Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06TOKYO642, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/06/06
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TOKYO642.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06TOKYO642 | 2006-02-06 08:18 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO6668
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0642/01 0370818
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 060818Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8296
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/COMPATWING ONE KAMI SEYA JA
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7079
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4434
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 7496
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 4526
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5638
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0422
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 6607
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 8697
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 11 TOKYO 000642
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST
DIVISION; TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS
OFFICE; SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
ADVISOR; CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 02/06/06
INDEX:
(1) Irresponsible of government not to make sure whether US
observes Japan's beef import requirements; Safety policy
abandoned? No buyer for over 2,000 tons of beef
(2) Reasons for DFAA breakup initiative
(3) Second-fiddle candidates for LDP leadership race -- Taku
Yamasaki, Koichi Kato, representatives from LDP factions, LDP
Upper House -- start preparatory steps for campaign
(4) Bush and Koizumi - Battle over beef imports (part 1): Prompt
decision on second ban has driven splinter in alliance even
deeper
(5) Bush and Koizumi - battle over beef imports (part 2): Power
bases: Clash over food safety, interest
ARTICLES:
(1) Irresponsible of government not to make sure whether US
observes Japan's beef import requirements; Safety policy
abandoned? No buyer for over 2,000 tons of beef
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Pages 24-25) (Slightly abridged)
February 1, 2006
The government failed to conduct a fact-finding inspection,
supposed to have been done before resuming US beef trade.
Agriculture Minister Shoichi Nakagawa so "confessed" before a
Diet meeting on Jan. 30. Conducting a prior inspection was
decided at a cabinet meeting. Failing to do so is a violation of
public faith. It was just recently after the restart of US beef
imports when the revelation of the sloppy inspection system in
the United States came out. As if to follow suit, the Japanese
government has exposed its own failure to ensure public safety.
Such being the case, who in the world can ensure our safety?
"If the meat continues to fail to clear customs, it will become
unmarketable, so we'd like the US to buy it back at the same
price as the import bill," grumbled Tatsuo Iwama, executive
director of the Japan Meat Import/Export Association, a group of
40 distributors handling imported meat.
Since the reinstatement of the ban on US beef imports on Jan. 20,
a total of 1,380 tons of beef worth 1.4-1.5 billion yen have been
stranded in warehouses or containers unable to clear customs.
Combining meat stored at non-member companies of the association,
the volume would be over 2,000 tons.
Meat is stored at 20 centigrade below zero at present. Iwama
lamented: "This is a last resort to maintain meat quality, but
despite that, meat quality deteriorates day by day. We hope
imports will be restarted again quickly, but chances are ...."
Agriculture Minister Nakagawa revealed in his Diet replies on
Jan. 30 that the cabinet-obligated prior-fact-finding survey was
not conducted before the restart of US beef imports.
On Dec. 13, the day after the removal of the import ban, the
Agriculture Ministry and the Health Ministry dispatched a joint
government fact-finding team to the US. On the 16th of that
TOKYO 00000642 002 OF 011
month, the first US beef shipment arrived in Japan. The team of
10 officials was divided into three groups to each investigate
one of three processes: 1) confirming the age of cattle; 2)
confirming removal of specified risk materials (SRM); and 3)
sorting out meat that was Japan-bound from that bound for other
countries. Each group examined whether the processes were being
observed.
An official in the Health Ministry's Inspection and Safety
Division said confidently:
"One day was devoted to inspect each place. An on-site inspection
was carried out at all facilities we visited to see that exports
procedures were observed. The inspection did not end by just
looking at files and papers."
The US has 38 slaughterhouses exporting beef to Japan. Japan
inspected 11 plants. The same official explained, "We had a plan
to inspect all those facilities one by one over time."
However, Yasuhiro Yoshikaka, chair of the Prion Research
Committee of the Food Safety Commission, told Kyoto News Service
when he was interviewed:
"Our understanding was that the government would resume beef
imports after examining (for instance, the effectiveness of the
observation of the requirements)."
Yoshikawa also pointed out that "audit" is used in the agreement
between Japan and the US to mean "inspection," but he asserted
that the word, "inspection," should replace "audit," because
"audit" connotes something perfunctory.
Responding to questions asking why a prior inspection was not
carried out, Nakagawa said: "An effective survey was not possible
before the lifting of the import ban." But Keisuke Amagasa, an
expert on the BSE issue and representative of the Citizens'
Biotechnology Information Center, criticized Nakagawa: "The
prerequisite for resuming imports was to remove specified risk
materials, so a prior inspection was essential."
Agriculture minister shows no sign of self-reflection, insisting
there is "no problem" with administration
Until recently the Japanese government explained: "The US has
promised to meet the export requirements." But in January, the
sloppy state of the US inspection system was exposed, when a US
inspector ignorant about what was defined as risk materials to
remove (let beef with backbones be shipped to Japan).
On Jan. 26, Prime Minister Koizumi made this seemingly defiant
reply in the Diet: "The US is to blame. I don't understand why
Japan is blamed." As of Jan. 30, when it was revealed that no
prior inspection had been conducted, Nakagawa remarked
indifferently: "I think on our part, there's no problem with our
administration."
Toshiko Kanda, secretary general of the National Liaison
Committee of Consumer Organization, said angrily: "The primary
responsibility definitely lies with the US, but it's also
important for Japan on its part to do something to have the US
side actively observe the rules. It's just an excuse to say, 'The
US has said this or that.'"
TOKYO 00000642 003 OF 011
The Food Safety Commission's (FSC) final report released on last
Dec. 8, which in effect moved Japan to decide on the resumption
of US beef imports, did not make a prior fact-finding inspection
a condition for the resumption of imports.
The reason is that the FSC had to make a risk assessment on the
premise that the export program would be observed.
The report therefore attached a supplementary item to the
conclusion. The report then reiterated: "A risk assessment this
time was made on the premise that the export program on Japan
will be observed. So, an oversight body (Japanese government)
needs to guarantee that the export program is observed."
Tokyo Medical College Prof. Kiyotoshi Kaneko, who served as
deputy chief of the FSC's prion expert panel, said, "Our worst
fear came true." He continued:
"When we were asked to discuss the matter, we were told to
discuss it on the premise that the export program on Japan would
be observed. We were also told that the conditions to observe the
program did not need to be put on agenda for discussion. We
therefore did not discuss even once the question of whether to
conduct a prior fact-finding inspection or an ex-post facto
inspection. I repeatedly raised the question of whether the
premise was reliable in actuality. The answer was that: 'the
government is responsible.'"
There is a rumor that there was a scheme to give the resumption
of beef imports as a present to President Bush when he visited
Japan last November. Kanda explained:
"The report was released on Dec. 8, Thursday, and as quickly as
the following Monday, the resumption of imports was decided.
There was no showing of ways to make the other side observe the
export program."
Referring to this fact, some are beginning to conjecture that
this explains why a full-fledged fact-finding inspection was not
carried out in the US. In that way, even if there was a problem
with imports, the Japanese government's responsibility would not
be pursued.
Amagasa said:
"The recent incident stemmed from a US that is reluctant to
improve its sloppy oversight structure and an irresponsible
Japanese government that has left everything in the hands of the
US."
The hurdle of the resumption of beef imports has become even
higher now. A panel member, Shigetaka Yamamoto, chief of the
National Institute of Health Sciences' Biomedical Food Research
Division, pointed out:
"It's unrealistic to send inspectors to all facilities to inspect
them around the clock. Before the second resumption of beef
imports, the US government needs to re-educate its inspectors in
the proper way and then report on the results of their re-
training (to Japan)."
Professor Satoshi Kai at the graduate school of Kyushu
TOKYO 00000642 004 OF 011
University, also a panel member, proposed this: "In the case of
beef exports from Japan to the US, US inspectors came to Japan to
authorize Japanese plants to export meat to the US. Japan, too,
should establish a similar system."
Professor Kaneko warned:
"Consumers play the leading part. Insufficient communication
between ministers, between the government and the concerned
offices, and between the government and the nation have caused a
dispute over the differences in the replies. Discord at home will
make it difficult for Japan as a whole to assume a resolute
attitude toward the US. The government needs to realize that if
nothing is done, it could aggravate the wound, ending up with a
loss of public confidence."
Key points of the written government reply and the unified
government view
Written government reply as of Nov. 18, 2002
The Health Ministry and the Agriculture Ministry think it
necessary to send on a regular basis an inspector to the US
before or after the resumption of US beef imports in order to
inspect slaughterhouses in the US.
Unified government view as of Jan. 30, 2006
The written government reply endorsed the thinking of the Health
Ministry and the Agriculture Ministry at the time. It is not
necessarily true to say that it has decided to take a certain
action. The Food Safety Commission's final report does not
include the implementation of an inspection into the conditions
for the resumption of imports.
Desk memo:
I was astonished at US Under Secretary of Agriculture Penn's
remark that: "The probability of being involved in a traffic
accident is higher than that of being infected with disease as a
result of eating beef." We can ascertain the exact number of dead
or injured in traffic accidents. But the US has not carried out
blanket testing, so the (BSE) probability is unclear. In
addition, the disease appears in people dozens of years ahead. So
the policy-makers of today are not accused. I sensed this in the
responses of Japan and the US.
(2) Reasons for DFAA breakup initiative
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 3) (Full)
Eve., February 2, 2006
The Defense Facilities Administration Agency, an external body of
the Defense Agency, is facing a scrap-and-build plan that would
breaking it up and meld it into the Defense Agency. The reason
for growing calls for a drastic shakeup of DFAA is the recently
exposed bid-rigging scandal over DFAA-ordered construction
projects for its contractors. However, there are complicated
circumstances behind the scenes, such as complaints about DFAA in
connection with the planned realignment of US forces in Japan.
The Defense Agency, which desires to raise its status to a
ministry, is apparently eager to set up itself as a policy-
planning office like ministries.
TOKYO 00000642 005 OF 011
Bid-rigging scandal: A pillar of preventive steps
"It's clear to me that the Defense Facilities Administration
Agency has not taken the Central Procurement Office's
misappropriation case as its own. I even feel angry." This
comment came from Defense Agency Director General Fukushiro
Nukaga when he met the press on Jan. 31. Gentle as he is, Nukaga
unusually raised his voice.
The CPO malfeasance case was brought to light in 1998 when Nukaga
was in his current defense chief post. Nukaga, who was a first-
time cabinet minister at the time, was driven to quit his cabinet
portfolio four months later to take the responsibility for the
scandal. CPO is a body in charge of buying or acquiring equipment
and the like for the Self-Defense Forces. In the wake of the
scandal, the Defense Agency reorganized CPO, segregating its
contract divisions from the organization of CPO and transferring
its cost-accounting divisions to an internal bureau of the
Defense Agency.
This time, DFAA became tainted with a scandal involving its
retirees who have parachuted into a private-sector company like
the CPO scandal. Late last year, Nukaga deemed it inevitable for
prosecutors to indict those involved in the bid-rigging scandal.
Since then, Nukaga, who learned a lesson from the CPO scandal,
has been circumspectly prepared for the possible indictment.
In the CPO scandal, officials were found to have destroyed
evidence. Furthermore, CPO mishandled things after the case was
exposed. This became a fatal blow to the Defense Agency. This
time, the Defense Agency immediately launched a fact-finding
committee and a preventive study group. Nukaga quickly pledged
full cooperation for investigations in order to clean up the
agency.
As a pillar of preventive steps, the Defense Agency has a plan to
dismantle and integrate DFAA. CPO once was the Special
Procurement Agency, which used to be a counterpart of the
occupation forces in Japan. Touching on this history, Nukaga
criticized CPO for its personnel's underlying sense of
entitlement from those days. "We will ferret out administrative
and organizational problems so that such a case will not occur
ever again," Nukaga said. "That's my responsibility," he added.
With this, the second-time defense chief fretted about how to
bail himself out by laying emphasis on his reform-minded stance.
USFJ realignment: Gap with Defense Agency policy course
"Contrary to what you might think," a Defense Agency official
said, "we have little to do with the Defense Facilities
Administration Agency." This official noted a "gap" between the
Defense Agency's policy measures and DFAA's jobs, recounting that
the gap came out through coordination with local governments over
the realignment of US forces in Japan.
Nukaga is inclined to disband DFAA. For one thing, Nukaga
believes that DFAA's closed nature-even more than the bid-rigging
scandal-has contributed to the delay in the government's local
coordination over the realignment of US forces in Japan.
On Jan. 30, when DFAA officials were arrested, the Defense Agency
officially announced its appointment of DFAA Naha Bureau Director
TOKYO 00000642 006 OF 011
General Masanori Nishi to the post of Technical Research and
Development Institute (TRDI) deputy director general, which is a
de facto demotion.
After hard negotiations, Japan and the United States agreed on a
plan to relocate the US Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station in
Okinawa Prefecture to a coastal area of Camp Schwab in the island
prefecture. The Defense Agency's Administrative Vice Minister
Takemasa Moriya pushed for the plan. Nishi, tuning in to local
opposition, was critical of the plan. Nishi's stance is said to
have brought Moriya's anger down on him.
Nishi is well spoken of in Okinawa, where many miss him. But in
the eyes of Nukaga and Moriya, Nishi appeared to be "only turning
his face toward Okinawa and reluctant to carry out the Defense
Agency's policy measures."
DFAA is tasked with improving the environment to secure the use
of bases. Nukaga, however, urges DFAA to do some rethinking
itself. "Security is not the kind of matter to be bargained with
local heads for a happy medium," Nukaga said. He also said, "I
don't want them to do their jobs with their usual approach."
The Defense Agency gives top priority to the realignment of US
forces in Japan. The Japanese and US governments have now agreed
to relocate the heliport functions of Futenma airfield to a
coastal area of Camp Schwab. To do so, however, the Defense
Agency needs the governor's approval to use the surface of public
waters to reclaim land from the sea. The agency is even poised to
transfer the governor's reclamation-related entitlement to the
state if the governor does not allow the Futenma relocation.
There is no doubt that DFAA's reluctance about such a hardline
stance has fueled arguments calling for the floated breakup of
DFAA.
Defense Agency's upgrading to ministry: Persuading New Komeito
On Jan. 25, the House of Councillors held a question-and-answer
session. Shozo Kusakawa, in his interpellation representing the
New Komeito party, insisted that DFAA should be consolidated into
the Defense Agency so that the Defense Agency will not fatten its
organization in its upgrading to a ministry. In reply, Nukaga
stated that there was "something difficult" in Kusakawa's
suggestion. "However," Nukaga went on, "the suggestion is full of
warmheartedness at its bottom." He added, "We'd like to make
headway for transition to the status of a ministry with
cooperation obtained." Nukaga had made arrangements with his
agency's administrative officials on his parliamentary replies
prepared by them. Nukaga told them to rewrite their scripts more
easily, with the New Komeito in his mind.
For one thing, the New Komeito is currently in office as the
LDP's coalition partner. However, some people in the New Komeito
are strongly opposed to the idea of raising the Defense Agency to
the status of a ministry. DFAA's bid-rigging scandal this time
could also work against the Defense Agency for the time being.
However, Nukaga and others are emphasizing the necessity of
raising the Defense Agency to a ministry from the perspective of
administrative reform. They think that this standpoint, if it
works well, can be convincing to the New Komeito and other
parties.
Moriya is even more positive about breaking up DFAA and
TOKYO 00000642 007 OF 011
streamlining it into the Defense Agency. The Defense Agency now
has many more jobs to do along with the expanded scope of SDF
missions overseas. In addition, the Defense Agency is required to
cooperate with local governments in civil protection during
emergencies. However, there is a limit to the number of divisions
and offices to be newly created. The Defense Agency will need to
realign its existing organizations so as enhance its policymaking
functions. The Defense Agency would like to find ways and means
for that purpose by breaking up DFAA.
The Defense Agency is also thirsty for new posts, including a
vice-ministerial-level defense councillor post that is on a par
with the Foreign Ministry's deputy minister post. If DFAA is
dismantled, its director general post can be slotted in for that
new post.
In addition, the Defense Agency also eyes establishing local
outposts. The Defense Agency pales in comparison with other
government ministries and agencies because none of its internal
bureaus branches out across the nation. DFAA has a total of eight
local bureaus in the country. However, none of these local
bureaus serves as a point of contact for Japan's defense-related
policies in general. In the event of disasters, for instance,
each prefecture's governor is to ask a local garrison of the
Ground Self-Defense Force for help.
If DFAA is integrated into the Defense Agency, DFAA's local
bureaus can be transformed into outposts for the Defense Agency's
internal bureaus. One idea being floated is to turn each of these
local DFAA bureaus into a regional bloc defense bureau. Another
idea is to embed the nationwide network of SDF local recruiting
offices-currently under the wing of GSDF army headquarters-in
these regional defense bureaus as the Defense Agency's local
points of contact.
(3) Second-fiddle candidates for LDP leadership race -- Taku
Yamasaki, Koichi Kato, representatives from LDP factions, LDP
Upper House -- start preparatory steps for campaign
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Full)
February 5, 2006
Forces in the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) are quietly moving
into action with an eye on the September election for party
president that will determine who will succeed Prime Minister
Junichiro Koizumi.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe and other likely contenders
for the party leadership race apparently will move their
campaigns into full gear in the spring or later. However, "second-
fiddle candidates" are now waiting for their chances to exercise
their influence on the selection of candidates for the
presidential race by taking preparatory steps.
Yamasaki, Kato to respond to the government by pointing out what
is right and wrong
On Feb. 4 Taku Yamasaki visited the town of Mogami in Yamagata
Prefecture to deliver a speech in the home constituency of Koichi
Kato, a longtime ally of Yamasaki.
Yamasaki said, "The next leader must balance domestic politics
and foreign policy."
TOKYO 00000642 008 OF 011
Kato stated: "President Bush has told Mr. Koizumi that Japan-
China relations should be repaired. I'm concerned about Mr.
Koizumi's foreign policy."
The two once formed a group with Koizumi called the "YKK trio."
Yamasaki expressed in early January his desire to run in the
presidential race. He said in a speech on Feb. 4, "Mr. Kato is
one of the qualified candidates for the presidency." Kato has
recently noticeably distanced himself from Koizumi, while
standing at the forefront of criticizing the leadership in
meetings of the party's General Council.
Regarding the government's proposal of revising the Imperial
House Law, about which a cautious view is growing in the ruling
and opposition camps, Kato pointed out, "We will have no choice
but to agree to the prime minister's proposal in the end."
Yamasaki then agreed to Kato's view.
The two were not necessarily solely criticizing Koizumi, but they
appear to be aiming at playing up their political identity by
pointing out to the government what they think is right or wrong.
Factions to avoid becoming "hunting grounds"
In a meeting on Feb. 2 of his faction, Chairman Yuji Tsushima
said, "As a policy group, it is important for us to work out
responsible policies for the public." He underscored his
intention to come up with his faction's policy principles around
mid-June.
Last December the Tsushima faction (formerly the Hashimoto
faction) staved off a breakup after nearly one and a half years
of decline. It will be difficult, however, for the faction to
pick its own candidate for the presidency. By issuing a set
policy principles, the faction aims not only at justifying its
reason for existence but also at confirming internal unity so
that the faction would not become a hunting ground for other
factions.
Factions in the LDP are in similar circumstances more or less.
The Komura faction plans to formulate a policy statement calling
for consideration not only to equal opportunity but also to equal
results for all. The Nikai faction is working on its own policy
proposals.
Since the factions have rapidly lost influence since the
inauguration of the Koizumi government, the prevailing view is
that the factions will not take the initiative in selecting
Koizumi's successor. They are having a hard time finding ways to
be involved in the presidential election.
Aoki remonstrates with Koizumi about his way of administration
In a meeting on the night of Jan. 24 between Koizumi and senior
ruling bloc members at the Prime Minister's Official Residence,
Mikio Aoki, chairman of the LDP caucus in the House of
Councillors, gave Koizumi a warning, saying, "It would be better
for the prime minister not to talk about the presidential
election."
In a question-and-answer session at the full Upper House session
on Jan. 24, Aoki referred to the good and bad effects of the
TOKYO 00000642 009 OF 011
Koizumi reform drive. He made this candid statement about the
Koizumi style politics, "The prime minister should stop
criticizing" the Upper House members elected in the proportional
representation segment and their support bodies "for being forces
of resistance."
Aoki is interested in how to fight Upper House elections, which
will take place next summer. He intends to go into those
elections using a conventional election strategy. Regarding the
view that Abe should be the character to use in the election, he
commented, "We were defeated in the 2004 election by using
Koizumi and Abe as the election combination." He has sought to
check the mood that Abe should be regarded as the most likely
successor to Koizumi.
(4) Bush and Koizumi - Battle over beef imports (part 1): Prompt
decision on second ban has driven splinter in alliance even
deeper
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Slightly abridged)
February 5, 2006
Following the finding of specified risk materials (SRM) in a US
beef shipment to Japan, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on the
morning of Jan. 20 ordered his staff to suspend trade for the
second time.
In Dec. 2003, the Japanese government placed a ban on US beef
imports shortly after the first discovery of a BSE-infected cow
in the US. Tokyo then decided to reopen the market under the
conditions that only beef from cattle aged up to 20 months with
SRM removed can be exported to Japan. But the incident happened
only a month after the resumption of the trade.
Referring to US beef in a policy speech given shortly before his
decision to place the second ban, Koizumi underscored, "We will
secure food safety and a peace of mind from the consumers'
perspective."
A proposal to place a partial ban was at first floated at a
meeting of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) and
the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, but Koizumi
promptly decided to place a total embargo, projecting his
resolve.
It is said that Japan-US relations have never been better thanks
to the firm relationship of trust between Koizumi and Bush. Bush
has steered clear of applying pressure on Japan, a measure that
had marred bilateral relations during the Clinton administration.
However, the issue of whether to resume US beef imports has been
the only exception to such a smooth relationship.
In June 2004, the G-8 Summit was held at Sea Island, Georgia.
During the Japan-US summit meeting held over lunch, Bush stressed
how delicious US beef was, that meat having been served as a main
dish, and he then led off the subject by asking, "What has become
of the BSE issue?"
His remark implicitly reflected his hope for an early resumption
of beef imports by Japan, but Koizumi sidestepped the question,
noting, "Experts are now discussing the issue."
During the summit meeting in Sept. 2004, held under the condition
that the US side bring up the BSE issue, according to a senior
TOKYO 00000642 010 OF 011
Foreign Ministry official, Koizumi again replied, "The issue
should be judged from a scientific viewpoint."
Then National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, who was present
at the meeting, reportedly called on Koizumi to make a political
decision, noting, "You say that the issue should be judged from a
scientific viewpoint, but there needs to be political will to
make a top-down decision." This statement was not released out of
consideration to bilateral relations.
As the US government and Congress became increasingly disgruntled
with Koizumi's adamant attitude and toughened their request, the
reaction on the Japanese side became even stronger.
At the time, Japanese beef exports to the US were still under
suspension, a measure taken after an outbreak of foot-and-mouth
disease. The US has kept the import ban in place due to the
discovery of a BSE-infected cow in Japan in Sept. 2001.
Japan adopted a blanket cattle inspection system to ensure food
safety, but the US government refused to lift the import ban on
Japanese beef.
An aide to Koizumi complained of a unilateral request from
Washington: "Japan is carrying out a blanket inspection, and yet
the US has refused to lift the import ban on Japanese beef.
Unless the US removes the ban in Japanese beef, Japan will not
lift the ban on US beef imports."
On Dec. 12, Tokyo and Washington mutually announced their
decisions to restart beef imports from each other. It appeared
that a splinter in the alliance had been pulled out.
However, it now turns out that the splinter has been driven
deeper into the alliance with the imposition of a second ban on
US beef imports by Japan, following the finding of SRM in a US
beef shipment to Japan.
(5) Bush and Koizumi - battle over beef imports (part 2): Power
bases: Clash over food safety, interest
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Excerpts)
February 6. 2006
Ever since Japan suspended US beef imports in Dec. 2003,
President Bush has continued to urge Prime Minister Koizumi to
reopen the Japanese market. The Republican Party's election
situation is behind Bush's continuing call for reinstating the
beef trade.
Major beef producing states in the US are Texas, where the
President himself has a ranch, Nebraska, Kansas and Colorado in
order of output. The Farm Belt covering those mid-western states,
where livestock raising is a major industry, is the Republican
Party's power base.
The National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) donated 386,000
dollars to political parties and candidates in the 2004 election,
of which 87% went to the Republican Party and its candidates. For
his reelection in 2004 and the Republican Party's victory in the
2006 off-year election, Bush needed to obtain support from beef
producers by thrusting at Japan the request for the resumption of
beef trade.
TOKYO 00000642 011 OF 011
Countering Bush's request, Koizumi has continued to insist, "I
will judge whether or not to resume beef trade from a scientific
perspective." Koizumi on his part had his own election situation.
In order for him to press ahead with his reform initiative,
countering "forces of resistance," who were against the
privatization of postal services and Japan Highway Public
Corporation, it was necessary to obtain popular support.
Voters in urban areas, who ushered in the Liberal Democratic
Party's (LDP) landslide victory in the September general election
last year, have been the support base for the Koizumi reform
initiative. Such people are at the same time consumers who are
sensitive to food safety. If Koizumi gives priority to the Japan-
US alliance relationship, making light of food safety, the
public's support for his reform efforts would immediately lose
steam.
Looking back on Koizumi's adamant stance, one staff member at the
Prime Minister's Official Residence noted: "The prime minister
has consistently insisted that he would judge whether to restart
US beef imports or not from a scientific perspective. So much so,
we even thought we should consider the possibility of resuming
such imports ourselves."
Koizumi has categorically expressed his resolve to step down in
September. However, in order to obtain support from the people
for the continuation of his reform initiative, he has found it
difficult to decide once more to resume the beef trade in a
casual manner. On the other hand, Bush is under the gun to
strongly urge Japan to resume US beef imports in order to help
secure a Republican Party victory in the off-year election.
Differences in their power bases are working to prolong the US
beef import issue and even exacerbate it, despite the honeymoon
relationship.
SCHIEFFER