Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07PARIS1066, SBU) UNESCO -- INFORMATION MEETING ON TECHNICAL MISSION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07PARIS1066.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07PARIS1066 2007-03-19 16:33 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris
null
Lucia A Keegan  03/20/2007 09:48:25 AM  From  DB/Inbox:  Lucia A Keegan

Cable 
Text:                                                                      
                                                                           
      
UNCLAS    SENSITIVE     PARIS 01066

SIPDIS
cxparis:
    ACTION: UNESCO
    INFO:   DCM SCI POL ECON AMBU AMB AMBO

DISSEMINATION: UNESCOX
CHARGE: PROG

APPROVED: DCM:AKOSS
DRAFTED: POL:DROSTROFF
CLEARED: LEGAL:TMPEAY

VZCZCFRI707
OO RUEHC RUCNSCO RUCNDT
DE RUEHFR #1066/01 0781633
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 191633Z MAR 07
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5754
INFO RUCNSCO/UNESCO COLLECTIVE
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1174
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 001066 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: UNESCO SCUL IS
SUBJECT:  (SBU) UNESCO -- INFORMATION MEETING ON TECHNICAL MISSION 
TO THE OLD CITY OF JERUSALEM 
 
 
1. (U) Summary and background:  Six Arab state members of UNESCO 
have requested an extraordinary and unprecedented special meeting of 
the UNESCO Executive Board to discuss Israeli archaeological work on 
the ramp leading to the al-Mughrabi Gate on the Temple Mount.  At 
the invitation of the Israeli government, UNESCO's Director General 
dispatched a technical mission to report on conditions at this 
sensitive World Heritage site.  The mission's report was issued on 
March 12 and is available on the UNESCO website - www.unesco.org. 
 
2. (U) Summary and background continued.  In a surprisingly brief 
and low-key information meeting on March 19 for UNESCO delegations, 
the technical mission reported that while the digging had caused no 
damage, they recommended that the Israelis halt work until there are 
consultations with other concerned parties like the Government of 
Jordan and until there is a clear plan for continued work on the 
site.  There was no clear sign about what steps the Israelis might 
take next in advancing the repair and reconstruction of the ramp to 
the Temple Mount.  Both the Israeli and Palestinian representatives 
(the Palestinian observer heads the Arab group at UNESCO) used 
measured language, helping to keep the tone of the meeting calm 
while conveying different messages.  Delegates respected the 
Director General's request not to turn the information meeting into 
a debate on whether a special session of the Executive Board should 
be held, and it remains unclear what decision will be taken by the 
Executive Board's Chairman following the Executive Board Bureau 
meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 21 March. US Ambassador Oliver sits 
on the Bureau.  End summary. 
 
3.  (U) Today's information meeting presided over by Director 
General Matsuura was held to review  the report on the UNESCO 
Mission to Jerusalem related to the archaeological work undertaken 
on the access ramp to the Mughrabi Gate, 27 Feb-2 March, 2007. 
Matsuura began by explaining that the Old City of Jerusalem was 
placed on the World Heritage List after being nominated by Jordan, 
and is also on the World Heritage "Danger" list.  He briefly went 
over the timeline, following the start of excavation work by the 
Israelis, which led to an increase in tensions in early February, 
prompting his decision to send a technical mission to assess the 
nature of the work in progress around the Mughrabi Gate. The 
technical mission's report was received by the Director General on 
their return, and published on 12 March. 
 
4.  (U) The Director General said that the report, while easing some 
fears about the work and the state of the ramp, also highlighted 
some problems that he said UNESCO must address urgently.  Matsuura 
said "given UNESCO's mandates, we cannot afford to fail," making it 
clear he understands the importance of UNESCO both staking its claim 
to cultural issues within the UN system, yet doing its best to keep 
the issue from becoming politicized, noting that that is the General 
Assembly's work in New York. He also twice referred to consultations 
he has had on this issue with Secretary General Ban. 
 
5.  (U) Assistant Director General for Culture, Francoise Riviere 
added that no work has been done inside the Haram es-Sharif, and 
that the work did not threaten the Al-Aqsa Mosque in any way.  She 
explained that the Israeli Antiquities Authority (IAA) had described 
the work being done as "preventative archeology", and said that they 
reported the work could last up to six months.  At this point it is 
not clear whether the work will simply fortify the ramp, or if a 
bridge will be built.  Riviere noted that the report states clearly 
that the technical mission had found that the work does respect 
professional norms.  The current work underway, according to the IAA 
is to maintain the solidity of the structure. 
 
6.  (U) Riviere called for the work now underway to stop, and called 
for consultations among all concerned parties.  She then noted the 
five recommendations proposed by the technical mission: 
 
- The Government of Israel should be asked to comply with its 
obligations regarding archeological excavations and heritage 
conservation in World Heritage sites such as the Old City of 
Jerusalem and, in particular, with Decision 30 COM.34 adopted by the 
World Heritage Committee in Vilnius in July 2006 on this matter; 
 
- The Government of Israel should be asked to stop immediately the 
archeological excavations, given that the excavations that had been 
undertaken were deemed to be sufficient for the purpose of assessing 
the structural conditions of the pathway; 
 
- The Government of Israel should then clearly define the final 
design of the access structure, whose principal aim should be to 
restore the Mughrabi pathway without any major change to its 
structure and shape, in order to maintain the values of authenticity 
and integrity of the site.  A clear work plan thereon should be 
communicated to the World Heritage Committee in the shortest 
possible time; 
 
- The Government of Israel should be asked to engage immediately a 
consultation process with all concerned parties, in particular the 
authorities of the Waqf and of Jordan, the latter having signed a 
peace agreement on 26 October 1994, and agree upon a plan of action 
before taking any further action and decision thereon; 
 
-This process should be supervised by an international team of 
experts coordinated by UNESCO and involving in particular structural 
engineers, specialized in archeological consolidation works, in 
order to ensure the most appropriate solution for the restoration of 
the Mughrabi pathway. 
 
7.  (U) The Palestinian observer to UNESCO, Elias Sanbar, spoke 
first, on behalf of the Arab Group.  He said that the key concepts 
that are guiding the group's actions and proposals are "urgency" and 
"status quo".  Calling the matter a "complex political situation," 
Sanbar said that it is important to remember that East Jerusalem is 
an occupied territory, and that this fact cannot be removed from the 
character of this place.  He also noted that Jerusalem is part of 
joint agreement concluded between Israel and the Palestinians at 
Oslo.  He said that each and every time a change is made in 
Jerusalem, it alters future negotiations on the final territorial 
status of the city. 
 
8.  (U) Sanbar also noted Item 6 from the New Delhi Accords that, 
according to him, says parties shall refrain from undertaking any 
archeological excavations in occupied territories.  He added that 
Jerusalem must be maintained in its present state.  He asked that 
the Mission's five recommendations "assume concrete form" and be 
implemented. 
 
9.  (U) Sanbar then requested that an "extraordinary" session of the 
Executive Board be held, so that delegates could proceed to discuss 
these issues.  Sanbar then mentioned the planned museum project, the 
"House of Tolerance" that he said is expected to be built on the 
oldest Arab cemetery in Jerusalem.  Sanbar went on to say that he 
had visited Jerusalem and came back with a sense of urgency, given 
what he saw as a deteriorating situation on the ground, which he 
described as "very worrisome."  He also said that he felt he had 
confirmation that the Israelis would not take any decision without 
consultations with the Jordanians. 
 
10. (U) Sanbar said that given the succession of problems, he is 
convinced that of the need for a special session of the Executive 
Board to have an in-depth discussion on the Old City of Jerusalem. 
He went on to say that the call for a special session was endorsed 
by the Secretary General of the Arab League and Arab Foreign 
Ministers. 
 
11. (U) In his closing comments, Sanbar said that he understood that 
UNESCO is not the forum for resolving the Israeli-Arab conflict or 
the future of Jerusalem.  He said, however, that he requests three 
things: 
 
- Clarify and review the state of the site; 
 
- Protection.  Consider joint efforts to protect the site, owing to 
these repeated problems; 
 
- Prevention. Ensure a constructive spirit and dialogue and not 
worry about politicization. 
 
12. (U) The Director General then intervened saying that UNESCO must 
accept the political status quo, as we are not to engage in debates 
on political issues.  He added that that is why he is in constant 
touch with New York on this subject.  Matsuura then said that the 
issue of whether or not to hold a special session of the Executive 
Board is a matter for decision by the Chairman of the Executive 
Board who was scheduled to arrive in Paris later in the day. 
Finally, Matsuura specifically asked that delegates not use this 
information meeting to debate the question of whether a special 
session of the Executive Board should or should not be held. 
 
13. (U) The Israeli ambassador, David Kornbluth, then spoke, 
thanking the DG for his efforts and the Palestinian delegate for the 
"tenor of his remarks, if not the entirety of the content." 
 
14. (U) Kornbluth noted that the technical mission had been "invited 
to Israel" in the spirit of diplomacy, and given Israel's policy of 
complete transparency on this issue. 
 
15. (U) Kornbluth added that the report confirms that the original 
concerns regarding the archeological work at the site were 
unwarranted, and reassured the room that Israel intends to continue 
to fulfill its commitments under the 1972 World Heritage Convention, 
"as it has done in the past."  He also said that consultations are 
now going on in Jerusalem "on a wide basis" (though he would not say 
who was consulting), and that he looks forward to discussions on the 
subject at the World Heritage Committee meeting in New Zealand. 
Kornbluth added that "this is a matter of utmost sensitivity for the 
parties concerned", and that the World Heritage Committee meeting in 
New Zealand "is the way forward." 
 
16.  (U) The Indian ambassador spoke on behalf of the Asia-Pacific 
group at UNESCO (ASPAC) expressing concern about possible damage to 
the Outstanding Universal Value of the site, and asked the World 
Heritage Center to send a technical mission to investigate. 
 
17. (U) She noted that she welcomes that fact that Israel says a 
consultation process is starting.  Mukherjee also asked that 
Francisco Bandarin, director of the World Heritage Center provide 
details for an "action plan" that is being developed for the Old 
City.  Finally, Mukherjee expressed solidarity with the Arab Group 
but, notably, said that India (note: not ASPAC) supported the call 
for a special session of the Executive Board. 
 
18. (U) Bandarin spoke briefly, noting that the World Heritage 
Center is now finalizing an action plan which will be submitted to 
the World Heritage Committee in June.  The DG promised to send out 
more information on it when it is ready.  It has four key elements: 
 
- Detailed and complete map of monuments and housing located in 
Jerusalem; 
 
- 20 project profiles and sheets; 
 
- Manual for housing conservation; 
 
- Scheme for micro-financing for housing renovation. 
 
19. (U) The ambassador from the Dominican Republic intervened 
briefly to say that UNESCO has an important role to play which is 
above and beyond the purely political aspects of such an issue. 
 
20. (U) The German ambassador, speaking on behalf of the 27 European 
Union states, welcomed the report of the technical mission.  He said 
that the EU aligns itself with the report's recommendations and said 
that there must be further debate at UNESCO on this issue, without 
specifically commenting on the call for a special session of the 
Executive Board. 
 
21. (U) Gabon's ambassador's said that the Africa Group supports the 
technical mission to Jerusalem, but added that she "won't talk about 
our position regarding the holding of the special session." 
 
22. (SBU) Comment:  The Director General chaired what had the 
potential to be a long and turbulent meeting with a surprisingly 
firm hand.  The Palestinian offered an appealing argument 
undoubtedly designed to bring undecided delegates on board for the 
Arab Group's call for a special session of the Executive Board.  The 
Israeli tried to kick the problem back to where many think it should 
be dealt with - in New Zealand at the next World Heritage Committee 
meeting in June.  At the same time, the timing of the Executive 
Board Chairman Zhang's return to Paris (for an Executive Board 
Bureau meeting on Wednesday) and the support of the US, Russian, 
Japan, and other heavyweights could potentially win the day with a 
combination of strong arguments and a Chinese strategy to run out 
the clock.  End comment. 
OLIVER