Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07TOKYO2979, JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 07/02/07-1

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO2979.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07TOKYO2979 2007-07-02 01:21 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO0513
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2979/01 1830121
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 020121Z JUL 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5075
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4246
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1831
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 5411
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 0939
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2640
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7677
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3735
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4829
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 TOKYO 002979 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT: JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 07/02/07-1 
 
 
Index: 
 
1) Top headlines 
2) Editorials 
 
Prime Minister's weekend schedule: Mostly campaign-related 
activities 
 
Opinion polls: 
3) Asahi poll: Abe Cabinet support rate sinks to lowest ever, 28 % 
, rivaling unpopularity of former Mori administration 
4) Mainichi poll shows 52 %   non-support rate for Abe Cabinet, with 
majority of public unhappy about prime minister's handling of 
pension issue 
 
Kyuma flap: 
5) Defense Minister Kyuma: "Atomic bombings of Japan could not be 
helped" 
6) Text of Kyuma's remarks justifying US use of atomic bombs to end 
war 
7) Opposition parties blast Kyuma for atomic-bombing remarks 
8) Ruling parties perplexed by Kyuma's atomic-bombing remarks, fear 
they could impact on the Upper House election 
9) Prime Minister Abe: Defense minister was just introducing US view 
 
10) Opposition camp demands Kyuma's dismissal for atomic-bombing 
remarks 
11) Abe rejects calls for dismissing Kyuma, though admits remarks 
were inappropriate 
 
Articles: 
 
1) TOP HEADLINES 
 
Asahi: 
Poll: Cabinet approval rate declines to low of 28 % 
 
Mainichi: 
Poll: Cabinet disapproval rate rises to new high of 52 % 
 
Yomiuri, Sankei: 
Abe, Ozawa lock horns in debate ahead of Upper House election 
 
Nikkei: 
Japan's economy growing driven by domestic, external demand 
 
Tokyo Shimbun: 
Abe refuses to dismiss Defense Minister Kyuma 
 
Akahata: 
Kyuma's atomic bombing remark demonstrates unfitness for office 
 
2) EDITORIALS 
 
Asahi: 
(1) Heated debate expected ahead of Upper House election 
(2) Kyuma's appalling atomic bombing remarks 
 
Mainichi: 
(1) Kyuma's thoughtless and dishonorable remarks 
(2) Abe-Ozawa debate needed more heat 
 
 
TOKYO 00002979  002 OF 007 
 
 
Yomiuri: 
(1) SIA officials must lose public servant status 
(2) More party-head debates needed 
 
Nikkei: 
(1) Campaign issues now clear with Abe-Ozawa debate 
(2) Kyuma unfit for office 
 
Sankei: 
(1) Four-party talks must not replace six-party talks 
(2) Preservation of cultural assets deserves thorough discussion 
 
Tokyo Shimbun: 
(1) Kyuma's atomic bombing remarks expose his ignorance 
(2) Hong Kong marks 10 years since reversion 
 
Akahata: 
(1) National Life White Paper needs viewpoint of social solidarity 
 
3) OPINION 
 
Poll: Cabinet support hits new low of 28 % 
 
ASAHI (Top play) (Abridged) 
July 2, 2007 
 
The Abe cabinet's support rate hit a record low in the Asahi 
Shimbun's telephone-based eighth public opinion survey conducted on 
June 30 and July 1, with the Diet having essentially ended its 
ordinary session. Abe was enthusiastic about reforming the Social 
Insurance Agency and revising the National Public Service Law. He 
has just had relevant bills get through the Diet. All the more for 
this reason, the survey's results were severe for him. 
 
In the survey this time, the Abe cabinet's support rate was 28 % 
(31 %   in the last survey). The lowest figure in the past was 30 % 
, which was shown in the fourth serial survey taken June 2-3. This 
time, the Abe cabinet's support rate was below 30 %   for the first 
time. The Abe cabinet's nonsupport rate was 48 %  , the same as in 
the last survey. The cabinet support rate last dropped below 30 % 
when the Mori cabinet was in office, though the results of previous 
polls and the one taken this time cannot be simply compared due to 
different polling methodologies. 
 
The Abe cabinet's support rate, after dropping to 30 %  , stayed low 
at 34 %  , 32 %  , and 31 %  . Among men, its support rate was 24 % 
 this time, showing a substantial drop from 36 %   in the last 
survey, with its nonsupport rate rising to 52 %   from 50 %   in the 
last survey). Among those in their 20s to 50s, the support rate was 
low at around 20 %  . Among those who support the ruling Liberal 
Democratic Party, the Abe cabinet's support rate was a record low of 
64 %  , failing to reach 70 %   for the first time. 
 
In the current Diet session, the ruling coalition rammed pension and 
other bills through the Diet. Respondents were asked if they 
appreciated the Abe cabinet's response to the issue of the 
government's pension record-keeping flaws. In response to this 
question, 24 %   answered "yes," with 59 %   saying "no." When it 
comes to the leading opposition Democratic Party of Japan 
(Minshuto), 27 %   answered "yes" to that party's response over the 
pension issue, with 45 %   saying "no." The survey shows the 
public's severe view of the Abe cabinet. 
 
TOKYO 00002979  003 OF 007 
 
 
 
In the breakdown of public support for political parties, the LDP 
stood at 25 %   (27 %   in the last survey), with the DPJ at 16 % 
(15 %  ). New Komeito, the LDP's coalition partner, was at 3 %   (4 
%  ). The Japanese Communist Party was at 2 %   (2 %  ), and the 
Social Democratic Party (Shaminto) at 1 %   (1 %  ). 
 
4) Poll: Cabinet nonsupport at 52 % 
 
MAINICHI (Top play) (Abridged) 
July 2, 2007 
 
The Mainichi Shimbun conducted a telephone-based nationwide public 
opinion survey on June 30 and July 1. The rate of public support for 
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his cabinet was 32 %  , the same as in 
the last survey taken in May. However, the nonsupport rate for the 
Abe cabinet reached 52 %  , up 8  percentage points. The figure is 
the worst since the Abe cabinet came into office in September last 
year. Asked about the government's pension record-keeping flaws, a 
total of 74 %   answered that they would factor in the issue when 
voting in the upcoming election for the House of Councillors. As 
seen from the figure, the pension issue is now a major point of 
contention in campaigning for the election. In addition, a total of 
63 %   gave negative answers when asked if they appreciate the 
government and ruling parties' efforts to handle the pension 
fiasco. 
 
A total of 23 %   answered "no" to a question asking if they would 
factor in the pension issue when voting in the election, and only 32 
%   answered "yes" to a question asking if they appreciated the 
government and ruling parties' efforts to deal with the pension 
issue. The figures show that the pension issue is a minus factor for 
the governing parties and one of the likely causes of the rise in 
the disapproval rating for the Abe cabinet. 
 
5) Defense Minister Kyuma: Atomic bombings couldn't be helped 
 
ASAHI (Page 1) (Excerpts) 
July 1, 2007 
 
Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma stated in a speech on June 30 in 
Kashiwa City, Chiba Prefecture: 
 
"Many Nagasaki people suffered by the US atomic bombing, but I 
understand the bombing in Nagasaki put an end to the war.  I think 
it was something that couldn't be helped." 
 
 
His remarks might be taken as justifying the US atomic bombings. 
Opposition parties appear likely to call on Prime Minister Shinzo 
Abe to sack him. Kyuma's remarks are now creating a controversy. 
 
6) Gist of Defense Minister Kyuma's remarks on atomic bombings 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Abridged) 
July 1, 2007 
 
The following is a gist of the remarks about the atomic bombings of 
Japan made by Defense Minister Kyuma in a speech on June 30: 
 
Although the United States knew that Japan would lose the war, it 
dropped atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. By dropping a bomb on 
 
TOKYO 00002979  004 OF 007 
 
 
Nagasaki, the US reasoned that Japan would surrender if it went that 
far. In that case, the US thought it could stop the Soviet Union 
from joining battle, for on August 9, the USSR began to invade 
Manchuria and other places. Fortunately, the war ended on August 15, 
without the Soviet Union having occupied Hokkaido. However, mistakes 
could have led to the Soviet taking over Hokkaido. If at the time, 
it took over Hokkaido, there would have been nothing anybody could 
have done. Although countless numbers of people suffered a great 
tragedy, in my mind it could not have been helped in order to end 
the war. On that, I do not hold any grudge toward the United States. 
But I still wonder if it was necessary for them to have used the 
bombs, knowing that they were winning the war. 
 
7) Defense Minister Kyuma's remarks on atomic bombings blasted by 
opposition parties 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Excerpts) 
July 1, 2007 
 
In reaction to Defense Minister Kyuma's statement on June 30 that 
the dropping of atom bombs on Japan by the United States "couldn't 
be helped," Hiroko Hatakeyama, deputy director of the Hiroshima 
Prefecture federation of atomic-bomb victim groups stated: "Have all 
those people who died because of the atomic bombings died because it 
couldn't be helped? I feel that the feelings of the atomic-bomb 
victims have not been transmitted to the Japanese government, and I 
am so sad that words escape me." 
 
Hearing such views, Social Democratic Party head Fukushima stated, 
"I can't sense there was any thought toward the atom-bomb victims 
(in Kyuma's words)." She issued a statement seeking the resignation 
of Defense Minister Kyuma. 
 
Minshuto (Democratic Party of Japan) Deputy President Kan met the 
press along with Secretary General Kamei of the Peoples New Party 
and said: "He is totally unqualified to be defense minister." 
 
8-1) Kyuma remarks perplex ruling party; Could impact on the 
election 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Abridged) 
July 1, 2007 
 
Widespread confusion hit the government and the ruling party on June 
30 in reaction to Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma's comment that the 
dropping of atomic bombs by the US on Japan "couldn't be helped." 
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and others have tried to quell the issue, 
but because of Japan's status as the only nation to have suffered 
from atomic bombings and the feelings of atom-bomb survivors, the 
ripples from his comment could last a long while. 
 
The prime minister yesterday seemed to take the view that there was 
no problem with the content of the defense minister's remarks, 
saying, "I understand he was presenting the United States' way of 
thinking (in those days).  I am told that he also had mentioned the 
anger felt in places affected by the atomic bombing. 
 
LDP Secretary-General Hidenao Nakagawa stated, "I think that was his 
personal opinion. It appears that the defense minister has issued a 
statement, so I think the misunderstanding will be cleared up." 
 
These comments came at a time when the Diet, having clashed over the 
 
TOKYO 00002979  005 OF 007 
 
 
pension fiasco, has basically ended its session and lawmakers were 
shifting focus to the upcoming election.  Aides to the prime 
minister were not pleased with the latest remarks but are preparing 
to calm the situation. 
 
The ruling camp is deeply perplexed, with New Komeito head Akihiro 
Ota saying, "(The defense minister's) true intent may be very 
different." He added, "If there is something that could bring about 
a misunderstanding, an explanation is required." 
 
Yoichi Masuzoe, an LDP member of the House of Councillors commented, 
"Now we have given the opposition more material to use," adding, 
"Votes from Hiroshima and Nagasaki will now surely decrease during 
the next election." 
 
8-2) Kyuma's apology for A-bomb comment: Ruling camp concerned about 
adverse impact on Upper House election 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 2, 2007 
 
Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma apologized yesterday for his comment on 
the atomic bombings in 1945 by the United States. The apology came 
as Kyuma bowed to mounting pressure from the Kantei and the ruling 
camp. Members in the ruling parties, which face an uphill campaign 
for the upcoming House of Councillors election over pensions and 
other issues, are concerned that they could face a tougher time due 
to the Kyuma remark. The opposition camp is ready to intensify its 
attack against the ruling parties over the newly emerging issue, in 
addition to pensions. 
 
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe conveyed to Kyuma through his secretary on 
June 30, when Kyuma made the controversial remark, that he should be 
concerned. But Kyuma, who appeared unconcerned, refused to retract 
his comment on a TV program yesterday morning. In response, Liberal 
Democratic Party Policy Research Council Chairman Shoichi Nakagawa, 
who also appeared on the same program, had to suggest to Kyuma: "You 
had better apologize." 
 
Further, a senior New Komeito member made a phone call to a close 
aide to the prime minister and sought an additional response by 
saying, "His true intention should be clarified." Aware of such an 
atmosphere in the ruling parties, Kyuma told LDP Secretary General 
Hidenao Nakagawa on the phone in early afternoon of the same day, "I 
will retract the comment" and later gave a press conference in 
Nagasaki. 
 
With Kyuma's apology and the prime minister's rejection of the 
possibility of dismissing him, the ruling bloc intends to put an end 
to the issue, with Secretary General Nakagawa saying: "Since the 
defense minister apologized and retracted (the comment), the issue 
will not have a serious impact." But the opposition camp is poised 
to thoroughly pursue Kyuma over his controversial remarks, including 
a call for his resignation. Democratic Party of Japan (Minshuto) 
Secretary General Yukio Hatoyama directed his criticism at the prime 
 
SIPDIS 
minister during a gathering yesterday in Yokote City, Akita 
Prefecture, saying, "Mr. Kyuma should resign from his ministerial 
post, but the prime minister is trying to defend him." 
 
9) Prime Minister Abe: Defense minister just introduced US view on 
atomic bombings 
 
 
TOKYO 00002979  006 OF 007 
 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Full) 
July 1, 2007 
 
In a speech the city of Marugame, Kagawa Prefecture, Prime Minister 
Shinzo Abe revealed his perception that there was no problem with 
Defense Ministry Fumio Kyuma's remarks that the US bombing in 
Nagasaki was something that couldn't be helped. Abe stated: "I 
understand that he just introduced the US way of thinking. I have 
heard that he has mentioned his view that how Nagasaki suffered from 
the atomic bombing." 
 
Abe then stressed: "Eliminating nuclear weapons is Japan's mission. 
I think Japan has played a leading role in the United Nations." 
 
10) Defense Minister Kyuma's comment on atomic bombings: Opposition 
parties intend to seek dismissal 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 2, 2007 
 
Defense Minister Kyuma yesterday held a press conference to 
apologize for his comments. However, opposition parties are geared 
up to continue to seek his dismissal from Prime Minister Abe, saying 
that he has not taken back his comment that the atomic bombings were 
unavoidable and that his apology was insufficient. Democratic Party 
of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) Secretary General Hatoyama yesterday told 
reporters: "He did not say that he made a mistake. His apology is 
not acceptable at all." 
 
Japanese Communist Party General Secretary Ichita also criticized 
Kyuma: "The fact that he made that comment remains. The defense 
minister should be dismissed. The government and the ruling parties 
are trying to calm the situation, surprised at the heavy criticism 
his comment has brought. We will pursue this incident." 
 
Social Democratic Party head Fukushima told reporters: "We will 
demand the dismissal of Mr. Kyuma. We will make his comment a 
campaign issue for the Upper House election." 
 
11) Prime Minister Abe refuses to dismiss Kyuma despite his remarks, 
but recognizes them as inappropriate 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Top play) (Full) 
July 2, 2007 
 
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and the opposition Democratic Party of 
Japan's (Minshuto) President Ichiro Ozawa took part in a one-on-one 
debate and a meeting (hosted by the People's Council for Building a 
New Japan) held at a Tokyo hotel to examine each party's manifesto. 
In the debate, Abe talked about Defense Minister Kyuma's recent 
comments that America's use of atomic bombs was "inevitable" and 
acknowledged that they were inappropriate, noting: "Prudence is 
required not to make remarks that could give a false impression to 
the public." However, Abe indicated he would reject the calls from 
the opposition parties for the dismissal of Kyuma, saying: "Japan's 
mission is to eliminate nuclear weapons. I expect Mr. Kyuma as 
defense minister to demonstrate his capability to do so from now on 
as well." 
 
Ozawa criticized Kyuma for his comments: "He essentially spoke for 
America. As a minister, he lacked common sense, and his remarks were 
inappropriate." Also, Ozawa asserted, "Japan should seek an apology 
 
TOKYO 00002979  007.2 OF 007 
 
 
from the United States (for its dropping of atomic-bombs) and 
discuss the matter." 
 
In response, Abe rebutted: "Japan's responsibility is to aim for 
abolition of nuclear weapons instead of devoting energy to calling 
on the US to apologize." 
 
SCHIEFFER