Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07LAPAZ137, BEHIND THE SCENES, MINING TAX DISCUSSIONS BEGIN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07LAPAZ137.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07LAPAZ137 2007-01-19 21:18 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy La Paz
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHLP #0137/01 0192118
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 192118Z JAN 07
FM AMEMBASSY LA PAZ
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2117
INFO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 6466
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 3789
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 7667
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 4916
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 2158
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA 2246
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 3269
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 4352
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO 4798
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 9390
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0277
RUEHUB/USINT HAVANA 0093
RHMFIUU/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUMIAAA/USCINCSO MIAMI FL
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS LA PAZ 000137 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR WHA/AND LPETRONI 
COMMERCE FOR JANGLIN 
TREASURY FOR SGOOCH 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EMIN EINV ECON PREL PGOV BL
SUBJECT: BEHIND THE SCENES, MINING TAX DISCUSSIONS BEGIN 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) GOB officials and mining company executives have 
quietly begun discussing tax increases.  Industry 
representatives say the changes will be significant -- on 
paper, GOB officials are seeking a 50 percent share of 
before-tax profits -- but far less substantial than the 500 
percent hike proposed January 6 by Bolivia's minister of 
mining.  Representatives of U.S.-based Coeur d'Alene and Apex 
Silver said January 18 that the GOB's proposed tax hikes 
would adversely affect their operations, potentially forcing 
each firm to cancel or halt investment.  Miners' 
cooperatives, meanwhile, have expressed staunch opposition to 
any tax increase and threatened nation-wide road blockades, 
presenting a significant challenge to the Morales 
administration.  End summary. 
 
---------------------------- 
MINING TAX DISCUSSIONS BEGIN 
---------------------------- 
 
2. (SBU) Behind the scenes, GOB officials and mining company 
executives have quietly begun discussing mining tax 
increases.  Coeur d'Alene executive Jim Duff told Econoff 
January 18 that the GOB clearly wants to raise taxes, 
suggesting that the administration has little choice but to 
act in some way on President Morales' frequent promises to 
"nationalize" the mining sector.  Duff said he expected the 
GOB to move quickly to present new legislation, perhaps 
within the next two weeks; according to Duff, the GOB is 
looking for ways to mark President Morales' inaugural 
anniversary and to honor his much-publicized declarations 
that 2007 will be the "year of mining." 
 
-------------------------------- 
GOB PROPOSES SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 
-------------------------------- 
 
3. (SBU) Industry representatives say the proposed changes 
will be significant -- on paper, GOB officials are seeking a 
50 percent share of before-tax profits -- but far less 
substantial than the 500 percent hike proposed January 6 by 
Minister of Mining Jose Dalence.  GOB officials have told the 
industry's major players -- Apex Silver, Coeur d'Alene, 
Newmont Mining, and Swiss-owned Glencore -- that they want to 
eliminate companies' ability to credit the complementary 
mining tax (CMT) against income taxes; abolish the tax rate 
cap on the sliding scale currently in place (the scale varies 
by mineral, imposes different tax rates at different mineral 
prices, and sets minimum and maximum tax rates); and raise 
taxes at each level of the sliding scale.  To illustrate, 
gross sales of silver are currently taxed at a minimum rate 
of three percent at a silver price of $4/ounce, with rates 
varying up to a maximum rate of six percent at a silver price 
of $8/ounce; with the GOB's proposed changes, tax rates at 
each price would increase, with taxes potentially rising as 
high as 20 percent at a silver price of $21/ounce. 
 
---------------------------- 
COMPANIES SAY THEY MAY LEAVE 
---------------------------- 
 
4. (SBU) Representatives of U.S.-based Coeur d'Alene and Apex 
Silver said January 18 that the GOB's proposed tax hikes 
would adversely affect their operations, potentially forcing 
each firm to cancel or halt investment.  Coeur d'Alene's Duff 
told Econoff that the elimination of companies' ability to 
credit the CMT against income taxes would alone significantly 
damage profitability; together with proposed tax hikes, the 
modification could more than double the company's annual tax 
bill (which includes the CMT, taxes on income and dividend 
withholdings, and royalties paid to the seven mining 
cooperatives leasing the project's silver deposits to Coeur 
d'Alene).  Duff reportedly told the mining minister and other 
GOB officials that new taxes would make it impossible for the 
firm to recover its capital investment, especially if silver 
prices fell from today's record highs to their long-term 
average of $5/ounce.  Duff ultimately told GOB officials he 
believed tax increases would force Coeur d'Alene's board to 
suspend the firm's $130 million San Bartolome silver project; 
the possibility of cancellation reportedly had some effect, 
but Duff said he suspected GOB officials would ignore the 
threat and move blindly ahead. 
 
5. (SBU) Apex Silver CEO Jeff Clevenger echoed Duff's 
concerns, telling the Ambassador January 18 that the GOB's 
proposed tax hikes would effectively amount to a 70 percent 
share of earnings.  Company executives reportedly tried to 
explain the effective tax rate to GOB officials but made 
little progress, as most officials possessed only a limited 
understanding of the industry.  Executives indicated that 
Apex would accept a true 50/50 profit split and urged GOB 
officials to carefully consider the effective impact of 
proposed tax hikes on the company's ability to realize a 
satisfactory investment return, lest Apex be forced to halt 
its $900 million San Cristobal project.  Executives also 
urged GOB officials to moderate their rhetoric, noting that 
threats to "nationalize" the mining sector and introduce a 
500 percent tax increase had disastrous implications for the 
company's stock price; according to one executive, Apex lost 
$300 million in market capitalization on the mining 
minister's comments alone.  Despite their arguments' 
relatively limited success, company representatives said they 
would continue to engage GOB officials. 
 
--------------------------------------- 
MINERS' COOPERATIVES EXPRESS OPPOSITION 
--------------------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) Miners' cooperatives, meanwhile, have expressed 
staunch opposition to any CMT increase and threatened 
nation-wide road blockades, presenting a significant 
challenge to the Morales administration.  The National 
Federation of Miners' Cooperatives immediately rejected 
proposed tax hikes and called on the GOB to respect existing 
contracts and honor past promises to seek cooperatives' 
agreement before changing the industry's tax structure; in 
response, the GOB announced January 16 that it would begin 
discussions with mining cooperatives and state mining 
employees' unions. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
7. (SBU) While executives fully expect tax increases, they 
appear confident that the GOB will avoid extremes.  Many 
believe the GOB's much-hyped "nationalization" of the mining 
industry will parallel that of the hydrocarbons sector, e.g., 
that GOB officials will introduce tax increases in lieu of 
asset expropriations.  Industry representatives do not 
consider the GOB's public statements an indication of the 
GOB's true intentions; rather, they consider the rhetoric an 
effective means of alarming companies and forcing a softening 
of negotiating positions, pointing out that a 50 percent 
share of before-tax profits suddenly seems acceptable when 
the alternative is a 500 percent increase. 
8. (SBU) Comment continued: Company representatives may be 
able to accept the inevitability of tax hikes, but many have 
a difficult time accepting the disconnect between the 
administration's harmful proposals and GOB officials' public 
statements recognizing the importance of private investment. 
By raising mining taxes, the GOB risks losing the investment 
it claims to want, puts thousands of much-needed jobs on the 
line, and sets the stage for a potentially damaging 
confrontation with miners' cooperatives -- unless it placates 
a once supportive group by exempting them from tax increases. 
 End comment. 
GOLDBERG