Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07TOKYO3179, JAPAN POST PRIVATIZATION - COMMITTEE COMMENTS ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO3179.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07TOKYO3179 2007-07-12 03:49 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO0116
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3179/01 1930349
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 120349Z JUL 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5423
INFO RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 5617
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA PRIORITY 2024
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA PRIORITY 1111
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA PRIORITY 4444
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE PRIORITY 5613
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO PRIORITY 2821
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/TREASURY DEPT WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 TOKYO 003179 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
USTR FOR CULTER, BEEMAN, MEYERS 
NSC FOR TONG 
DOC FOR 4410/ITA/OJ/NMELCHER 
PARIS FOR USOECD 
TREASURY FOR IA/DOHNER, CARNES AND POGGI 
STATE PASS TO FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD FOR JKOHLI 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN JA PGOV
SUBJECT: JAPAN POST PRIVATIZATION - COMMITTEE COMMENTS ON 
THE IMPLAMENTATION PLAN.  GOOD FOR US FINANCIAL COMPANIES; 
NOT SO GOOD FOR EXPRESS CARRIERS 
 
REF: TOKYO 02716 
 
1. (SBU) Summary. Japan Post begins a ten-year privatization 
process on October 1 releasing nearly $3 trillion in banking 
and insurance assets from government control.  In 
preparation, the Japan Post Company on May 1 issued an 
implementation plan, rumored to be over 400 thousand pages in 
length, and provided a 119 page summary of the plan for 
public comment to interested parties. The lack of detail in 
the summary, however, and the extremely limited time allotted 
for public comment (sixteen business days) makes it difficult 
to evaluate whether equivalent conditions of competition will 
exist after October 1.  The 
Postal Service Privatization Committee (PSPC), the council 
charged with overseeing the privatization process, 
subsequently released an opinion paper on the implementation 
plan which contained language that was particularly welcomed 
by the insurance and financial industries for its assurances 
regarding transparency, Japan Post successor companies being 
subject to the same rules and regulations as the private 
sector, and the process for introducing new products. The 
opinion was particularly positive when compare to the PSPC's 
comments on draft implementation plan in late 2006 which 
focused on "consumer convenience" rather than competition 
issues.  The PSPC opinion was less favorable for 
international express mail delivery services. Japan Post's 
Express Mail Service (EMS), which the USG contends competes 
directly with international express mail companies such as 
FedEx and UPS, will continue to be classified by the Ministry 
of Internal Affairs and Communication (MIC) as universal 
service after privatization.  This allows for preferential 
regulatory treatment and creates an unfair competitive 
advantage that enables EMS to deliver its service at a 
significantly reduced cost versus competitors.  The PSPC 
opinion did not challenge this situation.  The USG and 
industry should continue to apply pressure on the GOJ to 
establish a level playing field in this sector. End Summary. 
 
2. (SBU) As discussed reftel, Japan Post begins a ten-year 
privatization process on October 1 releasing nearly $3 
trillion in banking and insurance assets from government 
control.  In preparation, the Japan Post Company on May 1 
issued an implementation plan, rumored to be over 400 
thousand pages in length, and provided a 119 page summary of 
the plan for public comment to interested parties.  Both the 
American Chamber of Commerce in Japan (ACCJ) and the U.S. 
government submitted comments to the Postal Service 
Privatization Committee (PSPC), the council charged with 
overseeing the privatization process, during the public 
comment process.  Despite repeated requests from the USG and 
industry, however, Japan Post Corp. never released the entire 
implementation plan to interested parties. 
 
3. (SBU) The primary concern for both domestic and 
international industry in the privatization process is 
ensuring that the four new Japan Post entities, the postal 
banking company (Yucho), the postal insurance company 
(Kampo), the postal delivery company and the postal service 
company, are subject to equivalent conditions of competition 
as the private sector.  The lack of detail in the summary, 
however, and the extremely limited time allotted for public 
comment (sixteen business days) makes it difficult to 
evaluate whether these equivalent conditions will exist after 
October 1.  Much of the discussion in both the USG's and 
ACCJ's comments submitted to the PSPC focused on this lack of 
detail. 
 
4. (SBU) Subsequent to ACCJ representatives testifying before 
the PSPC, the committee agreed to allow interested parties to 
submit questions to Japan Post Corp. and to compel the 
company to respond.  Before industry was able to develop such 
a list, however, PSPC issued its own opinion on the 
implementation plan.  Its assessment was surprisingly 
laudatory. The opinion contained language that was 
 
TOKYO 00003179  002 OF 003 
 
 
particularly welcomed by the insurance and financial 
industries for its assurances regarding transparency, Japan 
Post successor companies being subject to the same rules and 
regulations as the private sector commencing October 1 and 
the process for introducing new products. 
 
5. (SBU) With regards to insurance and banking, the opinion 
states there should be "maximum effort..made to dispel the 
perception of an implicit government guarantee," that the 
privatized Japan Post companies should "be granted the same 
treatment in the enforcement of relevant laws and 
regulations" as private corporations and that "new business 
operations shall be approved through the commission's 
investigations and deliberations while ensuring appropriate 
competitive relations."  Finally, the report calls for 
measures to prevent cross-subsidization and other 
preferential treatment between the privatized companies 
stating "At the time of succession, there will be a need to 
consider...whether contracts between the succeeding companies 
will comply with...the arms-length rule regulation...." 
These are all issues of great concern to U.S. industry.  The 
commission's positive remarks are a welcome step forward, 
especially compared with its remarks on the draft 
implementation plan in July 2006 in which PSPC emphasized 
"consumer convenience" over competitive concerns. 
 
6. (SBU) Unfortunately, the PSPC opinion was less favorable 
for international express mail delivery services. 
Specifically, the opinion discusses the development of "new 
business operations of the postal delivery corporation" and 
calls for these new businesses to be established "under 
equivalent conditions of competition with private companies." 
 However, when questioned about the definition of "new 
business operations," Office for the Privatization of Japan 
Post (OPJP - PSPC's secretariat) Counselor Akira Nishihara 
told Ecouns in a June 15 meeting that international express 
delivery services like those provided by FedEx and UPS are 
not now provided by Japan Post.  The 
Japan Post product, Express Mail Service (EMS), which the 
USG believes competes directly with FedEx and UPS, is defined 
under universal service as put forth by the Universal Postal 
Union and, as such, does not compete with the private sector, 
Nishihara maintained.   Equivalent conditions of competition 
would only apply to new products Japan Post would develop in 
the future. This is the same position that the Ministry of 
Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) which regulates EMS 
held during the Regulatory Reform talks in May. 
 
7. (U) Defining EMS as part of universal service is 
significant.  Under universal service, the timely and 
efficient receipt of mail is a right of every Japanese 
citizen and therefore, products categorized as such may 
receive preferential regulatory treatment.  By classifying 
EMS as part of universal service, the product can enjoy 
favorable treatment in such things as customs clearance and 
de minimus customs declaration.  This allows EMS to deliver 
its product at an extremely low price. According to Japan 
Post's website, a 500 gram (1.1 pound) package mailed using 
EMS from Tokyo to San Diego would cost the sender Y1,500 yen 
($12.19) and would arrive in "two-to-three" days.  The same 
package using FedEx would cost Y8,280 yen ($67.31) for 
priority service (delivery by 12:30pm on the second day) or 
Y12,420 yen ($100.97) for first class service (delivery by 
8:30am on the second day). 
 
8. (SBU) The matter is further complicated as the Japan 
Fair Trade Commission (JFTC), which is charged with 
overseeing anti-monopoly and competitive policy issues, 
released a report in July 2006 giving its opinion that EMS 
does compete directly with international express mail 
delivery companies.  The report states "(because) the EMS 
network cooperation between six postal agencies including 
Japan Post has been strengthened, some of the EMS services 
have become similar to international express delivery 
 
TOKYO 00003179  003 OF 003 
 
 
services, creating competition between EMS and international 
express mail delivery services." 
 
9. (SBU)  During a July 6 meeting with Ecouns, JFTC 
Director for International Affairs Shuichi Sugahisa 
reaffirmed the commission's belief that EMS does compete with 
the private sector. He noted the report specifically 
discusses what accounting procedures should be used to ensure 
proper costing to account for EMS' use of the Japan Post 
infrastructure.  Failing to do so could constitute dumping, 
Sugahisa suggested. However, Sugahisa also stated that JFTC 
could only issue its opinion and had little enforcement 
capability unless there was a clear violation of Japan's 
Anti-Monopoly Act.  The commission has no ability to take 
action against another government entity, he said. When 
pressed, Sugahisa admitted that allowing different customs 
procedures for EMS could be an unfair competitive advantage 
that would allow EMS to price its services below those of its 
competitors.   He stated that one way to resolve this issue 
would be for private industry to bring suit against the 
Government of Japan and let the Japanese courts decide.  This 
has been tried once before by a group of businesses which 
believed the Tokyo metropolitan government provided unfair 
competitive advantages to a city-run slaughterhouse.  The 
court ruled in favor of the city. 
 
10.  (U) The PSPC's opinion regarding Japan Post's plans for 
the postal banking and insurance companies post privatization 
is a positive development for U.S. industry particularly 
given the concerns surrounding the 2006 draft implementation 
plan.  At that time, there was little to no mention of the 
need for competitive equality in introducing new products or 
about the need for transparency in financial reporting to 
protect against cross-subsidization.  The concerted efforts 
of the USG and the ACCJ can be credited with the progress 
made on this front.  Unfortunately, the outlook for express 
delivery is not as bright.  The USG and U.S. industry should 
continue to urge on the GOJ to establish a level playing 
field in this sector. 
SCHIEFFER