Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06GENEVA2337, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL -- REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06GENEVA2337.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06GENEVA2337 2006-09-22 08:20 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Mission Geneva
VZCZCXYZ0006
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHGV #2337/01 2650820
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220820Z SEP 06
FM USMISSION GENEVA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1090
INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1599
UNCLAS GENEVA 002337 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PHUM UNHRC
SUBJECT: UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL -- REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE ON 
REPLACING THE 1503 COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE 
 
 
1.  This is an action request.  See para 6. 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
2.  Informals, led by Swiss Permanent Representative Blaise 
Godet, were held September 15 to continue discussions on 
replacing the existing 1503 human rights procedure with a new 
complaints procedure endorsed by the Human Rights Council. 
During the course of informals, several delegations appeared 
willing to cast aside the key limitations on the existing 
1503 procedure -- that the allegation be of a "consistent 
pattern of gross and reliably attested violations of 
fundamental human rights," and that domestic remedies be 
exhausted.  Questions also arose regarding the need to keep 
the procedure confidential versus opening it up to greater 
transparency to the complainants, as well as if/how it should 
be linked to Universal Periodic Review.  There does not 
appear to be any concerted opposition to a complaint 
procedure.  The difficulty will be reaching agreement on the 
form it should take and its modalities. 
 
ISSUES FOR DECISION RAISED BY FACILITATOR 
----------------------------------------- 
 
3.  Swiss Permrep Blaise Godet has been appointed the 
"facilitator" of an informal working group on the complaint 
procedure to be adopted by the Human Rights Council (HRC) to 
replace the ECOSOC-mandated 1503 procedure.  Godet referred 
several times to the mandate under UNGA Resolution 60/251 
creating the Council to "assume, review and, where necessary 
improve and rationalize" Commission mechanisms, including "to 
maintain . . . a complaint procedure."  The first meeting of 
the group, September 15, worked on the basis of a "checklist" 
prepared by Godet.  (Checklist was emailed to L, DRL, and 
IO.)  The checklist notes key characteristics of the current 
1503 procedure, such as that the allegations must state a 
"consistent pattern of gross and reliably attested violations 
of human rights and fundamental freedoms," universality, 
exhaustion of domestic remedies, and complementarity.  The 
checklist raises questions whether there should be more 
transparency vis-a-vis the Council and complainants, whether 
it should avoid overlap with other mechanisms, and how it 
should be linked (if at all) with the Universal Periodic 
Review (UPR).  It also raises questions about the type and 
number of bodies that should be involved, and their 
composition, whether individuals or groups can submit 
complaints, the number of steps in the procedure, and the 
powers and types of outcome for the procedure. 
 
REVIEW OF STATES' POSITIONS 
--------------------------- 
 
4.  The discussion on the paper heard many states calling for 
improvement of the current 1503 mechanism, but with most 
participants being unable to articulate how that might be 
accomplished.  Most criticisms of the current mechanism 
focused on its "politicization," though a number of 
delegations cautioned that the procedure works relatively 
well and should not be changed drastically. 
 
-- The EU wants greater transparency for the complainants, 
impartiality, and objectivity in the process.  It had not, 
however, agreed among its members on any specific points or 
recommendations. 
 
-- China asserted that the original purpose of 1503 was to 
address country situations first in a confidential way, but 
that it had evolved into a kind of individual complaints 
procedure.  At the same time, country situations eventually 
by-passed the 1503 process and went right to public airing in 
the Commission.  China would not tinker with the current 
structure and admissibility requirements, but would return 
the procedure to what China asserts is its original role as 
the gatekeeper for consideration of country situations in the 
public sessions of the Council.  Pakistan largely agreed. 
 
-- Russia said it had no strong interest in the 1503 
procedure, but given the mandate from the UNGA to maintain a 
complaints mechanism, supported keeping the existing 
procedure with few changes.  It called for better handling of 
communications by the Secretariat, including more Russian 
translators and better tracking of correspondence.  Russia 
underlined the importance of the confidentiality of the 
procedures, arguing that this is a unique aspect of 1503 
which allows states quietly to follow through with 
implementation. 
 
-- India, Japan, Colombia, Indonesia, the United States, and 
others also stated clearly that the admissibility 
requirements of the current procedure must be maintained in 
order to avoid a massive flood of complaints. Argentina, 
Chile, and Peru asserted, however, that such requirements 
were outmoded and created unfair obstacles to the ability of 
complainants to seek redress.  They would create a 
straight-forward individual complaints procedure with tough 
remedies, including compensation for violations.  In 
addition, the Czech Republic and Norway called into question 
the necessity of a requirement for a "consistent pattern of 
gross . . . violations," asserting that such a standard is 
political not legal and therefore is unnecessary for the 
Council to consider human rights violations. 
 
-- Several delegations complained that the OHCHR Secretariat 
had a record of losing 1503 complaints and that many 
applicants never learned the outcome of their submission. 
The Secretariat stated that it had improved its handling of 
the communications over the years, and had developed a system 
for minimizing overlap with other mechanisms.  To the extent 
that the same claim is filed through more than one procedure, 
the Secretariat now will only take it up in one.  According 
to the Secretariat duplicative filings have been reduced to 
less than 5 percent of the total. 
 
-- Peru and Argentina, with scattered support, argued that 
the political role of the Working Group on Situations should 
be abolished, with the entire process being turned over to 
the independent experts, who could meet year-round under the 
new Council structure, and make recommendations to the full 
Council.  Russia, China, Iran, India, and Japan maintained 
the crucial role the intergovernmental committee plays in 
vetting complaints before they get to the full Council. 
 
CONSULTATIONS TO CONTINUE 
------------------------- 
 
5.  Godet was unable to reconcile the various views, but 
stated that it was clear the existing 1503 procedure must be 
the basis for further discussions, and that delegations 
seemed to want to improve it where possible.  Peru maintained 
that one could not rule out other models as well.  Godet 
ended by stating that he would be in touch with delegations 
during the Council session and come back to the informal 
working group with a revised checklist. 
 
ACTION REQUEST 
-------------- 
 
6.  Department is requested to provide guidance to Mission on 
USG goals for a complaints mechanism in the Council, focusing 
first on the points in Godet's checklist.  What aspects of 
the 1503 procedure may be improved upon?  Which aspects must 
be maintained?  Department is also requested to provide some 
sense of how the complaints mechanism might relate to other 
mechanisms, including those of existing treaties and the 
nascent UPR. 
 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
7.  The Department and Mission devote considerable resources 
every year addressing mostly frivolous 1503 complaints 
against the United States.  The political nature of the 
Working Group on Situations has been a source of frustration 
when regional group balance resulted in cases being dismissed 
or forwarded to the Commission based on regional 
considerations rather than their merit.  Nonetheless, Mission 
believes that the 1503 procedure has been manageable while 
providing in several cases for the Commission to take action 
to address pressing human rights situations.  With that in 
mind, Mission Geneva would caution against opening it up to a 
revision that could result in either an unmanageable flood of 
communications or an overly restrictive system that would 
limit the Council's ability to address serious country 
situations. 
TICHENOR