Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06PARIS2439, FRENCH SENATE VOTES BIOTECH BILL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PARIS2439.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06PARIS2439 2006-04-13 10:26 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

131026Z Apr 06
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 002439 
 
SIPDIS 
 
BRUSSELS PASS USEU FOR AGMINCOUNSELOR 
STATE FOR OES; EUR/ERA AND EB (SPIRNAK); 
STATE PASS USTR FOR MURPHY; 
USDA/OS/JOHANNS AND PENN; 
USDA/FAS FOR 
OA/TERPSTRA/ROBERTS/SIMMONS/RICHEY/JONES; 
ITP/SHEIKH/HENKE/MACKE/TOM POMEROY/MIKE 
WOOLSEY/GREG YOUNG; BOB RIEMENSCHNEIDER 
FAA/SEBRANEK/BLEGGI; 
EU POSTS PASS TO AGRICULTURE AND ECON 
GENEVA FOR USTR, ALSO AGRICULTURE 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ETRD FR EUN
SUBJECT: FRENCH SENATE VOTES BIOTECH BILL 
 
REF: PARIS 506 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  On March 21, 22 and 23, the 
French Senate debated and approved a Biotech Bill 
presented by the Minister of Research, Francois 
Goulard.  Significant outcomes from the debate 
included:  further definition of the new French 
Biotech Council charged with evaluating and 
authorizing biotech products and expansion of its 
communication function; support for proposed 
coexistence measures including no-fault liability 
and a compensation pool; and rejection of 
amendments proposing the creation of GMO free 
regions.  The final text voted by the Senate will 
be sent to the National Assembly in mid May.  If 
the National Assembly adopts the same version a 
final law could be ready before the Parliamentary 
summer recess.  Any changes made by the National 
Assembly would require additional readings which 
could delay the final law until fall.  End 
Summary. 
 
2.  (U) As indicated in reftel, the Biotech Bill 
is France's transposition of EU Directives 1998/81 
and 2001/18 (regulating the authorization of GMOs 
for confined use and for their release into the 
environment) into French law.  It further 
streamlines the French regulation of GMOs and 
introduces new rules on GM and conventional crop 
coexistence. 
 
3.  (U) Opponents to the Bill, including most 
Socialist, Communist and Green Senators, resent 
the way that heavy penalties for failure to enact 
EU directives are driving France to enact biotech 
measures.  Nevertheless, the opposition was open 
to measures allowing research in confined 
environments but were against open field testing 
and commercial production.  By contrast, Senators 
from the majority political party (UMP, 
traditionally considered conservative) were open 
to research in open fields and commercial 
production.  Centrist Senators were more 
hesitating to take firm positions one way or the 
other. 
 
4.  (U) In total, legislators presented 221 
amendments to the bill. 
 
------------------- 
General Amendments: 
------------------- 
The general amendments mentioned the precautionary 
principle in the text, requested an increase in 
the budget for public research on plant 
biotechnology, and banned commercial production of 
biotech crops and open-field testing and 
restricted research to confined environments. 
 
5.  (U) These amendments were all defeated.  The 
Research Minister insisted that the Bill was under 
the umbrella of the precautionary principle, which 
provided the necessary guarantees to authorize 
open field testing and commercial production of 
biotech crops. 
 
 
------------------------------------------ 
Amendments Relative to Public Information: 
------------------------------------------ 
 
6.  (U) Some amendments called for the 
Biotechnology Council to increase communication. 
The Senate voted to form a Biotech Committee (in 
French, "Haut Conseil des Biotechnologies"), which 
would include a scientific and a socio-economic 
section. Members of the scientific section would 
have to declare their connections with biotech 
companies or organizations.  The scientific 
section would be charged with evaluating biotech 
products prior to their authorization, while the 
socio-economic section would concentrate on the 
economic and social impacts of adopting a 
biotechnology. 
 
7. (U) An amendment to create local committees to 
monitor biotech test plots at the community level 
and provide more public information was defeated. 
Instead, the Senate directed that the Biotech 
Committee should provide information on a national 
and local level to mayors of the communities where 
open field test plots are located. 
 
8. (U) The Senate agreed to adopt measures to help 
avoid destructions of open field test plots. 
Note: Although belonging to a political group 
generally hostile to open field testing, the 
Senator who proposed this amendment is elected 
from the region where the leading French planting 
seed company (Limagrain) is located (Puy de Dome). 
 
-------------------------- 
Amendments on Coexistence: 
-------------------------- 
 
9.  (U) Coexistence liability measures passed by 
the Senate included a no-fault liability regime 
and a government-managed compensation pool funded 
by farmers' contributions (to be replaced by a 
private insurance regime after 5 years). 
 
10.  (U) Amendments requiring that the seed 
industry contribute to the coexistence liability 
compensation fund passed, however, no specific 
value for such contribution was indicated in the 
text adopted by the Senate. 
 
11.  (U) Senators rejected amendments banning GMOs 
from Appellation of Origin (AOC) regions.  Many 
consider GMOs a threat to high quality logos like 
AOC and the European Geographical Indicators.  The 
amendments were finally rejected because the 
Research Minister (1) said they would not comply 
with the European regulation; and (2) explained 
that the Institute in charge of Appellations of 
Origin (INAO) has the authority to recommend or 
require the absence of biotech products in the 
zones where AOC products are produced. 
 
---------- 
Next Steps 
---------- 
 
12. (SBU) On March 23, the Senate, by a vote of 
166 to 127, adopted a final text (the "Petite 
Loi").  Originally, the GOF had announced that the 
Parliament would use an emergency process to adopt 
the Biotech Bill so that both Chambers of the 
Parliament (Senate and National Assembly) would 
examine the Bill once, instead of twice, under the 
regular process. 
 
13. (SBU) However, the French Government (GOF) 
backed down under pressure from anti-biotech 
activists and accepted two readings of the Bill by 
both Chambers.  This means that the text adopted 
by the Senate will be presented to the National 
Assembly in the second half of May for a second 
reading.  If necessary, the Senate will do a third 
reading in June and the National Assembly will 
have a final reading in September or October. 
14. (SBU) Senator Jean Bizet, UMP (party of the 
majority, generally considered conservative and 
overall pro-biotech), the Senate rapporterur for 
the Biotech Bill, recently indicated to Ag 
Officials that his party will continue to try to 
accelerate the process.  Their hope is that the 
National Assembly will adopt a version of the Bill 
similar to the Senate's and then no additional 
readings will be needed by the Chambers.   Under 
this scenario, a Law could be adopted before the 
Parliamentary summer recess. 
 
15.  (SBU) Senator Bizet, though, admits that the 
vote in the National Assembly will be more 
difficult and controversial than the Senate.  Of 
interest, the rapporteur selected for the Biotech 
Bill in the National Assembly, Patrick Ollier, 
UMP, is not a biotech specialist, but is the 
President of the Economic Affairs Committee in the 
National Assembly.  His nomination indicates that 
the GOF is making the biotech issue a political 
issue supported by the current political majority. 
 
Stapleton