Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07TOKYO2336, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/24/07
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO2336.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07TOKYO2336 | 2007-05-24 08:32 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO5080
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2336/01 1440832
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 240832Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3895
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 3670
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1236
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 4800
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 0453
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 2117
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7155
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 3214
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4372
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 TOKYO 002336
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/24/07
INDEX:
(1) Eliminating the danger of Futenma airfield: US wants to expedite
relocation plan
(2) US forces realignment law enacted; How will subsidies help
relocation plans move forward?
(3) 2007 Close-up column -- US forces realignment bill to be enacted
into law today: Local governments housing US bases forced to make a
difficult decision with subsidies tied to realignment plans
(4) Interview on collective self-defense (Part 3): Opposition DPJ's
policy chief Takeaki Matsumoto insists on using UN judgment as
yardstick for Japan's response
(5) OIE classifies US as controlled-risk nation for BSE; Japan may
be pressed to ease import conditions for US beef
ARTICLES:
(1) Eliminating the danger of Futenma airfield: US wants to expedite
relocation plan
OKINAWA TIMES (Page 5) (Full)
May 24, 2007
Kevin K. Maher, US consul general in Okinawa
I had an opportunity on May 14 to speak about the issue of Futenma
relocation in a regular meeting of the Okinawa Association of
Corporate Executives. Again, I would like to convey to the people of
Okinawa Prefecture an outline of my speech there and my true
opinions.
First of all, I want to stress that the US government is aware of
the concerns of local residents living in the vicinity of Futenma
airfield about danger and noise and that we agreed more than 10
years ago in the SACO final report to relocate Futenma airfield.
Unfortunately, however, Japan was unable to implement the SACO
relocation plan for various reasons.
In October 2005, the Japanese and US governments agreed anew in a
two-plus-two meeting of the Japan-US Security Consultative Committee
to relocate Futenma airfield to a US military facility at Camp
Schwab on Henoko Point in Nago. In addition, the US government
agreed again on Futenma relocation in May 2006 and in May 2007. Now
is the time to implement this relocation plan. We hope that the
Futenma relocation plan will be accelerated.
The realignment plan in Okinawa is a rare chance that comes once in
several decades, and I believe that this large-scale plan, if it is
brought to fruition, will lead to a substantial reversion of bases
and to a mitigation of the burden.
This realignment plan is to relocate the Futenma base from a densely
populated place in the city of Ginowan to a US military facility at
Camp Schwab and is to transfer 8,000 Marines to Guam, thereby
reducing or returning the sites of most US facilities that are
located south of Kadena. In order to carry out the plan, it is
desirable that all those concerned, including the prefectural and
municipal governments, cooperate. We would like to ask for local
understanding and support.
We need to do things in a realistic way. In October 2005, the
TOKYO 00002336 002 OF 009
Japanese and US governments agreed to a document titled "Japan-US
Alliance: Transformation and Realignment for the Future." This has
two major goals. One is to mitigate the burden of base-hosting local
governments. The other is to improve the capabilities of our
alliance. It is very important to proceed with these two things at
the same time.
It is not realistic to call for simply closing down Futenma
airfield. Given the present security environment of Asia, it is
indispensable to maintain the Futenma base's functions, and it is
realistic to relocate the base functions of Futenma to a US military
facility at Camp Schwab. We should carry out the Futenma relocation
plan as soon as possible to dissolve the anxiety of Ginowan
citizens. That is all I meant in what I said at the meeting of the
Okinawa Association of Corporate Executives.
(2) US forces realignment law enacted; How will subsidies help
relocation plans move forward?
YOMIURI (Page 13) (Abridged)
May 24, 2007
The Diet yesterday passed a bill to facilitate the realignment of US
forces in Japan featuring a plan to subsidize local governments that
will bear greater security burdens, paving the way for the
implementation of the realignment plan, agreed upon last May between
the governments of Japan and the United States.
Iwakuni
"It is not proper to manipulate the wishes of local governments with
state subsidies. Such an approach won't be able to change my
decision."
This comment came in a press conference yesterday from Mayor
Katsusuke Ihara of Iwakuni City, Yamaguchi Prefecture, the planned
relocation site for carrier-borne jet fighters, now based at US
Naval Air Facility in Atsugi, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Ihara's firm stance reflects the fact that the Iwakuni pubic has
expressed their opposition to the relocation plan on two occasions.
Iwakuni City conducted a municipal referendum last March, shortly
before the merger with seven neighboring municipalities, in which 87
PERCENT said "no" to the fighter jets' relocation. Although the
outcome of the referendum lost its effectiveness with the municipal
merger, Ihara won the new city's mayoral race in April on the slogan
of blocking the relocation.
The situation has changed markedly over the last one year, however.
The government produced last May a US force realignment final report
mentioning the plan to relocate the carrier-borne aircraft to
Iwakuni regardless of the city's referendum and the outcome of the
mayoral race. As a result, the Yamaguchi prefectural government,
which had been aligned with Iwakuni, effectively endorsed the
relocation plan in hopes of receiving state subsidies.
The Defense Facilities Administration Agency compiled its fiscal
2007 budget that did not include 3.5 billion yen in subsidies for
the project to build a new Iwakuni city hall. It was intended to
serve as pressure on the anti-base group in the city.
TOKYO 00002336 003 OF 009
Ihara now finds himself facing a growing number of local calls for a
pragmatic response in order to obtain the government's economic
package and subsidies.
For instance, Iwakuni Chamber of Commerce and Industry President
Hisashi Nagano took this view: "It is not appropriate to describe
the government's steps as a carrot-and-stick approach. There is
every reason for a municipality bearing a security burden to receive
financial aid from the government. This is a once-in-a-century
opportunity."
The tide has also changed for the city assembly in which the pro-
and anti-base groups had been competing with each other. The city
assembly rejected in March the FY2007 budget designed to make up for
the shortfall in the city hall construction spending with the merger
special bonds. Then came the assembly's adoption of a resolution to
effectively accept the relocation plan. "The fact that the mayor's
attitude is blocking the government's economic package is a serious
blow to the city, which is financially strapped," an assembly member
noted.
Given the turmoil in the municipal government over the force
realignment plan, some city executives fear that the city might
collapse.
Hardships have not ended for Ihara. On May 22, the prefectural
government decided to suspend its housing project in Atagoyama in
central Iwakuni. The city is likely to be pressed to convert it into
a US military housing project.
Some people speculate that in the event of the FY2007 budget being
rejected once again in the regular June city assembly session, Ihara
would resign and run in the mayoral race that would follow in order
to seek the public's judgment on the realignment plan. Will Ihara be
able to reverse the subsidy-oriented public opinion?
Futenma
In the wake of Diet approval of the special measures legislation,
Mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro of Nago, the relocation site for the US
Marine Corps' Futenma Station, commented yesterday: "I will make
every effort to stabilize the livelihoods of the local residents and
revitalize the local economy." Touching on the fact that the law is
good only for 10 years, Shimabukuro said: "I hope the government
will extend it as long as there are bases here."
Nago City Assembly Chairman Kenyu Shimabukuro of the henoko district
adjacent to Camp Schwab also noted: "We are the only place in Japan
that has accepted the Futenma relocation plan, so we think we
deserve special treatment from the central government."
Nago has been split over the Futenma relocation plan since the
government came up with a sea-based heliport plan in 1996. The
government has supported the pro-base group by, among other steps,
hosting the 2000 Summit in Okinawa and offering a 10-year,
100-billion-yen northern part economic package to improve
infrastructure there. In enacting the special measures law this
time, the government has decided to continue giving special
consideration to Okinawa, as seen its partial continuation of the
northern part economic package.
But past developments also showed difficulty in implementing
relocation plans after obtaining local understanding.
TOKYO 00002336 004 OF 009
The Futenma relocation plan has stalled over making changes to the
government's plan to build a V-shaped pair of runways at Camp Schwab
rather than over the appropriateness of the relocation plan itself.
"The special measures law was enacted, but that doesn't mean the
Futenma relocation plan would move forward immediately," a senior
Okinawa official noted.
47 of 68 affected local governments accept relocation plans
The US forces realignment special measures law will be good for 10
years until March 31, 2017. The law is designed to give a boost to
the implementation of the US forces realignment plan, agreed upon by
Tokyo and Washington last May. The key element in the law is to
create a system to provide subsidies to municipalities accepting
additional security burdens in accordance with the state of progress
in implementing the plan. The government has earmarked 5.1 billion
yen for FY2007, the program's initial year. The total amount is
expected to reach 100 billion yen in the end.
According to the Defense Ministry, 47 out of the 68 affected local
government have expressed a willingness to accept realignment plans.
Although they are not totally happy with the relocation plans
because of projected noise and security factors, carrots in the name
of state subsidies are extremely appealing to them.
Mayor Yoshifumi Tsuchiya of Shintomi Town, Miyazaki Prefecture, home
to the Air Self-Defense Force's Nyutabaru base, which has accepted
US fighter training, took this view about the new law yesterday:
"It's best not to bear any burden. Nonetheless, I can give a
positive assessment to the law to some extent. As the next step, I
would like to ask the government to allow us to spend subsidies in a
broader way."
(3) 2007 Close-up column -- US forces realignment bill to be enacted
into law today: Local governments housing US bases forced to make a
difficult decision with subsidies tied to realignment plans
MAINICHI (Page 3) (Full)
May 23, 2007
Kaori Onaka, Yudai Nakazawa, Norio Oyama
A bill for facilitating the implementation of USFJ realignment plans
is to be enacted into law today. The bill will pressure relevant
local governments to accept more of the burden of hosting US
military facilities in return for subsidies amounting to 100 billion
yen concerning the realignment plans. It will also serve as the
grounds for Japan to pay the costs of relocating US Marines from
Okinawa to Guam, which are expected to exceed 700 billion yen. The
central government wants to both maintain deterrence and reduce
Okinawa's burden, and it also wants to build an irreplaceable
alliance between Japan and the US with a vast amount of financial
aid as the driving force. Meanwhile, local governments are being
forced to make a difficult decision on the question of whether to
accept subsidies in return for tolerating an increase in the burden
related to the military facilities.
"Some people describe the subsidy system relating to the force
realignment plans as something like slapping local governments in
the face with a wad of cash. What do you think?" Ichita Yamamoto of
the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) said at a session
TOKYO 00002336 005 OF 009
yesterday of the Upper House Committee on Foreign Affairs and
Defense, turning to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Under the subsidy
system, subsidies will be provided to local governments in
proportion to the degree of their cooperation in accepting the
burden.
Abe's answer to Yamamoto was: "Subsidies are not meant to persuade
local governments by the strength of money but meant to properly
respond to the local governments that decided to (accept an increase
in the burden of their hosting US forces) for the security of the
country."
It is no mistake, however, that the subsidies of this kind can
become a bargaining chip for facilitating the realignment plans.
Local governments' moves in this sense are divided into four stages:
(1) announcement of accepting realignment plans; (2) launch of an
environmental impact assessment; (3) launch of the construction of a
necessary facility; and (4) implementation of realignment plans. The
amount of subsidy will increase according to progress. This
mechanism makes it easy to induce local governments to accept
realignment plans, as well as to prevent them from "running away"
after receiving subsidies. The central government has already
budgeted 5.05 billion yen for subsidies to be provided in this
fiscal year.
In fact, local governments, which have six candidate bases for the
transfer of US military aircraft drills conducted at present at
Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, announced they would accept the
transfer, like Aomori Prefecture's Misawa City Government noting,
"It's unavoidable for our burden to increase because of our
cooperation with the central government for its policy." Mayor
Hisami Arakawa of Fukuoka Prefecture's Chikujo Town, where the
drills were already transferred, voiced his expectations: "Our town
was the first to accept the relocation, so we believe we will
receive the largest subsidy."
In contrast, Yamaguchi Prefecture's Iwakuni City, which houses the
Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni Base, which is seen as the
relocation site for the 59 carrier-based planes assigned to the
Naval Air Facility Atsugi Base (in Kanagawa Prefecture) and 12 air
refueling planes based in the Futenma Air Station, was thrown into a
jumble over the subsidy issue, because the central government put an
end last December to subsidizing the city for the construction of a
city office building. This subsidy had been provided in line with
the agreement of the Japan-US Special Action Committee on Okinawa,
per se, but as a result of the city being involved in the
realignment plans, the situation has changed. On May 17, Mayor
Katsusuke Ihara attended a meeting of the Lower House Committee on
Security and argued: "It's incredible that the subsidy was stopped
owing to US force realignment plans. That is disturbing the citizens
even further."
The city government has yet to find a way out of the confusion.
During a city assembly session in March, the assembly rejected the
initial budget bill, which included a plan to use special merger
local bonds for the construction of a new city office building,
while the assembly adopted a resolution in effect accepting the plan
for the transfer of carrier-based aircraft.
What are the grounds for 730 billion yen figure for Japan's share?
Along with the relocation of the Futenma airfield, 8,000 Marines and
their 9,000 dependants are expected to move from Okinawa to Guam. A
TOKYO 00002336 006 OF 009
road map for the implementation of the US force realignment as
agreed on between Japan and the US at a Japan-US Security
Consultative Committee (2+2) session in May 2006 mentioned that the
realignment costs would be shared by Japan and the US. However, how
much money Japan will actually pay has yet to be determined, as
Foreign Minister Taro Aso said, "A number of rumors are flying
around. One rumor is that the Japanese side's burden will amount to
3 trillion yen, but the exact amount has yet to be calculated."
Paying that amount is an administrative act, but the grounds for
that calculation are very vague.
A symbol of this vagueness would be the construction cost of family
housing. At a meeting yesterday of the Upper House Committee on
Foreign Affairs and Defense, Tsurunen Marutei of the major
opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) argued that
the construction cost per house calculated by the US side was no
more than 20 million yen or so, but Washington indicated
construction costs of 800 million yen per unit to the Japanese side.
Marutei sought to disclose the basis for the calculation, arguing,
"It's a waste of money." But Prime Minister Abe simply said: "We
will carefully calculate the cost."
According to the road map, the total relocation cost is estimated at
10.27 billion dollars (or some 1.23 trillion yen). Of this amount,
Japan will pay 6.09 billion dollars (some 730 billion yen), of which
a maximum 2.8 billion dollars (or 340 or so billion yen) is to be
disbursed from the national coffers. The remaining 3.29 billion
dollars (or some 400 billion yen) is likely to be financed or lent
by a special purpose entity (SPE) to be established by private firms
in the region via the Japan Bank for International Cooperation
(JBIC) and other organizations. The SPE will construct housing and
repay the loans from rent income to the Japanese government through
the JBIC.
However, Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma pointed out that "it will take
50 years" to repay the loans from rent income. Depending on the
circumstances, the buildings during that period could become
superannuated and turn into nonperforming loans. Osaka University
Prof. Kazuya Sakamoto, a close aide to Abe, noted at a
question-and-answer session of the Lower House Committee on
Security: "This sort of cost-sharing is quite unusual. As a matter
of fact, Japan's payment for the construction of another country's a
military facility in that country's territory is questionable."
(4) Interview on collective self-defense (Part 3): Opposition DPJ's
policy chief Takeaki Matsumoto insists on using UN judgment as
yardstick for Japan's response
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Full)
May 24, 2007
-- What is your view about Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's approach of
having an expert panel discuss the question of the exercise of the
right to collective self-defense?
Matsumoto: "I think the establishment of that panel in itself has
become his goal. He appears to be fanning the flames and trying to
come up with a conclusion at a sitting instead of promoting
discussion according to a plan based on his term in office. This
approach is sensational. It's dangerous to debate the question of
the use of armed force under such a time table."
-- Some members in you party are tolerant of exercising the right to
TOKYO 00002336 007 OF 009
collective self-defense.
Matsumoto: "Every member has his or her own taste, but our party
bands together. Using armed force is viewed as an illegal act
internationally. Cases where using armed force is allowed are
limited for cases of self-defense and action taken in accordance
with the United Nations Charter. These two are the premise for
(Japan to) exercise the right to collective defense."
-- The prime minister instructed the panel to examine four cases
regarding the question of the use of the right to collective
self-defense. Of the four, intercepting missiles and protecting US
war ships are strongly called for by the US military.
Matsumoto: "We need to value our relations with the United States,
but should Japan-US relations turn into those between the US and the
United Kingdom, Japan, following America's decision to exercise the
individual defense right, would support it. We never aim to develop
the Japan-US alliance into global alliance.
"To give an example, whether it was the right thing to open war
against Iraq is now viewed as a big issue internationally. Launching
that war was a decision by the US. If Japan totally allows the
exercise of the right to collective self-defense, chances will
increase that Japan will be affected by other countries' individual
self-defense rights and decisions to use armed force. We therefore
have been sticky on the propriety of the Iraq war."
-- Do you mean that the Japan-US alliance should not be made a
criterion for Japan to decide whether to exercise the right to
collective self-defense?
Matsumoto: "In the area of diplomacy, Japan needs to keep it in mind
that Germany and Japan are considered by the rest of the world as
the countries that caused the war 60 years ago. Should Japan be
engaged in using armed force, Japan should use a UN decision that
can easily obtain approval from most people as a criterion for Japan
to make a decision."
-- Minshuto insists that Japan should play an active part in UN
peacekeeping operations (PKO).
Matsumoto: "We must further step into debate on PKO cooperation. If
we establish an international peace cooperation basic law in
conformity with the Constitution, I think Japan could respond even
more to PKO requests. Regarding the use of armed force, Japan needs
to at least create a law for that purpose. This may lead to amending
the PKO Cooperation Law."
(5) OIE classifies US as controlled-risk nation for BSE; Japan may
be pressed to ease import conditions for US beef
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Excerpts)
May 24, 2007
New international standards
The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) classified the United
States as a "controlled-risk nation" for BSE to allow it to export
beef irrespective of cattle age. The OIE has introduced a new
three-level safety-classification system for BSE since early this
year. The OIE divides countries into three categories: those having
"negligible risk of BSE"; "controlled BSE risk"; and "undetermined
TOKYO 00002336 008 OF 009
risk of BSE". This classification is reached as a result of
screening documents related to outbreaks of BSE and the management
of feed. Countries in the first category are allowed to export beef
without any restrictions at all. Countries in the second category
are allowed to export even specified risk materials (SRM) if such
materials are from cattle aged 30 months or younger.
In its general meeting, the OIE unanimously approved the
applications of 11 countries and regions. Japan also supported the
OIE Science Committee's decision on the US application, but it still
takes the view that "the OIE authorization will not immediately lead
to a relaxation of Japan's import conditions," as Chief Cabinet
Secretary Shiozaki noted.
SIPDIS
On this point, a senior official of the Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) commented: "Since we have not read the
contents of the detailed report submitted by the US to the OIE, it
will be impossible for us to judge whether an outbreak of BSE would
be prevented in Japan."
Japan currently limits imports of US beef to cattle 20 months of age
or younger, adding the extra condition that all SRMs be removed.
Japan's requirements are considerably severer than those of the US.
OIE authorization is legally unenforceable, so the two countries
will determine final conditions through bilateral negotiations, but
Japan will be inevitably pressed to ease its conditions based on the
new OIE standards.
US pressure
After the OIE decision was announced, US Secretary of Agriculture
Mike Johanns told reporters: "We hope that countries closing their
markets will start moving in the direction of drawing a conclusion
immediately."
US congressional members and high-ranking government officials have
quickly issued comments in succession. Taking advantage of the OIE
authorization, persons concerned in the US are aiming to urge their
trade partners to review their import conditions. Following the
discovery of the first case of BSE in the US, its trade partners
thrust different import requirements with the US. Under such a
circumstance, the US was pressed to set up country-specific
production lines, making it impossible to resort to mass production
and resulting in being unable to boost exports.
Given the seal of approval from the OIE of the safety of US beef,
the US is now expected to apply greater pressure on Japan to review
its import conditions. Japan is likely to be forced to make a
concession in bilateral talks.
Focus from now
MAFF Minister Matsuoka indicated that, if officially asked by the
US, Japan would consider the possibility of starting talks with the
US on relaxing its import conditions for US beef. As the timing, he
implied sometime after Japan completes its ongoing inspections to
check whether meatpacking plants in the US have abided by the safety
procedures set by Japan in early June.
In order for Japan to ease its import requirements for US beef, the
Japanese government should submit an agreement reached in bilateral
talks to the Cabinet Office's Food Safety Commission to solicit its
advice.
TOKYO 00002336 009 OF 009
The focus of bilater talks will be on Japan's conditions of limiting
imports of US beef to cattle aged 20 months or younger and of having
SRMs removed. In 2003, a 21-month-old cow and a 23-month-old cow
were identified as BSE positive in Japan. These cases prompted Japan
to adopt tougher import requires than the international standards.
However, no infection was confirmed in an experience conducted by a
team of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, and Japan is
losing grounds for its assertion.
Countries or region designated under new OIE safety classification
system for BSE
Countries or region:
Negligible risk of BSE: Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, Uruguay,
Singapore
Controlled BSE risk: America, Canada, Switzerland, Taiwan,
Chile, Brazil
SCHIEFFER