Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06SEOUL888, KOREA ENVIRONMENT ISSUES: SUPREME COURT RULING ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SEOUL888.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06SEOUL888 2006-03-20 06:55 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Seoul
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHUL #0888/01 0790655
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 200655Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6690
INFO RUEAEPA/EPA WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 2976
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0302
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0384
UNCLAS SEOUL 000888 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
PASS USTR FOR RUSSELL SMITH 
STATE FOR OES/ETC, OES/ENV, OES/PCI 
STATE ALSO FOR EB/TPP/BTA AND EAP/K 
EPA FOR OIA 
USDOC FOR 4431/ITA/MAC/OPB/EAP/MORGAN 
WHITE HOUSE FOR CEQ 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SENV PGOV KS
SUBJECT: KOREA ENVIRONMENT ISSUES: SUPREME COURT RULING ON 
SAEMANGEUM PROJECT A SETBACK FOR NGO'S 
 
 
Summary 
------- 
1.  On March 16, South Korea's Supreme Court handed down a 
final ruling that the Saemangeum Reclamation Project, begun 
in 1991 but stalled over the last year by a lawsuit, could 
go ahead.  The world's largest coastal reclamation project, 
the Saemangeum project will convert 40,100 hectares of tidal 
flats and shallows off the southwestern coast into farmlands 
and a freshwater reservoir.  With the verdict, a long and 
contentious litigation between the government and local 
environmental groups ended in favor of development rather 
than conservation, disappointing local environmental NGOs, 
local fish-farming interests and a number of international 
NGOs dedicated to conserving wildlife habitats. 
Nevertheless, the lengthy controversy has heightened the 
awareness of environmental issues among the Korean public 
and has reinforced Korean society's understanding of the 
need to consider environmental impact in planning major 
development projects.  End Summary. 
 
Huge But Controversial Project 
------------------------------ 
2.  The Saemangeum Reclamation Project involves the 
construction of a 33-kilometer-long embankment to protect 
reclaimed land from the sea.  It is located in North Jeolla 
province, in the estuaries of the Mangyeung and Dongjin 
Rivers. 
 
3.  Critics describe the project as a pork-barrel plan by 
former President Roh Tae-woo to win North Jeolla votes.  It 
was presented as a campaign pledge during the 1987 
presidential campaign.  In the intervening years, 
environmental awareness has grown steadily in South Korea 
and so has opposition to the project.  Complicating the 
problem, President Roh Moo-hyun opposed the project when he 
was the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries during 
the Kim Dae-jung Administration, but changed his position to 
support it after he won the 2002 presidential election. 
 
4.  Since ground was broken in 1991, the project has become 
one of the most controversial of the nation's major 
development projects.  Debates about whether to go ahead 
with the project or stop construction have arisen repeatedly 
over the past 15 years. 
 
5.  As the project dragged on, the estimated total cost has 
snowballed from 1.3 trillion won (USD 1.3 billion) to 4 
trillion won (USD 4.1 billion.  The government has spent 
about two trillion won (USD 2.1 billion) on the project so 
far.  Of the planned 33-kilometer seawall, only a 2.7- 
kilometer section remains unfinished, halted by a lower 
court decision in 2005. 
 
Supreme Court Rules In Favor of the Government 
--------------------------------------------- - 
6.  The Supreme Court on March 16 ruled that the project 
could go ahead, upholding a similar decision dated December 
21, 2005, by the appellate-level Seoul High Court.  The 
appeals court decision overturned a February 4, 2005 ruling 
by the Seoul Administrative Court in favor of the 
environmental groups.  The lower court had ordered the 
suspension of the project, concluding that no net economic 
benefits could be expected due to the anticipated economic 
losses caused by water pollution in the proposed reclamation 
reservoir, and by the destruction of the tidal-flat 
ecosystem. 
 
7.  The Supreme Court recently decided to handle cases 
involving the nation's major development projects in an 
expedited manner to minimize social conflict.  The procedure 
was applied for the first time in this case, providing a 
quick response to the appeal filed by environmental groups 
in January. 
 
8.  Eleven of 13 justices, including the Chief Justice, 
ruled in favor of the project, while the remaining two voted 
against it.  The Court said if the project were cancelled or 
shelved at this point, the national and social interests of 
securing farmlands would not be achieved and losses would be 
incurred because of the enormous investments made to date. 
The court concluded that the expected environmental damage 
would not be great enough to outweigh the prospective 
economic losses of terminating the project.  The court 
stated that protecting the environment is a value enshrined 
in the Constitution, but said that economic development is 
also an important constitutional value. 
 
Reactions to the Court's Final Ruling 
------------------------------------- 
9.  Both the central and provincial governments welcomed the 
court's decision, while local environmental NGOs, fish 
farmers, and a number of international groups dedicated to 
conserving the habitats of global wildlife expressed their 
strong dissatisfaction with the result.  Some of the local 
environmental groups said they would continue their fight 
against the project.  Work is expected to begin on closing 
the remaining gaps in the seawall later this month.  The 
whole project is currently scheduled for completion by 2012. 
 
10.  Mindful of increasing costs due to the suspension of 
the project, public opinion generally welcomed the court's 
decision.  Most daily newspapers printed favorable 
editorials and featured the decision on their front pages. 
 
Comment 
------- 
11.  As one editorialist noted, the controversy over 
Saemangeum has helped raise public awareness about the 
importance of the environment.  The lengthy and expensive 
conflict over the project also serves as a reminder to 
policymakers about the importance of including environmental 
concerQ up front in the policymaking process.  End Comment. 
 
VERSHBOW