Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07MEXICO5632, SUBJ: SUGAR WORKER EARN FAR LESS THAN THEIR UNION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MEXICO5632.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07MEXICO5632 2007-10-29 17:45 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Mexico
VZCZCXRO2240
PP RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHM RUEHHO RUEHJO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHPOD
RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #5632/01 3021745
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 291745Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9360
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
RUEHXI/LABOR COLLECTIVE
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MEXICO 005632 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR DRL/AWH AND ILCSR, WHA/MEX, USDOL FOR ILAB 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ELAB EAGR ECON ENGR PGOV PINR MX
SUBJECT: SUBJ: SUGAR WORKER EARN FAR LESS THAN THEIR UNION 
 
REF: (A) MEXICO 5462 B) MEXICO 0278 
 
1.  SUMMARY:  Mexican sugar is one of the most expensive to 
produce in the world; costing on average almost 2 1/2 times 
more to produce than its most efficient competitors.  A 
number of reasons exist for this cost difference but one of 
the most frequently cited causes is Mexico,s largest sugar 
workers union which is accused of being corrupt and is blamed 
for demanding "excessive" wages and benefits for its members. 
 There is no doubt that this large union, as opposed to its 
rank and file workers, is doing very well.  However, a closer 
look at conditions for the worker shows that they are not 
doing as well as their union (or its leaders).  Add to this a 
complicated federal law which mandates artificially high 
prices and a startling lack of investment by mill owners and 
the reasons for the high cost of Mexican sugar go far beyond 
what could honestly be attributed to any wages or benefits 
being paid to the workers or their union.  This is the second 
of two reports on the current state of affairs within 
Mexico,s largest sugar cane workers union, the Workers Union 
of the Mexican Sugar Industry (STIASRM). 
 
 
THE HIGH COST OF MEXICAN SUGAR 
------------------------------ 
 
2.  The cost of producing Mexican sugar is one of the highest 
in the world.  Brazil, which more or less sets the 
international standard for efficient productions cost, can 
produce a ton of sugar for approximately USD 15.00 per ton. 
That same ton of sugar costs USD 40.00 per ton produce in 
Mexico; or more than twice as much.  The conventional wisdom 
in Mexico has long held that the high cost of sugar was due 
to (1) high prices mandated by a federal &Contract Law8 
(CL) which artificially raised prices over and above the cost 
of normal market factors and (2) the supposedly high wages 
paid to the members of the Workers Union of the Mexican Sugar 
Industry (STIASRM). 
 
3.  Contract Laws (see Ref A) are a type of collective 
bargaining agreement negotiated by industry, union and 
government representatives.  Since CLs are negotiated 
arrangements they are established for fixed periods of time 
and vary significantly from industry to industry.  CLs 
establish minimum standards (which can include price floors 
for agricultural and/or manufactured products) that both 
employers and employees are expected to follow over and above 
the permanent guidance contained in Mexico,s Federal Labor 
Law.  In theory CLs are periodically renegotiated like any 
collective bargaining agreement but in practice they rarely 
contain any meaningful change. 
 
4.  Since taking office in December of 2006, the 
administration of Mexican President Felipe Calderon has 
steadily worked to modify some of the factors often blamed 
for the cost of Mexican sugar.  In early October, after nine 
months of negotiations, the Calderon government, the mill 
owners, cane producers and the unions reached an agreement 
that is said to significantly change the CL that the sugar 
industry had been operating under without since 1936.  As a 
part of the discussions to re-negotiate the sugar industry,s 
CL, significant give and take was agreed to with regard to 
wages and benefits for the sugar cane workers.  As a result 
of this dual track negotiation, the official GOM position 
states that the members of the Sugar Workers Union are no 
longer seen as one of the main factors contributing to the 
high cost of Mexican sugar. 
 
 
THE NEW SUGAR BAD GUYS 
---------------------- 
 
5.  The chief culprits now being blamed for Mexico,s high 
sugar costs are the various elements of the industry,s 
production logistical chain and outdated technology. 
According to the GOM's Secretary of Agriculture, the main 
reason for the high cost of Mexican sugar are the fees 
charged by the individuals and firms that transport or 
warehouse sugar.  Between them these middlemen reportedly 
raise the price of producing Mexican sugar from 5.5 pesos per 
kilo (approximately USD 0.51) to 12.00 pesos per kilo 
(approximately USD 1.12). 
 
MEXICO 00005632  002 OF 003 
 
 
 
6.  The other main bad guy according to the current official 
line is outdated technology.  In some instances sugar mill 
plants are operated with 40 years old technology.  Blaming 
technology is a polite way for the GOM to be politically 
correct; thereby allowing it to avoid saying that the mill 
owners have done little or nothing to modernize their 
industry.  Reportedly this under investment or lack of 
investment will change as a result of the modifications in 
the sugar industry,s new Contract Law (Ref A). 
 
7.  None of the above elements should be taken to mean that 
the sugar workers and their union are completely blameless. 
For example, the new CL does not change the rules under which 
sugar workers can allegedly receive as much as three months 
of paid vacation per year.  The workers have what mill owners 
consider a fairly generous retirement plan based on a 
collective bargaining agreement negotiated in 1998.  The 
workers also reportedly get a fifty percent reduction in any 
and all sugar they purchase for &personal8 use as well as 
subsidized electricity for residential, union office use and 
for the schools where their children study.  To be fair to 
the sugar workers, it must be acknowledged that these last 
benefits are not outside the norms that most other organized 
unions in Mexico have obtained for their members.  That said, 
it can also not be denied that these benefits come at a price 
that ultimately adds to cost of production. 
 
 
THE REAL TAKE HOME PAY OF A SUGAR WORKER 
---------------------------------------- 
 
8.  Reftel A outlined some of the good and bad points of 
Enrique Ramos Rodriguez, the leader of the STIASRM, Mexico,s 
largest sugar union.   The STIASRM leader appears to 
personally oversee the income from two up-scale hotels 
constructed with union funds.  In addition to controlling the 
income from these hotels the STIASRM leader is also said to 
either control or own outright two sports clubs, two sugar 
mills, two office building and 15 homes in Mexico City as 
well as an undetermined number of warehouses.  The Mexican 
media have gone into extensive detail on the perks, 
privileges and properties of the Secretary General of the 
STIASRM, but very little has been said about the real wages 
of the average sugar worker. 
 
9.  According to most union observers the labor component of 
producing Mexican sugar is only four percent of the total 
production cost.  At the start of the dual track discussions 
that produced the new sugar industry CL in early October, the 
union had requested a 15 percent wage increase for the 
workers but it ultimately accepted a raise of only 4.5 
percent.  Ramos eventually saw the need to accept a lower 
wage for the workers (one of his good points) but he did so 
in exchange for a commitment from the mill owners to invest 
heavily in new plant and in worker training.  According to 
the GOM,s Secretary of Agriculture these two steps should 
reduce the cost of producing Mexican sugar by as much as 15 
percent. 
 
10.  These expected productivity improvements are to be 
applauded but even after the 4.5 percent wage increase sugar 
union workers do not earn particularly high wages.  A general 
laborer in Mexico,s sugar industry (cane field or mill 
worker) earns 76 pesos per day (roughly USD 7.22).  The 
maximum salary of a highly skilled sugar worker is 232 pesos 
per day (roughly USD 21.48).  The highest daily wage of a 
senior worker employed just below the management level is 375 
pesos per day (approximately USD 37.72).  These salaries are 
all above the Mexican minimum daily wage (about USD 4.47) and 
by comparison these amounts earned by skilled sugar workers 
are substantial.  However, the Mexican minimum wage is a very 
poor standard of comparison in terms of the quality of life a 
worker earning that amount could afford.  The higher skilled 
workers are clearly better off than those at the bottom but 
these upper limit wages are not earned by the majority of 
sugar workers and even if they were a salary that amounts to 
under USD 38.00 a day can hardly be called lavish. 
 
 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
 
MEXICO 00005632  003 OF 003 
 
 
11.  There is no doubt that STIASRM union members are better 
off than most agricultural and even some manufacturing 
laborers.  That said, is it difficult to understand the long 
held view that the relatively modest wages cites above could 
realistically have been considered the most significant 
contributing factor to the high cost of Mexican sugar.  The 
STIASRM and its leader (especially its leader) clearly 
deserve a share of the blame for high Mexican sugar prices 
but up until now they have been portrayed as much worse than 
they actually were.  Now that the union and the workers are 
no longer the worst villains of the sugar industry the usual 
suspects, i.e. the middlemen, have moved more toward front 
and center.  Interestingly, the mill owners and came 
producers have not seriously been singled out of a portion of 
the blame.  These two private sector elements, and not the 
workers or their union, are the main beneficiaries of the 
price floors mandated by the Contract Law.  In all 
probability, union wage and benefit demands were calculated 
with an eye on the guaranteed profits of the sugar 
industry,s private sector but such a negotiating tactic 
could be justified, from their perspective, as simply asking 
for what the market would allow. 
 
 
Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity and the North American 
Partnership Blog at http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/nap / 
GARZA