Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07AITTAIPEI1580, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-TAIWAN RELATIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07AITTAIPEI1580.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07AITTAIPEI1580 2007-07-16 08:28 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0017
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #1580/01 1970828
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 160828Z JUL 07
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5992
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7028
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 8275
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001580 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - BROOKE SPELLMAN 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
 
Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused July 14-16 
news coverage on the legislators' elections and the presidential 
election slated for early 2008, and on a rally in Taipei Saturday 
marking the 20th anniversary of the lifting of martial law in 
Taiwan.  In terms of editorials and commentaries, a news analysis in 
the pro-unification "United Daily News" discussed Washington's 
reported suspension of the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan.  The 
article criticized the Chen Shui-bian administration's manipulation 
of the referendum on the island's bid to join the United Nations 
under the name "Taiwan" and called the suspension of the arms deal 
"the price for hugging the United States' legs [i.e., acting like a 
docile child]."  A column in the "United Daily News" also lashed out 
at the Chen administration's efforts in pushing for the signing of a 
free trade agreement with the United States.  An op-ed in the 
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times," written by 
Richard Holloran, a writer based in Hawaii, said the United States' 
support for Taiwan is dwindling.  A separate op-ed in the "Taipei 
Times," written by Professor John Copper at Rhodes College in 
Memphis, however, said "in coming months, it is difficult to 
conceive of Taiwan not becoming an issue in the U.S. presidential 
campaign."  End summary. 
 
A) "The Price for Hugging the United States' Legs" 
 
Journalist Lee Chih-teh noted in an analysis in the pro-unification 
"United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] (7/15): 
 
"The Executive Yuan, via powerful manipulation, has successfully 
reversed [a previous decision by its Referendum Review Committee] 
regarding the referendum on 'Taiwan's bid to join the United Nations 
under the name Taiwan.'  Before the applause for celebrating such a 
success has even died out, the United States has already conveyed a 
message of penalty -- namely, the Taiwan military's 'Feng Sun 
Project' [to purchase 66 F-16C/D fighter jets from the United 
States] has been suspended as a result of the U.S. State 
Department's objection.  One cannot help but wonder if the Green 
politicians can understand that this is the price they have to pay 
for 'hugging the United States' legs [a Chinese expression that 
roughly translates as 'behaving like a docile child toward one's 
parents'].' ... 
 
"On Taiwan's part, following the power transfer in Taiwan in 2000, 
relations between two sides of the Taiwan Strait first came to a 
standstill because the DPP had deep doubts about Beijing, which, on 
the other hand, said it would 'listen to [President Chen 
Shui-bian's] words and watch his deeds.'  After that, cross-Strait 
relations quickly deteriorated because Chen and the Green 
politicians constantly manipulated ethnic issues and cross-Strait 
conflicts for political gains.  The collapse in cross-Strait 
relations left Taiwan no option in the game played by Washington, 
Beijing and Taipei but to lean entirely toward the United States. 
... 
 
"'Hugging the legs' [of the United States] is of course a viable 
strategy if one just looks at the conflicts between the United 
States and China.  But the question is that other than bilateral 
conflicts, Washington and Beijing still share common interests.  The 
top priority [for the two] right now is nothing but 'cross-Strait 
stability and unchanged status quo,' and any side that seeks to 
affront such common interests will have to be penalized. ..." 
 
B) "What Kind of a Policy Is this?" 
 
Journalist Sun Yang-ming wrote in the "United Notes" column in the 
pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] (7/14): 
 
"... In addition to using the 'transit stops [in the United States]' 
to fool the Taiwan people [into thinking the United States still 
strongly backs Taiwan], the Bian administration's relations toward 
the United States can now only focus on the signing of a so-called 
'free trade agreement' (FTA).  Without a doubt, it will be great 
news for Taiwan if a U.S.-Taiwan FTA is signed.  But anyone with 
common sense knows that this would be 'mission impossible' during 
the term of office of the Bian administration. 
 
"Former AIT Taipei Director Douglas Paal once lashed out at the Bian 
administration, saying that the latter must have ulterior political 
intents behind its move to push for an FTA with the United States. 
In fact, even if Paal did not mention it, anyone in the diplomatic 
circle knows that an FTA is a highly political matter.  If one looks 
at the countries that have signed FTAs with the United States, 
including Israel, Singapore, and South Korea, one will see that each 
of them is a country of high strategic importance.  Isn't Taiwan 
hitting its head against the wall when it fails to define its 
importance [to the United States]...while still pushing for an FTA 
with the United States?  The Americans will naturally be suspicious 
of the Bian administration's intentions behind its push for the FTA. 
... 
 
"In addition, given the great political significance in signing an 
FTA, it will surely create great conflict between Washington and 
Beijing.  Does it sound likely that the Bush administration would 
confront Beijing just to act in concert with a government's policy 
that runs counter to its own interests?  Should the Bush 
administration really agree to sign an FTA with the Bian 
administration, or even just to discuss it, it will be regarded as a 
move to endorse the Bian administration's Taiwan independence 
policy.  Will the United States ask for trouble?  Can the Bush 
administration be that stupid? ..." 
 
C) "US Support for Taipei Dwindling" 
 
Richard Holloran, a writer based in Hawaii, opined in the 
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 
30,000] (7/15): 
 
"... US support for far-away Taipei is dwindling, making it possible 
that Washington might not help defend Taiwan against China. 
Consider the subtle change in US President George W. Bush's stance. 
Shortly after he took office in 2001, the president told a TV 
interviewer that the US would do 'whatever it takes' to protect 
Taiwan. ...  In an address in Prague last month, the president 
praised Taiwan and South Korea for marching toward democracy.  But 
he said not a word about the US helping to defend Taiwan against a 
China that has repeatedly said it will use force if Taiwan does not 
submit peacefully.  This turnabout has been several years in the 
making. ... 
 
"Political leaders in Taiwan, notably President Chen Shui-bian, have 
not helped their cause.  Chen stirred the wrath of both Beijing and 
Washington recently by announcing he would hold a referendum to 
gauge domestic support for a proposal that Taiwan apply for UN 
membership using the name 'Taiwan.' ...  Taiwan has also lost US 
support by appearing to be unwilling to defend itself.  Taipei has 
dithered over the purchase of a large arms package that Bush offered 
in 2001 and US officers have said that Taiwan's forces, while 
showing signs of improvement, have been slow to modernize.  The 
consequence of US failure to defend Taiwan would be profound. ... 
 
"Acquiescing in China's takeover of Taiwan would jeopardize US naval 
supremacy in the western Pacific and to give China control of the 
northern entrance of the South China Sea, through which more 
shipping passes than through the Suez and Panama canals combined. 
To abandon a fledging democracy would undercut the ability of any 
administration in Washington, whether Republican or Democratic, to 
persuade other countries to undertake democratic reforms.  Moreover, 
there is no guarantee that China would be satisfied with conquering 
Taiwan.  Beijing is acquiring the capability to project power beyond 
Taiwan into the rest of Asia and the Pacific. ..." 
 
D) "Taiwan and the Next US President" 
 
John Copper, a professor of International Studies at Rhodes College 
in Memphis, Tennessee, opined in the pro-independence, 
English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 30,000] (7/15): 
 
"...  In fact, former American Institute in Taiwan director Raymond 
Burghardt has pointed out that none of the candidates has voiced an 
opinion on Taiwan and probably won't.  In other words, Taiwan is not 
going to be an issue in the coming US elections.  Not exactly true. 
While the candidates have not set forth a position on the 'Taiwan 
issue,' it is possible to glean something about their stances.  They 
have talked about Taiwan before and one can guess how each might 
treat Taiwan as president. ... 
 
"All of the candidates, Democrats and Republicans, have enunciated a 
positive view of Taiwan's democracy.  But this is less important 
than the matter of whether the US will protect Taiwan.  The point is 
that Taiwan's political system doesn't matter if it is absorbed by 
China.  In coming months, it is difficult to conceive of Taiwan not 
becoming an issue in the US president campaign.  It has been in 
every campaign for more than half a century.  Military strategists 
see the Taiwan Strait as the world's number one flashpoint.  The US 
and a fast rising China differ on Taiwan's future and that is an 
issue worth debating." 
 
YOUNG