Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07PRAGUE881, Czechs Ready to Join Schengen

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07PRAGUE881.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07PRAGUE881 2007-07-27 12:38 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Prague
VZCZCXRO4358
RR RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHPG #0881/01 2081238
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 271238Z JUL 07
FM AMEMBASSY PRAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9410
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PRAGUE 000881 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EUR/NCE, EUR/ERA, CA/FO 
 
E.O. 12958: 
TAGS: PGOV PREL CVIS EZ
SUBJECT: Czechs Ready to Join Schengen 
 
1. (U) Summary:  The Czech Republic is anxious and ready to 
implement the Schengen Agreement on January 1, 2008.  This is a high 
priority political issue that unites all political parties, as 
evidenced by the unanimous passage of the "Schengen Package" in 
Parliament May 2007 that brought domestic legislation into 
compliance with all Schengen regulations.  For Czechs, Schengen is 
one of the most tangible advantages of joining the EU, and without 
it, Czechs believe new EU member states are treated as second class 
citizens.  A recent poll found that 78% of Czechs regard the 
country's Schengen entry as an important gain in their EU 
membership.  Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek believes that Schengen 
entry is as momentous to Czech citizens as when Communism ended, 
saying "entering the Schengen area is an important step towards full 
membership in the EU."  The Czech Republic has successfully 
completed all interim Schengen evaluations and will face the final 
hurdle - an evaluation of its operation of the Schengen Information 
System (SIS) - in September 2007.  The GOCR is confident it will 
pass the SIS test and has unrolled plans for a US$1 million public 
education campaign.  However, despite intense internal preparatory 
efforts, external issues over which the GOCR has little control - 
resistance from Austria and mixed EU evaluations of neighboring 
Schengen-candidate countries - may threaten its accession to 
Schengen.  End Summary. 
 
2. (U) Czech Ministry of Interior International Relations Department 
Director Blanka Rybonova informed emboffs July 26 about preparations 
for the Czech Republic to join Schengen on January 1, 2008.  The 
Schengen Agreement, which the Czech Republic signed as part of its 
accession to the EU on May 1, 2004, abolishes national borders and 
standardizes border control between participating countries.  Before 
a country can implement the Schengen Agreement, it must meet four 
criteria: (1) security of external ground borders and maritime 
ports; (2) standardization in issuance and regulations of visas; (3) 
operation and maintenance of the Schengen Information System (SIS), 
a database of personal information used for law enforcement 
purposes; (4) security of their airports.  Currently, the Czech 
Republic is scheduled to lift ground border checks on December 31, 
2007 and airport checks on March 29, 2008. 
 
3. (SBU) The Czech Republic has been negotiating with its neighbors 
on how to handle its ground borders.  Because the Czech Republic is 
completely surrounded by other EU-member states (Poland, Slovakia, 
Austria, and Germany), the EU never formally evaluated Czech border 
security (criteria 1).  However, since its neighbors Poland and 
Slovakia have external borders, the EU holds Czech accession to the 
Schengen area dependent on Poland and Slovakia's ability to secure 
their borders.  Consequently, the Czechs have been coordinating 
closely with their neighbors.  Austria presents another potential 
monkey wrench for Czech Schengen hopes.  Rybonova said that Austria, 
driven by domestic political concerns, is nervous about an enlarged 
Schengen, and asked all of its neighbors preparing to join Schengen 
(Slovenia, Hungary, Czech Republic, and Slovakia) to lift their 
Austrian border control in stages.  All four countries rejected this 
idea. Instead, the Czech Republic is working on a bilateral 
Memorandum of Understanding outlining specific measures the Czech 
Republic will take to enhance security in the Austrian border area. 
 
 
4. (SBU) During its initial Schengen evaluation in 2006, the Czech 
Republic received poor marks for security problems at the Brno 
airport.  However, these problems have been fixed and the Czechs 
successfully passed the July 2007 Schengen evaluation.  The Czechs 
face one final test: in September 2007 they will be evaluated on 
their implementation of the SIS law enforcement database.  Rybonova 
believes the Czech Republic will pass this test as the GOCR has 
everything it needs to manage this system.  In anticipation of a 
successful entry into the Schengen area, the GOCR has announced it 
will spend CZK 25 million (over US $1 million) to educate people 
about the consequences of Czech Schengen entry. 
 
5. (SBU) As the clock ticks towards January 1, 2008, the Czech 
Republic faces three vulnerabilities that may block its Schengen 
accession.  First, a systematic vulnerability in SIS could delay 
Czech entry.  In July, after the SIS's software was updated to 
handle the upcoming expansion, press reported that nine current 
Schengen countries (Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Finland, Norway, 
Iceland, Italy, Greece and the Netherlands) failed the software's 
operational test.  These states are to be retested before the end of 
2007 to ensure the system's functionality.  However, if the updated 
SIS cannot function throughout all member states, Czech entry would 
be delayed until this software problem is solved.  Second, Austria 
may try and persuade other EU states that the new member states are 
not adequately prepared for Schengen.  Third, if Slovakia and Poland 
fail their Schengen evaluation, Czech entry into Schengen would be 
delayed until after it institutes an external border with these 
countries.  Accordingly to Rybonova, this last scenario is not 
likely since Poland and Slovakia have made significant strides to 
fulfill the Schengen evaluation criteria. 
 
 
PRAGUE 00000881  002 OF 002 
 
 
6. (SBU) Comment: The Czechs believe that their entrance into the 
Schengen area will bring them one step closer to being full-fledged 
members of the EU. As such, their criticism of the U.S. visa waiver 
policy and "double standards" for old and new EU member states may 
intensify; the Czechs may in turn increase pressure within the EU to 
invoke the EU solidarity clause and visa reciprocity clause to 
pressure the US into introducing a single visa policy for all EU 
Schengen states.  That said, we expect that the successful passage 
of the 9/11 legislation now in Congress, which would modify the visa 
waiver policy in a manner that favors the Czech Republic, will make 
the Czechs less likely to press for a tougher EU stance.  However, 
while Czech entry into the Schengen would signify completion of 
basic border security, the Czechs still have not signed the EU Prum 
Convention, a new agreement to extend cross-border cooperation for 
combating terrorism, cross-border crime and illegal migration.  The 
EU has yet to decide whether to expand the Prum Convention to the 
new EU member states.