Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06WARSAW280, POLAND: Embassy Warsaw Special 301 Input

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WARSAW280.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06WARSAW280 2006-02-22 12:51 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Warsaw
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WARSAW 000280 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EUR/NCE/MSESSUMS 
STATE PASS USTR FOR DONNELLY/ERRION 
COMMERCE FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/EUR/OECA/MROGERS 
 
REF: (A) 2005 Warsaw 01869 (B) 2005 Warsaw 02210 (C) 2005 
Warsaw 02385 (D) 2005 Warsaw 03022 (E) 2005 Warsaw 03267 (F) 
2005 Warsaw 03361 (G) 2005 Warsaw 03411 (H) 2005 Warsaw 
03451 (I) 2005 Warsaw 03780 (J) Warsaw 0068 (K) 27JAN06 
Birdsey-Burgess/Rogers Email (L) 2005 Warsaw 3593 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD KIPR PL
SUBJECT: POLAND: Embassy Warsaw Special 301 Input 
 
----------------------------- 
Slow Progress, New Government 
----------------------------- 
 
1. (SBU) Despite lingering problems in enforcement and, 
particularly, in judicial adjudication of optical disc (OD) 
piracy cases, there has been slow, but nonetheless steady, 
progress in Poland's handling of IPR violations, warranting 
maintenance of Poland's position on the Watch List.  And 
while problems related to market access for pharmaceutical 
firms continue unabated, at this time we have no new 
evidence of specific IPR violations related to data 
exclusivity.  That said, the legacy of problems dating back 
to poorly-enforced data exclusivity regulations continues to 
pinch the revenues of innovative firms, especially when 
combined with non-IPR related problems such as lack of 
access to the public health system drug reimbursement list. 
U.S. firms also point out post-accession additions to the so- 
called "ghost list" of market approved drugs, though not 
actually available, as they can be used to establish 
reimbursement prices well below that of the existing 
innovative drug. 
 
--------------------- 
Optical Disc Progress 
--------------------- 
 
2. (SBU) Secretary Gutierrez praised Poland's anti-piracy 
efforts and progress despite lingering problems in some 
areas (Ref K).  Persistent efforts to encourage Poland's law 
enforcement to be more active, particularly at bazaars along 
the German border (Refs D, G, I) paid off last year not only 
with an increase in raids on pirates.  Significantly, these 
efforts also provided the foundation for an industry 
initiative that brought legal experts from other EU 
countries to Poland, sensitizing the judiciary in south 
western Poland to the criminal nature of OD piracy. 
 
3. (SBU) The December conference in Wroclaw, coordinated by 
the local Polish affiliate of the International Federation 
of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) was noteworthy for 
several reasons, but mostly because it was a shining example 
of industry-government cooperation.  It was this type of 
cooperative effort that the Polish government highlighted in 
its anti-piracy strategy (Ref D) released last spring.  The 
increase in cooperation is evident from statistics of 
seizures of pirated goods. 
 
---------- 
Statistics 
---------- 
 
4. (U) Poland has made great strides in optical disk 
seizures over the past year starting in calendar year 2005. 
Compared to the previous year, the number of total cases 
increased from 1208 to 1221. Regions showing significant 
improvement indicated by an increase in the number of cases 
from 2004 to 2005 include: Lubuskie, Malopolskie, 
Swietokrzyskie, Zacholdniopomorskie and Warszawa.  The most 
impressive growth took place in the Warszawa and Malopolskie 
regions with an increase of 84 and 43 cases respectively 
when compared to 2004 data.  In descending order, Polish 
authorities seized the largest number of foreign CDs, 
totaling 233,873 followed by CDR (95,853), MP3 (76,803), CD 
polish (60,179), DVDs (22,036), foreign cassettes (2,453), 
Polish cassettes (832) and CDRW (766). 
 
5. (U) When analyzing the data, general trends emerge. For 
example, more CDs than cassettes were seized and more 
optical disks with foreign materials were seized when 
compared to purely Polish material.  With regard to specific 
regions, Warszawa seized the largest number of foreign CDs 
(68,725) and Polish CDs (20,098) with the Malopolskie region 
coming in second with 17,411 Polish CD seizures.  The most 
pirated DVDs were found in the Malopolskie region (8433) 
with Warszawa coming in a distant second with 5550 DVDs 
seized in 2005.  Seizures of cassettes are much lower than 
CDs, DVDs and MP3 materials due to improvements in 
technology.  The largest number of seizures of Polish 
cassettes, foreign cassettes and MP3 pirated material took 
place in the Mazowieckie region: 215, 929, and 22,611 
respectively.  Lastly, the largest number of CDR seizures 
took place in the Zachodniopomorskie region with 23,332. Of 
note, aside from CDRW seizures in the Pomorskie and 
Dolnoslaskie region with 753 and 13 respectively, no other 
region seized any pirated CDRW materials.  In discussions 
last year with Wroclaw police officials, they noted that 
college students burning CDRWs for profit is a particular 
problem in their area.  The CDRW seizures in Dolnoslaskie 
appear to support their claims. 
 
------------------------- 
But Not All Is Rosy . . . 
------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) Despite the evident progress, there are still 
several reasons why Poland should be maintained on the Watch 
List. 
 
- Since the departure from the Ministry of Culture of a key 
contact active in anti-piracy efforts, and the relatively 
quick dismissal of his successor, it has been increasingly 
difficult to find someone who will take "ownership" of the 
piracy issue in this key government office. 
 
- Related to this point, key elements pertaining to awarding 
damages of the EU Enforcement Directive are apparently being 
weakened in legislation currently under consideration. 
 
- Although retail sales in the Warsaw Stadium have 
decreased, evidence indicates that the Stadium continues to 
serve as a "wholesale" distribution site. 
 
- The judicial process, already slow and cumbersome, is 
backlogged with cases, and there appears to be limited 
interest in addressing some of the more egregious causes of 
prosecutorial sloth (such as procedural issues related to 
expert testimony, see Ref I).  It should be noted that 
Poland's judicial system is equally inefficient in dealing 
with non-IPR commercial disputes. 
 
- IFPI notes that Poland's production capacity has grown to 
775 million units.  The Embassy has visited the largest 
producer of CDs and DVDs in Poland (the Thomson plant 
outside Warsaw, which produces - for export -- OD media 
almost exclusively for major western firms) and is less 
concerned, given the current lack of evidence, with gross 
production capacity figures.  We believe the real concern is 
the "missing" production line from Wroclaw, which somehow 
vanished from police storage as reported last spring. 
 
----------------- 
Next Steps for OD 
----------------- 
 
7. (SBU) In discussions with visiting MPA representatives, 
we outlined what we believe to be the most efficacious 
course of action in dealing with outstanding piracy issues. 
A stronger focus on legislative fixes to evidentiary 
requirements, an emphasis on stronger criminal penalties, 
and a strengthening, rather than dilution, of legislation 
when implementing EU directives are the most salient points. 
Further cooperation with industry (see Ref D) and the 
judiciary will, we believe, support these efforts most 
effectively. 
 
--------------- 
Pharmaceuticals 
--------------- 
 
8. (SBU) More thorny are the issues facing the 
pharmaceutical industry.  The Polish government has been 
less than aggressive in protecting intellectual property 
(read data exclusivity) in the past; however, now we are 
dealing with the legacy of the ghost of the data exclusivity 
past, with no strong evidence of new violations of TRIPs 
obligations being brought forth.  It is understandable that 
the innovative drug industry is frustrated with its lack of 
market access, but we believe the best way to assist the 
industry is to focus on tangible issues we can attack now, 
rather than go through the repetitive and less effective 
process of reminding the Poles of their international 
obligations (Ref J). 
 
9. (SBU) As Secretary Gutierrez noted in his discussions 
with both industry representatives and Health Minister 
Religa, the biggest obstacle for innovative firms is lack of 
access to the public health system drug reimbursement list. 
Attacking the Poles on older cases related to data 
exclusivity deficiencies will not address this problem. 
 
---------- 
The Issues 
---------- 
 
10. (SBU) As noted, the lack of access to the reimbursement 
list means that innovative drugs are paid for by the Polish 
health care consumer 100 percent out of pocket.  Although, 
by our count, four new molecules were added to the 
reimbursement list last year, these were the first additions 
to the list in seven years.  With the lack of innovation 
represented in the reimbursed Polish pharmaceutical market, 
it is at the same time astounding to realize that Poles pay 
more for prescription medicines than any other EU country. 
 
11. (SBU) In addition, the still unresolved Customs and 
Margins case (see Refs A,L) creates tremendous uncertainty 
for innovative firms, most of which import their products. 
Additional troubling calls from the Health Ministry for cost 
of production data (a complete non-starter for most of 
innovative firms) raises the spectre of a new rash of 
problems with data exclusivity, given Poland's problematic 
track record of protecting data in the 1990s. 
 
------------------------------- 
And Where We Go From Here . . . 
------------------------------- 
 
12. (SBU) Nonetheless, these problems have less to do with 
strict IPR-related issues than they do with tremendous 
market access obstacles.  As noted in Ref L, we believe the 
best way to address these issues is with increased dialogue 
with Ministry of Health officials, which now seems to be a 
real possibility. 
 
13.  (SBU) In discussions with Secretary Gutierrez, Minister 
Religa offered to have the Health Ministry engage in 
dialogue with the innovative drug industry.  To that end, 
the Embassy is working with the Pharmaceutical Committee of 
the AmCham to invite Religa to the March 2-3 meeting in 
Warsaw of the chief executives of major innovative firms. 
The Ambassador is conveying directly the importance of the 
meeting to the Minister. 
 
14. (SBU) In any event, we hope to establish an 
"institutionalized dialogue," perhaps on a monthly basis, 
between industry and the Ministry.  The receptivity of the 
Minister to transparency and dialogue during the Gutierrez 
visit is something we believe should be pounced on.  At the 
same time, we believe maintaining Poland on the Watch List 
will provide us with leverage, should problems related to 
cost of production data move forward.  Keeping our powder 
dry and testing the Ministry's willingness to engage in 
fruitful discussions is, we believe, the proper course of 
action.