Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HANOI1434, VIETNAM: PREPARING FOR THE JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HANOI1434.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06HANOI1434 | 2006-06-14 08:05 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Hanoi |
VZCZCXRO6647
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHKSO RUEHPB
DE RUEHHI #1434/01 1650805
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 140805Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY HANOI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2328
INFO RUEHHM/AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH CITY 1326
RUEATRS/DEPTTREAS WASHDC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1085
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEHZU/APEC COLLECTIVE
RUEHZS/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 HANOI 001434
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/MLS AND EB/TPP/BTA/ANA
STATE PASS USTR GREG HICKS, DAVID BISBEE
USDOC FOR 4431/MAC/AP/OPB/VLC/HPPHO
TREASURY FOR OASIA
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD EINV EAID ECON KIPR PREL VM
SUBJECT: VIETNAM: PREPARING FOR THE JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING
-- REVIEW OF KEY ISSUES
HANOI 00001434 001.2 OF 008
SENSITIVE - DO NOT POST ON INTERNET
¶1. (SBU) Summary and Introduction: The United States and
Vietnam will convene a meeting of the Bilateral Trade
Agreement (BTA) Joint Committee in Hanoi, June 19-20. In
preparation, Mission is providing a review of implementation
issues to raise with the Vietnamese side during the
discussions. In our view the most important issues are:
WTO/BTA inconsistent provisions in Vietnam's new IPR law and
draft regulations and continued poor IPR enforcement,
clarity on how the new Common Investment Law (CIL) and
Unified Enterprise Laws (UEL) are consistent with BTA
provisions, confirmation that sanitary and phyto-sanitary
(SPS) regulations will be science-based and not unduly
inhibit trade, continued cases of use of reference pricing
by Customs, and the need for regulations defining the
trading/distribution rights of foreign companies. However,
while continuing to note areas where implementation is
lagging, we should also acknowledge the tremendous progress
that Vietnam has made. End summary and introduction.
Intellectual Property Rights
----------------------------
¶2. (SBU) The new IPR law is a vast improvement over
previous laws, bringing Vietnam's substantive law into
closer conformity with international norms and strengthening
enforcement. However, serious concerns remain:
-- Term of Copyright protection: Article 27 provides for a
term of 50 years from publication for films, photos,
dramatic works, applied art works, or anonymous works. For
other works the term is life of the author plus 50 years.
This term does not comply with the BTA, which requires that
where the term of protection of a work is not based on the
author's lifetime, the term must not be less than 75 years
from publication or, if the work is not published within 25
years from its creation, 100 years from creation.
-- Content-Based Restrictions on Copyright Protection:
Articles 7 and 8 of the new IPR law provide that IP rights
cannot "infringe upon interests of the state, the public or
legitimate rights and interests of other organizations,
individuals and shall not violate other applicable
provisions of relevant law." In addition, the state can
prohibit or limit IP rights "in order to ensure the
objectives of national defense, security, people living
(sic) and other interests of the nation and society ." We
had hoped that regulations would narrow this language, but
instead there are draft copyright implementing regulations
taking this language further, confusing censorship with
copyright protection by denying copyright protection to any
work that might be subject to censorship. We understand
that there is a new draft of the regulations, which we do
not yet have, but which we hope is an improvement.
-- Overly Broad Provisions on Fair Use and Compulsory
Licensing: Articles 25 (use without obtaining permission or
paying royalties) and 26 (use without obtaining permission,
but paying royalties) allow broad exceptions to normal IP
rights. For example under Article 26, "broadcasting
organizations using published works for the purpose of
carrying out broadcasting programs with sponsorship,
advertisements or collection of money in any form" do not
need to get copyright holders' permission to broadcast works
and are to pay royalties "in accordance with the Government
regulations." This provision could exempt all commercial TV
and radio broadcast. The draft implementing regulations do
not clarify this issue.
-- Potential Conflict between Civil Code and IPR Law:
Vietnam's Civil Code also contains some IPR provisions.
Article 5 of the IPR law provides that the Civil Code
applies where the IPR law is silent and that in the case of
conflict between the IPR law and other laws, the IPR law
applies. Government officials say that in the case of a
HANOI 00001434 002.2 OF 008
conflict with the Civil Code, Article 5 means that the IPR
law would apply. Nevertheless, principles of statutory
interpretation are still undeveloped in Vietnam and it is
hard to predict how courts would rule on such a conflict.
-- Notice and takedown provisions: Neither the IPR law nor
the draft Information Technology law provide adequate notice
and takedown provisions for internet IPR violations.
-- Enforcement provisions: Mission has not seen draft
implementing regulations on enforcement. However, the draft
copyright implementing regulations provide guidance on civil
(Articles 49 - 51) and administrative procedures (Article
52). Article 51 provides that in order to prove copyright
ownership, a plaintiff must provide a certificate of
copyright issued by COV, a certificate showing an
application for copyright, or a written certification by a
"socio-professional" organization. This requirement may
violate BTA Article 3(2) by effectively requiring a
"formality" in order to enforce copyrights. Other concerns
include whether IPR law Articles 202, 214 comply with BTA
requirements for disposal outside the channels of commerce;
Article 214's provision for re-export of goods; and whether
the new law will provide legal penalties severe enough to
deter.
¶3. (SBU) International obligations: Vietnam has joined all
the international conventions that, in the BTA, it pledged
to join, except for the Union for the Protection of New
Varieties of Plants (UPOV) convention. Post understands
that the Ministry of Justice is evaluating a proposal to
join the UPOV and that the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development expects that Vietnam will join this year. The
new IPR law and previous regulations provide some
protections for plant varieties. However, Vietnam's
enforcement of its IPR obligations under international
conventions is poor, as it is in general.
¶4. (SBU) Enforcement: The most important IPR issue is not
the new law and regulations, but enforcement. Mission
recommended that Vietnam continue to be on the 301 watch
list primarily because of weak enforcement of the current
laws. Legal DVDs, CDs, and software are virtually
unobtainable in Vietnam. The government and SOE's are among
the worst offenders. A particularly egregious violator is a
digital-terrestrial service operated by the Ministry of
Posts and Telematics, which illegally broadcasts overspill
satellite signals to end-users for a one-time decoder box
purchase fee.
Trade in Goods
--------------
¶5. (SBU) Technical Barriers to Trade(TBT)/Sanitary and Phyto-
sanitary (SPS) Measures: The National Assembly is now
debating a new draft law on standards and technical
regulations, which should be passed in its spring 2006
session (May to June). Under the draft law, technical
regulations are mandatory while standards, which can be set
either by government or non-government (including foreign)
entities, are voluntary. The new draft law contains BTA/WTO
consistent language requiring that technical regulations and
standards be based on science, look to international
standards, and not unreasonably inhibit trade. It
encourages transparency, allowing for public comment before
a new regulation or standard is issued, and provides for
procedures to contest the implementation of regulations and
standards.
¶6. (SBU) In the past, U.S. businessmen have raised a number
of complaints about TBT/SPS, including insufficient notice
of changes in applicable regulations, lack of transparency,
and uneven application of regulations. Regulations have at
times lacked a sound scientific basis and been inconsistent
with international norms. For example, in November 2005,
the Ministry of Health imposed a blanket ban on all imports
HANOI 00001434 003.2 OF 008
of chicken, ostensibly to prevent the spread of Avian
Influenza (AI), although international standards do not call
for a blanket ban regardless of whether the exporting
country has an AI problem. On the other hand, Vietnam has
made progress in its SPS regime and recently became the
first country in Asia to open its market to U.S. boneless
beef and offal. An SPS Enquiry Point under the Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) was set up in
September 2005, but it will not operate until after WTO
accession. MARD sent a letter to USTR requesting technical
assistance in February 2006.
¶7. (SBU) Trading Rights: Vietnam has still not fully
implemented BTA obligations regarding trading rights for
U.S. firms because it has not yet passed the necessary
implementing regulations. Implementing regulations for the
Common Investment Law (CIL) and Unified Enterprise Law
(UEL), which will come into effect on July 1, 2006, as well
as the Commercial Law (CL), which entered into force on
January 1, 2006, are now being drafted and should provide
the necessary permanent legal basis for trading and
distribution rights. In the meantime, a diplomatic note of
July 2005 provides a temporary legal basis for trading
rights for U.S. companies. The GVN had provided us in
August 2005 with a point of contact for U.S. business to
apply for trading rights (and distribution services rights)
as permitted under the BTA. One company, Colgate Palmolive,
was granted a license to import through this method, though
this license was limited to a single product, and the
company had to reapply to have trading rights for this
product extended into 2006. The GVN appears to be
interpreting its obligation here very narrowly and the
application process for these rights is burdensome; it has
not yet, to our knowledge, given blanket authorization to a
company to directly import goods. Other companies, e.g.
Carrier and American Indochina Management (AIM), which are
American-owned but Singapore and Hong Kong registered,
respectively, have been told they are ineligible for these
rights since they are not registered in the United States.
¶8. (SBU) Customs: Vietnam has essentially complied with
its obligation to comply with WTO rules to establish a
system of customs valuation based on transaction value and
to ensure that other fees and charges do not exceed the cost
of services rendered. We continue to hear occasional
complaints of "reference pricing." These appear to be
isolated incidents and seem to get resolved through a post
clearance audit process, which is still pretty cumbersome.
It also appears that Customs officials may resort to some
sort of reference price when faced with a good that is
unusual or infrequently imported, e.g. used golf clubs.
Post clearance audits occasionally have the appearance of an
attempt to get more money out of importers.
¶9. (SBU) Recently, FAS raised a problem regarding the use
of reference prices for dried peas. (Note: The peas were of
Canadian origin, although the supplier was American.) Dried
peas for food or feed use come in under HS 07131090. They
are properly invoiced at less than USD 300/ton. However, in
the Vietnamese Customs reference-price book, all the
commodities under the 0713 subheading, which include all
kinds of beans and lentils as well as peas are given a USD
2/kg or USD 2,000/ton reference price. Based on the
reference price, Customs rejected an invoice for imported
U.S. dry peas for less than USD 300 and valued the shipment
at USD 2000/ton. When the importer appealed, Customs only
lowered the tariff to USD 800, still well above the actual
prices. With a 30 percent tariff on dried peas, this
effectively closes the market. We should question the
Vietnamese about the continued existence of a reference
price book and ask how it is used as well as about the role
of post clearance audits.
¶10. (SBU) State Trading: According to BTA rules, state
owned enterprises (SOEs) should make sales and purchases in
accordance with commercial considerations. Vietnamese laws
HANOI 00001434 004.2 OF 008
and regulations have removed most of the overt preferences
for SOE's, but the system is still not transparent. The GVN
is in the process of "equitizing" many SOEs. Generally,
this simply refers to changing the form of the SOE into a
shareholding company. Along with equitization, the state
usually distributes some portion of the shares to workers
and managers. Therefore with equitization, management and
de facto state control are not necessarily changed. The
shares of equitized SOEs rarely end up being offered to the
public or being listed on the stock exchange or sold in arms-
length, commercial transactions. Even the shares not
distributed to enterprise workers or management are often
sold to friends and relatives of current management.
Vietnamese statistics are not consistent in defining SOEs.
Often SOEs that have been equitized are included in the
private sector even though the state continues to hold a
majority share.
¶11. (SBU) To a certain extent, equitization appears to make
enterprises act in a more commercial, market-oriented
manner. A 2005 study by the GVN's Central Institute for
Economic Management (CIEM) and the World Bank found that 87
percent of equitized firms reported better performance even
when management did not change. In the study, the surveyed
firms reported that productivity went up by 18 percent;
workers' average salaries went up by 11 percent; sales
increased by 13 percent and after tax profits increased by
49 percent. However, a USAID supported study, using data
derived from the Provincial Competitiveness Index, found
that SOEs tend to "crowd out" private companies, having more
favorable access to inputs (such as finance and land) and
customs in provinces where there are more SOEs.
Services
--------
¶12. (SBU) General issues: In a number of service sectors,
Vietnam made commitments, such as on percentage of U.S.
equity permitted, in terms of joint ventures. However, the
new Unified Law on Enterprises (UEL) no longer provides for
joint ventures as a legal form of enterprise. It is unclear
how Vietnam's commitments will be fulfilled under the new
law. Post has heard conflicting reports on how these
commitments will be treated. Some experts say that the
equity percentages will simply apply to shareholding
companies and other forms of enterprises under the new law.
However, one expert said that proposed regulations would
effectively recreate joint ventures as a form of enterprise
and require U.S. companies to meet the requirements for
being a joint venture before being allowed to avail
themselves of their rights under the BTA. Another issue is
how the rights of U.S. companies that are currently
operating in Vietnam as joint ventures would be affected if
and when they transform themselves into one of the forms of
enterprise recognized under the UEL. Finally, a number of
sectors are considered to be "conditional," e.g., subject to
an approval process under the CIL. It is not clear yet what
the standards for approval will be or how they will impact
U.S. investors.
¶13. (SBU) Legal Services: Vietnam's National Assembly is
supposed to pass a new law on lawyers in 2006. The law had
its first reading in the current National Assembly session
and should be passed in the fall session. Under the BTA,
U.S. law firms are permitted, as of entry into force of the
agreement, to establish 100 percent owned law firms, as well
as joint ventures, and to consult on Vietnamese laws if the
consulting lawyers have graduated from a Vietnamese law
college and satisfy Vietnamese requirements. A local U.S.
law firm confirmed that it was able to participate actively
in Vietnam's legal market and has been able to hire
Vietnamese lawyers to advise on issues of Vietnamese law.
However, the GVN has split the legal profession between
solicitors and barristers. The effect of this split has
been to make it impossible for the law firm to use its
Vietnamese lawyers to represent clients in court.
HANOI 00001434 005.2 OF 008
Fortunately, the new law on lawyers is expected to abolish
the distinction between solicitors and barristers.
¶14. (SBU) Market Research: The new Commercial Law does not
provide regulations and the Ministry of Trade has said that
it does not plan to provide separate regulations on this
issue. It is therefore not clear how the Vietnamese plan to
implement their BTA commitment to allow U.S. companies to
avail themselves of their BTA rights. At the same time,
however, we are not aware of any U.S. business interest in
this sector.
¶15. (SBU) Telecom: Under the BTA, Vietnam is supposed to
abide by the WTO Telecom reference paper, which requires,
inter alia, an independent regulator, a pro-competitive
legal framework, and cost-based interconnection fees. There
have been regulations or decrees to implement some issues
mentioned in the reference paper:
-- competitive safeguards (Competition Law passed in
December 2004),
-- interconnection (Directive No. 07/2005/CT-BBCVT by
Minister of Post and Telematics dated September 15, 2005 on
network interconnection and public telecommunications
services, Decision No.12/2006/QD-BBCVT dated April 26, 2006
issuing Regulation on interconnection between public
telecommunications networks), and
-- universal service (Decision No. 74/2006/QD-Ttg dated
April 7, 2006 approving a program on provision of public
welfare telecommunications services until 2010).
¶16. (SBU) However, many problems remain: cross-
subsidization still exists although reduced considerably by
Decision 191/2004/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister on the
establishment of the Public Welfare Telecommunications
Service Fund and Decision 217/2003/QD-TTg on management of
post and telecommunications fees and prices. VNPT Group is
being restructured to separate the management and finances
of the individual subsidiaries and thus, theoretically,
eliminate opportunities for cross-subsidization. However,
even under the new structure there could be still
opportunities for cross-subsidization since the VNPT Board
of Management could "reinvest" profits from a profitable
subsidiary to one which is not making a profit.
¶17. (SBU) MPT has made a little progress towards becoming
an independent regulator. However, MPT lacks a systematic
mechanism for regulating the telecom sector, which is still
almost entirely state-owned. Although MPT officials do not
sit on the VNPT board, a fundamental conflict of interest
problem remains in that VNPT, which, while technically an
SOE "owned" by the Ministry of Finance, has been
"established" under MPT (other telecom players have been
established by other ministries). This arrangement follows
the practice for the majority of Vietnam's SOEs and presents
a fundamental problem for regulatory systems in other
sectors as well. Detailed regulations on transparency of
interconnection arrangements or public availability of
licensing criteria have not yet been issued. Decree 160 on
Telecommunications discusses licensing criteria, but the
criteria are not clear. Regulations on the public
availability of the terms and conditions of individual
licenses have not yet been issued.
¶18. (SBU) The only private Vietnamese telecom firms, of
which there are a few, are non-facilities-based Voice over
Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers. Mission is aware of two
telecom service providers that have asked for our assistance
and been in contact with USTR. (Note that a Business
Cooperation Contract (BCC), a type of revenue-sharing
concession that enables restricted market entry for a fixed
period of time, is currently the only form of foreign
investment in Vietnam's telecommunications sector.) VITC is
a U.S. company with a BCC with Vietnam Post and Telecom
HANOI 00001434 006.2 OF 008
(VNPT) (the telecom monopoly) to provide wholesale and
retail international voice and data communications through
VNPT's various subsidiaries. UTS is a U.S. VoIP provider
with a BCC with Vishipel, a telecom company owned by the
General Corporation for Marine Transport (an SOE). VITC
sought Mission's assistance in selling 25 percent of its
equity to VNPT (the deal fell apaQ over a disagreement over
who owed whom money). UTS asked for help when its VoIP quota
was reduced, but quotas have since been abolished. (See
Septel on Telecom for more details.)
¶19. (SBU) Distribution: The new Commercial law, which took
effect on January 1, 2006 will implement this right, but
implementing regulations have not yet been issued. In the
meantime, a July 2005 diplomatic note from the Ministry of
Trade confirmed that it was ready to grant licenses to
interested U.S. businesses. As mentioned above under
trading rights, the GVN in August 2005 instituted a POC at
the Ministry of Trade through which U.S. companies could
apply to avail themselves of trading and distribution
rights. This was meant as a stopgap measure until
legislation implementing these rights was passed. Most U.S.
companies we have talked to are not interested in a
distribution JV in which they have only a minority share.
There is only one company which has attempted to pursue a
distribution JV, American Indochina Management (AIM). As
noted above, AIM has been told by the GVN that it does not
qualify for BTA distribution rights since it is not an
American-registered company.
Investment
----------
¶20. (SBU) The new CIL and UEL appear to have moved towards
creating a level playing field for foreign and domestic
companies. Under these two laws, which come into effect on
July 1, 2006, both domestic and foreign enterprises are
treated essentially the same. However, we have not yet had
the opportunity to evaluate the draft regulations for these
two laws.
¶21. (SBU) Investment Licensing: CIL Chapter IV, Section I,
sets out the procedures that both foreign and domestic
enterprises must follow to register an investment. Domestic
enterprises do not need to register if they have investment
capital less than VND 15 billion (about USD 1 million). All
foreign investors must register. However, for both foreign
and domestic enterprises that have less than VND 300 billion
(about USD 20 million) in investment capital and do not fall
into the list of conditional investment sectors,
registration is a relatively simple notification process and
does not require evaluation. Domestic and foreign
investments over USD 20 million are subject to an approval
process.
¶22. (SBU) Entry, Sojourn and Employment of Aliens: It is
unclear if Decree 105/2003/ND-CP is inconsistent with
Article 8 of the BTA, which states that each party shall
permit nationals and companies of the other Party to
transfer or engage executives, managers or those possessing
specialized knowledge, subject to the laws of each party on
entry and sojourn. Decree 93/2005/ND-CP, which amends
Decree 105/2003/ND-CP, provides that in case a foreign
invested enterprise needs to hire a number of foreigners
exceeding three percent of the total laborers of the
enterprise they may file an application to the local
authority for consideration.
¶23. (SBU) Consensus requirement: BTA Annex H 4.2(b)
allowed Vietnam to maintain until December 2004, a
requirement that a limited number of important joint venture
decisions (appointment or dismissal of key officers,
amendments to the charter, approval of the final financial
statements, and loan for investment) be decided by
consensus. For U.S. companies that have been pushing to
gain the right to hold a 51 percent share of joint ventures,
HANOI 00001434 007.2 OF 008
dropping the consensus requirement is important to ensure
that majority ownership confers meaningful control of a
joint venture. There are two questions to raise about this
issue. First, how will the Vietnamese implement 4.2(b) now
that joint ventures no longer exist under the UEL?
¶24. (SBU) Second, how does Vietnam reconcile 4.2(b) with
the supermajority provisions in the new UEL? Under the UEL
all decisions by a shareholders' meeting must be made by a
65 percent majority of participating shareholders. The
following decisions must be approved at a shareholders'
meeting by a supermajority:
-- amending of the corporate charter,
-- reorganizing or dissolving the company,
-- sale or investment of over 50 percent of corporate
assets,
-- approving the development strategy of the company,
-- removing of members of the boards of management and
supervision,
-- deciding on classes of shares and total number of shares
of each class,
-- approving the annual financial statement,
-- electing members of the boards of management and
supervision.
Annex H does not specify what should replace "consensus" and
arguably any provision for less than 100 percent meets that
requirement. However, discussions at the WTO may have made
this issue moot.
¶25. (SBU) Requirement that the general director or first
deputy general director be Vietnamese citizens: BTA Annex H
4(a) phased out this requirement by December 2004. In a
diplomatic note dated June 8, 2005, the GVN confirmed that
this requirement had been abolished. BTA Annex H 4(a)
applies only to joint ventures, which will no longer exist
under the new CIL and UEL, however, neither of these new
laws appear to require that enterprise officers be
Vietnamese citizens. It would be useful to confirm that
under the new laws and their regulations, foreign invested
enterprises will not face any citizen requirements for
leading enterprise officers.
¶26. (SBU) Capital Requirements: BTA Annex H 4.1 phased out
minimum capital requirements in December 2004. In a
diplomatic note dated June 8, 2005, the GVN confirmed that
this requirement had been abolished. BTA Annex H 4(a)
applies only to joint ventures, which will no longer exist
under the new CIL and UEL, however, neither of these new
laws appear to require that foreign invested enterprises
have a minimum share of capital. It would be useful to
confirm that under the new laws and their regulations,
foreign invested enterprises will not face any minimum
capital requirements.
Transparency
------------
¶27. (SBU) One of the great successes of the BTA has been
increasing transparency in Vietnam. All legal normative
documents (LND) must be published in Vietnam's Official
Gazette and the Prime Minister issued Decree 161/2005/ND-CP
which forbids agencies from issuing any legal norms except
by means of an LND. The decree also requires agencies to
send LND drafts that affect business to the VCCI for
publication on its website (in Vietnamese) and to allow 20
days for comments. Previously drafts had been published,
but often with little or no time for interested parties to
read and comment.
¶28. (SBU) The USAID funded STAR program is working with the
GVN to create an electronic version of the official gazette,
which would have the same legal authority as the printed
gazette. English language versions of some important laws
and decrees, as well as economic information, are available
HANOI 00001434 008.2 OF 008
on websites, such as the Vietnam Economic Portal
(www.vnep.org.vn). A number of Vietnamese government
agencies, including the Ministries of Trade and Justice,
have websites with legal and economic information. The open
debate over the draft CIL in fall of 2005 was an example of
how much the legal process in Vietnam has changed. Foreign
businesses vigorously objected to certain provisions of the
law and many of their comments were taken into account,
resulting in a much better law. Nevertheless, it is often
difficult to obtain up-to-date information on new drafts of
laws and regulations, especially in English, even those
which the GVN must provide to the WTO working party. It can
also be difficult to obtain economic data from the
Government Statistical Office (GSO); the process is
cumbersome and non-transparent and GSO charges significant
fees.
BOARDMAN