Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06MEXICO1716, SENATE PASSES CONTROVERSIAL BROADCASTING AND TELECOM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MEXICO1716.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06MEXICO1716 2006-03-31 21:37 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Mexico
VZCZCXRO9356
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #1716/01 0902137
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 312137Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9909
INFO RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHDC
RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MEXICO 001716 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR WHA/MEX, WHA/EPSC, EB/CIP 
STATE PASS USAID FOR LAC:MARK CARRATO 
TREASURY FOR IA MEXICO DESK: JASPER HOEK 
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC/NAFTA: ANDREW RUDMAN, NTIA 
FCC FOR EMILY TALAGA 
STATE PASS USTR FOR JONATHAN MELLE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON ECPS EINV PGOV MX
SUBJECT: SENATE PASSES CONTROVERSIAL BROADCASTING AND TELECOM 
 
REFORMS 
 
Ref: MEXICO 01080 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) On March 30, with 81 votes in favor, 40 against, and 4 
abstentions, the Mexican Senate approved controversial reforms 
to Broadcasting and Telecommunications Laws. Previously, on 
December 1, 2005, the Chamber of Deputies had unanimously 
passed the bill.  It has now been sent to President Fox who is 
expected to approve it in no more than ten days.  The bill will 
eliminate the Communications and Transportation Minister's 
current discretionary power to grant or revoke concessions by 
introducing a transparent bidding process.  Opponents of the 
bill allege that it encourages media concentration by the two 
broadcasting giants, Televisa and TV Azteca.  While supporters 
of the law say it promotes technological convergence and 
represents a significant advance from the original circa-1960 
broadcasting law, they also acknowledge it still has some gaps 
that should be improved in the future.  End Summary. 
 
------------------ 
THE "TELEVISA LAW" 
------------------ 
 
2. (SBU) Opponents, including legislators from the Party of the 
Democratic Revolution (PRD) and some Institutional 
Revolutionary Party (PRI) and National Action Party (PAN) 
Senators, have accused the PRI and PAN of having sold their 
votes in favor of what has been called "the Televisa bill" in 
exchange for Televisa's support for their presidential 
candidates' campaigns in the media.  Allegedly, broadcasting 
giant (and near monopoly) Televisa drafted the controversial 
bill to protect itself from future arbitrary decisions made by 
the incoming president, tacitly referring to current poll- 
leader Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO). 
 
------------------ 
COFETEL'S AUTONOMY 
------------------ 
 
3. (SBU) Critics say the bill fails to provide true autonomy to 
Mexico's telecommunications regulator, COFETEL.  For opponents, 
the new selection process for commissioners was tailored to 
favor the existing dominant players by failing to restrict any 
person with close ties to any telecom or broadcasting company 
from becoming a COFETEL commissioner.  Thus, it will not be 
surprising to see executives from Televisa, Telmex, and TV 
Azteca as incoming commissioners. According to the reforms, the 
President has 30 days after the law is published - and before 
the July presidential elections - to designate the five 
commissioners.  None of the current commissioners will be 
allowed to remain. 
 
4. (SBU) The bill theoretically encourages a long-term vision 
and continuity by selecting commissionaires for an 8-year 
tenure, which can be renewed for a second term.  With the 
amendments, COFETEL will regulate and administer the radio 
electric spectrum and promote the efficient use of it. However, 
no significant changes were made to provide more autonomy to 
COFETEL as its decisions and opinions will still be subject to 
review by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation 
(SCT).  Although concessions will be granted through public 
tenders, the final decision will still be made by SCT and not 
COFETEL. 
 
------------------------ 
CONCESSIONS AND LICENSES 
------------------------ 
 
5. (SBU) One of the most significant changes in the bill is 
that concessions will be granted through a bidding process. 
Supporters of the bill say the new law will foment competition 
by making more spectrum available and by ending the practice of 
the government handing out concessions by decree.  Televisa and 
TV Azteca could also participate in those tenders.  Critics of 
the bill say that it will not encourage competition as 
legislators failed to oblige bidders to obtain a favorable 
opinion from Mexico's anti-trust authority, the Federal 
Competition Commission, before submitting their bids in order 
 
MEXICO 00001716  002 OF 002 
 
 
to prevent media concentration.  Given this, and the 
prohibition on foreign investment, dominant companies will have 
a distinct advantage in winning tenders. 
 
6. (SBU) Another concern is that, under the new law, the two 
big broadcasters would receive free digital spectrum to cover 
their existing analog frequencies, while potential newcomers to 
the market would have to pay for additional spectrum that is 
put out for bidding.  After the digitalization process, 
broadcasting companies will easily keep the freed spectrum for 
convergence simply by requesting it from SCT and by making a 
payment in exchange.  Since no clear criteria about the payment 
have been defined in the law, critics believe that the State 
wouldn't recover the spectrum nor would receive any payment. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
7. (SBU) Given that Mexico's national elections are fast 
approaching, many observers here believe that legislators 
should have waited until after the elections to pass such a 
controversial reform so that all interested parties' views are 
considered.  Although the law may represent an advance for the 
sector compared to the obsolete law of 1960, some critics 
believe it would have been better to pass a more comprehensive 
reform that would not have so blatantly benefited the handful 
of big broadcasters that already dominate Mexican media. 
However, now that the step towards a new broadcasting and 
telecommunications law has been taken, we hope that 
improvements are passed in the near future that will indeed 
strengthen COFETEL and help the sector become more competitive. 
We will report separately on the views of Embassy contacts in 
government and the telecom industry after President Fox has 
signed the bill. 
GARZA