Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06HONGKONG2850, HIGH COURT RULES ON COVERT SURVEILLANCE CASE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HONGKONG2850.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06HONGKONG2850 2006-07-12 09:35 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Consulate Hong Kong
VZCZCXRO6320
PP RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHHK #2850/01 1930935
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 120935Z JUL 06
FM AMCONSUL HONG KONG
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7718
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HONG KONG 002850 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
NSC FOR DENNIS WILDER 
DEPT FOR EAP/CM 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL HK CH PINR MC
SUBJECT: HIGH COURT RULES ON COVERT SURVEILLANCE CASE 
 
REF: HONG KONG 0523 
 
1. (SBU) Summary:  On July 12, the Hong Kong Court of Final 
Appeal (CFA) struck down a February lower court ruling that 
had granted six-month "temporary validity" to the 
Government's covert surveillance and wiretapping operations, 
despite the lower court's finding that such operations were 
unconstitutional.  The six-month grace period was meant to 
give the Government an opportunity to enact corrective 
legislation without disrupting normal investigative 
operations, but the CFA found that the lower court had gone 
too far in granting "temporary validity."  Recognizing the 
need to avoid a legal vacuum, the CFA instead substituted a 
"suspension" of the declarations of unconstitutionality for a 
period of six months from the date of the lower court's 
original ruling.  The practical effect of this is that the 
Government will still have until August 8 to enact corrective 
legislation but, importantly, will not be shielded from legal 
liability for its unconstitutional surveillance operations, 
as had been the case under the lower court's "temporary 
validity" order.  End Summary. 
 
2. (SBU) The CFA on July 12 overturned a lower court decision 
granting "temporary validity" to the Government's covert 
surveillance and wiretapping operations for a period of six 
months.  In that earlier decision, issued on February 9, 
2006, High Court Justice Michael Hartman ruled that Chief 
Executive Donald Tsang's August 2005 executive order 
authorizing covert surveillance was "an administrative order 
having no legislative effect" (see ref).  Hartman also ruled 
that Section 33 of the decades-old Telecommunications 
Ordinance was unconstitutional because it authorized access 
to, or the disclosure of, the contents of intercepted 
communications in violation of Articles 30 and 39 of the 
Basic Law, which guarantee the right to free and private 
communications.  Hartman accepted, however, the Government's 
petition to grant "temporary validity" to both the executive 
order and the Telecommunications Ordinance for a period of 
six months to allow the Government time to enact corrective 
legislation.  Hartman admitted that his ruling was "unusual" 
and "exceptional" but justified it by arguing that the 
prospect of a legal vacuum constituted "a real threat to the 
rule of law."  As precedent for his decision, Hartman relied 
heavily on a Canadian decision in which the court granted 
"temporary validity" to nearly all of the laws on the books 
in Manitoba Province, despite having declared those laws 
unconstitutional because they were not written in both French 
and English. 
 
A Victory for Long Hair, But Little Practical Effect 
--------------------------------------------- ------- 
 
3. (SBU) The plaintiffs in that case, legislator "Long Hair" 
Leung Kwok-hung and fellow activist Koo Sze-Yiu, appealed 
Hartman's "temporary validity" ruling to the CFA.  In its 
unanimous decision, CFA Justice Kemal Bokhary said "The 
scenario in the present case is nothing like a virtual legal 
vacuum or a virtually blank statute book (referring to the 
Canadian case).  It is by no means as serious as that.  I see 
nothing to justify temporary validity in the present case." 
Bokhary added, however, that "All things considered, I am of 
the view that the danger to be averted in the present case is 
of a sufficient magnitude to justify suspension."  Bokhary 
concluded that "I would allow the appeal to set aside the 
temporary validity order.  In its place I would, to afford an 
opportunity for the enactment of corrective legislation, 
substitute suspension of the declarations of 
unconstitutionality so as to postpone their coming into 
operation, such postponement to be for six months from the 
date of Hartman's judgment of 9 February 2006." 
 
4. (SBU) The practical effect of the CFA's ruling is that the 
Government will still have until August 8 to enact corrective 
legislation.  However, it will not be shielded from legal 
liability for its unconstitutional surveillance operations, 
as had been the case under Hartman's "temporary validity" 
ruling.  Bokhary made this point explicit by saying "The 
Government can, during that period of suspension, function 
pursuant to what has been declared unconstitutional, doing so 
without acting contrary to any declaration in operation. 
But, despite such suspension, the Government is not shielded 
from legal liability for functioning pursuant to what has 
been declared unconstitutional." 
 
5. (SBU) Outside the court, Leung and Koo opened a bottle of 
champagne in front of television cameras to celebrate their 
victory.  They called on Donald Tsang to make a public 
 
HONG KONG 00002850  002 OF 002 
 
 
apology for his unconstitutional act, and to promise not to 
do it again.  The Government has not yet reacted to the 
ruling.  Leung and Koo, both of whom claim to be targets of 
covert surveillance and wiretapping, say they intend to file 
a lawsuit against the Government for unconstitutional 
surveillance. 
Sakaue