Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06ABIDJAN227, COTE D'IVOIRE: ILO-UNHCR TO PUBLISH REPORT ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06ABIDJAN227.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06ABIDJAN227 2006-03-01 16:50 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Abidjan
VZCZCXRO3863
RR RUEHPA
DE RUEHAB #0227/01 0601650
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 011650Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY ABIDJAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1024
INFO RUEHZK/ECOWAS COLLECTIVE
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0449
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ABIDJAN 000227 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR PRM/AFR-MNICHOLSHON AND AF/W-RKAMINSKI 
DEPT PASS TO USAID/OFDA/DDEBERNARDO 
GENEVA FOR RMA 
BRUSSELS FOR MMEZNAR 
DAKAR FOR USAID/OFDA/RDAVIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREF PHUM PREL EAID SOCI IV
SUBJECT: COTE D'IVOIRE:  ILO-UNHCR TO PUBLISH REPORT ON 
EXPLOITATION OF REFUGEE CHILDREN 
 
REF: A. ABIDJAN 93 
 
     B. ABIDJAN 152 
     C. ABIDJAN 168 
     D. STATE 229909 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  ILO and UNHCR will publish a report on 
the exploitation of refugee and displaced children in Cote 
d'Ivoire almost two years after its completion.  ILO-UNHCR 
identified labor and sexual exploitation as the two main 
forms of exploitation for refugee and displaced children in 
Cote d'Ivoire.  The draft study also shows that conflict in 
Cote d'Ivoire since September 2002 has increased the 
vulnerability of refugee and displaced children to 
exploitation throughout the refugee welcome zone (ZAR) along 
the border with Liberia.  Officials with the International 
Rescue Committee (IRC) have worked with some 50 children 
suffering from various forms of exploitation since July 2003 
in seven villages around Tabou where they operate.  UNHCR has 
not shared their findings with IRC.  The study's findings 
provide further reason for UNHCR to engage in an active 
return promotion phase for Liberian refugees in local 
communities and in the Nicla camp and Tabou Transit Center 
(TC) in Cote d'Ivoire.  End Summary. 
 
2.  (SBU) ILO and UNHCR officials confirmed plans to publish 
the findings of a report on exploitation of refugee and 
displaced children in Cote d'Ivoire almost two years after 
its completion.  Refugee Coordinator (RefCoord) learned from 
PolOff working on the Trafficking in Persons (TIP) report 
that UNHCR had participated in this study with ILO in 2004, 
but for one reason or another had not authorized ILO to 
publish the results of the study until now.  RefCoord met 
with Kimbimbi Sanda, UNHCR Representative, on February 17. 
Sanda appeared nervous and uncomfortable and only after a 
long discussion did he admit that UNHCR was responsible for 
the delay in publication.  Sanda gave a draft copy of the 
report to RefCoord with the understanding that it would not 
be cited in the TIP report until official publication. 
 
ILO RECEIVES AUTHORIZATION 
-------------------------- 
 
3.  (SBU) RefCoord met the Head of ILO's Abidjan Office, Ben 
Lakp Low, and their Child Trafficking Focal Point, Boua Bi 
Semien Honore, on February 22.  Honore explained that ILO had 
entered into the joint-study with the Protection Unit at 
UNHCR in 2004.  He said the Protection Officer in charge at 
that time, Mr. Van der Castel, was concerned about the 
possibility of child exploitation among the refugee 
population living in the Refugee Welcome Zone (ZAR) 
established by the Government of Cote d'Ivoire along the 
western border with Liberia.  (Note: the ZAR stretches from 
the region west of Guiglo to the south around the city of 
Tabou.  End note.)  Refugees in the ZAR are mostly integrated 
into local villages.  Current estimates put the Liberian 
refugee population in Cote d'Ivoire around 40,000 with a 
small percentage living in the Tabou Transit Center 
(approximately 2,500 refugees) and in a refugee camp near 
Guiglo (approximately 6,000 refugees).  ILO and UNHCR agreed 
to look at the impact of the Ivoirian crisis on both refugee 
and displaced children in the ZAR region for the study. 
 
4.  (SBU) Although ILO had the lead role in the study, Honore 
explained they could not publish it without UNHCR's approval. 
 Honore confirmed that UNHCR had changed personnel involved 
in the study and that this probably played some role in 
UNHCR's delay.  However, he also believed the results 
revealed what he called "sensitive" issues in refugee child 
protection and felt UNHCR was uncomfortable with the results. 
 Interestingly, Honore said they had just received UNHCR's 
authorization and expected their own consultant to prepare a 
final version within ten days, after which ILO will move to 
publication. 
 
DRAFT STUDY SHOWS REFUGEE CHILDREN IN PRECARIOUS SITUATION 
--------------------------------------------- ------------- 
 
5.  (SBU) ILO-UNHCR identified labor and sexual exploitation 
as the two main forms of exploitation for refugee and 
displaced children.  Although the study points out that it 
can be difficult to distinguish between exploitation refugee 
children suffer to that experienced by displaced children, it 
concludes that refugee children are vulnerable due to their 
 
ABIDJAN 00000227  002 OF 003 
 
 
status as refugees (i.e., they are without their normal 
social support networks in the host-country), the loss of 
wealth as a result of their fleeing to Cote d'Ivoire, 
hostilities within the ZAR region itself (33% of refugee 
children began working after 2002), and the fact that they 
represent a cheap and easily manageable labor force. 
 
6.  (SBU) The report shows that refugee children are working 
at an increasingly earlier age (35% between the ages of 
5-14), they often accept the worst jobs, they are often 
injured at work, and they are not guaranteed regular salary 
payments.  The report concludes that all children in the ZAR 
region are increasingly exploited in mining work and on 
palm-oil plantations, are susceptible to recruitment into 
militia groups, and are increasingly involved in child 
prostitution.  The report states that female refugee children 
are most often found working in prostitution and exposed to a 
range of physical violence, an increased potential for 
HIV/AIDS infection, and unwanted pregnancies. 
 
IRC UNAWARE OF REPORT'S FINDINGS 
-------------------------------- 
 
7.  (SBU) The International Rescue Committee (IRC) has worked 
in Cote d'Ivoire as one of UNHCR's main implementing partners 
in the Tabou region.  Sanda mentioned that UNHCR worked with 
IRC in gender-based violence (GBV) activities in the west but 
admitted he had not shared results of the 2004 study with 
IRC.  Maurizio Crivellaro, Acting Country Director for IRC, 
stated IRC was also disappointed with UNHCR's support in 
lobbying for recognition of schooling for refugee children in 
the ZAR region.  Having their school studies officially 
recognized would aid refugee children returning to Libeia or 
help them integrate into the local school ystem if they 
chose to remain in Cote d'Ivoire. The ILO-UNHCR report also 
alludes to schooling for children in the ZAR region as one of 
the problems in the post-2002 context. 
 
8.  (SBU) IRC established a Child Protection Program in 2003 
to address child abuse and exploitation and other child 
protection concerns in the villages in the Tabou region where 
they are present.  IRC treated 55 children between July 2003 
and December 2005 who were victims of sexual abuse, labor 
exploitation on plantations, and refugee children living with 
heavily impoverished parents who were subjected to various 
forms of abuse and exploitation as a result. 
 
PROTECTION: DID UNHCR DROP THE BALL? 
------------------------------------ 
 
9.  (SBU) Sanda told RefCoord that many of the refugee 
children in Cote d'Ivoire received their status at a time 
when the government granted refugee status on a prima facie 
basis to all Liberians.  The report itself mentions that it 
was difficult for researchers to determine which Liberian 
refugee children were actually holding refugee status and 
which were simply Liberians engaged in long-standing 
cross-border movements who claimed to be refugees.  Although 
it is possible that a large number of the refugee children 
covered in the study might not have held refugee status, the 
study affirms that the exploitation taking place in the ZAR 
region was common to all children, regardless of their status 
as refugees, displaced, or migrants. 
 
10.  (SBU) The report's findings that conflict within the ZAR 
region after 2002 led to increased risk of exploitation for 
displaced and refugee children would seem to stand in direct 
contradiction to Sanda's often stated position that Liberian 
refugees are well integrated in local communities.  We have 
noted that almost all of UNHCR's facilitated returns to 
Liberia from Cote d'Ivoire (more than 13,000 officially 
assisted) have come from the local communities, not the Nicla 
camp or the Tabou Transit Center (TC).  UNHCR claims a 
further 20,000 have returned on their own from these same 
communities. 
 
11.  (SBU) At the same time, Liberian refugee camps and 
populations continue to be located in areas of extreme 
volatility.  Recent ethnic clashes near Guiglo and Tabou in 
just the last month have resulted in some 20 deaths and the 
displacement of hundreds of people (refs. A and B).  Violence 
against UNHCR's own offices in Guiglo in January has left 
them dependent on local Caritas staff who do not even have 
 
ABIDJAN 00000227  003 OF 003 
 
 
proper equipment to distribute food rations (ref. C). 
Against this backdrop, it does appear the study's conclusions 
might have pointed to shortcomings in UNHCR's ability to 
provide adequate protection to refugee children in Cote 
d'Ivoire they would have preferred not to reveal. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
12.  (SBU) If UNHCR has an advocacy role to fill in Cote 
d'Ivoire it should be in support of the rights of refugee 
children.  At a minimum, the study's findings should have 
been shared with UNHCR's NGO and UN partners working in the 
ZAR region to enable them to prepare some specific activities 
in response to information ILO-UNHCR had worked to produce. 
The findings of the report would also seem to bolster further 
the need for UNHCR to move forward with an active promotional 
phase for return to Liberia for both the local and camp-based 
refugee populations.  Post requests that PRM follow-up on 
this issue with UNHCR Geneva to make sure our concerns on the 
delay of the report's publication are conveyed and that UNHCR 
Abidjan has a clear plan to implement UNHCR's promotion 
return phase for Liberian refugees in Cote d'Ivoire. 
Hooks