Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06TOKYO2094, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 04/18/06
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TOKYO2094.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06TOKYO2094 | 2006-04-18 08:17 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO6014
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2094/01 1080817
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 180817Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1096
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/COMPATWING ONE KAMI SEYA JA
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 8385
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5757
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8935
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 5745
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6936
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1818
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7983
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 9859
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 12 TOKYO 002094
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST
DIVISION; TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS
OFFICE; SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
ADVISOR; CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 04/18/06
INDEX:
(1) Futenma relocation: V-airstrip plan iffy; Expert wonders if
US military will follow agreement
(2) Japan, US talks on Guam relocation cost in final stretch; Two-
plus-two on May 2; US lowers total cost to 9.5 billion dollars
but Tokyo, Washington still wide apart
(3) China's ban on sea traffic in East China Sea does not cross
over the Japan-China median line, says Chinese Foreign Ministry;
China corrects error in its previous notice
(4) Minshuto head Ozawa to clash with government, ruling
coalition over a set of three issues: social divide, Yasukuni
Shrine visits, and foreign policy
(5) WTO Doha round unlikely to reach agreement; US gradually
moving away from WTO
(6) US Embassy minister in speech emphasizes America's efforts to
address environmental issues
(7) Visitors' gallery column: US Fair Trade Commission Chairman
Deborah Majoras says Japan should put more effort into studying
competition policy
(8) Future course of Food Safety Commission - Interview with
Yasuhiko Nakamura, member of FSC and guest professor at Tokyo
University of Agriculture: Panel is still immature but in right
direction
(9) Examining post-Koizumi contenders (Part 1): Sadakazu Tanigaki
(10) Kasumigaseki confidential: Transfer of operations and
authority from government to private-sector
ARTICLES:
(1) Futenma relocation: V-airstrip plan iffy; Expert wonders if
US military will follow agreement
ASAHI (Page 39) (Full)
April 16, 2006
The Defense Agency and Okinawa Prefecture's Nago City have
reached a basic agreement on a plan to lay down a V-shaped pair
of airstrips across the cape of Henoko in the city to take over
the heliport functions of the US Marine Corps' Futenma Air
Station in its relocation to that coastal area. The agreed V-
airstrip plan is intended to avoid flying over neighboring local
communities. However, the plan is premised on a specific wind
direction and only expects a one-way landing approach and takeoff
roll. Self-Defense Forces officials and civilian experts are
raising questions about the plan, with one of them regarding it
as "iffy" and another wondering if the US Marines will fly along
the agreed flight paths.
The city of Nago, in its talks with the government over the newly
planned alternative base for Futenma airfield, insisted on its
stance of avoiding the setting of flight paths of US military
aircraft over the local communities of Henoko, Toyohara, and Abu.
In order to meet this precondition, the Defense Agency hammered
TOKYO 00002094 002 OF 012
out the idea of laying down two runways in a V-shape. One of the
runways is on the shoreside for normal landings and takeoffs
under the visual flight rule (VFR) and landings under the
instrument flight rule (IFR) in bad weather. The other airstrip
is on the seaside for takeoffs in bad weather.
The V-airstrip installation plan is premised on the wind
direction. "In the area of Henoko," Defense Agency Director
General Nukaga noted, "the wind blowing there is almost always
from the north." The Defense Facilities Administration Agency's
Naha bureau checked to see yearlong wind directions at the cape
of Henoko from April 2004. The DFAA found from the survey that
about 70% of the winds there were from the north side-northerly
or northeasterly winds.
Generally speaking, headwinds are ideal for the safe landings and
takeoffs of both helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. Premised on
findings from the weather monitoring survey, US warplanes are
expected to land and take off from the southwest to the
northeast.
"They're going to deal with nature, but they're thinking to
themselves that the wind will blow in a specific direction only."
With this, Kensuke Ebata, a commentator on military affairs,
raised a question about the Defense Agency's way of thinking.
"It's strange to think that way," Ebata said. He added: "I've
never heard that there's a civilian airport or a military
facility that allows landing and taking off in a one-way
direction only. It's only natural to go around for safe landings
and takeoffs depending on the wind direction."
What if the wind blows the other way from the south? In this
case, one SDF officer noted: "In order to make a landing on the
shoreside runway, pilots would have no choice but to go around
and nose down in their landing approach from the other way around
over the Abu area to avoid a tailwind." The officer also said,
"They often take different flight paths in order to make safe
landings." One official in the Defense Policy Division of the
Defense Agency has also admitted: "We've yet to talk with the US
side about what to do when the wind blows from the south."
In the case of a southerly wind, the shoreside runway could be
used instead for taking off and the seaside one for landing.
However, many are raising a question about using different
runways for landing and taking off.
Even in the case of landing as expected by the Defense Agency,
aircraft could encounter a sudden gust of wind or other
unexpected conditions when it is about to touch down. In this
case, the aircraft has to nose up and go around. The pilot will
then need to fly his aircraft over the shoreside runway and try
again. However, the pilot has to make a considerably sharp right
turn if he tries to avoid flying over the Abu area's local
communities situated ahead of that runway, according to an SDF
pilot. "It's dangerous," the SDF pilot said.
Fixed-wing aircraft conducts 'touch-and-go' training at Futenma
airfield. In this case as well, it is impossible to use different
runways.
"On the map, they're supposed not to fly over local residential
areas," said an SDF expert on heliborne operations. "But," this
expert went on, "that's a far cry from the facts about weather
TOKYO 00002094 003 OF 012
conditions and actual flight operations."
Another problem is the type of aircraft to be deployed. The US
Navy has revealed a plan to deploy the MV-22 Osprey in Okinawa to
replace the Marines' carrier helicopters, beginning in the fall
of 2012 or later. The MV-22 Osprey is a tiltrotor vertical/short
takeoff and landing (VSTOL) aircraft, which can also fly at a
high speed like fixed-wing aircraft. The US Navy once suspended
its development of this aircraft due to its crashes.
(2) Japan, US talks on Guam relocation cost in final stretch; Two-
plus-two on May 2; US lowers total cost to 9.5 billion dollars
but Tokyo, Washington still wide apart
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Abridged slightly)
April 18, 2006
Talks between Japan and the United States on sharing the cost for
relocating US Marines from Okinawa to Guam -- the thorniest issue
in the realignment of US forces in Japan -- have now reached the
final stretch. But the negotiations on the costly project have
run into snags. Tokyo and Washington intend to hold a meeting of
the Japan-U.S. Security Consultative Committee of foreign and
defense ministers (2 plus 2) on May 2 as a deadline for settling
the issue and adopting a final report.
Tug-of-war
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi yesterday morning ordered
Defense Agency Director General Fukushiro Nukaga to make every
effort to swiftly settle the cost-sharing issue.
As part of the realignment of US forces in Japan, the governments
of Japan and the US have decided to reduce the number of US
Marines in Okinawa by 8,000 to alleviate the burden on the
prefecture. But reaching an agreement between Tokyo and
Washington on sharing the cost is a prerequisite for relocating
the troops, who will mostly go to Guam.
The US initially asked Japan to bear 75% of the total estimated
cost of 10 billion dollars, or 1.11 trillion yen, based on the
fiscal 2006 exchange rate. The cost included 7.5 billion dollars
(832.5 billion yen) directly connected with the relocation of
Marines, and 1 billion dollars (111 billion yen) for building
Navy and Air Force facilities. Japan, however, insisted that the
cost be reduced, arguing, "The total cost itself is not
reasonable."
Tokyo originally expressed its willingness to loan 3 billion
dollars (333 billion yen) for building family housing and other
facilities.
On April 13-14, Nukaga held talks with US Deputy Under Secretary
of Defense Richard Lawless and others in which the defense chief
presented a compromise plan of disbursing 3 billion dollars from
the general account in addition to the loan portion. The US also
lowered the total cost to 9.5 billion dollars (1.545 trillion
yen). But the two sides have yet to reach an agreement, as their
views are still wide apart.
Groundbreaking burden-reducing step
Japan has never financed a US military facility on American soil.
TOKYO 00002094 004 OF 012
During the 1991 Gulf war, Japan extended 13 billion dollars of
financial assistance to the coalition. To assist in Iraq's
reconstruction efforts, Japan also promised to provide 5 billion
dollars (555 billion yen) in official development assistance,
including 69.9 billion yen for SDF activities.
Nukaga emphatically said, "During the Gulf war, Japan disbursed 1
trillion yen from state coffers, and after the Iraq war, 500
billion yen was offered to assist Iraq's reconstruction efforts."
A senior Defense Agency official also took this view: "The US
force realignment is a once-in-half-a-century chance to reduce
Okinawa's burden. In view of international contributions, there
is every reason for Japan to pay its fair share of the cost."
A percentage formula or tallying specific items?
The Defense Agency thinks Japan should foot the bill by tallying
specific items rather than setting a certain percentage of the
total cost. The government wants to avoid its share from rising
in proportion to growing US estimates.
But the government's view is not necessarily monolithic with the
Foreign Ministry, which is ready to accept the percentage
formula.
The Defense Agency intends to settle the issue through talks
between the Nukaga-led Defense Agency and the US Defense
Department rather than at the April 24-25 senior working-level
talks in Washington.
(3) China's ban on sea traffic in East China Sea does not cross
over the Japan-China median line, says Chinese Foreign Ministry;
China corrects error in its previous notice
YOMIURI (Page 1) (Full)
Eve., April 18, 2006
China issued a notice banning ship navigation in the waters
around the Japan-China median line within (Japan's) exclusive
economic zone (EEZ). The aim of this notice was for China to
expand its exploration of gas fields in the East China Sea. In
this regard, the Chinese Foreign Ministry late yesterday
indicated that it would revise its previous notice, noting,
"There was a technical error in it." With this revision, the
oceanic area subject to the navigation ban will be waters that
fall within China's territory from the median line. This
information came from the Chinese Foreign Ministry to the
Japanese Embassy in Beijing.
According to an account by China, the Chinese Maritime Bureau
mistakenly set an area for the work scope for the expansion of
the Pinghu gas field in the East China Sea at latitude 27.7-29.4
north instead of at latitude 29.7-29.4 north. Correcting this
error, the bureau will revise the previous notice banning sea
traffic. According to the Japan Coast Guard (JCG), an area
stretching some 3.6 kilometers east to west and some 200
kilometers south crossing over the median line has been
previously prohibited from navigation. But with the revision, the
length of the area stretching south has been shortened to about
five kilometers.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe stated at a press conference
TOKYO 00002094 005 OF 012
after a cabinet meeting this morning: "I am left with the
impression that it was merely a plain mistake. Even if the area
is within the Chinese territory from the median line, China needs
to pay due respect to the other country's rights and
obligations." He again indicated displeasure with China's
responses taken during the past few days.
(4) Minshuto head Ozawa to clash with government, ruling
coalition over a set of three issues: social divide, Yasukuni
Shrine visits, and foreign policy
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full)
April 18, 2006
It has been ten days since Ichiro Ozawa assumed the presidency of
the main opposition party Minshuto (Democratic Party of Japan).
Ozawa has set a policy course of making a clear distinction
between the party's position and that of the ruling Liberal
Democratic Party (LDP). He has replaced his predecessor Seiji
Maehara's policy of presenting counterproposals in the Diet.
Ozawa instead will toughen the stance of opposing the government
and ruling coalition, focusing on a set of three issues: the
widening social gap, visits to Yasukuni Shrine by Prime Minister
Junichiro Koizumi, and Japan's foreign policy toward Asian
countries.
According to press reports, a candidate backed by Minshuto now
has an edge over other candidates running in the House of
Representatives by-election in the Chiba No.7 district. In a
campaign speech on April 15 for the Minshuto ticket, Ozawa took
up the issue of the widening social disparity in Japan. He
severely criticized the government, claiming, "Money makes money.
Gaps between the urban and rural areas are widening further.
Japan is creating an unfair society. We must change politics."
Ozawa has proposed the creation of a "fair country" that will
provide the people with a safety net. He wants to make clear the
distinction between the party's policy and the Koizumi reform
drive, which he says excessively relies on free competition and
market mechanisms. The special feature of Ozawa's policy is that
he highly values the lifetime employment and seniority-base
systems as measures for job security.
In his speech for Minshuto's candidate, Ozawa also criticized
Koizumi's repeated visits to Yasukuni Shrine, which will become a
main campaign issue in the LDP presidential race.
Ozawa's assertion is that Yasukuni Shrine is a place to honor
those who died in past wars. He stated that those branded as
Class-A war criminals did not die in battle, and they therefore
should not be enshrined at the shrine. Some critics have noted
that Ozawa's view is tantamount to political intervention in the
affairs of a religious institution.
Ozawa, however, wore an expression of relief, telling reporters,
"It would be easy to do so. If we obtain the reins of government,
we will do it immediately. I will tell you how to do it then."
Given Japan's deteriorated relations with China and South Korea
over Koizumi's Yasukuni visits, Ozawa has stressed that he would
do his best to strengthen Japan's Asia diplomacy.
Ozawa also places emphasis on Japan-US relations, just as Koizumi
TOKYO 00002094 006 OF 012
does. He, however, underscores that he would make efforts to
repair strained relations with neighboring countries, while
maintaining Japan-US relations as the axis. In that context, he
would further strengthen Asia diplomacy.
While criticizing Koizumi's foreign policy as tilting solely
toward the United States, Ozawa has proposed establishing a
national security system centered on the United Nations. Some
Minshuto members have said that Ozawa's views are more
understandable than Maehara's. Ozawa clearly mentions the policy
differences with Koizumi, "Since his policy is premised on the
present political system, our ways of thinking are different."
The question is how Ozawa will give shape to a "new Ozawa policy
line." Minshuto lawmakers have become increasingly interested in
a new version of Ozawa's book "Plan to Remodel Japan." Ozawa is
reportedly working on a revision.
(5) WTO Doha round unlikely to reach agreement; US gradually
moving away from WTO
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 3) (Slightly abridged)
April 17, 2006
The Doha round of World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations,
which began in 2001, has been stalled. Overtures for a
breakthrough were repeatedly held, but all have failed so far.
The WTO Ministerial Conference intended for reaching a general
agreement on setting rules on trade liberalization is scheduled
for late April, but it is becoming increasingly unclear whether
it will actually take place as planned. The United States has
begun moving away from the WTO. It is instead shifting emphasis
to free trade agreement (FTA) talks.
Japan, US discuss on phone
"A number of difficult challenges remain to be addressed before
we reach a basic agreement at the end of April." This remark came
from US Trade Representative (USTR) Rob Portman in early April,
when he expressed concern on the phone to Minister of Economy,
Trade and Industry (METI) Toshihiro Nikai. Nikai, who wants to
finalize the talks with joint efforts with the US, sought
cooperation from Portman. However, a growing view among major
nations is that "it is difficult to reach an agreement before the
end of April," a senior METI official said.
This view is related to the failure in recent overtures for a
breakthrough in the deadlocked WTO talks. Six major nations and
regions, including Japan, the US, Europe, and Brazil, convened a
ministerial conference in London in mid-March but they failed to
achieve any visible results. Afterwards, the US, the European
Union (EU), and Brazil met twice in Rio de Janeiro on March 31
and on April 1, but their talks did not make progress on major
areas, such as a range of tariff cuts. Reportedly, USTR Portman
conveyed on the phone the atmosphere of the meetings to his
Japanese counterpart during the Japan-US consultations.
The WTO will hold working-level talks in Geneva starting on April
18, but when it comes to the ministerial conference planned for
later this month, no detailed schedule for it has been
determined, allowing only speculation that it will be postponed.
Difficult coordination in agricultural sector
TOKYO 00002094 007 OF 012
The biggest barrier to the (Doha round of) negotiations is the
agricultural sector. Most member nations have agreed to follow a
tariff reduction formula, under which heavy customs duties, for
instance, those on agricultural products, will be drastically
reduced. But when it comes to the focal issue of how far the
(tariff) rates will be lowered, no concessions have been made.
Brazil and the US have called for a 75-90% cut of tariffs on
products on which heavy customs duties are now imposed, while the
group of food importers, including Japan, insist that a reduction
rate should be limited to a maximum of 45% .
Meanwhile, the US, which has been urged to significantly cut its
farm subsidies, is now on the defensive. The US Congress is
increasingly moving toward protectionism. In fact, it raised
vehement opposition to an Arab-affiliated firm's takeover of US
port operations and then forced the firm to withdraw its
takeover. The Congress also is strongly opposed to a drastic cut
in farm subsidies. The US government is apparently stymied (by
the Congress' moves). In addition, Brazil and other countries are
under pressure to reduce their tariffs inflicted on industrial
products. "(WTO) negotiations are thus in a tangle," a government
official said.
If a general agreement is not reached (at the ministerial
conference) scheduled for the end of April, the conference will
be again held in June. But, "If no agreement is reached there, a
final agreement before the end of the year will become
impossible," a government official explained.
"If the talks fell apart, the US would have to shift emphasis to
FTA talks." This March, a US official made this remark to a
Japanese official in charge of WTO talks. The US has begun moving
away from the WTO. One government official expressed concern:
"Isn't the US planning to walk out of the WTO?"
The US Congress had granted the Bush administration the Trade
Promotion Authority (TPA) for negotiations, but the TPA will
expire at the end of June 2007. Given the time necessary to go
through the process of obtaining approval from the Congress, if a
final agreement is reached before the end of the year, the Doha
round would be in effect stopped.
A senior Foreign Ministry official expressed concern: "Maybe the
US is attempting to form a club of the willing in the trade area
as it did in invading Iraq while shrugging off the United
Nation's resolution?" If that were to happen, the momentum toward
trade liberalization that has now swept across the world,
including developing nations, could wither at once.
(6) US Embassy minister in speech emphasizes America's efforts to
address environmental issues
CHUNICHI SHINBUN (Page 23) (Full)
April 15, 2006
By Shinya Abe
Joyce Rabens, minister for environment, science and technology at
the US Embassy in Tokyo, delivered a speech at the Nagoya
American Center in Nagoya City regarding America's efforts to
address climate change, including global warming. In the speech,
she highlighted the Bush administration's positive stance toward
environmental issues.
TOKYO 00002094 008 OF 012
The United States left the Kyoto Protocol, an international
treaty on prevention of global warming, and has yet to return.
Minister Rabens was not positive about America returning to the
pact: "Given the Senate's opposition to signing the Protocol, the
US is unlikely to return."
On the other hand, Rabens stressed that the US government "has
poured as much money as other countries for anti-global-warming
measures."
From the standpoint of national security, she pointed out the
need to reduce dependence on imports of energy resources and
pointed out the steps (the US has taken in that regard): "We have
promoted through the tax system the use of such alternative
energy resources as atomic energy, solar energy, and wind power";
and, "We have placed restrictions on the fuel used by new pickup
truck models (such as recreational vehicles)."
Rabens was asked questions from the audience, for instance, about
average person's awareness of environmental issues and America's
transportation system that tends to depend heavily on automobiles
and airplanes, which are not viewed as being energy-efficient.
Rabens answered proudly, "America is second to none in its
efforts to address environmental issues, for instance, reducing
the use of plastic shopping bags and recycling plastic bottles."
Commenting on the traffic system, she explained the situation in
her country: "A high-speed railway, if constructed, would be
effective (in view of cutting green house gas emissions), but a
vast investment would be necessary. Legislators have no interest
in investments that will have no effect on the next election."
(7) Visitors' gallery column: US Fair Trade Commission Chairman
Deborah Majoras says Japan should put more effort into studying
competition policy
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 19) (Full)
April 17, 2006
Deborah Majoras, chairman of the US Fair Trade Commission points
out: "It was said that because of Japan's corporate culture and
other factors, the system of surcharge leniency (under the
amended Anti-Monopoly Act) would not work, but the fears were
groundless." She lauded the fact that the first examples of
reporting offenders have come out under the system, saying,
"Japan and the US are now on equal ground in terms of companies
seeking to improve productivity (under fair competition).
Even in the US, which preceded Japan on this, it was thought at
first that there would be few companies reporting offenders.
However, in reality, the exposures have been effective. "I would
like to see more efforts put not only into exposing offenders but
also into studying how to make competition policy even better, "
she said.
(8) Future course of Food Safety Commission - Interview with
Yasuhiko Nakamura, member of FSC and guest professor at Tokyo
University of Agriculture: Panel is still immature but in right
direction
ASAHI (Page 15, 2006)
April 14, 2006
TOKYO 00002094 009 OF 012
I appreciate the efforts of the members of the prion experts
panel in tackling the very difficult work of assessing risk. It
is regrettable that half of the members resigned recently. Most
of them left the panel due to age limits or personal
circumstances. It is very simple and dangerous to label those who
resigned as skeptics (of resuming US beef imports). Some said
that they were forced out of the panel under political pressure,
and others claimed that they were replaced with "yes-men." Such
views are just based on conjecture.
Some of the members who stepped down take the view that a
conclusion has already been reached" and that "the assessment is
not being done on a scientific basis." But I do not think their
views are correct. I have attended various deliberations and
study meetings held at ministries and agencies hundreds of times.
In such meetings, the chairman and the secretariat always set the
direction. Seeing such a situation some criticized that the
ministries and agencies set policies as they like under the cover
of such meetings. Such criticism is somewhat reasonable.
Expert panel members conducted a good 10 rounds of discussion on
US beef, without setting a time limit. The Ministry of Health,
Labor and Welfare (MHLW) and the Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) must have been irritated at the
pace.
Since information on US beef, covering from production to
distribution, was quite insufficient, the panel collected data to
make up for the lack of information. But data were not enough,
either. Under such a situation, the panel came up with a final
assessment on the premise that the US would fulfill the
conditions set by Japan in resuming imports. Though it was an
anguished judgment, I think it was also a scientific assessment
of sorts.
If a member harbors dissatisfaction, that person should make an
assertion during an open meeting in a thorough way. We do not
mind even if the number of meetings increases. All panel members
take responsibility for a report worked out by the panel. If a
member complains about the report afterwards, such is rude to
other members and will confuse the public. In any conference, all
participants cannot necessarily be satisfied with the decisions
reached there. Various opinions are presented, and coordination
is carried out to seek a point of compromise.
I also feel that the MHLW and MAFF had set the course of having
the panel start looking into domestic anti-BSE measures, review
the nation's blanket-testing system, and then deliberate on US
beef. We had not noticed this scenario.
In this sense, we need to mull how to response to the
government's requests for our advice and suggestions from now. If
there are problems in such requests, or if the panel finds it
difficult to conduct discussions, we will take the time needed
for discussion. We might come up with a conclusion that
deliberations are unnecessary.
Our panel is independent of the government, but it cannot be
completely unconnected with it, because there are the public is
behind the lawmakers. The panel cannot take action that ignores
society. Given this, the Food Safety Commission (FSC) is
accountable to both the political sphere and the public. The
TOKYO 00002094 010 OF 012
panel also needs to listen to an explanation about why the
government asked for its advice. It is not enough for the panel
to only assess risk on a scientific basis. It is important for
the panel to perform its duty while keeping itself politics at
arm's length while maintaining a tense relationship with it.
When the first case of BSE was found in Japan in September 2001,
a major panic broke out. The blunders made by MAFF deepened
consumer distrust further. A series of beef mislabeling incidents
and labeling violations threatened the safety and security of
food. If we adopt our conventional method for scientific
assessment in our usual way, people might think that we are
helping the management side, including the MHLW, to conduct their
jobs in an easier way.
In order to restore consumer confidence in beef, the government
separated the function of scientific assessment from the function
of management and set up the FSC, with the aim of pursuing a
fairer judgment. Though the panel is in the right direction, it
is still immature because it was inaugurated only less than three
years ago. The panel has still repeated the process of trial and
error. It might be considered that the recent "uproar" was caused
due to its immaturity.
(9) Examining post-Koizumi contenders (Part 1): Sadakazu Tanigaki
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Abridged)
April 17, 2006
On April 15, Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki made a one-day
trip to his home turf, House of Representatives Kyoto
Constituency No. 5, for the first time in about six months.
"He is stubborn when it comes to policies"
Tanigaki delivered a speech in Maizuru. Asked afterward about his
aspirations to become prime minister, Tanigaki modestly said:
"Revamping the country's finances is the biggest challenge for
the successor to Prime Minister Koizumi. I need to produce solid
plans first in order to seek the position." Later on, Tanigaki
visited the grave of his father, Senichi, in Fukuchiyama.
Tanigaki has repeatedly referred to the need to swiftly hike the
consumption tax, turning a deaf ear to other lawmakers' advice to
keep the LDP presidential election in mind by abstaining from
mentioning the possibility of a future tax hike. Health, Labor
and Welfare Minister Jiro Kawasaki, one of Tanigaki's strongest
supporters, described him this way: "He works honestly and
diligently without playing to the gallery. But he is unexpectedly
stubborn when it comes to policies."
In September 2002, Tanigaki became chairman of the National
Public Safety Commission in the Koizumi cabinet. Although nearly
three years have passed since he was shifted to the post of
finance minister, Tanigaki's popularity ratings as a potential
Koizumi successor are still hovering around 2%. LDP members close
to Tanigaki are more eager than Tanigaki himself to make him the
next prime minister.
Knowledgeable about policies and having a warm personality,
Tanigaki has long been regarded as a future prime ministerial
candidate by members of Kochikai (former Miyazawa faction).
Ironically, Tanigaki captured national attention during the so-
TOKYO 00002094 011 OF 012
called Kato rebellion against then Prime Minister Mori.
A tearful Tanigaki trying to dissuade Kato from voting for an
opposition bloc-presented no-confidence motion against the Mori
cabinet in a Lower House plenary session that was televised
nationally.
Upset by the scene, Sadatoshi Ozato, who was serving as
"guardian" to Tanigaki, immediately called the lawmaker to a
Japanese restaurant near the Diet building to chide him: "What
are you thinking about? A lawmaker's action has a lasting impact
on the public." Looking back on the incident, a fellow lawmaker
also said bitterly, "That tarnished Mr. Tanigaki's image."
Five and a half years have passed since then. Former factional
colleagues, such as Kawasaki, Yasuo Fukuda, and Gen Nakatani,
have been busy paving the way for Tanigaki's candidacy for the
LDP presidency. In April, they met twice on Friday nights to work
out their strategy.
On the night of April 7, when Tanigaki was on an official trip
abroad, factional executives had a heated discussion on measures
for the faction's May 15 party. A plan is also underway to unveil
the faction's policy proposals at the upcoming party to make them
a Tanigaki administrative vision.
But Tanigaki himself remains elusive. Tanigaki supporters met for
the second time on the night of April 14 to work out their
strategy. But Tanigaki cancelled his attendance at the eleventh
hour, citing another meeting. Other members were visibly
disappointed.
Only 15 members
Of the four post-Koizumi contenders -- Taro Aso, Tanigaki
Sadakazu, Yasuo Fukuda, and Shinzo Abe -- only Tanigaki is a
faction leader. But his faction is small with only 15 members -
five short of the required endorsements of 20 lawmakers for
seeking the LDP presidency. There are movements to reunite
Kochikai as well. But given Abe's high popularity, a mood to
support Tanigaki is not gaining momentum.
Will the simple and honest approach of calling for fiscal
reconstruction alone be able to bring bright prospects for
Tanigaki?
(10) Kasumigaseki confidential: Transfer of operations and
authority from government to private-sector
BUNGEI SHUNJU (Page 234) (Full)
May 2006
The Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy, an advisory panel to
the government, has been working on drafting measures in line
with Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's policy line of
"transferring operations and authority from the government to the
private sector." However, what is happening in the advisory panel
itself is a "transfer from the private-sector to the government."
Prime Minister Koizumi and his private secretary, Isao Iijima,
early this year chose Atsuro Saka (joined the Finance Ministry in
1970) as assistant deputy chief cabinet secretary. Even the
Finance Ministry did not expect this appointment. The only aim of
TOKYO 00002094 012 OF 012
Koizumi and Iijima was to use Saka to counter Internal Affairs
and Communications Minister Heizo Takenaka, who deprived Saka of
his role while the two were working respectively as chair and
member of the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy in the
Cabinet Office. As Koizumi noted, "Mr. Saka has a wealth of
experience in the Economic and Fiscal Policy Council," Saka
demonstrated remarkable negotiating skills and an ability to
coordinate views. He was an unusual person in the Cabinet Office,
which is made up of bureaucrats coming mainly from the former
Economic Planning Agency who are out of touch with politics.
Saka has now been working closely with Takenaka's successor,
Kaoru Yosano, state minister in charge of financial affairs. Both
Saka and Yosano are graduates of Azabu High School and the
University of Tokyo. They have been playing golf together for
some time.
Yosano, who favors Finance Ministry bureaucrats, installed
Yukihiro Oshita (entered the Finance Ministry in 1986) in the
newly established office to assist reform of the revenue and
expenditure system. Oshita served as secretary to Yosano during
his tenure as deputy chief cabinet secretary. Yosano has
consolidated the structure aimed at a consumption tax hike. All
the more because Saka and Oshita worked hard to draft the fiscal
structural reform law, which has been frozen as a symbolic
blunder in economic policy, they are enthusiastic returning to do
battle.
Council members from the private sector such as Osaka Prof.
Masaaki Honma who fell into line with Takenaka's views, are now
toeing the line of the bureaucrat-centered council. Takenaka is
now like an airplane on the verge of crashing. Koizumi and Iijima
are only interested in how to maximize their power to the end.
The situation in the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy, now
controlled by the bureaucracy, tells the true story about the
Koizumi reform drive that was carried out for nearly five years
without principles.
SCHIEFFER