Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06TOKYO1616, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 03/28/06
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TOKYO1616.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06TOKYO1616 | 2006-03-28 08:13 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO3843
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1616/01 0870813
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 280813Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0209
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/COMPATWING ONE KAMI SEYA JA
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7987
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5352
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8503
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 5363
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6536
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1363
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7541
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 9496
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 16 TOKYO 001616
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST
DIVISION; TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS
OFFICE; SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
ADVISOR; CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 03/28/06
INDEX:
(1) Poll of LDP lawmakers on post-Koizumi candidates; Abe tops
list; Consumption tax a major issue
(2) Yasukuni issue likely to become major campaign issue for LDP
presidential race; Abe and his support group changes
(3) Light and shadow of what "Koizumi politics" has created over
the past five years - Changing society (part 1): Economy has
recovered but many of the weak left behind due to transitional
pain, competition
(4) Light and shadow of Koizumi politics-- five years of
accomplishments (part 2): Regional disparity - urban areas
enjoying prosperity, while regional communities stagnant
(5) USFJ realignment: Japan should not flinch from negotiating
relocation cost
(6) Iwakuni and Okinawa plebiscites exhibited need for government
to offer explanations fairly and squarely; Sources of distrust
must not be expanded
(7) Beef imports from Mexico, China gradually increasing, though
BSE risk remains unknown
(8) BSE risk: Structural defects found in US inspection system;
Safety procedures must be observed to reduce BSE risk
ARTICLES:
(1) Poll of LDP lawmakers on post-Koizumi candidates; Abe tops
list; Consumption tax a major issue
SANKEI (Page 1) (Abridged slightly)
March 28, 2006
The Sankei Shimbun has conducted an opinion poll of the 408 Upper
and Lower House members belonging to the Liberal Democratic Party
(LDP) to find out the trend for the party's presidential election
in September. The results showed that Chief Cabinet Secretary
Shinzo Abe was the front-runner for the LDP presidency,
underpinning his popularity in public opinion polls and in the
LDP. Many also cited fiscal reconstruction and policy toward Asia
as major policy issues. Heated debates are likely to occur in the
post-Koizumi race on both the domestic and diplomatic fronts.
The survey was conducted on March 16-27. Replies came back from a
total of 161 lawmakers: 136 from the Lower House and 25 from the
Upper House. The retrieval rate was 39.5%.
Of them, 91 named specific individuals as fit to become the LDP's
new president. Possible presidential candidates were named in the
following order: (1) Shinzo Abe by 27 members; (2) former Health,
Labor and Welfare Minister Bunmei Ibuki (head of the Ibuki
faction) by 14; (3) Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki (head of
the Tanigaki faction) by 12; (4) former Chief Cabinet Secretary
Yasuo Fukuda by 11; (5) Foreign Minister Taro Aso by 10; and (6)
former LDP Vice President Taku Yamasaki by seven.
Abe has been boasting national popularity in a variety of public
opinion polls. The results reflected the strong expectations of
TOKYO 00001616 002 OF 016
junior and mid-level lawmakers, in addition to the Mori faction
where he belongs.
The list of policy issues was topped by fiscal reconstruction
including the consumption tax, with 100 lawmakers citing it. The
choice offered a glimpse into the lawmakers' strong interest in a
tax hike, the issue that may affect the future of the
administration, with the Upper House lection scheduled to take
place next year. Eighty lawmakers pointed out policy toward Asia,
including the Yasukuni issue, and 62 people cited the
continuation and revision of the Koizumi structural reform drive.
Regarding specific policy issues, 64 said the government must
decide on a consumption tax hike during the term of the next
prime minister, while 66 said such was unnecessary. The outcome
clearly reflected the conflict between the government and the
LDP.
Additionally, 70 people said that the next prime minister should
visit Yasukuni Shrine, while 36 opposed to a shrine visit.
The list of qualities required of the new leader was topped by
policy capability with 115 members mentioning it, followed by
strong presence for elections, abundant experience in politics,
and top-down leadership.
(2) Yasukuni issue likely to become major campaign issue for LDP
presidential race; Abe and his support group changes
ASAHI (Page 2) (Full)
March 28, 2006
Hidenao Nakagawa scrambling for prior settlement
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi and potential candidates to
succeed Koizumi, including Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe,
have stated in chorus that the issue of visits to Yasukuni Shrine
by prime minister should not be made a major campaign issue in
the September presidential election of the Liberal Democratic
Party (LDP). However, the view is now becoming stronger in LDP
regional chapters that presidential candidates should talk about
their own Asia policy. Such a local perception is now reflected
in LDP headquarters. The local move has boosted the momentum of
former Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda, and it has brought
about a strategic change to Abe and his supporters.
In a meeting on March 22 at the Hotel New Otani in Tokyo, LDP
Policy Research Council Chairman Hidenao Nakagawa told Chon
Bichien, director of the reform and liberalization forum, who is
regarded as a brain-trust advisor to Chinese President Hu Jintao:
"Since Foreign Minister Taro Aso is a Christian, he does not care
about visiting Yasukuni Shrine. Mr. Abe has not visited the
shrine since he assumed the chief cabinet secretary's post."
During the meeting, Nakagawa suggested a summit between Prime
Minister Junichiro Koizumi and President Hu, which the Chinese
government has refused to hold. He apparently wants to put an end
to the Yasukuni issue while Koizumi is in office in order to have
Abe, whom he sees the most suitable person, smoothly succeed
Koizumi.
Should Asia policy becomes a main campaign issue and if Abe
TOKYO 00001616 003 OF 016
mishandles the Yasukuni issue, he might be placed at a
disadvantage in the presidential race. In consideration of the
suspended talks between the top leaders of Japan and China,
Nakagawa is now shifting a focus on a breakthrough of the
political deadlock.
On Feb. 23, Nakagawa along with New Komeito policy chief
Yoshihisa Inoue, who also wants to put an end to the Yasukuni
issue, met in Beijing with Chon. During the meeting, Nakagawa
said to Chon, "If the Yasukuni issue becomes a main issue in the
presidential election, the issue will not be resolved as you have
hoped in consideration of Japanese public opinion." Inoue said,
"As a result of a summit between Prime Minister Koizumi and
President Hu, Koizumi's successor will not go to Yasukuni
Shrine."
Nakagawa and Inoue called on Chon to take a forward-looking
approach. The two meant that if the environment for a summit were
prepared, the next prime minister would be able to choose not to
visit the Shinto shrine. Chon dismissed the suggestion. He
argued: "Who can guarantee the next prime minister will not pay
homage at Yasukuni Shrine? Prime Minister has so far visited the
shrine five times."
The Chinese side cannot easily accept Nakagawa's proposal.
Koizumi stated yesterday, stressing his pet view, "Because I
visit Yasukuni Shrine, China does not hold a summit. I cannot
understand this."
Abe cautious about remarks
The focus is now on Abe's movements. Abe is regarded as having
hawkish foreign and security policies.
At a press conference held immediately after he assumed the chief
cabinet secretary post, Abe stated, "I have visited Yasukuni
Shrine as a Japanese national. I would like to continue to keep
this feeling." A lawmaker, who has close ties with Abe commented,
"He will visit the shrine even after he becomes prime minister."
On the advice of business leaders, however, he has refrained from
clarifying his view since he assumed his post. He recently
reiterated: "I would like to continue to have the feeling of
paying my respect to those who died for the nation."
Appearing on a TV Tokyo program on March 24, Abe criticized the
Chinese leadership, noting, "Not closing summit and foreign
minister-level communication channels shows the wisdom of a
mature country. It is wrong to suspend the talks between top
leaders." Meanwhile, he expressed enthusiasm for repairing the
strained bilateral ties through technical cooperation in the
energy area.
Calls have grown in political circles for Abe to make a policy
shift.
Former Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori recently talked about the
possibility of Abe visiting Yasukuni Shrine: "I think he will not
visit the shrine. I believe he will make a decision after
considering the timing, condition and place."
A veteran lawmaker said:
TOKYO 00001616 004 OF 016
"If he visits the shrine before the presidential race, that would
become a contentious issue. If he goes there after becoming prime
minister, his government would be shaken. Therefore, he should
choose a realistic option."
If Abe weakens his political identity, his popularity may
decline. A junior lawmaker close to Abe said, "I've heard that he
would express his determination to visit the shrine when he
declares his candidacy for the presidential race. Otherwise, he
will lose his policy imprint.
Foreign Minister Taro Aso, another post-Koizumi contender,
indicated that he would refrain from visiting Yasukuni Shrine. He
recently said, "National interests take preference over personal
interests."
Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki, a possible successor to
Koizumi, remains unclear about his intentions regarding the
Yasukuni issue. He unsuccessfully sought a meeting with a Chinese
leader on the sidelines of recent Japan-China finance ministerial
talks in Beijing. He is eager to improve relations with China.
The existence of Yasuo Fukuda, who has gained public support even
though he denies he is a candidate, has induced changes in the
stances of Abe, Aso and Tanigaki. Fukuda has made it clear he
would repair the strained ties between Japan and China and Japan
and South Korea. According to the result of Asahi Shimbun's March
poll, 20% of the respondents said that Fukuda would be the
suitable person to be the next prime minister, while 47% said Abe
would be the best for the post.
An anti-Abe lawmaker was happy with the 20% support for Fukuda,
saying, "It has now become clear that the Yasukuni issue could be
the top issue in the presidential race. Fukuda may yet be able to
defeat Abe."
(3) Light and shadow of what "Koizumi politics" has created over
the past five years - Changing society (part 1): Economy has
recovered but many of the weak left behind due to transitional
pain, competition
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Top play and page 2) (Full)
March 26, 2006
Five years ago, with the country increasingly distrustful of
politics, the Koizumi administration came into power, winning
exuberant support from the public. Its political style has
significantly changed the paradigm of the Japanese society. The
economy has succeeded in overcoming the long slump that had
continued since the burst of the economic bubble around 1990. But
the new competition-oriented policies have given rise to such
adverse-effects as dividing the society into winners and losers,
as well as widening the economic gap between big cities and rural
areas. What was "Koizumi politics" anyway? With the approval of
the fiscal 2006 budget bill on March 27, political challengers
who want to succeed Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi are likely
to pick up steam and start campaigning (for the Liberal
Democratic Party presidential election scheduled for September).
Before the campaign starts, the Tokyo Shimbun probes into what
has actually happened over the past five years.
Balance of reforms
TOKYO 00001616 005 OF 016
"When will the end of the rainy season be announced?" A somewhat
out-of-season remark is beginning to come out from some
government officials at Japan's government offices district,
Kasumigaseki, Tokyo, since this the time when the cherry trees
are beginning to bloom.
The Japanese economy, which has suffered from deflation for
years, is clearly on a recovery track now -- in terms of economic
indicators and corporate performances. Can Prime Minister Koizumi
crown the last phase of his tenure before stepping down in
September by declaring that Japan's departure from deflation?
This question, in part because of its political implications, is
drawing attention.
At a time when the economy was worsening, the Koizumi
administration came into existence waving the banner of
structural reform. In the fall of 2002, it adopted a tough policy
aimed at speeding up the disposal of sour bank loans, which had
crippled the economy. The administration's goal was to halve the
ratios of nonperforming loans held by major banks by the end of
March 2005.
Business leaders and politicians were quick to erupt into anger
against the reforms. In the spring of 2003, the Nikkei Stock
Average dipped below the 8,000 yen level. Not only there was an
increase in the number of bankruptcies but the number of suicides
due to financial difficulties also jumped. Moral decay was
noticeable, and heinous crimes broke out frequently across the
country. But the stock market started to rise once the government
made a decision to inject public money into the Resona Group.
Leading banks one after the other began to restructure, and
distinguished firms like Daiei were driven to the verge of
bankruptcy. But owing to their efforts, they achieved the goal of
halving their bad loans by the end of March 2005.
Banking institutions are likened to the blood of the economy.
When their businesses return to normal, the economy, too, comes
to life. Big banks have recovered their business performances so
remarkably that they are even being criticized now as making too
much profit. They are turning around their previous recruitment
scheme to an offensive one, departing from the long constraint on
hiring new graduates.
"It's no good to ask for everything from the government." Late
last year Koizumi made this remark in a speech at a symposium
hosted by an economic organization. This remark is indeed what
Koizumi has insisted on in his effort to promote economic
revitalization.
Koizumi urged firms to dispose of their nonperforming loans using
their own efforts, so he did not implement any notable economic
stimulus packages for them. He had no choice but to do so perhaps
because of fiscal difficulties on the government side, but this
attitude made corporate executives definitely determined to
think, "We no longer can depend on the government."
Steel, once a star industry, is enjoying an unprecedented boom
now. This is the result of their internal reforms by repeating
restructuring and streamlining.
Looking back on past years, Fumio Sudo, president of the JFE
Holdings, a leading steel firm that was born by the merger of NKK
Corp. and Kawasaki Steel in September 2002, remarked: "Prime
TOKYO 00001616 006 OF 016
Minister Koizumi continued to signal a message that he would
destroy old mechanisms. Private firms had the sense of crisis
that the only way to survive would be self-reliant efforts. His
message and this sense of crisis were both heading for the same
direction." On the other hand, there are some who take a cool
view that it is incorrect to say that the economy has revived
owing to structural reforms, arguing: "(Mr. Koizumi) happened to
be in office during the recovery cycle of the economy." But it
seems possible to judge him as fulfilling his responsibility to a
certain degree for the consequences of the most challenging task
for his administration, even though he may be seen as a "lucky
prime minister" helped by favorable winds, such as special
procurement demand from China.
"I hope reforms will be carried out without causing pain,"
Koizumi said after inspecting in mid-January a small firm
manufacturing medical injection needles at Sumida Ward, Tokyo.
Firms that survived the pain have succeeded in restructuring
their businesses, but firms that were unable to do so were forced
to go bankrupt. Middle-aged and older unemployed citizens were
walking the streets. "No growth without reforms" -- under this
buzzword, some successfully opened up new business opportunities
to become winners, but there are many losers, too, who even now
remain unable to get out of the mire.
The strong enjoy more benefits in a society with widening
disparity; Long struggle for employment after corporate
restructuring-caused layoffs
"People who are here are still lucky. Those who have abandoned
their efforts to find a job do not come here." A 58-year-old man
who we will call Shoichi Takahashi, made this remark at the job
placement agency, Hello Work Shinjuku, located on the 23rd floor
of a skyscraper at the West Exit of JR Shinjuku Station, Tokyo.
Takahashi every morning from Monday through Saturday travels to
the agency from Kasukabe City, Saitama Prefecture, to look for a
job.
Six years ago, Takahashi worked at a small firm manufacturing
mailing machines. He was in charge of quality and production
control, but he was forced to resign due to the company's layoff
program. Since then he has been looking for a job.
Finding a job is not easy for people in their fifties like
Takahashi. In most cases, he has been unable to get interviews
because he fails to meet the qualifications, for instance,
because of his lack of experience or his age.
So far Takahashi has twice found a part-time job concerned with
quality and production control. But after two weeks after working
as a part-timer, he was forced to quit because he did not get
along with the regular workers.
Looking back on that, Takahashi said: "Other workers kept away
from me presumably because I had worked in a similar post in the
past."
Since then he has been unemployed. With no one to depend on and
living alone, he ended up on welfare three years ago. Setting
aside the room rent, he has to live on 70,000 yen per month.
Families on welfare like Takahashi reached 1,051,676 households
TOKYO 00001616 007 OF 016
as of December 2005. The number of such families has jumped from
777,638 households in April 2001, when the Koizumi administration
came into existence.
Various statistics vividly demonstrate that the public has been
hard up for money over the past five years since the Koizumi
cabinet was launched.
The average income of the head of a family (periodic income
excluding bonuses) was 373,321 yen per month in April 2001, but
it slipped to 350,099 yen in January 2006. The percentage of
households that said, "We have no savings," was 12.4% in 2000 but
in 2005, recorded 23.8%, the highest ever.
Companies are boosting profits, while households are badly off.
Dai-ichi Life Research Institute Senior Economist Naoki Iizuka
gives this analysis: "That is the result that companies that were
unable to pay the personnel costs pursued restructuring."
According to this institute's estimation, the labor distribution
rate, which indicates how much companies allocate their operating
income and other profits for the personnel expenses, began
dropping in the latter half of 2002, the year after the Koizumi
administration came into being. In the Oct.-Dec. quarter of 2005,
this rate came to 62.8%, the same level immediately after the
burst of the economic bubble around 1992. The decline in this
rate is negatively affecting those who were left out of the
benefits of the reforms like Takahashi. It is not easy for them
to rejoin the game.
However, responding to the criticism that (his reforms) are
widening social disparity, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi
argues: "(Disparity) is not necessarily a bad thing." "Even
though the gap is widened, if the minimum level of safety net is
prepared, it's not that hard for capable persons to get a bigger
slice of the pie," he adds.
What is felt from Koizumi's remarks is the nature of his reforms
that in order to attain the goal of economic growth, it is an
unavoidable choice to give a boost first to the strong and leave
measures for the weak on the back burner.
Asked about the so-called Koizumi reforms, Takahashi said: "I
don't agree with them. The disparity is widening. It seems our
society is getting worse."
(4) Light and shadow of Koizumi politics-- five years of
accomplishments (part 2): Regional disparity - urban areas
enjoying prosperity, while regional communities stagnant
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Excerpts)
March 27, 2006
Omotesando Hills (a huge multipurpose complex consisting of six
floors above ground and six below), the newest fashionable
shopping site in Tokyo, which opened in February, is crowded with
as many as 60,000 to 70,000 shoppers on weekends. There are 93
tenant shops and restaurants in the complex. Among the tenants, a
coffee shop sells a chocolate drink at almost 2,000 yen and
another shop carries pet bugs, the prices of one species being
more than 100,000 yen. Despite such expensive products, sales of
the shopping mall for the first month after the opening exceeded
1.4 times the estimated level. A spokesman of the management
TOKYO 00001616 008 OF 016
office said excitedly, "We can actually feel the economic
recovery."
The downtown sections of Tokyo have been exploding in a rush of
redevelopment projects since 2001. Whenever new buildings were
built, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visited them -- New
Marunouchi Building (Marubiru), Shiodome Shiosite and Roppongi
Hills.
Koizumi said, "Such good buildings are being built and they are
always crowded with many people. I cannot believe Japan's economy
is in a slump."
However, there are few shoppers even in the evening shopping in
the downtown area in front of the US base in the city of Misawa
in Aomori Prefecture, where the local residents suffer from the
noise of US aircraft. Many shops in the one-kilometer-long
shopping street have closed their shutters.
In addition to the continued business slump, the reason is
because many people go to large-scale retail shops built in the
suburbs of Misawa City.
As part of fiscal reconstruction, Prime Minister Koizumi has
drastically cut public works projects since he assumed office.
Koizumi's fiscal reconstruction drive has hit hard Aomori, a
prefecture whose economy greatly depends on public projects.
The budget for public works projects for fiscal 2006 in that
prefecture is only 55%of what it was in 2001 when Koizumi assumed
office. Another serious problem is the drop in the number of
private housing starts, including condominiums.
The regional economic slump greatly affects employment. Aomori
Prefecture's active job opening to applicant ratio for 2005 was
0.40, marking the lowest rate across the country for four years
in a row. There are obvious gaps with the large cities such as
the urbanized Aichi Prefecture's 1.67, and Tokyo's 1.38. Aomori's
jobless rate was highest for three consecutive years until last
year.
The Koizumi government has promoted the so-called "trinity
reform" that would rearrange the taxation and fiscal relations
between the central and local governments. Regional areas where
there are a few large companies, however, have suffered from a
reduction in state subsidies.
The government has reduced its subsidies to Aomori Prefecture by
37.6 billion yen over the past three years starting in fiscal
ΒΆ2004. Therefore, the budgets for commerce and industry and
agriculture-forestry-fisheries industries were drastically cut.
The prefecture was able to use freely only 400 million yen in tax
revenues.
While large cities enjoy prosperity, regional areas are suffering
even worse than ever from the economic slump.
(5) USFJ realignment: Japan should not flinch from negotiating
relocation cost
ASAHI (Page 15) (Full)
March 25, 2006
TOKYO 00001616 009 OF 016
Kazuhisa Ogawa, military analyst
Japan and the United States are now about to enter into the final
phase of intergovernmental coordination over the realignment of
US forces in Japan. One of the major issues pending in the talks
is where to relocate the heliport functions of the US Marine
Corps' Futenma airfield in Okinawa Prefecture. Another big issue
is how to share the cost of moving US Marines from Okinawa to
Guam. Senior officials from the Japanese and US governments met
early this month. On that occasion, the United States asked Japan
to pay 75% of the Guam relocation cost estimated at 10 billion
dollars, or approximately 1.18 trillion yen, in order for the
Okinawa-based US Marines to move 8,000 troops. However, the
Japanese government deemed it impossible to foot such a bill in a
March 16 meeting of cabinet ministers. All eyes are now on h,Q_Qu#BjT^9Qj9!Xfan to shoulder an appropriate burden for it was Japan that
first proposed alleviating Okinawa's burden of hosting US
military bases, while securing its alliance with the United
States.
In April 1996, the Japanese and US governments reached an
agreement to return Futenma airfield. Since then, I have
suggested the need for the Japanese government to resolve other
US military base issues in Okinawa and work out a package of
drastic economic stimulus measures for Okinawa's self-
sustainability. In Okinawa, the presence of US Marine ground
troops has been the object of local resentment. I have advocated
readying them in the rear for rapid deployment instead of
stationing them on that island prefecture, while thinking to
myself that Japan should pay for it in an appropriate way. Their
transferal to Guam is based on a similar idea.
Even so, what if Japan refuses Uncle Sam? That's always been a
matter of primary concern to Tokyo. Japanese government officials
might be thinking to themselves that in that case, the United
States might even abrogate its security treaty with Japan. If
they negotiate with their US counterparts while thinking that
way, Japan would have to pay as much money as the United States
wants. There's no doubt that the talks will be settled with the
United States making some concessions. However, if Japan
underlines its national interests based on objective views as
noted below, it should be possible for Japan to hold down its
cost sharing to below 50%. Japan's diplomatic skills will now be
truly tested.
Even among US allies, Japan is situated in the most strategically
important place. Washington has always feared that Tokyo might
call off the bilateral alliance. In fact, the United States has
always been worried about Japanese sensitivities every time there
has been a crime or an accident involving US military personnel.
It's a far cry from its attitude toward other allies in similar
incidents. Japan has become even more important in the US
military's global transformation intended to deal with newly
emerging threats following the 9-11 terrorist attacks.
Aside from how to interpret the scope of the Far East described
in the Japan-US Security Treaty, the Japanese archipelago has
capabilities to back up US military operations in the hemisphere
ranging from Hawaii to the Cape of Good Hope on the southern
extremity of Africa, and it forms a strategic base like the bases
TOKYO 00001616 010 OF 016
on the US mainland. The Japanese people currently shoulder an
annual burden of approximately 600 billion yen for the stationing
of US forces in Japan, including 240 billion yen from its
omoiyari yosan or literally "sympathy budget" slot. This host
nation support financially buttresses the US forces in Japan.
However, there is an even more important factor for the United
States. Japan is the only country that can provide strategic
bases in this hemisphere. US forces deploying on a massive scale
in this sphere are equipped with state-of-the-art weapons. Only a
country with industrial, technological, and financial power at
the same level with the United States can support their presence
and can remain a strategic linchpin for them in the region. There
can be no country but Japan to meet that requirement.
In the event Japan calls off the alliance, the United States,
which cannot expect to secure any alternatives for its strategic
bases in Japan, would lose about 80% of its power projection
capabilities. If so, the United States can no longer remain the
only superpower. Russia and China wouldn't comply with the United
States. Eventually, the United States will be just a lonely big
power.
Indeed, Japan has much to lose should it dissolve the alliance.
In this case, Japan would need to make up for the US military
presence with its own military capabilities. To do so, Japan will
have to spend a huge amount of money. Furthermore, such an option
is even likely to result in isolating Japan in the international
community. However, the United States will lose much more and can
no longer remain the world leader. Based on this objective
perspective, Japan should display its diplomatic strength without
flinching and should set forth its own standpoints.
(6) Iwakuni and Okinawa plebiscites exhibited need for government
to offer explanations fairly and squarely; Sources of distrust
must not be expanded
MAINICHI (Page 7) (Abridged slightly)
March 22, 2006
By Nakae Ueno, Mainichi Shimbun Western News Department
Iwakuni City, Yamaguchi Prefecture, conducted a plebiscite on
March 12 in which 87% of the voters, or 51% of all the eligible
voters, said "no" to a plan to relocate US carrier-borne aircraft
to the US Marine Corps' Iwakuni Air Station in the city. Seeing
the results, I said to myself, "Will the local residents be let
down for the third time?" I have covered Nago, Okinawa
Prefecture, and Iwakuni since Tokyo and Washington adopted last
October an interim report on the realignment of US forces in
Japan. I strongly feel that if the government intends to push
ahead with US force realignment believing that the Japan-US
security system has entered a new age, it needs to spell out why
such is necessary to the people openly and squarely.
Prior to the Iwakuni poll, two local plebiscites took place in
Japan: one in 1996 in Okinawa over the propriety to realign and
downsize bases in the prefecture, and another one in 1997 in Nago
over whether to approve the construction of an alternate heliport
for Futenma Air Station. In both cases, residents said "no" to
the US bases. But immediately after the prefectural referendum,
then Okinawa Gov. Masahide Ota refused the prime minister's order
to sign papers necessary to force landowners in the prefecture to
TOKYO 00001616 011 OF 016
continue to lease land to the US military. Then Nago Mayor
Tetsuya Higa also announced shortly after the local poll that his
city would accept the construction of the heliport. Their steps
drew criticism as conflicting with the popular will.
I got a hunch from then Iwakuni Mayor Katsusuke Ihara's four
press conferences that the local residents would be "betrayed"
for the third time. Ihara's statements lacked coherence. He
described the plebiscite as a golden opportunity for Iwakuni to
determine its future course, while indicating that the
responsibility for national defense rested with the central
government. Asked if Ihara would be able to negotiate with the
central government during his term of office, he simply said, "I
will convey local views to the central government."
Ihara resigned from office on March 19, the day before Iwakuni's
merger with seven neighboring municipalities. Whether to accept
the carrier-borne unit has been a campaign issue for the April 23
mayoral election for the new city. Until then, no one will be in
charge of talks with the central government. Tokyo intends to
produce a US force realignment final report by the end of this
month. In other words, Iwakuni's popular will for a dialogue with
the central government would be left up in the air. What was the
Iwakuni plebiscite all about?
It is undeniable, however, that the two previous plebiscites
prevented the base issue, as symbolized by the Futenma
relocation, from moving forward.
In that context, I find Ihara's strategy somewhat agreeable.
Ihara, an opponent of the relocation plan, proposed the
plebiscite to challenge business circles, which were eager to
accept the relocation plan in anticipation of a hefty economic
revitalization package from the government. Ihara continued to
urge residents to go to the polls knowing that chances for
rejecting the relocation would grow with voter turnout in excess
of 50 percent.
The Iwakuni Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICCI) led by
Tokumitsu Sasagawa adopted a resolution to entice some Atsugi
base functions to the city conditioned on the construction of an
additional runway and other factors last June when Iwakuni, the
city assembly, and the seven neighboring municipalities were in
agreement to block the relocation.
An ICCI executive blamed then ICCI President Sasagawa's ambition.
In his New Year statement last year, Sasagawa painted a rosy
picture with Okinawa in mind, saying Iwakuni would benefit
tremendously from its acceptance of carrier-borne jets. The
government provided Nago and other municipalities in the northern
part of Okinawa with economic stimulus measures in return for
accepting the alternate facility for Futenma Air Station. But the
efficacy of such measures is not clear. One local head noted,
"The Okinawa Summit was held, and there were many other projects,
but all those were short-lived, like a flash in the pan."
Job-creating US bases can be helpful to revitalize local
economies on one hand, and they could also dampen local
communities' independent efforts to foster industries on the
other. The US military's strict restrictions on the height of
smokestacks and other facilities have driven major plants away
from the Iwakuni area. A strong sense of lost earnings is looming
TOKYO 00001616 012 OF 016
over Iwakuni, where people do not get any military land rent in
stark contrast to Okinawa.
It is easy for the central government to dismiss the outcome of
the Iwakuni poll as regional arrogance. But the government should
give thought to the weight the 51% of the eligible voters
carries. I believe many people feel uneasy about being embroiled
in the realignment of US forces in Japan that is said to reflect
qualitative change in the Japan-US security system. They also
resent being exposed to greater noise levels.
A man in his 60s who accepts the relocation plan commented, "The
plebiscite has awakened those citizens who may have had doubts
about the existence of the base."
If the central government firmly believes that US force
realignment is necessary for the future of Japan, it should
explain its reasons sincerely without taking advantage of local
expectations for economic packages. Otherwise, sources of
distrust in the Japan-US security system would spread across
Japan.
(7) Beef imports from Mexico, China gradually increasing, though
BSE risk remains unknown
SANKEI (Page 5) (Excerpts)
March 28, 2006
Mexican and Chinese beef imports have gradually been increasing
recently. In these countries, even a single case of BSE has not
been discovered. Some experts, though, warn that the BSE risk of
Mexican beef is as high as American beef. Japan has imported far
smaller volumes of beef from Mexico and China than imports from
Australia, but restaurant chains have begun to use beef imported
from the two countries. Japan and the US are scheduled to hold
their expert talks this week on the recent incident in which a
specified risk material (SRM) was found in a US veal shipment to
Japan. Isn't there any blind spot in the safety measures our
nation has taken to prevent BSE at the water's edge?
Japan imported about 460,000 tons of beef in 2005, of which
410,000 tons came from Australia, accounting for 90% of all.
Those from Australia and New Zealand make up 98%.
In 2003, when the first case of BSE was found in the US, Japan
imported 0.2 tons of beef from Mexico. As the ban on US beef
imports has dragged on, however, the volume increased to 1,800
tons in 2004 and 6,700 tons in 2005. This figure is 30,000 times
larger than the 0.2 tons. The volume of imports from China also
grew from 17 tons in 2003 to 27 tons in 2005.
An industry source made the following analysis on the increase of
Mexican beef imports: "there certainly is the aspect of covering
the drops in imports from the US, but the taste of Mexican beef
is similar to American beef."
Japan has attached the condition of removing SRMs but no
threshold age for importing beef from Mexico and China, taking
into consideration the fact that no case of BSE has been reported
there.
But a prion panel member has begun to suggest: "Mexico and the US
are connected by land, so the BSE risk of Mexican beef, like
TOKYO 00001616 013 OF 016
American and Canadian beef, should not be disregarded."
Immediately after the first case of BSE was announced in the US,
the US Department of Agriculture set up a team of experts from
Britain, Switzerland, New Zealand, and other countries to examine
its safeguard measures. The international survey team issued a
report with unexpectedly severe comments: "It is impossible to
draw a line between contaminated districts and clean districts in
the North American area. It is necessary to work out measures
that cover all the member countries of the North America Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA), including Mexico." A survey team of
Minshuto (Democratic Party of Japan) members also noted in its
report: "About 900,000 head of cattle, beef, and animal feed have
been traded annually between the US and Mexico."
As if to prove this, beef with the label bearing the mark
"produced in America" was found in a shipment from Mexico to
South Korea in July 2004. Following this, South Korea banned beef
imports from Mexico.
Regarding Chinese beef, as well, there are many uncertain
factors. According to the international survey team, meat-and-
bone meal that had been produced in large quantities in the US
until the first case of BSE was confirmed was exported to China,
Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Another expert commented: "A
BSE-infected case could be discovered anytime in China."
Japan requires all cows for human consumption to be tested. The
US has increased the number of cattle subject to inspection to
670,000 since June 2004. The number of inspected cows was about
3,500 in Mexico and about 3,500 in China both in 2004. A virus
expert said: "(The two countries) are negative about disclosing
information on infection diseases. The countries are black
boxes."
The Cabinet Office's Food Safety Commission (FSC) will launch a
country-specific BSE risk survey. Some give a warning
particularly about Mexico and China, a member remarking: "No case
of BSE has been reported, but there may be cattle infected with
the diseased." Reflecting such a view, a prion panel - chaired by
Yasuhiro Yoshikawa - will collect data related to production,
inspection, and distribution, and will examine to see the safety
of Mexican and Chinese beef.
Since each nation has a different inspection system, it is
difficult to compare the BSE risk of their beef in an objective
way.
When Japan resumed US beef imports, Japan attached the conditions
of importing only beef from cattle 20 months of age or younger
and removing all SMRs. For Mexican beef, Japan attaches only the
SMR-removal condition. A survey team member said: "The risk of
Mexican beef is higher than American beef." Restaurant chains
have begun to use Mexican or Chinese beef, keeping in mind the
risk of BSE infection of US beef. Focusing on this recent trend,
Chairman Yoshikawa said: "We must not ignore BSE risk on humans."
In assessing BSE risk, the FSC needs to obtain data from the
countries concerned, but it is uncertain whether Mexico and China
will respond to its call, although the US and Canada positively
responded in hopes of resuming exports.
An expert panel member was overheard saying: "It would be
TOKYO 00001616 014 OF 016
impossible to make assessments due to a lack of data. Whether to
continue imports (from Mexico and China) even under such a
situation will be decided not by scientists but by the government
in charge of risk management." Another member, though, called for
caution, remarking: "If the risk of BSE remains unknown, it is
rational to suspend imports."
An Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ministry source said: "It
is difficult to ban imports under international rules only for
the reason of there being suspicions."
Given this, the government has required meat-processing plants in
Mexico to submit the certificates of origin and has conducted
sampling tests on more than 5% of imported beef from cattle grown
in Mexico and carrying rough records.
Restaurant chains that use Mexican and Chinese beef are calling
on the government to strengthen its quarantine system. A member
of the Japan Food Service Association commented: "It will be
impossible to assess BSE risk because (Mexico and China) are
unlikely to provide data. It is essential for the government to
thoroughly manage bilateral trade."
A restaurant industry source familiar with meat-eating habits in
North America assailed:
"US has invested capital and technology in the Mexican cattle
industry, but the money and technology have not necessarily
reached the processes of production, processing, and
distribution. ... It is more important for the government to
strengthen coastal examinations, instead of adding fuel to public
concern and distrust by making a fuss, only out of scientists'
curiosity and without confirming if such assertions are true or
not."
(8) BSE risk: Structural defects found in US inspection system;
Safety procedures must be observed to reduce BSE risk
SANKEI (Page 7) (Slightly abridged)
March 26, 2006
Question by a female reader in Kanagawa Prefecture:
Case after case of BSE infection among Japanese cattle has been
discovered here. If Japan resumes US beef imports again, is the
BSE risk higher in the US product than that in Japanese beef?
Should a person eat beef from a BSE-infected cow contract the
Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD), who will assume the
responsibility?
Answer:
Both humans and animals can be infected with BSE. Should a person
eat specified risk materials (SRM), such as the brain and spinal
cord, from infected cattle, that person will die of vCJD after
showing typical clinical symptoms, such as the spongy appearance
of the brain tissue, disturbance in perception, and walking
difficulty. As of now, 169 cases of vCJD have been reported
across the world. Of them, 154 cases occurred in Britain. In
Japan, the first patient of this disease was confirmed in 2005.
It was learned that the patient (who died in 2004) had been in
Britain for about one month around 1989. He is considered to have
contacted the disease in that country.
TOKYO 00001616 015 OF 016
Though vCJD is a dreadful disease, it might not be necessary to
become excessively concerned about catching that disease. The
Cabinet Office's Food Safety Commission (FSC) estimates that vCJD
is extremely rare, and a simulation predicts that one person or
less in Japan might have picked up the disease from eating
domestic beef.
Scientific assessment difficult
Is there any difference in the level of BSE risk between American
and Japanese beef?
The Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries Ministry (MAFF) and the
Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry (MHLW) asked the FSC in May
2005 to make equivalence assessments of the BSE risk of US and
Japanese beef. As a result, the government set the following
conditions for Japan to resume US beef imports: (1) only beef
from calves 20 months of age or younger should be imported; (2)
Japan's SRM standards should be adopted, although the US has
different standards.
The prion expert study group (chaired by Yasuhiro Yoshikawa) has
finalized a report of recommendations. The report noted that
since much remains unknown about the quality and volume of data
on US beef, "it is difficult to make scientific equivalent
assessments." But it concluded that as long as the conditions
were met, "the difference in the levels of BSE risk of Japanese
and US beef is small."
The panel gives this explanation: Even if a cow younger than 20
months of age is infected with BSE, only a small amount of agents
causing the disease are accumulated in it; so under the current
inspection method, the cow will test negative. There is also no
possibility of the disease being contracted even if one eats
meat. It concluded that as long as SRM are properly removed in
the slaughtering process; imported beef will have little BSE risk
on humans.
This means the risk of US beef imported to Japan based on severe
import conditions is far smaller than that of beef consumed in
the US, and the risk of imported beef is almost the same level as
that of domestic beef.
Based on this view, Chairman Yoshikawa stated: "Should a person
who has never left Japan ate American beef and then developed the
disease, the responsibility would rest with those who assessed
the risk of US beef." He thus referred to the responsibility of
the expert panel if the case of vCJD is found in Japan.
Yoshikawa, though, added: "It is inconceivable that such a case
will happen."
Separated process necessary
Japan reinstated its ban on US beef imports, following the
discovery of vertebral columns in a US veal shipment to Japan
this January. Bones were also found in a shipment to Hong Kong in
March.
The meat-processing facility that shipped the banned material to
Hong Kong had cleared Japanese government inspection. This
incident posed questions on not only the US management system but
also Japan's inspection system.
TOKYO 00001616 016 OF 016
In response to the US violations in its beef shipments, Chairman
Yoshikawa commented coldly: "These incidents are apparently the
United States' unilateral violations of our contract that are on
a different level from risk assessments by scientists. I am
dumbfounded by such incidents, rather than feeling outrage."
Some point out that behind the United States' ineligible
shipments, there are faults in its processing system. In
exporting beef to Japan, American plants have to carry out meat
processing based on both Japanese and American. Cattle 30 months
of age or younger are separated from other cattle first. Later,
cattle 20 months of age bound for Japan are separated from them.
In addition, Japan and the US have adopted different SRM
standards.
Based on the view that many mistakes will unavoidably be made
under such a processing system, Yoshikawa has proposed these
preventive measures to be taken by the US: (1) The process of
cattle bound for Japan and that for the US should be separated;
and (2) Japan should reopen its market only to beef produced at
facilities authorized by Japanese inspectors.
Yoshikawa added: "Exercising the right to choose beef upon seeing
country-of-origin markings is also one of the risk assessments."
SCHIEFFER