Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06TOKYO2311, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 04/27/06
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TOKYO2311.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06TOKYO2311 | 2006-04-27 22:56 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO7247
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2311/01 1172256
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 272256Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1467
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/COMPATWING ONE KAMI SEYA JA
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 8561
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5936
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 9127
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 5918
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 7109
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1991
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 8156
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0023
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 13 TOKYO 002311
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST
DIVISION; TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS
OFFICE; SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
ADVISOR; CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 04/27/06
INDEX:
(1) Japan's sharing of US Marines relocation cost: Defense chief
Nukaga's two preparatory steps -- secret meeting with US
ambassador to Japan, visit to National Arlington National
Cemetery to reduce Japan's actual spending less than that of US
(2) Japan-US alliance entering new phase, with Japan folded into
US global strategy
(3) Japan's share of cost of US force realignment: 3 trillion yen
still a "conservative estimate"; Is Japan an automated cash
dispenser? Swelling defense spending for building anti-terrorism
networks
(4) South Korean president aims to beef up political power by
taking tough stance against Japan over Takeshima (Dokdo) issue;
Japanese government perplexed by his statement; Repairing
strained bilateral ties difficult for time being
(5) Bright and dark sides of five years of Koizumi politics (Part
1): Koizumi-Bush honeymoon relationship strengthened Japan-US
alliance
(6) Bright and dark sides of five years of Koizumi politics (Part
2): Consideration for ally boosting Japan's base burden
(7) Interview with Kent Calder, director of SAIS Reischauer
Center for East Asia Studies: Japan-US relations could
deteriorate over beef issue
(8) Yutaka Iimura picked as ambassador to France
ARTICLES:
(1) Japan's sharing of US Marines relocation cost: Defense chief
Nukaga's two preparatory steps -- secret meeting with US
ambassador to Japan, visit to National Arlington National
Cemetery to reduce Japan's actual spending less than that of US
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full)
April 27, 2006
Japan's share of the cost of relocating US Marines from Okinawa
to Guam was reached an agreement on April 23 between Defense
Agency Director General Fukushiro Nukaga and US Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld. This newspaper looked into the backstage
of a political settlement in the unusual ministerial negotiations
after a number of rounds of senior working-level talks.
Nukaga took two preparatory steps on April 23 before meeting with
Rumsfeld. One was a secret meeting with US Ambassador to Japan
Thomas Schieffer. Nukaga enthusiastically told Schieffer:
"It is a good chance for the United States to realign US forces
in Japan while Mr. Koizumi is prime minister and I am defense
chief. (If the US does not agree to our proposal), you will miss
your chance."
Schieffer, a friend of President George W. Bush, responded: "I
think so. I will convey it to Secretary Rumsfeld." Schieffer has
influence in the Defense Department.
TOKYO 00002311 002 OF 013
The other preparatory step Nukaga made was a visit to Arlington
National Cemetery located in the suburbs of Washington. He
offered a silent prayer for US soldiers, who were killed in the
war. He made the decision to visit the cemetery after considering
it overnight, since he had obtained information that Rumsfeld
would hold talks with him after making a surprise visit to Iraq
to inquire after injured US soldiers. A Japanese Embassy official
in Washington had told him that if he started the talks with
money, the talks would come to in a rupture in ten minutes.
At the outset of the meeting held in the evening, Nukaga told
Rumsfeld that he had visited Arlington National Cemetery. He said
eventually, "Japan has supported US efforts to fight terrorism
and weapons of mass destruction for the sake of global peace and
justice."
Rumsfeld, though a hawk politically, responded gently, "We
appreciate Japan's contribution." His eyes were filled with
tears. The talks started well.
However, Rumsfeld took a tough stance in them. He retained the
stance of calling on Japan to bear 75% of the relocation cost. He
underscored:
"It is unprecedented that an economic superpower like Japan
spends only one percent of its gross domestic product (GDP). It
was Japan's request that US Marines in Okinawa be relocated to
Guam, wasn't it?"
Nukaga rebutted:
"The Japanese public will not accept the US proposal that Japan
pay 75% of the total relocation cost. I want the US to calculate
in detail as to how much is needed for the relocation of
Marines."
Nukaga moreover introduced a compromise plan suggested by
Schieffer that Japan would shoulder one-third of each: 1)
spending from the Japanese government's general account; 2)
investments and loans by Japan; and 3) costs to be shouldered by
the United States.
Nukaga loudly proclaimed: "I cannot accept ballpark figures.
Japan's share should be less than that of the United States.
Prime Minister Koizumi shares the same view. I cannot give in on
that point."
Nukaga asserted that Japan's real spending should be reduced
because investments and loans would be returned but money from
the government general account would not be paid back.
Their argument lasted for about one hour. After a break, Rumsfeld
softened his stance, making some concessions to Nukaga.
In return, the US side asked the Japanese side for 1 billion
dollars assistance for the construction of a highway that would
connect a port and an Air Force base. Nukaga, however, turned
down the request, saying, "It is possible to extend investments
and loans, but grants are impossible."
The US final plan was that Japan should pay 59% or 6.09 billion
dollars of the estimated 10.27 billion dollars. Japan's real
money outlay will be 2.8 billion dollars, which is less than the
TOKYO 00002311 003 OF 013
3.18 billion dollars to be paid by the United States.
"If you don't accept this plan, let's end the talks," Rumsfeld
said hinting at a rupture of the negotiations. He forced Nukaga
to make a decision. The US plan was acceptable for Japan because
Japan's share was within the amount agreed by Nukaga and the
Finance Ministry.
Nukaga said, "We accept it." He and Rumsfeld reached an agreement
after spending three hours negotiating.
Rumsfeld said with satisfaction, "It would be even better if the
Defense Agency is upgraded by this to the status of a ministry."
(2) Japan-US alliance entering new phase, with Japan folded into
US global strategy
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 1) (Full)
April 25, 2006
Talks on the realignment of US forces in Japan have surmounted a
crucial stage. Japan and the United States will now hold a 'two-
plus-two' foreign and defense ministerial meeting of their
security consultative committee in early May to reach a final
accord. The US military's realignment in Japan has had the aim of
building a closer partnership between the Self-Defense Forces and
the US armed forces. It is also intended to bring about a high
readiness so that they can respond to regional conflicts and
other contingencies. This means that Japan will be completely
folded into the United States' global strategy.
"This is a project that will end the 'postwar' (period) in the
true sense of the word." With this, Takemasa Moriya,
administrative deputy director general of the Defense Agency,
accounted for the US military's realignment when he called on
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi in private at his office last
month. "I know," Koizumi nodded. The premier then told Moriya to
continue working together with Defense Agency Director General
Fukushiro Nukaga on the US military's realignment.
Postwar Japan chose to arm itself lightly and prioritize its
economy while depending on the United States' military
deterrence. However, eventually the Cold War came to an end. It
was a prologue to the current age of regional conflicts and
terrorist attacks. The notion of security has undergone a sea
change. As a natural consequence, Tokyo and Washington began
exploring a new relationship in the process of redefining their
bilateral security alliance in 1996.
Koizumi was aware of that move, so he calls the bilateral
security arrangements an "alliance." It is taken for granted in
the international community that an alliance has military
connotations. In Japan, a cabinet minister was once driven to
resign over his interpretation of the Japan-US relationship being
an "alliance." Koizumi, however, had no hesitation. "I'll bring
it to a settlement under my cabinet." With this, Koizumi voiced
his unwavering resolve behind the scenes of the agreement reached
this time between Japan and the United States over the
realignment of US forces in Japan.
It is an inevitable task also for the United States to beef up
its bilateral alliance with Japan.
TOKYO 00002311 004 OF 013
With the protracted deployment of US troops in Iraq, there has
been increasing calls from veterans for US Secretary of Defense
Rumsfeld to resign. President Bush defended his Pentagon chief.
"He's been doing really well in the transformation of US forces
to prepare for threats in the 21st century," Bush said.
The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 prodded the United States
to gear up for the mobility of its troops and outfits. In order
to make up for the increasing burden of military costs, the
United States asks its allies for their greater personnel
contributions and fiscal outlays. This is the Bush
administration's basic strategy. Meanwhile, the United States has
been bogged down in a long, never-ending war. Veterans calling
for Rumsfeld's resignation also admit to the significance of
realigning US forces. "It's extremely important to realign US
forces," retired Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste said.
The United States, in its global strategy, weighs its European
allies and the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean as
strongpoints. In the Asia-Pacific region, Guam and Japan are
linchpins for its military operations. "So," one US military
official says, "we will pull out of South Korea." The Pentagon's
scenario is to integrate the command functionalities of Japanese
and US forces and to deploy reinforcements to Okinawa in the
event of an emergency.
"The United States' military spending accounts for more than 3%
of gross domestic product, South Korea at 2.5%, and European
countries between 1.5% and 2%. Japan is only at 1%." This is a
pet phrase Rumsfeld always uses whenever he meets with lawmakers
from Japan.
Tokyo and Washington squared off in their realignment talks over
their respective shares of the cost of moving US Marines from
Okinawa to Guam. Japan, in its standoff with the United States,
was not unwilling to pay money. Washington, however, meant to
gauge Tokyo's commitment to the international order and its
stability.
While the Iraq war has been protracted, the international
situation over the issue of Iran's nuclear development program
has also been growing tense. For the United States, Japan was the
last to negotiate with in the global transformation of US forces.
If the Pentagon takes time to talk with Japan, the United States
cannot transform its armed forces for the 21st century. The
United States can no longer forego its military transformation.
Both Bush and Koizumi came into office in 2001. However, Koizumi
will step down in September this year. Italian Prime Minister
Berlusconi, who has pushed for cooperation with the United
States, was defeated in a recent election. In the wake of the
Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, antiterror nations shaped a
global coalition. Nowadays, this 2001 international regime is
wavering.
Meanwhile, Koizumi, since coming into office in 2001, has
restructured Japan. Under his 2001 political structure, Japan has
fallen out of gear at home and abroad. For instance, Japan is now
at odds with South Korea over an oceanographic survey around the
archipelago of Takeshima islets. In addition, Japan and China
remain unable to break the ice in their standoff. Moreover, the
ruling Liberal Democratic Party was defeated in a recent by-
election for the House of Representatives.
TOKYO 00002311 005 OF 013
In East Asia, however, there are a number of uncertainties, such
as the Korean Peninsula and the Taiwan Strait. Given such a
situation in the region, the post-Koizumi leader-whoever may
become prime minister after Koizumi-will not have a very broad
range of options. Japan is currently faced with challenges in the
process of working together with the United States to realign its
military presence in Japan. These tasks have something in common
with Japan's prospective pullout of SDF troops from Iraq. The
alliance is now about to enter a new phase. Japan and the United
States will further fuse not only in the area of military
operations but also in the area of military costs.
(This report was written by Hiroshi Marutani, Washington, and
Naoya Yoshino, Political Section.)
(3) Japan's share of cost of US force realignment: 3 trillion yen
still a "conservative estimate"; Is Japan an automated cash
dispenser? Swelling defense spending for building anti-terrorism
networks
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Pp.26-27) (Abridged)
April 27, 2006
News that Japan would have to bear 710 billion yen for the
relocation of US Marines from Okinawa to Guam came as a surprise.
Then, as if to add insult to injury, US Deputy Under Secretary of
Defense Richard Lawless announced April 25 that Japan's share of
the entire process of US force realignment would run to a total
of 2.98 trillion yen over the next six to seven years. The under
secretary also suggested that Japan's share could swell even
SIPDIS
more, calling 2.98 trillion yen a "conservative estimate." Is
Japan simply a convenient "automated cash dispenser" for the
United States? Does Japan really have to foot such a huge bill?
The news that Japan would have to shoulder 3 trillion yen for the
US armed forces sped through base-hosting municipalities already
being shaken by the relocation issue. Assemblyman Jungen Tamura
of Iwakuni City, Yamaguchi Prefecture, disgustingly said, "Why is
Japan so generous when it comes to US bases?" Tamura is also a
member of Rimpeace, an organization that monitors US bases. On
April 23, Katsusuke Ihara, an opponent of the relocation of
carrier-based aircraft, won the city's mayoral race. Tamura
sarcastically said:
"During the election campaign, Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe
even said that the government would shoulder school lunches and
medical expenses in return for accepting the base relocation. In
addition, the government seems to be willing to extend subsidies
and several hundred billion yen. I wonder if such are included in
the 3 trillion yen."
Zenko Nakamura, head of a citizens group opposing the relocation
of Futenma Air Station to Nago, Okinawa, commented calmly:
"Finally the US seems to have gone on the offensive. It's good
that inconsistencies become clear this way."
Even Abe referred to 3 trillion yen as an "incredible sum of
money" (tondemonai kingaku). What is the basis for such an
amount?
Military analyst Motoaki Kamiura explained:
TOKYO 00002311 006 OF 013
"It is well known that Japan cut a secret deal with the US for
the reversion of Okinawa in 1972. Japan secretly paid 4 million
dollars (1.2 billion yen approximately at today's currency value)
for restoring the returned US bases to their original state,
which was supposed to be shouldered by the US. I heard that if
Tokyo and Washington reached an agreement to return part of
Kadena Air Base and Japan was forced as a result to pay the cost
of returning soil contaminated with heavy metals, similar
expenditures would be necessary."
Military journalist Tetsuo Maeda though that a plan may resurface
to relocate night-landing facilities from Iwojima to Hiroshima.
His logic is that the construction of a base in Henoko and the
work to accommodate a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier would not
cost 3 trillion yen, so there must be other major projects in the
pipeline.
Maeda continued:
"It also depends on how you count it. US force realignment is
designed to facilitate joint base use by lowering the barrier
between the US military and Japan's Self-Defense Forces. The SDF
and US military will jointly use the X-band radar to be deployed
at the Air Self-Defense Force's Shariki detachment base as part
of the missile defense system. The cost of those facilities may
have been included in Japan's share."
To begin with, what is behind US force transformation, which will
end up costing Japan so much?
It is an effort to create networks in other countries to jointly
pursue the global war on terrorism with the US military,
according to Hiromichi Umebayashi of Peace Depot, a nonprofit
organization.
Umebayashi explained:
"The US is insisting that the Japan-US alliance should move from
role sharing to power sharing, meaning that Japan should
voluntarily join America's global strategy. It's a problem that
such a critical choice is moving ahead steadily without the
government having sought the Japanese people's concurrence."
Maeda also noted:
"The question is whether the town will become safe if it pays
protection money to thugs. The missile defense system is designed
to defend only the Tokyo metropolitan area and the US bases in
Japan. Kyushu and other areas are not protected. The Defense
Agency has admitted that chances are extremely slim for Japan to
come under an armed attack. There is no need to spend such a
large amount of money on national defense."
The Japanese government has been providing the US forces in Japan
with 230 billion yen annually in host nation support (HNS). That
budget will grow dramatically over the next several years. Is the
Japan-US alliance worth that much money?
Professor Masaaki Gabe of the University of the Ryukyus stressed:
"The Iraq war has been costing the Pentagon 58 billion dollars
(approximately 6.6 trillion yen) annually. The US wants to shift
its financial burden onto its allies as much as possible, but
TOKYO 00002311 007 OF 013
there is no reason for Japan to pay for it."
People tend to justify supporting the Japan-US alliance in order
to counter terrorism and meet the threats of China and North
Korea.
Gabe took this view:
"The US military has declared that deployed aircraft carriers and
the missile defense system would be sufficient to deal with the
China threat. It also is unlikely that the threat to Japan of
terrorism in on the rise. There is no longer a need for the Japan-
US alliance. The principal reason for having one lies with Japan,
since it has no goals regarding its relations with the world and
Asia. No goals and no strategy. Japan just wants to maintain the
status quo, and therefore, it is at America's beck and call."
On the political front as well, the US refused to back Japan's
bid for a permanent UN Security Council seat. And Deputy
Secretary of State Robert Zoellick has been rejecting meetings
SIPDIS
requested by Japanese diplomats and lawmakers. Unrequited love
might lie beneath the Japan-US alliance.
Obirin University Prof. Akira Kato offered this view:
"The undercurrent of US force realignment is not political but
technological. Although exchanges between Japanese and US
lawmakers may have slackened off, such is not at all the case on
the military front. The US military has been pursing realignment
to create a network-based system that would link intelligence and
weapons. Japan's Self-Defense Forces are already part of that
system. The ultimate goal is to integrate the US military and
Japan's SDF, which is not possible under the Constitution. But
the SDF would not be able to declare its independence from the US
military. For instance, all satellite intelligence comes from the
US military. To become independent, Japan needs to launch its own
military satellites, but such a step would be criticized as a
move to become a major military power."
Technologically speaking, Japan cannot opt for "military
independence."
Given the situation, the government is likely to squeeze out 3
trillion yen by imposing a greater burden on the people.
Economist Noriko Konya explained:
"The sum of three trillion yen corresponds to 1% of the annual
consumption tax, or over 40% of the public works spending. The
government may try to scrape up the money by cutting deeper into
such areas as social security, subsidies, and education, thus
turning a blind eye to the public's difficulties."
Economic analyst Takuro Mori commented sternly:
"I don't understand why a four-member Japanese household has to
pay 100,000 yen to build a new house for the US military. It
won't cost that much to make all the highways free and help the
condo scam victims. The government may try to raise the
consumption tax rate to finance the US projects. The government
holds a tremendous amount of US bonds. It should sell them. I've
never heard of a country having paid money for the departure of
'occupation forces.'"
TOKYO 00002311 008 OF 013
(4) South Korean president aims to beef up political power by
taking tough stance against Japan over Takeshima (Dokdo) issue;
Japanese government perplexed by his statement; Repairing
strained bilateral ties difficult for time being
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full)
April 26, 2006
South Korean President Roh Moo Hyun released on April 25 a
special statement that he would determinedly respond to Japan's
claim to the Takeshima (Dokdo) islets in the Sea of Japan. Since
the territorial issue is a theme pulling at the heartstrings of
South Korean people, Roh's hard-line stance is apparently aimed
at recovering his political influence. All the more because South
Korea is scheduled to conduct unified local elections in late
May, Roh has no room for compromise with Japan on the Takeshima
issue. Although Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said that Japan
would respond calmly to Roh's comments, it is unlikely that Tokyo
and Seoul will find common ground.
Immediately after the president's special statement, South Korean
ruling and opposition parties released comments praising the
president's tough stance.
"Japan should know the South Korean public's view that the Dokdo
issue is part of the issue of past history." (Open Uri Party)
"President Roh stated what should be said on behalf of the
people." (Grand National Party)
It was unprecedented for both ruling and opposition parties to
heap praise on President Roh, particularly since the two camps
are facing off in the unified local elections coming up in late
May. A Grand National Party source having communication channels
to Japanese political circles revealed, saying, "If we criticize
the president's statement, we will be called friendly to Japan,
which will adversely affect the upcoming elections."
Takeshima is not just a bilateral issue but it will likely be
made a domestic political issue of South Korea. Open Uri Party
head Chong Dong Yong attempted to land on one of the islets in
early March when Grand National Party representative Park Kun Hye
was visiting Japan to meet with Prime Minister Koizumi. Chong's
attempt was unsuccessful due to bad weather. A source familiar
with the Open Uri Party admitted that Chong tried to play up the
policy contrast with Park.
One political commentator said, "Should the government stir up
national sentiments taking advantage of the Dokdo issue, it will
be able to strengthen its impetus." In fact, support rate for the
Roh government shot up from 35% to 50% in the poll conducted
immediately after Roh criticized as "an act of justifying Japan's
war of aggression" Shimane Prefecture's passing in March last
year of an ordinance designating a "Takeshima Day".
Roh has stressed that he is rectifying the wrongdoings committed
by past governments. He is trying to play up a tough stance of
working on the issues left behind by the past governments by
stressing his tough diplomacy regarding the Takeshima issue. He
can make clear differences with the government of President Park
Chong Hyi that shelved the Takeshima issue when it concluded a
treaty with Japan in 1965, as well as with the governments of
TOKYO 00002311 009 OF 013
President Kim Yong Sam and President Kim Dae Jung, which blurred
South Korea's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in Japan-South Korea
fisheries negotiations conducted from 1996 to 1999.
The view is that since South Korea effectively controls the
disputed islets, it should continue calm diplomacy. However, a
ranking Presidential Office official said, "We have no leeway to
remain calm."
Many in the Japanese government have now reached the conclusion
that it will be difficult to repair the strained bilateral ties
for the time being. Japan cannot withdraw its territorial claim
over Takeshima. The government's basic policy is that it will
promote cooperation with South Korea on other areas, while
continuing negotiations on the EEZ issue. Chief Cabinet Secretary
Shinzo Abe and Foreign Minister Taro Aso have dispatched messages
calling on Seoul to improve bilateral relations, even though they
have taken a hard-line stance against China. Abe and Aso,
therefore, have increased their distrust of President Roh, who
has stepped up his criticism of Japan.
Prime Minister Koizumi yesterday stated in a press interview:
"Keeping a Japan-South Korea friendship is a major premise. I
think the two countries should discuss the matter in order to
find realistic measures to resolve it." He sought a cool-headed
response.
There is a view in the Japanese government that South Korea will
gain no benefits externally since it already effectively controls
the disputed islets. However Roh seems to have made such remarks
as economic cooperation and cultural exchanges being unable to
help resolve this matter as a means of objecting to Koizumi's
continuing to visit Yasukuni Shrine while stressing the need for
"friendly ties between Japan and South Korea." The Foreign
Ministry has taken Roh's statement seriously, with an official
saying, "If Seoul links all issues to history, we will find it
difficult to deal with them."
Regarding Japan's planned marine survey, over which the two
countries were about clash, Seoul and Tokyo have agreed to resume
negotiations on the EEZ demarcation issue probably before the end
of May. Diplomatic authorities have reached an understanding to
resolve the issue through discussions.
Some government and ruling coalition officials have begun
criticize Roh's statement released three days after the two
governments had arrived at the agreement on the marine survey
issue. The concern is that the negotiations on the demarcation
issue may become an arena for a showdown between Tokyo and Seoul.
(5) Bright and dark sides of five years of Koizumi politics (Part
1): Koizumi-Bush honeymoon relationship strengthened Japan-US
alliance
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Abridged)
April 26, 2006
"Relations with Japan are close, and I personally like Prime
Minister (Junichiro) Koizumi. I closely cooperated with him on a
variety of matters."
Delivering a speech in Washington April 10, US President George
ΒΆW. Bush played up his relationship of trust with Koizumi.
TOKYO 00002311 010 OF 013
Bush has been preaching the importance of the war on terror
across the US on the back of growing criticism of the Iraq war.
In such speeches, Bush has referred to his relationship of trust
with Koizumi 13 times this year. The number stands out among
Japanese prime ministers.
Japan-US relations, which have been described as the best ever by
diplomatic officials of the two countries, have been supported
largely by the relations of trust between Koizumi and Bush.
Relations between the two countries were sour during the Clinton
administration. What turned them for the better in the Bush
administration? Both Japan and the US are responsible for that.
During the Clinton era, the US government often used gaiatsu, or
foreign pressure, for resolving bilateral problems. But the Bush
administration has respected Japan's "independent decisions,"
concluding that gaiatsu ruined cooperative relations between the
two countries.
Koizumi responded America's new stance with positive steps.
Following 9/11, the prime minister decided to send Maritime Self-
Defense Force vessels to the Indian Ocean to assist US forces. He
also swiftly announced his support for America's military attack
on Iraq and eventually deployed Ground Self-Defense Force troops
to help Iraq's reconstruction efforts.
"There were other options, but Prime Minister Koizumi decided to
send SDF troops," a former foreign minister noted.
Bush gave high scores to Koizumi's political style to make bold
decisions and take risks.
Koizumi and Bush have become closer since 9/11, according to
diplomatic officials of the two countries.
The Bush-Koizumi "honeymoon relationship" has significantly
strengthened the Japan-US alliance.
At the Japan-US summit in Kyoto last November, Koizumi said to
Bush: "It is because Japan-US relations are good that we have
been able to maintain good ties with all other countries,
including, China, the Republic of Korea, and the members of the
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)." In response,
Bush said: "It is a good idea and that, if Japan and the United
States have good relations, China also would want to strengthen
ties with Japan and the United States."
Bush invited Koizumi to the US for late June. Koizumi will be the
first Japanese prime minister to make an official visit to the US
in seven years, the last one being in April 1999 when Keizo
Obuchi was premier. Bush will host a White House dinner party for
Koizumi, as with the case of a state guest.
Bush only had a luncheon with Chinese President Hu Jintao, who
visited the US for the first time after assuming the current
post. The US government's higher treatment of Koizumi over Hu, a
chief of state, reflects the deepening Japan-US alliance.
(6) Bright and dark sides of five years of Koizumi politics (Part
2): Consideration for ally boosting Japan's base burden
TOKYO 00002311 011 OF 013
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full)
April 27, 2006
"The Japanese government will shoulder a huge amount of money.
Japan will pay part (6.09 billion dollars) of the cost of
relocating Okinawa-based Marines to Guam in addition to
approximately 20 billion dollars to finance domestic relocation."
So said Richard Lawless, US deputy defense under secretary,
yesterday. He indicated that Japan would pay an estimated 26
billion dollars or approximately 3 trillion yen of the overall US
force realignment cost over six to seven years.
In this case, Japan will have to defray 500 billion yen annually.
This figure is twice as large as its annual contribution to the
cost of stationing US forces in Japan (237.8 billion yen for
fiscal 2005).
Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe said in a press conference
yesterday: "I do not know the content of the reported figure. But
it is my impression that it is an incredible sum of money."
The realignment of US forces in Japan is part of the global US
force transformation being promoted by the Bush administration.
The US therefore naturally should pay the relocation cost.
In the force realignment in Japan, though, Okinawa's base burden
will be reduced, and many base facilities will be transferred to
other locations in the nation, whose costs should be borne by
Japan. In addition, Japan has also agreed to pay 59% of the
overall cost of relocating Okinawa-based Marines to Guam, though
such payment should be made by the US, reflecting Prime Minister
Junichiro Koizumi's stance of prioritizing the Japan-US alliance.
The decision stems from the prime minister's consideration to the
US, based on his determination that if Japan refuses to pay, the
US Congress may react sharply, and his ally, President Bush, may
be driven into corner.
Furthermore, Koizumi has dispatched Ground Self-Defense Force
(SDF) troops to Iraq on a reconstruction mission. Although an
increasing number of countries are beginning to withdraw their
troops under the worsening security situation there, Japan has
continued to deploy SDF troops.
If Japan, an important ally of the US, pulls troops out of Iraq
amid the political standstill there, it could give the impression
that the Iraq war has ended in failure. In such a case, President
Bush will find himself isolated.
Japan has deployed oil supply vessels in the Indian Ocean since
the US military launched military operation in Afghanistan. It
has yet to devise any plan to terminate the mission.
Koizumi has established close personal ties with President Bush.
In supporting Bush on the basis of such ties, Japan has responded
to US requests for financial assistance appropriate to its
strength as a nation. With Koizumi's resignation from the current
post this September, however, the current honeymoon between the
Japanese and US leaders will come to an end.
How will Japan-US relations change under a Koizumi successor? If
bilateral ties become exacerbated, the vulnerability of the Japan-
US alliance, which depends greatly on the Bush-Koizumi ties, may
TOKYO 00002311 012 OF 013
stand out in bold relief.
(7) Interview with Kent Calder, director of SAIS Reischauer
Center for East Asia Studies: Japan-US relations could
deteriorate over beef issue
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full)
April 27, 2006
Beef has become a major political issue between Japan and the US.
Dissatisfaction is growing stronger at Japan among members of the
Congress lobbying for beef industry interests.
Unless the beef issue is resolved during Prime Minister Koizumi's
term in office, US-Japan relations could deteriorate. On the
political front, the prime minister has moved bilateral ties
forward, but he failed to produce any positive results in
resolving the most difficult of issues, the agricultural sector,
including beef. There also are trade issues other than
agriculture that the two countries face. For instance, many
American firms are dissatisfied with Japan's process of
privatizing postal savings and postal insurance services,
criticizing the process as ambiguous. For now, the US
government's policy interest has been directed at the security
area, and the economic area has been set aside. Under such a
situation, discontent is growing among private-sector firms that
cannot receive government financial support.
In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the US,
Prime Minister Koizumi has found it considerably easier to
cooperate with the US government on the security front, and his
interest has been on the political area. Though this is merely a
personal view, the prime minister does not seem well versed in
economic issues. It might be said that he has been lucky because
the US government has given priority to the security area over
the economic front.
There is no need to worry, though, that Japan-US relations will
get worse immediately after the prime minister steps down. Should
Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe, who is regarded as the most
likely candidate, become prime minister, he supposedly will step
up efforts to strengthen cooperative relations with the US on the
security front in dealing with missile defense, US force
realignment, and other issues. I believe he will continue the
current administration's reform drive based on market principles.
I think that former Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda is also
a good candidate. He has maintained favorable relations with the
US. He know much about the need to have a pipeline and good
channels to Russia, so if Mr. Fukuda becomes prime minister, his
administration would have a high interest in energy policy.
(8) Yutaka Iimura picked as ambassador to France
SANKEI (Page 2) (Full)
April 26, 2006
The government decided in a cabinet meeting on April 25 to
appoint Yutaka Iimura, incumbent ambassador to Indonesia, as
ambassador to France and Andorra, effective as of April 25.
Shigeru Nakamura, currently director general of the Intelligence
and Analysis Service, has been be named as ambassador to Saudi
Arabia; Seiji Kojima, a Japan International Cooperation Agency
TOKYO 00002311 013 OF 013
(JICA) director, as ambassador to Pakistan; Haruhisa Takeuchi,
chief of the Cabinet Satellite Intelligence Center, as director
general of the Intelligence and Analysis Service. The
appointments of Nakamura, Kojima, and Takeuchi are effective as
of May 8.
Ambassador-designate Yutaka Iimura: Left the University of Tokyo
in mid-course; entered the Foreign Ministry in 1969; has been
serving as ambassador to Indonesia since July 2002; after serving
in such posts as director general of the Economic Cooperation
Bureau and deputy vice minister of Minister's Secretariat, age
59; hails from Tokyo.
Ambassador-designate Shigeru Nakamura: Graduated from
Hitotsubashi University; joined the Foreign Ministry in 1973; has
been serving as director general of the Intelligence and Analysis
Service since August 2004, after serving as ambassador in charge
of Iraqi Assistance Coordination; age 57; Tokyo.
Ambassador-designate Seiji Kojima: Graduated from the University
of Tokyo; joined the Foreign Ministry in 1972; has been a JICA
director since October 2004; age 58; born in Aichi Prefecture.
DONOVAN