Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07DHAKA1126, BANGLADESH: 527 REPORT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07DHAKA1126.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07DHAKA1126 2007-07-11 07:37 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Dhaka
VZCZCXRO9055
RR RUEHCI
DE RUEHKA #1126/01 1920737
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 110737Z JUL 07
FM AMEMBASSY DHAKA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4492
INFO RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0026
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 1729
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 9172
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 8002
RUEHGO/AMEMBASSY RANGOON 2554
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA 0824
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 DHAKA 001126 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPARTMENT PLEASE PASS TO EB/OIA HEATHER GOETHERT 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: CASC EINV KIDE OPIC PGOV BG
SUBJECT: BANGLADESH: 527 REPORT 
 
REF: STATE 55422 
 
1.  (SBU) The United States Government is aware of three (3) 
claims of United States persons that may be outstanding 
against the Government of Bangladesh (GOB). 
 
2.    a.  Claimant A 
 
      b.  1979 
 
      c.  In 1977 Claimant A entered into an agreement with 
the GOB Ministry of Agriculture.  The agreement granted 
Claimant A a ten-year franchise to trap and export rhesus 
monkeys, with the obligation that Claimant A would build 
monkey-breeding farms in Bangladesh.  The dispute began in 
January 1979 when the GOB terminated the contract after 
alleging that Claimant A had failed to begin building the 
breeding farms as agreed. 
 
Claimant A immediately sought to resolve the dispute through 
direct discussions with Bangladesh, but those efforts failed. 
 Claimant A then sought arbitration in accordance with the 
contract.  In 1986, after the GOB failed to appoint an 
arbitrator, Claimant A appointed a sole arbitrator and 
received an arbitral award of over $16 million.  Claimant A 
then sought to enforce the award in Bangladeshi courts for 
ten years.  In February 1996, a lower court ruled against 
Claimant A.  Claimant A appealed the lower court decision to 
the High Court. 
 
On March 14, 1999, the Bangladeshi High Court in Dhaka ruled 
in favor of Claimant A, but on November 2, 1999, the GOB 
filed an appeal in the Supreme Court.  No hearing has yet 
been held on the appeal. 
 
Since the early 1980s, the US Embassy has been in contact 
with the Government of Bangladesh to facilitate discussions 
with Claimant A.  In 1995, the Embassy contacted the GOB to 
express concern that access to Bangladeshi courts was being 
denied.  After the 1996 judgment, the US Embassy again 
contacted the GOB to encourage settlement.  Since then, the 
Embassy has continued to monitor developments in the case. 
 
Claimant A's representatives met with Ministry of Agriculture 
officials during the December 2-3, 2001 US Bangladesh 
Business Council's (USBBC) delegation visit to Dhaka. 
Claimant A continues to maintain its flexibility in 
negotiating a reasonable settlement, assuming the GOB is 
willing to begin such negotiations promptly, either in 
Washington, D.C. or in Dhaka.  Early in 2002, Claimant A 
representatives met with GOB officials in Washington, and 
expressed Claimant A's preference for resolving the matter 
amicably, but Claimant A officials also expressed firm plans 
to pursue all legal and political means to reach resolution. 
Claimant A has followed up with calls and letters to the 
Bangladesh Embassy asking for an update on the GOB's 
position, but received no response. 
 
According to Claimant A's attorney, the case remains pending 
on appeal before the Bangladesh Supreme Court and no date has 
been set for a hearing.  Stateside counsel met with the local 
attorneys in September/October 2006 in an attempt to expedite 
hearings on the appeal, but local counsel continues to feel 
that GOB does not view this as a high priority matter. 
 
3.    a.  Claimant B 
 
      b.  1995 
 
      c.  Claimant B, a US citizen, borrowed $2.5 million 
from a Bangladeshi bank in 1989 to perform research and 
development, and to set up a factory to produce cataract 
lenses in Bangladesh.  Claimant B apparently did not make his 
scheduled payments, and when his political connection fell 
from power, an anti-corruption case was filed against him (in 
1992).  Claimant B was arrested in 1995 and, after 
considerable US Embassy effort and congressional interest, he 
was released from jail and allowed to leave Bangladesh.  Over 
the years there have been efforts to establish a reasonable 
payment plan, however Claimant B states that his factory, 
which employs 90 people, has never made an operating profit 
and that in order to pay more than $5000 a month, he needs to 
be able to go to Bangladesh and run the factory without fear 
of arrest. 
 
DHAKA 00001126  002 OF 002 
 
 
 
A civil case against Claimant B, won by the bank for recovery 
of its funds, is on appeal and continues at an extremely slow 
pace.  On Feb. 28, 2001, the Anti-corruption court delivered 
a guilty verdict, and sentenced him to seven years in prison 
and a $4.63 million fine.  In order to appeal, Claimant B had 
to surrender himself to arrest and imprisonment within 60 
days.  From March 2001, the US Government has received no 
further information on the criminal case. 
 
4.     a.  Claimant C 
 
       b.  2004 
 
       c.  From November 2001 to October 2004, Claimant C 
implemented a $3.9 million judicial reform project pursuant 
to a contract supported by a loan from the World Bank to the 
GOB.  Claimant C was not able to advance reforms as 
envisioned.  As a result the GOB holds Claimant C responsible 
for non-performance and, pointing to an external evaluation 
prepared by a competitor of Claimant C showing only 41% of 
the contract was completed, is withholding the balance of 
$1,194,725 due on the contract.  Claimant C asserts that it 
produced significant deliverables where it was permitted to 
deliver under the contract, and that explicit limitation 
placed on it by the courts, along with other obstructions and 
delays from the GOB, frustrated its ability to perform in 
other areas. 
 
The World Bank is actively seeking to resolve this matter, 
and has made several attempts to bring a mediator to 
Bangladesh to resolve this.  Claimant C has sent a signed 
Advocacy Questionnaire to the US Department of Commerce's 
Advocacy Center, and Embassy Dhaka's commercial section is 
also actively engaged in attempting to resolve this claim. 
Most recent contact with the World Bank was in June of 2007. 
 
5.  (SBU) Claimant A: MOL, Bangladesh; (US investment); no 
known privacy act waiver 
          Claimant B: Dr. Mohammad Rafiquzzaman; US citizen; 
no known privacy act waiver 
          Claimant C: IRIS Center at the University of 
Maryland; US entity; no known privacy act waiver 
 
6.  (SBU) COMMENT:  Claimant B's dispute involves a claim 
against him by a government-owned special purpose bank for 
repayment of a loan with interest due as per the loan 
agreement.  Claimant B apparently does not dispute the 
underlying claim or the amount due, but sought to reach 
agreement on a payment plan to clear the debt.  The parties 
have thus far been unable to negotiate a settlement of the 
debt, and the bank has obtained a judgment for the amount due 
against Claimant B.  Based on information contained in paras 
9 and 11 of reftel, Post believes this case is not an 
"investment" within the meaning of Section 527. 
 
7.  (SBU) Claimant C's dispute is included based on reftel's 
request to err on the side of inclusion.  While the GOB's 
reliance on an external report prepared by a competitor of 
Claimant C is dubious, it is undeniable that the inherent 
objective of the contract was not reached, leaving at least a 
colorable dispute between the parties. 
PASI