Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06HANOI1814, HANOI MUSEUM EXHIBITION CRITICIZES VIETNAM'S PAST ECONOMIC

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HANOI1814.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06HANOI1814 2006-07-18 03:30 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Hanoi
VZCZCXRO1465
RR RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHHI #1814/01 1990330
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 180330Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY HANOI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2777
INFO RUEHHM/AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH CITY 1511
RUEHZS/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HANOI 001814 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/MLS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR VM
SUBJECT: HANOI MUSEUM EXHIBITION CRITICIZES VIETNAM'S PAST ECONOMIC 
POLICIES 
 
HANOI 00001814  001.2 OF 003 
 
 
1. (SBU) Summary:  A new exhibition at the Vietnam Museum of 
Ethnology (VME) in Hanoi is currently enjoying considerable public 
interest and media attention, as the exhibit indirectly criticizes 
the GVN's past economic policies, while carefully praising current 
pro-market reforms.  The museum's director claimed that the GVN did 
not attempt to censor the exhibit, which was partly inspired by a 
Smithsonian exhibition on racial segregation in the United States, 
despite the exhibition's often strong critiques.  Although the 
exhibit does not likely reflect an overall trend towards cultural 
openness by the GVN, it does set a new precedent for careful 
political criticism.  End Summary. 
 
State Museum Attracts Vietnamese Visitors 
------------------------------------------ 
 
2. (SBU) On July 9, Pol and Econ interns visited the Vietnamese 
Museum of Ethnology's (VME) exhibit entitled "Hanoi Life Under the 
Subsidy Economy, 1975-1986" and met with the VME's Director, Dr. 
Nguyen Van Huy, and Vice Head of the Southeast Asian Department, 
Mrs. Nguyen Thi Thu Huong.  Located in the outskirts of Hanoi, the 
spacious and well-maintained museum houses the new exhibition in a 
large room alongside its permanent collection of traditional 
artifacts.  In stark contrast to other State museums, a large number 
of both foreign and Vietnamese visitors crowd the VME, which boasts 
multimedia displays and realistic reproductions.  At the entrance of 
the exhibition, mannequins stand in line at a life-size storehouse 
for food, setting the scene of the "Bao Cap" (Subsidy) Economy 
period, while Vietnamese adolescents take pictures of their friends 
pretending to be in line to receive rations. 
 
Subtle Criticisms of Past Policies 
---------------------------------- 
 
3. (SBU) With its collection of old photographs, authentic household 
objects and a reproduction of an insalubrious neighborhood, the 
exhibit depicts the poor living conditions of Hanoi residents prior 
to the GVN's implementation of the "Doi Moi" (Renovation) policy in 
1986 by the GVN. Numerous signs throughout the showroom describe the 
difficulties common people faced to acquire basic necessities: 
"Food was bought with coupons...Distribution of goods was dependant 
on the rank of the citizen...High-ranking officials were served at 
special shops."  To illustrate these experiences, ration coupons are 
displayed next to small stones with an individual's position in the 
line chalked on each rock.  These served to ensure people's place, 
should they need to leave temporarily.  The concluding sentence of a 
caption describing a food stall summarizes the prevalent sentiment 
of the time: "Queuing to buy rice was always a suffering." 
 
4. (SBU) Without openly blaming the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) 
or the GVN for these hardships, the exhibition nonetheless points to 
Bao Cap policies as the source of economic failure.  Signs and 
captions, in both English and Vietnamese, denounce the 
"socio-economic mismanagement, inefficient systems and inappropriate 
mechanisms of Bao Cap" and blame the system's breakdown on 
"production problems, corruption, fraudulent use or connivance 
between trade staff."  Exhibits also note that as a black market 
emerged, "Buying and selling coupons illegally was common."  On top 
of these economic problems, the exhibition also hints at GVN 
censorship and dissent within the country during the period. 
Adjacent to a sign describing the GVN's "cultural management" 
policy, a caption of a theatrical play book reads, "if a name in a 
local play of the bad character is the same as a local official, the 
play could be banned."  Under another sign explaining the gradual 
path to Doi Moi, novels, poems and "Tien Phong" (Pioneer) newspaper 
articles, all hostile to Bao Cap, are on display. 
 
5. (SBU) Despite these subtle criticisms, the exhibition does not go 
as far as directly blaming the GVN for Bao Cap.  Censorship of 
cultural expression is depicted as a "strict and rigid management of 
all art forms," but the only repercussions mentioned are "unequal 
opportunities for people to enjoy cultural experiences."  The entire 
exhibit mitigates the responsibility of the GVN and defines Bao Cap 
as a time when "the courage and the intelligence of millions of 
people were suppressed," without delving into the actual root 
causes.  While some video displays mention the debate during the mid 
1980s about economic reforms, the final sign of the exhibition 
praises the GVN's Doi Moi reforms, which led Vietnam from a 
subsidence economy to global markets integration.  Once the country 
instituted market reforms, "the energy of the people virtually 
exploded, creating a boom in socio-economic development."  The final 
photograph of the exhibit shows the signing of the U.S.-Vietnam 
Bilateral Access Agreement in May 2006, symbolizing a bright outlook 
ahead, as Vietnam prepares to enter the World Trade Organization 
"later this year."  One middle-aged Vietnamese visitor told Econ 
intern that the significance of the exhibition is that it depicts 
the contrast between today's prosperity and the hardships under Bao 
Cap, but "it is not a criticism of the GVN." 
 
 
HANOI 00001814  002.2 OF 003 
 
 
Exhibit Embraced by Vietnamese Public 
------------------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) During the meeting with Huy, Pol intern noted that the 
exhibition differs greatly from other State museums' exhibits by 
offering a frank portrayal of Vietnam's history, and inquired 
whether this initiative marks Vietnam's new willingness to honestly 
reexamine its past and Socialist policies.  Without answering the 
question, Huy provided a detailed overview of the strong public 
interest in the exhibition.  Since its opening, the VME has seen an 
average of 800 to 900 visitors on Saturdays and Sundays, which 
"surprised everyone at the museum."  The VME was actually unable to 
accommodate all visitors during the first week, due to a shortage of 
tickets and parking spots. 
 
7. (SBU) Huy also pointed out that the exhibition attracts people 
from all levels of Vietnamese society.  While older Vietnamese come 
with their own sentiments and experiences, younger individuals visit 
the museum "to satisfy their curiosity."  "The newest Vietnamese 
generation does not know life under the Subsidy Economy and it is 
difficult for them to grasp the living conditions of that era," he 
added.  As a result, grandparents have to explain to their 
grandchildren their past hardships.  Lauding "this 
inter-generational communication," Huy mentioned that people also 
share their feelings and reconnect with each other through their 
common experiences.  Conveying visitors' reactions to the exhibit, 
Huy passionately explained that "people are truly happy to look back 
and witness the changes, but they also look forward to the future." 
 
 
American Advisor Participates in the Exhibition Design. 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
 
8. (SBU) Huy noted that the VME staff created the entire showing, 
but a lengthy preparation time was necessary to collect daily-life 
objects and conduct interviews with older Hanoi residents for a 
direct account of their experiences.  An American curator (NFI) from 
Alaska helped with the creation of a "community video," which 
allowed residents to freely recount their memories about the Bao Cap 
period.  This first-ever media experience in Vietnam was included in 
the exhibition's section dealing with the early debate about 
economic reforms.  Although the community film only relayed soft 
criticisms against Bao Cap, Huy insisted that "the initiative was 
entirely carried out by the people and the museum performed minimum 
edits without modifying the substance of the videos." 
 
No GVN Censorship of the Exhibition 
----------------------------------- 
 
9. (SBU) Pol intern speculated about possible GVN or CPV 
interference with the exhibit's contents and inquired whether the 
VME maintained its creative and intellectual freedom during the 
design process.  Huy candidly replied: "We were not censored." 
After the GVN approved the project last September, the VME worked on 
the exhibit without any constraint.  "I decided the content myself 
and no governmental agency objected," Huy declared.  The VME secured 
funding from the Vietnamese Academy of Social Sciences as part of 
its activities marking the 20th anniversary of Doi Moi.  Although he 
acknowledged that he planned this project for the past four years, 
Huy claimed that he did not have a clear vision for the exhibit 
other than "leaving an open-ended conclusion for visitors by 
reflecting different views from different people." 
 
10. (SBU) Finally, Huy noted that his inspiration for the exhibition 
stemmed from his visit to the Smithsonian Institution's National 
Museum of American History exhibition depicting racial segregation 
and the history of the Jim Crow era in the South.  Recollecting his 
sentiments after contemplating a display of a train with sections 
dividing white and black passengers, Huy praised the ability of 
American museums to objectively reexamine U.S. history and stated 
his belief that the VME could act in the same capacity for Vietnam. 
He noted that for this reason, the VME decided to display a famous 
Vietnamese poem by the exit of the Bao Cap exhibition.  Published 
shortly before the CPV's 6th Congress (which lead to the institution 
of Doi Moi), the piece strongly criticizes Bao Cap policies and 
condemns the Party for restricting the people's aspirations.  While 
the GVN condemned the poem at the time, Huy explained that the 
exhibit displays the work to recapture the end of Bao Cap.  Quoting 
one of the poem's verses -- "Who understands and who has to change" 
-- he concluded that, "I believe the Party had to change, that is 
why Doi Moi came." 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
11. (SBU) The VME's exhibition on Bao Cap provides an unprecedented 
critique of GVN socio-economic policies prior to Doi Moi.  The 
exhibit's implicit praise of Doi Moi policies is likely the main 
 
HANOI 00001814  003.2 OF 003 
 
 
reason the GVN tolerates these critiques.  Although the Bao Cap 
exhibit does not reflect an overall trend towards cultural openness 
by the GVN, it does set a new precedent for careful political 
criticism.  End comment. 
 
MARINE