
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY IA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS OTTAWA 001954 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PTER PREL CA
SUBJECT: GOC RESPONSE RE 2008 US-CANADA BILATERAL 
CONSULTATIVE GROUP MEETING 
 
REF: STATE 133852 
 
1. (SBU) In response to reftel demarche regarding the 
upcoming Bilateral Consultative Group (BCG) meeting in 
Washington, Deputy Director for Counterterrorism Yves 
Beaulieu and Policy Advisor Neil Brennan from the 
International Crime and Terrorism Division of the Department 
of Foreign Affairs and International Trade made suggestions 
and comments on our agenda (see paras 2 and 3).  In general, 
the GOC is in agreement with our list of topics, however. 
The GOC team would nonetheless like to know what general 
priorities General Dailey sees for the relationship, but 
added that it is still too early to assign leads in the 
various areas.  Also, the GOC team wants a meeting that is 
not too mechanical in flow -- e.g. lead, response, on to the 
next item -- and would like it to be more open in terms of 
discussion and a flow of ideas, with the option of hovering 
on an item if it deserves more attention. 
 
2.  (SBU)  January 16 
 
-- Most GOC participants will fly to Washington on the 
evening of 16 January.  Senior Coordinator for International 
Crime and Terrorism Mark Moher will come down either the 
evening of the 15th or the morning of the 16th.  Moher   4 
will be available for a heads of delegation meeting on the 
afternoon of the 16th.  (Note:  Beaulieu was not sure if this 
will be the first time that General Dailey and Moher will 
meet; they may also meet on the margins of the G-8 meeting in 
Berlin November 5-8.  If it is the first time, Moher would be 
available for lunch, if we are so inclined.  End note); 
 
-- The GOC team likes the idea of doing a focused threat 
briefing (primarily who and what) on the afternoon of January 
16 to allow for a more frank and detailed discussion, in 
contrast to last year; 
 
-- The GOC team agrees to a final discussion of the text of 
the Joint Declaration and promised to convey its views soon. 
The team is still not sure of the level of signing of the 
Joint Declaration on the Canadian side but continues to see 
this document as a deliverable for the BCG; 
 
-- Beaulieu suggested for the pre-meeting a quick review of 
the outstanding proposals from the last meeting, and raised 
the issue of a brief discussion of key regional issues such 
as Iran in this small venue before the larger group convenes. 
 
 
3.  (SBU)  January 17 
 
--  The GOC proposes the following for the meeting flow: 
 
a.  Principals present policy implications of the earlier 
threat assessment (modification of our #1); 
 
b.   Outstanding Issues (our #2): 
 
* Beaulieu said we need to go over these and see where they 
stand.  He could only remember the invitation to participate 
in US training courses (e.g. FSI), but noted that this did 
not pan out; 
 
* GOC team would like to be realistic about accomplishments 
and our level of cooperation and to avoid only considering 
this list when it is time for the next BCG; if that is what 
we have done, the team would welcome a discussion of how 
better to follow-up. 
 
c.  Follow-up on Bioterrorism Engagement (our #3):  The GOC 
team sees this as one of the more successful bilateral 
programs and wants us to update where things stand and how we 
keep it progressing; 
 
d. Cooperative Counterterrorism Research and Development (R & 
D) (our #4):  Beaulieu noted that last year we spent ninety 
minutes in plenary discussing this topic, and recommended 
that we limit this to a very brief overview presentation on 
current activities and future challenges by representatives 
current activities and future challenges by representatives 
of the two programs and that there be a breakout session at 
some point to permit more detailed discussions at the working 
level, on which the group could receive a briefing at the end 
of the session; 
 
-- NEW ISSUE: Perspectives on G8 Roma Lyon Process.  The GOC 
team is interested in our priorities, how we will work with 
Japan, etc., and would welcome a discussion on how we will 
approach this, to include Critical Infrastructure Protection, 
PPP, and Cyber proposals; 
 
-- NEW ISSUE: Geographic and Regional Issues -- Western 
Hemisphere and Asia.   Because of Canada's new focus on the 
hemisphere, the GOC would welcome a discussion of CT issues 
in the region.  Because of the criticality of Afghanistan, 
the GOC team also wants to compare notes on Afghanistan and 
Pakistan.  Beaulieu noted that we would need to limit the 
Afghanistan discussion to a few focused issues; 
 
e. U.S.-Canada Counterterrorism Concerns (our #5): 
 
* Beaulieu emphasized that the GOC does not want to repeat 
what is already under discussion in other fora (e.g. border 
control, passports, visas, etc.); 
 
* The GOC team would rather open this up for specific 
concerns from both sides.  If we stick to the issues we are 
proposing they would like add a few of theirs. 
 
f.  Strategies and Options for Dealing with Terrorist 
Financing (our #6) 
 
* The GOC team proposed making this less operational and more 
strategic in focus than what we proposed; 
 
* The GOC team would like to see presentations by FINTRAC and 
FINCEN on their strategic approaches; 
 
* The GOC team wants to include a G-8 discussions update if 
there are issues remaining after fall meetings. 
 
g.  TOPOFF 4: Exchange of views on the completed exercise 
(our #7) 
 
h.  Briefing on USG Regional Strategic Initiative (our #8) 
 
i.  Recent Developments in National Security Issues (CHANGE 
to our #9 away from changes to their organization in the 
direction of policy changes) 
 
* Canadian Anti-terrorism Act review; 
 
* Canadian issue of Security Certificates. 
 
j.  Radicalization and Outreach (our #10) 
 
* GOC team recommended discussion at a higher, strategic 
level, perhaps including the RCMP's new unit to work with 
minority communities; 
. 
* Challenges and Responses; 
 
* Lessons learned. 
 
k.  U.S.-Canada cooperation to promote capacity building and 
assistance programs (#11) 
 
* GOC team proposed a focus on places where there is a clear 
need for us to work together, not just compare notes on where 
we are working individually. 
 
4. (SBU) Administrative and Technical Issues 
 
-- Beaulieu recommended that, if we are to host a dinner, it 
be on the evening of January 17.  This would "capture" the 
GOC participants and ensure that they do not start leaving on 
the afternoon before the session concludes; 
 
-- Beaulieu said one of the interagency team wanted to ensure 
that Iran fits prominently in the program, and asked for our 
views on which block would provide enough time; 
 
-- Beaulieu suggested that Director Moher would also benefit 
from meetings in Washington with CIA, FBI, NCTC, noting that 
Moher could possibly come down a day early for these; 
 
-- The team asked to know soonest if the meeting will be held 
in Washington, D.C. or outside the city in order to plan 
travel now. 
 
Visit our shared North American Partnership blog (Canada & Mexico) at 
http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/nap 
 
WILKINS