Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06MANILA1862, GRP ADOPTS CONFLICTED BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORK

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MANILA1862.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06MANILA1862 2006-04-28 08:50 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Manila
VZCZCXRO7776
RR RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHML #1862/01 1180850
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 280850Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY MANILA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0773
INFO RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 1259
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHZS/ASEAN COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MANILA 001862 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EB/TPP/ABT FOR SPIRNAK AND GOETHERT 
STATE PASS USDA/FAS/ITP FOR SIMMONS, RICHEY AND CLARKSON 
ICD FOR PETLOCK 
STATE PASS USTR FOR BWEISEL, MSANDLER AND DKATZ 
STATE PASS USAID FOR JLEWIS 
STATE PASS USDOC FOR 4430/ITA/MAC/KBOYD 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ETRD ECON SENV TBIO TSPL RP
SUBJECT:  GRP ADOPTS CONFLICTED BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORK 
 
REF: 05 Manila 12 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, NOT FOR INTERNET, PROTECT 
ACCORDINGLY 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary.  President Arroyo issued an executive 
order (EO) adopting the National Biosafety Framework 
(NBF) as a compliance mechanism under the Cartagena 
Protocol on Biosafety (CPB).  The NBF, a compromise 
between pro- and anti-biotech policy makers, promulgates 
conflicting principles in recognizing the need for 
science-based risk assessments while allowing social, 
cultural, and ethical considerations to guide biosafety 
decisions.  Adding non-science based requirements could 
make the existing regulatory system more restrictive, 
complicated, and detrimental to GRP Department of 
Agriculture and donor efforts to use biotechnology to 
promote agricultural productivity and food security. 
Without a funding mechanism, however, implementation of 
the EO will likely stall.  End Summary 
 
------------------------------------ 
National Biosafety Framework Adopted 
------------------------------------ 
 
2.  (U) President Gloria Arroyo recently signed EO 514, 
establishing the National Biosafety Framework (NBF), 
prescribing guidelines for its implementation, and 
strengthening the National Committee on Biosafety of the 
Philippines (NCBP).  The GRP approved the new framework 
despite DA, industry, and Post advocacy to use solely 
science-based assessments and move out socio-economic 
considerations from the coverage of the NBF (reftel).  As 
a compromise, the drafters of the EO regarded non-science 
based assessments as discretionary provisions (versus 
mandatory as found in earlier versions of the NBF) that 
agencies may choose to require from technology 
developers.  The EO also clarified that the 2002 DA 
Administrative Order No. 8 or the commercialization 
guidelines shall continue to be in force and applied in 
the evaluation and monitoring of plant and plant products 
derived from modern biotechnology, assuaging industry 
fears that the EO would disrupt the existing regulatory 
system. 
 
3.  (U) The NCBP, a multi-sectoral committee chaired by 
the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), was 
tasked to oversee implementation of the NBF and set 
scientific, technical, and procedural standards on 
biosafety.  The committee is composed of the secretaries 
of the Departments of Agriculture, Health (DOH), 
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Foreign Affairs 
(DFA), Trade and Industry (DTI), and Interior and Local 
Government (DILG); biological, physical, environmental, 
health, and social scientists; and representatives from 
consumer, community (such as farmer, fishermen, or 
indigenous people), and industry groups. 
 
4.  (U) The NBF is the Philippines' compliance mechanism 
to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB).  Framers of 
the NBF contend that the framework will strengthen 
current science-based determination of biosafety and 
enhance decision-making by incorporating social, 
economic, ethical and cultural assessments. 
------------------------- 
New Administrative Set-up 
------------------------- 
 
5.  (U)  NCBP reorganization to include DTI, DFA, DILG, 
and appoint representatives from consumers and industry 
could be completed in early 2008.  In the meantime, NCBP- 
member agencies will continue to perform their regulatory 
functions, as follows: 
 
-- DOST will ensure that best available science is 
utilized in adopting biosafety policies, measures and 
guidelines and will take the lead in evaluating and 
monitoring biotech articles intended for use in 
laboratories and greenhouses. 
 
-- DA will address biosafety issues in promoting 
agricultural productivity and food security and will take 
 
MANILA 00001862  002 OF 003 
 
 
the lead in evaluating and monitoring plants and plant 
products derived from biotechnology. 
 
-- DENR will ensure that environmental impact assessments 
are considered in biosafety decisions and will take the 
lead in evaluating and monitoring biotech articles 
intended for bioremediation and genetic and wildlife 
resources improvement. 
 
-- DOH will formulate health assessment guidelines and 
will take the lead in evaluating and monitoring processed 
food derived from or containing biotech products. 
 
6.  (U)  As required under Article 19 of the CPB, DFA is 
the focal point for liaising with the Protocol's 
Secretariat.  The above-mentioned agencies were also 
 
SIPDIS 
designated as competent national authorities for 
performing administrative functions under the Protocol. 
The NCBP Secretariat was designated the focal point for 
the Biosafety Clearinghouse, in compliance with Article 
20 of the CPB.  It will coordinate with the Protected 
Areas and Wildlife Bureau (PAWB), an attached agency to 
the DENR and the focal point for the Clearinghouse 
Mechanism under the Convention on Biological Diversity. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
Conflict Between Social and Scientific Principles 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
 
7.  (U)  The EO recognized several widely accepted guides 
to biosafety decision-making.  It prescribed that risk 
assessments must be science-based and carried out on a 
case-by-case basis or applied to a "transformation 
event."  In addition, consistent with WTO Sanitary and 
Phytosanitary harmonization rules, the EO reasserted the 
importance of expert advice from international bodies and 
regulatory authorities of countries with experience in 
biotechnology.  The EO also subscribed to a more flexible 
"precautionary" approach in Articles 10 and 11 of the CPB 
that the lack of scientific knowledge or consensus does 
not indicate a particular level of acceptable risk. 
 
8.  (SBU)  On the other hand, the EO adopted several 
other principles that directly conflict with science- 
based standards.  For example, the EO drew from Article 
28 of the CBP in permitting social, economic, ethical, 
and cultural assessments prior to commercialization.  The 
EO also gave flexibility for GRP agencies to jointly 
issue environmental impact assessment guidelines as a 
requirement for biosafety decision-making.  These 
additional requirements may be inconsistent with WTO 
principles and would likely lengthen the approval process 
and make the regulatory system tedious and prone to 
corruption.  It could also make it more expensive for the 
private sector and public institutions -- which rely on 
meager national government budgets -- to commercialize 
their biotech innovations. 
 
------------------ 
Industry Reactions 
------------------ 
 
9.  (SBU) Monsanto, an American company, is concerned 
that as a result of the EO, biotech commercialization 
rules may become more restrictive and arbitrary.  The 
company anticipates difficulty renewing its permit to 
commercially propagate Bt corn (MON810, the first biotech 
food crop approved for commercial release in Asia), which 
will expire in 2007.  They are particularly worried about 
the DENR's environmental impact assessment system, which 
they perceive as prone to corruption.  Biotech Coalition 
of the Philippines President Ben Pecson was surprised 
that the President signed the EO after it had languished 
in her office for nearly two years.  He said the EO is 
inconsistent with the national policy to promote the use 
of biotechnology to address economic development goals. 
 
------------------------ 
Another Unfunded Mandate 
------------------------ 
 
10. (SBU)  The reorganization of the NCBP will commence 
 
MANILA 00001862  003 OF 003 
 
 
only after an inter-agency group concludes an agreement 
to share financial and technical resources.  Without its 
own funds, the NCBP would have to rely on ad hoc 
allocations from member agencies or external funding to 
implement the NBF and embark on capacity building 
programs identified in the EO.  The DENR-PAWB is 
requesting additional funding from the United Nations 
Environmental Program's Global Environment Facility (UNEP- 
GEF) to implement the EO, just as it did a $175,000 grant 
in 2003 to develop the NBF.  PAWB officials said the 
signing of the EO is an important milestone in securing 
additional funding for capacity building.  Another is 
ratification of the CPB by the Senate, which started 
hearings and will likely ratify before the end of the 
year. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
11.  (SBU)  DENR and anti-biotech NGOs succeeded in 
securing the legal basis for adding non-science based 
assessments in the biosafety regulatory system.  Although 
the NBF is toned down from earlier versions, it could 
complicate the biotech regulatory system and delay 
approvals for the use of GM products.  Under the new 
rules, the biosafety assessment process -- from 
greenhouse to single site to multi-site to commercial 
release -- could take at least two years to complete. 
Approvals could take much longer if required to address 
non-science based considerations.  The adoption of the EU- 
like provisions could undermine the Philippines' 
leadership role in agricultural biotechnology in Asia. 
Post will continue to monitor developments and work with 
the GRP and industry partners in assessing the EO's 
impacts on the biotech policy environment. 
 
KENNEY