Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HANOI1661, U.S. - Vietnam BTA Review
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HANOI1661.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06HANOI1661 | 2006-07-06 10:35 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Hanoi |
VZCZCXRO2384
OO RUEHHM
DE RUEHHI #1661/01 1871035
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 061035Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY HANOI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2622
INFO RUEHHM/AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH CITY 1457
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1096
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEHZU/APEC COLLECTIVE
RUEHZS/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 HANOI 001661
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/MLS AND EB/TPP/BTA/ANA
STATE PASS USTR DBISBEE, BWEISEL
USDOC FOR 4431/MAC/AP/OPB/VLC/HPPHO
TREASURY FOR OASIA
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR WTRO VM
SUBJECT: U.S. - Vietnam BTA Review
HANOI 00001661 001.4 OF 006
SENSITIVE - DO NOT POST ON INTERNET
¶1. (SBU) Summary: On June 19, the Ministry of Trade hosted the
annual meeting of the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) Joint
Committee. During the meeting, Vietnam clarified the steps it has
taken and those underway to implement BTA commitments. The
Vietnamese team made a concerted effort to address issues raised by
the United States. In large part, Vietnam is in compliance with its
BTA commitments, but some U.S. concerns remain, particularly in
areas where comprehensive legislation has recently been passed and
implementing regulations have not been finalized. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (SBU) After Vice-Minister of Trade Luong Van Tu welcomed the U.S.
delegation, Deputy Chief of Mission Boardman emphasized that
successful implementation of the BTA will build support for
Vietnam's Permanent Normal Trade Relation status in Congress.
Barbara Weisel, Assistant USTR for Southeast Asia and the Pacific
and Pharmaceutical Policy chaired the day-long meeting for the
United States while Office of the Government International Relations
Department Director Bui Huy Hung chaired for the Vietnamese side.
The U.S. delegation included Victoria Espinel, Assistant USTR for
Intellectual Property; David Bisbee, Director, Office of Southeast
Asia and the Pacific, USTR; Jennifer Ness, Attorney Advisor, U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office; Hong-Phong Pho, Country Desk Officer,
U.S. Department of Commerce; John Wade, Agriculture Attache, USDA;
and Janet Speck, Deputy Chief of Economic Section.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) - BTA Chapter 2
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶3. (SBU) Status of 2005 Intellectual Property (IP) Law and
Implementing Regulations: Vietnam provided the United States with
an update on the 2005 IP Law, which will take effect on July 1, and
will have four implementing decrees covering copyright, industrial
property, plant varieties, and enforcement as well as circulars from
each ministry, regulations on courts from the Supreme Court and
three decrees on administrative violations. The four main decrees
were originally going to be issued at the time the IP Law entered
into force; however, the Vietnamese side explained that they are now
scheduled to come out sometime before the end of July. Drafts of
the enforcement and industrial property decrees are currently on the
National Office of Intellectual Property (NOIP) website for public
comment. The Vietnamese also provided the U.S. side the latest
version of the copyright decree. When asked for clarification on
the legal status of existing decrees pending finalization of the new
decrees, Vietnam responded that existing IP-related decrees, if
consistent with the new law, will remain in force, unless replaced
by a new decree. Even though the new decrees will not be issued
before the law comes into effect, Vietnam plans to implement the IP
Law immediately. The U.S. side offered to help Vietnam with plans
to educate the public on the new law.
¶4. (SBU) Enforcement: The U.S. side expressed concern that
provisions in the IP Law that limit criminal liability to violations
exceeding a certain monetary amount or to repeated violations did
not meet the BTA and WTO requirement that infringement be criminal
if it is willful and on a commercial scale. AUSTR Espinel noted
that the United States has grave concerns about China's system,
which, like Vietnam's, sets monetary thresholds before conduct is
considered criminal. In response, the Vietnamese side cited
circulars and guidelines that defined the factors making
infringement criminal. Article 131 in the Criminal Code defines a
crime and Trial Circular No. 2 from the Second People's Court
provides greater detail. By Vietnamese law, the IP law's
implementing decrees cannot supersede the criminal code; therefore,
the decrees cannot be more specific than the code in this area. In
response to questions from the United States, the Vietnamese side
promised to provide further clarification on the definition of
"seriousness" in Vietnam's criminal code and to provide the United
States with an English language translation of Circular 2/2001
(12/25/2001), which deals with criteria for criminal thresholds.
¶5. (SBU) Remedies: The U.S. side asked which provisions of the new
law provided remedies for civil, criminal and administrative
violations that included seizure, forfeiture and destruction.
According to Vietnam, Article 202(5) of the IP Law provides these
remedies in civil proceedings and Article 214(2) provides them for
HANOI 00001661 002.4 OF 006
administrative proceedings. They promised to provide citations to
the appropriate provisions in the Criminal Code. The U.S. side,
noting that the IP law permits courts to order that infringing goods
be used for noncommercial use, asked the Vietnamese to clarify
"noncommercial use." The Vietnamese said "noncommercial use" could
mean giving the goods to charity or using them in public agencies.
The U.S. side responded that donating seized goods to charity is
acceptable, but distributing them to public agencies raised
concerns. GVN noted that the Common Decree on Enforcement clarified
the circumstances under which infringing goods could be used for
non-commercial purposes.
¶6. (SBU) Re-exporting: The U.S. asked for an explanation of the
rationale for permitting the re-export of pirated and copyright
goods once the infringing element has been removed because, unlike
for counterfeit goods, pirated and copyright goods, as a whole, are
infringements and the infringing element cannot be removed. Vietnam
explained that the broad language prevented situations where the law
would, in effect, require that valuable goods be destroyed even
though it is possible to remove the infringing element or where
destruction is environmentally harmful or excessively expensive.
The United States suggested clarifying this issue.
¶7. (SBU) Administrative Remedies: The two sides discussed how
monetary penalties would be calculated under the new law, with the
United States expressing concern that the low fines for
counterfeiting under administrative remedies in the IP law might not
sufficiently deter criminals or signal Vietnam's seriousness about
intellectual property rights. The administrative fines for
counterfeiting in the IP law are one to five times the value of the
infringing good, which could be lower than the value of the real
good. Vietnam noted that many National Assembly members felt the
penalty is too high because it might bankrupt counterfeiters and
would be difficult to enforce. Furthermore, Vietnam's ability to
modify the penalties is restricted because decrees cannot increase
the administrative penalties already set out in the IP Law. The
U.S. noted that it would be better to have a penalty equal to the
value of the genuine good than a penalty equal to five times the
value of the infringing good.
¶8. (SBU) Geographical Indications (GI): When asked if Vietnam has a
separate system for geographical indications and how trademarks and
geographical indications interact, the Vietnamese side said that
geographical indications are separate from trademarks. GIs are
covered in the decrees on enforcement and industrial property and
the Ministry of Science and Technology will also issue a circular.
The IP Law only provides for GIs in Vietnam; U.S. companies seeking
geographical indication protections must apply directly to the
Vietnamese government.
¶9. (SBU) Data Protection: Article 128 of the IP Law has two
paragraphs; the first requires the government to protect data from
disclosure or unfair commercial use and the second denies a license
to a subsequent applicant who uses data without permission. The
U.S. side emphasized that draft implementing decrees should apply to
both parts of Article 128 and that the U.S. would want to see draft
decrees before Vietnam's WTO accession. The WTO working party
report should provide clarity on Vietnam's data protection law. The
Vietnam side asked the U.S. side to provide written comments and
promised to convey U.S. concerns to the committees drafting the
implementing decrees.
Copyright - BTA Chapter 2
-------------------------
¶10. (U) The discussion on IPR enforcement and other IPR issues took
up the morning, therefore the Joint Committee split into two
sections in the afternoon. One group, led on the U.S. side by AUSTR
Victoria Espinel, discussed copyright issues, while the rest of the
group moved on to other issues.
¶11. (SBU) Phonograms: In response to questions from the U.S. side,
the Vietnamese clarified that Article 30 of the IP Law gives
phonogram producers exclusive rights to distribution and that
Article 30(2) only means the producer has the right to receive
benefits and does not detract from exclusive distribution rights.
The Vietnamese also explained that the phrase "provided they do not
HANOI 00001661 003.4 OF 006
influence the copyrights exercise" in Article 17(4) is a
mistranslation and that the phrase meant "without prejudice to the
rights of the copyright holder" as required by the Rome Convention.
¶12. (SBU) Exceptions and Compulsory Licensing: The U.S. side
expressed concern that Article 25(1) provisions on the use of
copyrighted works without obtaining permission or paying royalties,
specifically, 25(1)(a),(d'),(e) and (k), were too broad. (Note:
Article 25(1) contains both a (d) and a (d'). End note.) AUSTR
Espinel noted that the United States has some exceptions similar to
Vietnam's, however, the U.S. exceptions are drafted in very specific
language while the Vietnamese exceptions are more general.
Vietnam's intentions may be compatible with WTO requirements, but
the law's drafting could open a loophole. Regulations could make
the exceptions more specific. The Vietnamese side pointed out that
25(1)(k) (importation for personal use) was mistranslated; the
exception was limited to one copy. The Vietnamese side said it
would welcome suggestions on how to draft language for the
implementing decree that would narrow the exceptions.
¶13. (SBU) Importation Rights: The U.S. side asked if copyright
holders' rights included the right to control importation, noting
that they understood that the Civil Code included this right. The
Vietnamese side said that in Vietnamese, Article 20(d) of the IP Law
says "to distribute to the public and import". The phrase "and
import" had been erroneously omitted from the English version.
¶14. (SBU) Compulsory Licensing: According to the U.S. side, the
language in Articles 26 and 33 - allowing for use without obtaining
permission, but paying royalties - was far too broad and inclusion
of language taken from the Berne Convention on not prejudicing the
rights of copyright holders ("three-step test") was not enough to
solve the problem. AUSTR Espinel pointed out that Article 26 would
cover all commercial broadcasting. The Vietnamese representatives
explained that the provision was needed because Vietnam used the
public broadcasting system to disseminate information to the public.
The National Assembly had been "tough" on this issue because most
broadcasting stations use government funds. They confirmed that
compulsory licensing would also apply to hotels, bars and
restaurants. AUSTR Espinel took note of the political difficulty of
the issue, but also noted that the current language in the draft
implementing decree compounded the problem. She said that the
United States also has some broadcasting and public performance
exceptions and offered to send suggestions on narrowing the language
in the draft decree.
¶15. (SBU) Term of Copyright Protection: The Vietnamese said that
although Articles 27 and 30 provide for only 50 years of protection,
instead of the 75 years required by the BTA, U.S. authors would be
entitled to 75 years by virtue of Article 5, which states that the
provisions of international treaties prevail in the case of a
conflict with the IP law. The U.S. side asked for this assurance in
writing. AUSTR Espinel said that the WTO provisions on MFN meant
that Vietnam would have to extend the term to other countries. The
Vietnamese retorted that when negotiating the BTA, the U.S. team had
claimed that Article 4(b) would exempt them from the MFN
requirement. The U.S. side promised to look into this issue and get
back to them.
¶16. (SBU) Copyright Registration and Presumptions: The Vietnamese
side confirmed that copyright holders do not need to register or to
obtain a certificate in order to enforce their copyrights. A
registration/certificate only provides a presumption of authorship
and ownership. AUSTR Espinel asked why it did not also provide a
presumption that the work was protected by the state, which can be
useful. The Vietnamese said that they did not want people to assume
that registration was mandatory. The U.S. side also asked whether
Vietnam's law provided, as required by the Berne Convention, for a
presumption of authorship where the author's name appears on the
work in the "usual manner." The Vietnamese pointed to the provision
allowing authors to prove ownership through various documents,
including copies of the work. The United States asked for
clarifying language.
Trade in Goods - BTA Chapter 1
------------------------------
HANOI 00001661 004.4 OF 006
¶17. (SBU) Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS):
The Law on Standards is expected to be passed this session of the
National Assembly, which ends June 21, and will govern Technical
Barriers to Trade and Sanitary and Phyto-sanitary measures (SPS).
The draft law contains BTA consistent language. (Note: The Law on
Standards has been passed. End note.) The GVN has already set a
central SPS inquiry point to meet WTO standards and plans to set up
regional inquiry points. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development (MARD) representative declined the U.S. proposal for a
general technical assistance plan for SPS, but asked for additional
assistance to produce risk assessment reports for several varieties
of fruits that Vietnam would like to export to the United States.
¶18. (SBU) The U.S. side confirmed the USG commitment made during the
recent U.S.-Vietnamese WTO accession talks to provide assistance in
SPS trade capacity building. USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service
(FAS) has already arranged for 11 Vietnamese officials to receive
short-term training in the United States covering various SPS
issues. This will occur over the next several months. FAS will
continue working with the International Cooperation Department of
MARD to fulfill needs as defined by Vietnam. Certain assistance
that requires equipment and facilities such as a recent request for
animal quarantine facilities is beyond FAS's ability. The U.S. side
suggested that if this type of assistance remained important that
Vietnam should reiterate the need and possibly other U.S. agencies
might be able to accommodate Vietnam.
¶19. (SBU) Customs Valuation: The U.S. side sought answers to
questions previously submitted in writing and mentioned complaints
from importers about inappropriate use of reference prices. The GVN
noted that it believed all customs evaluations issues were resolved
during WTO negotiations in May and that technical issues would be
addressed with written exchanges. Vietnam agreed to provide written
responses to the U.S. questions at the earliest possible date.
Regarding minimum valuations, the GVN said that, contrary to
complaints made by U.S. firms, Vietnam does not apply minimum
valuations on imports, and uses its customs price database as a
reference for verifying declarations from importers, not as a data
source for reference pricing. The sources of data for this database
are Vietnamese and foreign customs data. For transactions between
related parties, Vietnam will use reference data from arms-length
relationships. Vietnam stated that Decree 155 and Circular 113
provide guidance and are the sole documents governing customs
valuation and reference pricing. Vietnam also added that the
Ministry of Finance intends to increase the kinds of payment
accepted as guarantees for importing.
¶20. (SBU) Trading Rights: Discussion of trading rights focused on
clarifying the process for companies to avail themselves of trading
rights and whether the licensing requirements that exist for BTA
eligible firms constituted a two-tier system inconsistent with the
intent of the BTA. AUSTR Weisel asked if more specific guidance on
trading rights would supplement Decree 12 and Circular 4. The GVN
commented that trading rights are within the scope of the Commercial
Law, and that four of the seven associated decrees have been
drafted. Two decrees relate to foreign invested enterprises trading
in goods and representative offices trading in goods. The GVN did
not describe the contents or timetable for issuing these decrees or
the associated circulars, but promised to supply the United States
with draft versions for comment. The GVN indicated that it did not
know if licensing would still be required seven years after entry
into force of the BTA (2008) when full and equal trading rights were
to be provided to both Vietnamese and U.S firms.
¶21. (SBU) Currently, U.S. companies may avail themselves of BTA
rights by petitioning the contact point put in place after the 2005
annual review and specified in a July 2005 diplomatic note. Vietnam
took note of U.S. concerns about the need for greater clarity with
respect to its plans to implement trading rights. Vietnam noted
that it would provide additional decrees to the United States that
are currently only in Vietnamese. Vietnam further explained that
Article 7 of the draft decree for foreign companies involved in
trading will provide additional guidance. The U.S. side stated that
the rights of U.S. companies must be in writing and requested
written instructions detailing the process for U.S. companies to
gain trading rights. AUSTR Weisel noted that requiring U.S.
HANOI 00001661 005.4 OF 006
companies to apply separately for each shipment violated the
national treatment principle.
Trade in Services - BTA Chapter 3
---------------------------------
¶22. Unified Enterprise Law (UEL): The two sides also engaged in a
detailed discussion of the impact the new unified enterprise law
will have on existing joint ventures in general and specifically in
the services sector where joint ventures continue to be required in
many areas. The new UEL, which no longer provides for joint
ventures as a distinct category of entity, must be reconciled with
provisions of the BTA that state Vietnam's commitments in terms of
joint ventures, previously the only vehicle for U.S. investments in
certain sectors. The U.S. side asked what would happen to existing
joint ventures, how U.S. companies could use rights given to joint
ventures under the BTA and WTO services schedule with new enterprise
forms, and whether equity proportion rules specified for joint
ventures in the BTA would apply to other enterprise forms. The
Vietnamese side explained that the new enterprise law contained the
concept of the joint venture in Article 2(2) and that a joint
venture would overlap with the forms of enterprises set out in the
new law, including limited liability and joint stock companies.
Existing joint ventures can choose whether to continue indefinitely
as joint ventures or transform themselves into other forms of
enterprises. In either case, their rights will be preserved, but if
a company chooses to reregister, UEL provisions would apply.
Entities choosing not to reregister will be restricted from
expanding their business sectors and will expire according to the
timetable in their original joint venture agreement. A draft decree
expected in early July will provide guidance for the registration of
enterprises. A Ministry of Justice (MOJ) representative stated that
the requirements for equity contributions are no longer in place.
(Note: We would want to see confirmation of her point in the
implementing regulations for the UEL, which are not yet drafted. End
note.)
¶23. (SBU) Legal Services: Vietnam stated that the National
Assembly is expected to pass the Law on Lawyers, which covers
domestic and foreign law firms, this session and that its contents
exceed the requirements of the BTA. The GVN claimed that Decree 87
currently fulfills its BTA commitments on legal services.
¶24. (SBU) Market Research and Audio Visual Services:
The U.S. side asked if, under the Commercial Law, market research
and audio visual services are conditional sectors and what
conditions would need to be met for U.S. firms to avail themselves
of rights under the BTA. The GVN said that market research is not a
conditional sector, so domestic and foreign invested companies can
participate in this sector and that Vietnam does not exercise its
right under the BTA to limit U.S. market research companies. The
audio visual sector is a conditional sector under the Commercial
Law, but, Vietnam said, the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of
Planning and Investment will issue criteria for foreign investment
that are consistent with BTA obligations. The U.S. also requested
clarification of the article in the Investment law that stated that
certain sectors were considered conditional but were not identified.
Vietnam agreed to provide clarification.
¶25. (SBU) Distribution: In response to the U.S. request for an
update on Vietnamese implementation of this commitment, Vietnam
explained that a decree covering distribution and trading rights is
in the legislative plan. The U.S. requested to review this decree.
[Note: Implementing decrees cover both trading rights and
distribution rights].
Investment - BTA Chapter 4
--------------------------
¶25. (SBU) Common Investment Law (CIL): This new legislation
eliminates the differential treatment afforded to Vietnamese
nationals and U.S. entities that existed when the BTA was
negotiated. To meet BTA commitments, the CIL provides equal
treatment for domestic and foreign investors. According to Vietnam,
seven decrees will implement the CIL: 1) a general decree on the
details of the law; 2) a decree on investment abroad; 3) a decree on
build-operate-transfer, build-transfer-operate, and build-transfer
HANOI 00001661 006.4 OF 006
projects; 4) a decree on business registration; 5) a decree on
transforming foreign invested enterprises; 6) a decree on
transforming state-owned enterprises; and 7) a decree on state
administered business licenses. Vietnam promised to provide drafts
of these decrees and also agreed to clarify which sectors are
included in the "other" category in Article 19 of the Investment
Law.
¶26. (SBU) Entry, Sojourn and Employment of Aliens: AUSTR Weisel
asked whether there are decrees covering employment of aliens
besides Decree 105. GVN explained that the CIL supersedes Decree
105, which limits foreign personnel to three percent of the
workforce, and, under Article 14(3) of that law, an investor can
hire management personnel without regard to nationality. Decrees
associated with this law should not include any restrictions on
hiring foreigners, although a professional certificate will still be
required where applicable.
Transparency - BTA Chapter 6
----------------------------
¶27. (SBU) The U.S. side offered additional assistance to help the
GVN implement the transparency requirements of the BTA. According
to the GVN, large cities and some provinces now have an official
gazette for normative legal documents, but there are too few
resources to achieve the objective of providing English versions of
all laws, including laws from the local level. In the near future
the GVN intends to publish, with the assistance of the USAID-funded
STAR Project, four reports on the BTA's impact on: 1) the economy in
2006, 2) the legal system, 3) FDI and 4) transparency in Vietnam.
The Future of the BTA
---------------------
¶28. (SBU) AUSTR Weisel emphasized that the BTA would not end with
Vietnam's WTO accession. Many BTA commitments go beyond the WTO,
and the United States intends to continue to use the BTA, along with
other vehicles, to build our bilateral relationship. The Vietnamese
side responded that the idea of the BTA ending upon WTO accession
"never entered our minds" and affirmed that the GVN also desired to
maintain and strengthen the bilateral relationship. AUSTR Weisel
noted that Vietnam's implementation was generally good and most of
the discussion had been simply to clarify issues.
Comment
-------
¶29. The talks were lengthy and detailed and the level of
preparedness of the Vietnamese side was impressive. Vietnamese
experts were able to respond to virtually all of the detailed and
technical questions posed by the U.S. side. Where they could not
respond or where the U.S. side pointed out conflicts with BTA
requirements, the Vietnamese promised to make every effort to take
our concerns into account and often asked the U.S. side to suggest
solutions. It was clear that the GVN took the meeting, and BTA
implementation, very seriously and was determined to make a good
showing.
MARINE