Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06SANJOSE762, HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSWOMAN SLAMS CAFTA-DR

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SANJOSE762.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06SANJOSE762 2006-04-07 15:40 2011-03-15 21:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy San Jose
VZCZCXYZ0018
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSJ #0762/01 0971540
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071540Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4699
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000762 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CEN JASON MACK 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD PHUM PGOV CS
SUBJECT: HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSWOMAN SLAMS CAFTA-DR 
 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1.  Costa Rica's Human Rights Ombudswoman, Dr. Lisbeth 
Quesada, released a report on March 30 criticizing the 
U.S.-Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement 
(CAFTA-DR).  Comparing the relative bargaining power of the 
U.S. and Costa Rica to "a wild tiger vs. a captive rabbit," 
the report identifies the Ombudswoman's concerns with the 
agreement, but refrains from specifically recommending 
rejection of the treaty.  While Costa Rica's negotiating team 
races to refute Dr. Quesada's criticism, local CAFTA-DR 
opponents had a field day, crowing that the report confirmed 
their arguments against ratification.  End summary. 
 
---------------------------- 
A BULLY PULPIT WITHOUT EQUAL 
---------------------------- 
 
2.  Elected by the Legislative Assembly for up to two 
consecutive four-year terms, the Human Rights Ombudsman is 
given the broad mandate of protecting the rights of all 
residents in Costa Rica, regardless of nationality.  The 
Ombudsman's office has over time become a bully pulpit and 
has built a reputation for being outspoken and opinionated on 
controversial topics, such as a former Ombudsman's successful 
suit to declare unconstitutional President Abel Pacheco's 
support for the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq. 
 
3.  Current Ombudswoman Lisbeth Quesada, a pediatrician and 
former professional actress, began her tenure in August 2005. 
 Relatively quiet for the first few months of her tenure, Dr. 
Quesada has recently unleashed a wave of opinions on 
government institutions, corruption and foreign policy.  Her 
most recent target is CAFTA-DR.  Likening the relative 
bargaining power of the U.S. and Costa Rica to a "wild tiger 
vs. a captive rabbit," Dr. Quesada launched a highly 
publicized criticism of the treaty at a press conference on 
March 30.  The press conference coincided with the release of 
her office's analysis of CAFTA-DR, which details more 
completely her concerns with the agreement. 
 
-------------------------------------- 
OPPOSITION DELAYED, BUT NOT UNEXPECTED 
-------------------------------------- 
 
4.  While she has publicly withheld her stance on CAFTA-DR 
until now, Dr. Quesada has made no secret of her opposition 
to the agreement in meetings with Embassy officials and 
Ambassador Langdale.  She has expressed on numerous occasions 
that CAFTA-DR by itself will not be a panacea for Costa 
Rica's or Central America's economic woes, and expressed 
doubt that those countries where CAFTA-DR had already entered 
into force would close the development gap between them and 
Costa Rica.  Dr. Quesada has demurred on the question of 
whether she intends to challenge the constitutionality of 
CAFTA-DR. 
 
5.  While the report does not call explicitly for the 
rejection of CAFTA-DR, it asserts that the treaty will be 
detrimental to the country unless it is accompanied by 
sweeping social reforms in the form of a long-delayed 
complementary agenda.  Further, Dr. Quesada stated her belief 
that the Legislative Assembly must include "interpretive 
clauses" in its ratification of the treaty, giving the GOCR 
more flexibility in breaking up government service monopolies. 
 
----------------------- 
COMPREHENSIVE CRITICISM 
----------------------- 
 
6.  Identified in the report as the Ombudswoman's primary 
areas of concern were: 
 
--Telecommunications: CAFTA-DR will require Costa Rica to 
strip the Costa Rica Electricity Institute (ICE) of its 
monopoly status for cellular, Internet and data services. 
Dr. Quesada asserts that, without these businesses to 
subsidize ICE's continued monopoly for less profitable 
land-line services, prices for terrestrial phone service are 
certain to increase, and favors requiring new Internet and 
cellular service providers to help subsidize terrestrial 
services. 
 
--Sovereignty: The Ombudswoman's report asserts that CAFTA-DR 
imposes restrictions on the Legislative Assembly's ability to 
legislate, and that Costa Rica will be obliged to adopt 
implementation criteria developed by "other states," and 
prevents the GOCR from resolving trade disputes in its own 
courts. 
 
--Labor Standards: While acknowledging that CAFTA-DR provides 
some opportunities for improving enforcement of existing 
labor laws within member countries, Dr. Quesada asserts that 
countries with higher labor standards will be placed at a 
competitive disadvantage.  (Note: She is comparing labor 
standards in Costa Rica with what she perceives to be the 
lower standards of other Central American countries.  End 
note.) 
 
--Environment: Despite CAFTA-DR's built-in requirements for 
environmental protection, Quesada maintains that Costa Rica 
will be unable to enforce its stricter-than-average 
protections against multinational corporations. 
 
--Distribution of wealth: Quesada acknowledges that CAFTA-DR 
will bring increased investment and national income.  She 
argues, however, that very little of that income will benefit 
lower-income citizens.  Of particular concern are small 
farmers and rural residents. 
 
--Agricultural inequity: Dr. Quesada asserts that Costa 
Rica's farmers will be unable to compete with subsidized U.S. 
agriculture, and that the country has no anticipated plan for 
dealing with the potentially negative effect of the treaty on 
small farmers.  (Note: The Minister of Agriculture challenged 
Quesada on this point, noting that 80 percent of farmers 
support CAFTA-DR.  End note.) 
 
7.  Reactions to the report from both sides in the CAFTA-DR 
debate were swift and predictable.  Labor unions, the 
country's most vocal opponents to the free trade deal, 
applauded Dr. Quesada's report and pledged to support the 
Ombudswoman.  CAFTA-DR's supporters, on the other hand, 
disagreed with Quesada.  The day after the report was 
released, a pro-CAFTA-DR attorney in private practice asked 
the Prosecutor General to bring criminal charges against 
Quesada for illegally attempting to "create disorder in the 
streets and chaos in the country."  Marco Vinicio Ruiz, the 
incoming Minister of Foreign Trade, defended CAFTA-DR, 
reiterating that its benefits far outweigh any potential 
problems.  He stated that when he heard Dr. Quesada's 
statements, he thought that her efforts were misdirected and 
that she should instead focus on protecting the "500,000 jobs 
that depend on exports." 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
8.  All of Dr. Quesada's arguments against CAFTA-DR have long 
since been debated and addressed.  They are given added 
weight, however, by her position as protector of the poor and 
marginalized.  She will undoubtedly raise these issues again, 
likely challenging the constitutionality of CAFTA-DR if it is 
voted favorably by the Legislative Assembly. 
LANGDALE