Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07LONDON704, UK TRADE UNIONS FEAR LOSS OF POLITICAL CLOUT FROM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07LONDON704.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07LONDON704 2007-02-23 16:23 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy London
VZCZCXRO6391
RR RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHHM RUEHIK RUEHJO
RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHRN RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHLO #0704/01 0541623
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 231623Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1981
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHXI/LABOR COLLECTIVE
RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 LONDON 000704 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ELAB PGOV UK
SUBJECT: UK TRADE UNIONS FEAR LOSS OF POLITICAL CLOUT FROM 
ELECTION FINANCE REFORM 
 
 
1. Summary: UK trade unions are anxiously following the 
deliberations of a commission exploring reforms to political 
party funding.  The trade unions darkly suspect that some in 
the Labour Party would like to use the commission to break 
the unions' financial hold on Labour.   At present, a handful 
of trade unions are the principal donors to the Labour Party. 
 The Blairites hope for a two-fer from the commission.  If 
they can restrict spending by all parties, they could 
neutralize both the hold of the unions on their own party and 
the considerable fundraising advantage of the Conservatives. 
The unions fiercely oppose this, but should they? Given a 
perceived failure of unions to deliver to its rank and file 
where it matters -- in the workplace -- funding a political 
party may be an unnecessary, albeit prestigious, distraction. 
  End Summary. 
 
LABOUR WANTS OUT FROM UNION GRIP 
 
2. Trade unions are anxiously following the deliberations of 
a commission exploring reforms to political party funding. 
PM Blair established the commission last year and appointed 
Sir Hayden Phillips its chair, in the wake of suspicions that 
political parties promised honors, including peerages, to 
major campaign donors.  The trade unions darkly suspect that 
some in the Labour Party would like to use the commission to 
break the unions' financial hold on Labour. 
 
3. By US standards, the amounts needed to fund UK elections 
are minuscule.  Parties can only spend GBP 30,000 ($60k) per 
candidate, or about GBP 19m ($38m) for an entire national 
election.  The great black hole of US campaigning -- TV time 
-- is free but tightly regulated in the UK.  Most party funds 
go to get-out-the-vote efforts and to advertising of 
questionable utility, such as leaflets and billboards.  FCO 
and Trade Minister Ian McCartney told LabCouns he considered 
the GBP 6m ($12m) Labour spent on billboards in the 2005 
elections a complete waste of money.  "Who cares about a 
fe--ing billboard?" 
 
4. Trade unions have been Labour's primary financier since 
the unions created the party in 1906.  Today, affiliated 
unions contribute GBP 3.00 per member per year.  Only 16 of 
the more than 70 UK unions are affiliated to Labour, but they 
include all the largest: AMICUS, UNISON, GMB and T and G, 
representing over half of the 7 million unionized workers in 
the UK.   This steady cash flow buys the unions one third of 
the seats on Labour's policy-making executive council.  Under 
a time honored tradition of "No say, no pay", the unions 
insist on being heard. 
 
5. Their impact is considerable, but not overwhelming.  The 
Labour Government has had to roll back or soften many of its 
competitiveness initiatives to placate its union membership. 
In 2005 the government agreed to grandfather all public 
sector workers in a pension plan that pays 100% of a worker's 
final salary, adjusted for inflation, for life, at an 
(unfunded) cost to the state budget of about one billion 
pounds ($2b) per month.  Other influences are more benign, 
such as commitments to end pay discrimination based on gender 
and increased access to higher education for disadvantaged 
groups.  On the other hand, Labour has pursued an agenda 
contrary to the unions' desires on many other issues, such as 
the independence of the Central Bank, National Health Service 
reform, and the war in Iraq. 
 
6. Union funding of Labour was on a steady decline until the 
peerages scandal.  From a high of 90% of all party money in 
its early years, the union contribution ebbed to a still 
considerable 25-40%, according to John Lloyd, a labor 
historian with the union Community.  With wealthy donors 
running for cover after the scandal, however, estimates of 
the unions' share are back up to 70%.  In effect, a handful 
of trade unions are the principal donors to the ruling party 
of our most important ally. 
 
7. Blair, most union observers believe, is trying to break 
that link.  Union demands are inconsistent with the Blairite 
vision of the centrist New Labour.  Mollifying that 
constituency risks alienating the larger Labour target 
audience.   Hence the importance of the Hadley Commission on 
reform of political funding.  The Blairites hoped for a 
two-fer.  If they could restrict spending by all parties, 
they could neutralize both the strangle hold of the unions on 
their own party and the considerable fundraising advantage of 
the Conservatives. 
 
DON'T COUNT ON IT 
 
8. "It's not going to happen," is the blunt assessment of 
 
LONDON 00000704  002 OF 002 
 
 
Amicus Deputy Secretary General Paul Talbott.   Labour simply 
does not have the ranks of moderately wealthy supporters who 
can each contribute several thousand pounds to the party, as 
the Tories do in abundance.  The Conservatives, consequently, 
favor a cap on large donations, which they can live without, 
but not on spending. 
 
9. The unions oppose any attempt to unseat them from the 
policy table.  They argue that their contributions should be 
counted as millions of individual donations of three pounds, 
not a handful of million pound checks.  They note that union 
political spending is endorsed by the membership in a 
referendum once a decade.  Devotees of inside baseball will 
appreciate this nuance: unions decide what number of their 
membership will affiliate with Labour, to fine-tune their 
financial support.  It is not always 100%.  The legendary 
leader of the National Union of Mineworkers, Arthur Scargill, 
sometimes affiliated more than 100% of his rank and file, to 
increase his political clout during his years of battle with 
Margaret Thatcher. 
 
10. Sir Hayden Phillips, faced with the fundamental 
philosophical approaches of the two main parties, has all but 
thrown up his hands.  Andy Bagnall, a domestic policy advisor 
to Labour Party chair Hazel Blears, calculates public alarm 
at the peerages affair was great enough to create the 
Phillips Commission but is not yet sufficient to accept the 
obvious solution, public funding.  And so the impasse 
continues, waiting perhaps for the police investigation to 
result in a criminal case sufficiently sordid to compel the 
public to accept giving taxpayer money to parties for 
political ends. 
 
COMMENT: DON'T QUIT YOUR DAY JOB 
 
11. Comment: Should that happen, trade unions would suffer 
the most, but perhaps not fatally.  Bagnall points out that 
the most dynamic unions, those with a growing membership, are 
not affiliated with the Labour Party.  Union members appear 
more interested in bread and butter issues of pensions and 
wages than in party politics.  The most recent annual survey 
of British Social Attitudes found that only one-third of 
union members believed they were getting value from their 
union membership.  The survey also found that workers in 
unionized workplaces tended to have twice as much mistrust of 
management and no greater wages than non-union shops.  Given 
this perceived failure of unions to deliver where it matters 
-- in the workplace -- funding a political party may be an 
unnecessary, albeit prestigious, distraction.  End Comment 
 
Visit London's Classified Website: 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/london/index. cfm 
Tuttle