Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07COLOMBO1391, SRI LANKA: MIXED REACTIONS TO NEW U.S. LAW ON MARITIME

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07COLOMBO1391.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07COLOMBO1391 2007-10-09 09:30 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Colombo
VZCZCXRO4085
RR RUEHCI RUEHLMC
DE RUEHLM #1391/01 2820930
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 090930Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6943
INFO RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 1439
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 0452
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 7439
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 5577
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 2248
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 8036
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA 0361
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHLMC/MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 001391 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR SCA/INS AND EEB/TRA/OTP 
STATE PASS USTR FOR ADINA ADLER 
COMMERCE FOR JONATHAN STONE 
MCC FOR S. GROFF, D. TETER, D. NASSIRY AND E. BURKE 
TREASURY FOR LESLIE HULL 
 
E.O 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EWWT ETRD PREL PTER KMCA CE
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA: MIXED REACTIONS TO NEW U.S. LAW ON MARITIME 
CARGO SCANNING REQUIREMENTS 
 
REF: A. SECSTATE 119837 B. COLOMBO 1134 
 
1. SUMMARY:  Colombo Port authorities and managers of shipping lines 
expressed opposing views on the ability to meet the new U.S. law on 
maritime cargo scanning requirements.  Authorities of the Port of 
Colombo maintain that the port will be able to scan all U.S.-bound 
shipping containers by year 2012.  With the port already operating 
the Container Security and Megaports Initiatives, they say the port 
is well-positioned to implement the new law before 2012. 
Authorities have several logistical concerns but they are confident 
these can be resolved.  These issues include: above all, timely 
cargo flow; infrastructure costs and space limits; shortage of 
skilled manpower; legal access to all containers; and added costs 
associated with all these issues.  By contrast, shipping lines 
operating in Sri Lanka argue that Colombo Port will not only be 
unable to fulfill the requirement in five years, but also that the 
port is only a small piece of how the entire global shipping network 
will be negatively affected and unable to efficiently manage the 
requirement.  End Summary. 
 
2. Econoff separately delivered ref A points to the Secretary to 
Ports and Aviation, Tilak Collure; Harbourmaster of the Port of 
Colombo, Captain Ravi Jayawickrema; Director General of Customs, 
Sarath Jayathilake; and Deputy Director of Customs and Intelligence, 
L.M. Nelson.  All supported the law and affirmed that the Port of 
Colombo, the country's main international port, would be able to 
scan all U.S.-bound shipping containers before the 2012 deadline. 
All agreed that the port, compared to others in the region, has 
fewer technical and logistical challenges to overcome as it already 
operates the Container Security Initiative (CSI) and the Megaports 
Initiative.  Presently, approximately 200-250 containers bound for 
the U.S. are handled each day at the port, of which 20 percent are 
local exports and the rest are transshipments. 
 
SCANNING DELAYS CARGO FLOW 
-------------------------- 
 
3. The primary concern all parties expressed was whether the Act 
would have a negative impact on cargo flow.  Currently operating at 
full capacity, the port's productivity is in steady decline and has 
caused enough congestion to persuade some shipping companies to 
reroute their lines to bypass Colombo Port (ref B).  Port 
authorities told Econoff that CSI and Megaports operations are among 
the factors contributing to the delays in cargo flow.  With each 
scan taking 15 minutes and an average of 10 to 15 cargo containers 
scanned daily, cargo flow is delayed by at least a couple hours each 
day.  Presently, only one of four scanners is fully operational with 
a second due to operate within a month.  The port authorities cited 
lack of space and limited skilled manpower to explain the delay in 
operating all the scanners.  Customs officials said they will submit 
to Econoff a detailed plan as to how they will get the remaining 
scanners in operation.  Though the port authorities blamed CSI and 
Megaports for exacerbating the delays, authorities appeared 
optimistic that once scanning inspections were integrated into the 
overall operations, the port will have an advantage over other 
regional ports that have not joined the two initiatives. 
Authorities told Econoff that they felt more comfortable tackling 
these logistical problems now knowing that their competitors will 
experience similar challenges in the future. 
 
WHO IS GOING TO PAY? 
-------------------- 
 
4. One concern port authorities expressed involved the cost 
associated with conducting secondary scanning inspections.  Port 
officials and the Treasury were still in discussion as to who would 
bear the costs of the false-alarm secondary inspections.  Secretary 
Collure predicted that the Treasury would likely favor shippers and 
that the costs would be incurred either by the Ports Authority or by 
the Customs Department.  To help defray the costs of non-fraud 
container inspections, the port is considering increasing fines for 
contaminated containers. 
 
5. Other costs that port authorities foresaw included new 
 
COLOMBO 00001391  002 OF 002 
 
 
radioactive systems-detection systems (depending on new technology 
requirements) and associated equipment such as cranes and trucks; 
building of the dedicated sites for the scanners; and training of 
technicians and operators assigned to the systems.  With a 
multi-million dollar infrastructure expansion underway already, 
authorities did not know how they would cover these additional 
costs. 
 
SHIPPING LINES AND EXPORTERS SEE LA AS UNWORKABLE 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
 
6. By contrast, local shipping ine managers and exporters said the 
U.S. containr scanning initiative was "unnecessary," "unthinkale," 
and "not viable."  One country manager of amajor shipping line 
asked Econoff why the U.S. culd not bear the burden and scan all 
the containes upon arrival in the United States.  Moreover, 
hipping lines and exporters doubt that Colombo Por would be able 
to fulfill the requirement withinfive years as the port is already 
experiencing lw productivity, high costs, limited space, and delas 
in its expansion plans.  Managers of the shipping lines also pointed 
out that the law will require significant funding, especially to 
procure more scanners, as the port's present inventory of four is 
not sufficient.  In addition, land for the placement of scanners, 
cargo containers, cranes, trucks, etc., has not been included in the 
present expansion plans. 
 
7. The biggest worry for shippers is global congestion in the 
shipping line network.  The scanning requirement will affect the 
whole journey of each vessel, forcing shipping lines to manage new 
delays at each port their vessels visit.  One country manager stated 
that such delays would increase costs for shipping lines, decrease 
the confidence of their customers who expect their cargo to be 
delivered on time, and negatively impact the environment as vessels 
burn more fuel to rush to their next destination port. 
 
8. Garment exporters in Sri Lanka likewise have told shipping lines 
that they think the requirement is unfeasible in the next five years 
as they cannot afford delays in their supply chains.  If the law is 
implemented, the "cut-off time" for exporters to have their cargo at 
the port for loading could be increased by two or three days; 
currently, exporters have to ensure their cargo is at the port 24 
hours before vessel arrival.  By forcing shorter production windows, 
the measure would increase costs. 
 
9. COMMENT:  Port officials and shipping lines agree that Colombo 
Port's biggest problem is its congestion and low berth productivity. 
 While port authorities are focused on the port's operations and how 
to logistically accommodate the new requirement, shipping lines 
argue simply that the new requirement will negatively affect the 
entire global shipping network.  Showing the same pragmatism and 
foresight that led them to make Colombo Port the first port in Asia 
to implement both CSI and Megaports, port authorities are resigned 
to working out the logistics to fulfill the requirement within the 
prescribed time. 
BLAKE