Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06SEOUL601, KOREA SPECIAL 301 IPR REVIEW: EMBASSY RECOMMENDS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SEOUL601.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06SEOUL601 | 2006-02-23 22:46 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Seoul |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHUL #0601/01 0542246
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 232246Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6135
INFO RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 2800
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1746
UNCLAS SEOUL 000601
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB/TPP/IPC AND EAP/K
STATE PASS USTR FOR CHOE-GROVES, CUTLER AND KI
COMMERCE PASS USPTO FOR URBAN
STATE PASS LIBRARY OF CONGRESS FOR TEPP AND POOR
TREASURY FOR IS/ISA/BUCKLEY AND ITT/CHANG
COMMERCE FOR 4431/IEP/OPB/EAP/MBMORGAN AND JBOGER
GENEVA FOR USTR
TAGS: ETRD KIPR ECON PREL KS
E.O. 12958: N/A
SUBJECT: KOREA SPECIAL 301 IPR REVIEW: EMBASSY RECOMMENDS
RETAINING "WATCH LIST" STATUS FOR KOREA
REF: A) SEOUL 212
B) 05 SEOUL 5122
C) 05 SEOUL 4551
D) 05 SEOUL 3942
E) 05 SEOUL 3903
F) 05 SEOUL 3277
G) 05 SEOUL 2936
H) 05 SEOUL 2435
I) 05 SEOUL 1256
J) 05 SEOUL 932
K) 05 SEOUL 872
OVERVIEW
--------
¶1. (SBU) Following Korea's removal from the Special 301
"Priority Watch List" in April 2005, the Korean government
continued to move forward in a number of areas to improve
the level of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection
in Korea. These measures included: introducing legislation
that will significantly enhance protection for sound
recordings transmitted over the Internet (both peer-to-peer
and web-casting); implementing regulations that restore the
ability of the Korea Media Rating Board to take necessary
steps to stop film piracy; increasing enforcement activities
by the Standing Inspection Team against institutions using
illegal software; establishment of the Copyright Protection
Center to better safeguard IPR both online and offline; and
a commitment to the continue the implementation of the "IPR
Master Plan" under the leadership of the Prime Minister's
Office, with the aim of providing overall policy guidance to
the government as it works to further improve IPR protection
in Korea.
¶2. (SBU) Korean recognition of the importance of IPR
protection has increased in recent years, and will likely
improve further as the amount and value of domestic Korean
IPR grows. Recent judicial decisions concerning piracy of
copyrighted materials, and the scope of liability in cases
involving illegal file-sharing and other IPR cases, are
providing useful precedents and helping to bring Korea's
legal system in line with international norms. While some
civil society groups continue to call for "fair use" and
demand "netizen" rights, general public sentiment towards
IPR violations is progressing toward acknowledgement of the
criminality of using IPR content without paying for it.
¶3. (SBU) Public and private interest in effective IPR
enforcement has been manifested through a series of
seminars, conferences and resolutions considering how to
actively enforce rightholders' claims. As Korea moves to
establish itself as a world leader in information technology
(IT) through innovations in both hardware and software, more
attention is being paid to the benefits that will accrue to
Korean rightholders through a comprehensive and vigorous
approach to IPR enforcement. Additionally, the Korean
government's pursuit of a U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement
should provide additional impetus this year toward further
enhancement of Korea's IPR regime.
¶4. (SBU) Despite this progress, the Embassy's view is that
Korea should be retained on the Special 301 "Watch List."
Korea's IPR protection regime continues to have important
gaps, and changes need to be made to Korean law to
strengthen protection of temporary copies, and allow for
technological protection measures, Internet Service Provider
(ISP) liability, ex parte relief, and coordination between
Korean health and IPR authorities to prevent marketing
approvals for patent-infringing products. In addition,
Korea still lacks full retroactive protection for pre-
existing copyrighted works, and its copyright terms need to
be extended. Finally, we remain concerned about
insufficient progress in fighting book piracy in
universities and street vendor sales of illegally copied
DVDs, and continue to cast a watchful eye to ensure no
erosion of protection for confidential pharmaceutical test
data. End Overview.
KOREAN IPR PROTECTION IN 2005
-----------------------------
¶5. (U) In support of the above recommendation, this message
focuses primarily on new developments in Korean intellectual
property rights protection in 2005, while also outlining the
general state of affairs on IPR protection, including the
enforcement situation, and the identification of continuing
gaps in Korea's IPR protection regime. While not an
exhaustive review, we have addressed most salient issues.
The issues covered below are:
-- Copyright Law
-- Computer Program Protection Act
-- Copyright Treaties
-- Copyright-related Judicial Cases
-- Data Protection
-- Patent Protection
-- Enforcement Trends
-- Software Piracy
-- Optical Media Piracy
-- Counterfeit Goods
-- International Cooperation and Training
-- Korea's "IPR Master Plan"
-- Conclusion and Comment
COPYRIGHT LAW
-------------
¶6. (U) Because Korea has one of the highest levels of
broadband Internet penetration in the world, the United
States has urged the Korean government to develop an
effective response to the unique challenges posed by the
changing nature of digital copyright piracy. In particular,
we have sought improvements to Korean copyright law to stem
Internet-based copyright violations.
¶7. (U) In 2005, the Korean government prepared and submitted
several very important amendments to the Copyright Act. The
proposed amendments would significantly enhance protection
for sound recordings transmitted over the Internet, either
through peer-to-peer transmission or via web-casting, by
giving rightholders, performers, and phonogram producers
significantly enhanced rights to control the transmission or
broadcast of their phonograms. The amendments would also
limit public performances of copyrighted works and eliminate
the complaint requirement in certain cases.
¶8. (U) Unfortunately, while the necessary legislation for
these amendments was introduced and underwent preliminary
deliberation at the Committee level in Korea's National
Assembly in late 2005, as of this report, the legislation
has not yet been enacted into law. Korean and foreign
copyright protection groups have testified at informal and
formal hearings in support of the legislation, and the USG
has also submitted formal comments in support of the
legislation. On the other side, "user rights" groups have
sought to water down or stall the legislation. We will
continue to monitor progress and encourage the Korean
National Assembly to take action on these important
amendments.
¶9. (U) Beyond the pending improved legislation, the United
States continues to discuss further improvements to the
Copyright Act with the Korean government. Currently, Korean
law does not extend the reproduction right to cover copies
made in the temporary memory of a computer, a significant
and still growing manner for use of copyrighted works. The
United States continues to urge Korea that to strengthen
both the Copyright Act and Computer Program Protection Act
by revising the laws to clarify that the copyright owner has
the exclusive right to make copies, temporary or permanent,
of a work or phonogram. We are also still concerned about
limitations on the use of technological protection measures
(TPM's) that manage access to a work, and we seek further
clarification on Internet Service Provider liability. The
current Copyright Act amendments still leave unclear the
scope of the underlying liability of service providers and
the limitations on and exceptions from that liability.
¶10. (U) The U.S. Government has also told the Korean
government that the private copy exceptions of the Copyright
Act generally should not be applicable to the Internet
environment, which by its very nature extends far beyond
private home use. Concerning library exceptions under
Korea's Copyright Act, the U.S. Government believes that a
notice period of at least 30 days should be given to
rightholders prior to the unauthorized digitization of their
works, to minimize any negative effects. Under the current
law, library exceptions still apply only to literary works
and not to broadcasts, performances and sound recordings.
The U.S. Government has also urged Korea to delete the
reciprocity limitations relating to database protection in
the Copyright Act, as it discourages the introduction of
databases from countries without such legislation, including
the United States.
¶11. (U) Korea currently provides copyright protection for
the life of the author plus 50 years. In line with
international trends, the United States is urging Korea to
extend the term of copyright protection for works and sound
recordings to the life of the author plus 70 years or 95
years from date of first publication where the author is a
legal entity.
COMPUTER PROGRAM PROTECTION ACT
-------------------------------
¶12. (U) Improvement of Korea's Computer Program Protection
Act (CPPA) to meet current challenges, as well as to comply
with new global norms, continues incrementally. Proposed
amendments to the CPPA would increase the power of the
Program Mediation and Deliberation Council (PDMC) and
increase penalties for assorted violations of Korean IPR-
related laws. Those amendments were introduced and
underwent preliminary deliberation in Korea's National
Assembly in late 2005. However, as of this report, the
legislation has not yet been enacted into law. While
supporting the amendments, the USG has suggested additional
improvements to the CPPA.
¶13. (U) Concerning software streaming programs -- computer
programs permitting the "streaming" of software from a
single server to multiple work stations -- no progress was
made in 2005 in clarifying the PDMC's mistaken
interpretation of the CPPA which included the inappropriate
normative statement that software developers "should" offers
users a license permitting streaming of their programs (Ref
F).
COPYRIGHT TREATIES
------------------
¶14. (U) Korea has ratified the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT),
and has committed to ratifying the WIPO Performances and
Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) after the prerequisite legislation
has been submitted and approved.
COPYRIGHT-RELATED JUDICIAL CASES
--------------------------------
¶15. (U) Complaints were filed throughout 2005 by a variety
of groups concerned with illegal sharing of files,
principally music. We are encouraged by a number of cases
concluded in 2005 that seem to provide the precedent for
increased legal protection for rightholders.
¶16. (U) Following a long series of appeals, in 2005 Soribada
III, which was Korea's most infamous peer-to-peer (P2P)
service provider, was ordered to shut down by Korea's
highest court, effectively ending the appeals process. A
final decision on Soribada's proposal to modify its service
to comply with the court's order and Korean laws is expected
soon. Prosecutors also ordered Daum and Naver, two of
Korea's largest Internet portals, to cooperate in efforts to
shut down blogs and other sites that share copyrighted
files.
¶17. (U) Bugs Music, a major P2P provider, also agreed to
stop providing files for free following a lengthy court
battle. Local rightholders sued to prevent Bugs Music from
continuing its service, and the settlement included Bugs
Music switching to a fee-based service and the transfer of
60 percent of the shares, as well as management rights, to a
domestic music industry group.
DATA PROTECTION
---------------
¶18. (U) At USG prompting, the Korea Food and Drug
Administration (KFDA) officially reconfirmed on March 31,
2005 that different versions of original drugs undergoing
post-marketing surveillance (PMS) in Korea are subject to
Korea's data protection regulations. This means that
manufacturers have to supply a full portfolio of clinical
data in order to obtain market approval if they intend to
market their drug while the original drug is still under
PMS, thus ensuring the continued honoring of commitments
related to data protection required by Article 39.3 of the
WTO TRIPS Agreement.
PATENT PROTECTION
-----------------
¶19. (U) Patent protection in Korea is generally solid, as
long as patent rights are clearly established. The Korean
Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) has amended relevant
rules to address U.S. concerns regarding restrictions on
patent term extension for certain pharmaceutical,
agrochemical and animal health products.
¶20. (U) However, an issue of continuing concern has been the
lack of coordination between the Korea Intellectual Property
Organization (KIPO) and the Korea Food and Drug
Administration (KFDA), which can result in the granting of
marketing approval for products that may infringe on
existing patents.
¶21. (U) Also on the patent front, U.S. firms have pointed to
Korean courts' apparent unwillingness to provide injunctive
relief in cases where KIPO or a lower court has established
that a rightholder's patent has been infringed upon, if the
case remains under appeal at the Patent Court or a higher
court. This allows the infringing products to remain on the
market until a final determination has been made. Korea's
Patent Court apparently lacks the legal authority to grant
injunctive relief. Although the Korean civil courts have
the authority to issue injunctive relief in patent cases, in
practice such relief remains rare, since the civil courts
tend to defer to the Patent Court.
ENFORCEMENT TRENDS
------------------
¶22. (U) The establishment of Korea's Copyright Protection
Center (CPC) in 2005, to conduct both online and off-line
copyright investigations, was a welcome move and we have
urged the Korean government to make effective use of the
CPC's investigative capabilities and to make its services
available to all rightholders, Korean and international.
The CPC has been receptive and generally internationalist in
approach. From its inception in April 2005 until year's
end, CPC investigated nearly 37,000 online users, and
brought criminal complaints against 802. These
investigations resulted in the deletion of almost 13 million
illegal files, the vast majority being music.
¶23. (U) Among its most prominent cases, the CPC abetted the
useful judicial precedents noted above by filing a criminal
complaint against Soribada III, a renowned peer-to-peer
service provider, and against five individuals for
maintaining illegal files on one of Soribada's chat sites.
CPC also filed criminal complaints against individuals for
illegally uploading music to be shared on Internet "cafes"
and "blogs." Additionally, CPC filed charges against the
operator of one such "cafe" for facilitating the illegal
sharing of files through his Internet site.
¶24. (U) During the same period, the CPC also looked into
3,452 cases of possible offline copyright violations --
covering music, video, publications, and games. Of those
investigations, approximately 2,900 resulted in seizure or
administrative action, and 546 were referred for criminal
complaints. In the offline arena, music-related cases made
up the largest group -- both in terms of number of cases,
and in seizures.
¶25. (U) According to ROKG data on the level of fines and
jail sentences imposed on infringers, there is an
accelerating rate of investigations, trials and convictions
in many areas. For instance, during the first three
quarters of 2005 (latest data available), fines were issued
in 17,015 cases of IPR violations. Jail sentences were
issued in 780 cases, with 103 cases resulting in
imprisonment. The United States continues to urge Korea to
further strengthen penalties for IPR violations in order to
increase their deterrent effect against piracy.
¶26. (U) Korean authorities from a variety of agencies and
authorities worked together to increase the level of IPR
awareness on university campuses before conducting intensive
enforcement campaigns coinciding with the opening of the
school year in September 2005. During this enforcement
campaign, more than 110 copy-shops were investigated, with
more than 5,500 seizures of illegally copied publications.
While the number of facilities investigated and the number
of publications seized was more than double that of the
previous year, the overwhelming majority of the seizures
were copies of Korean publications.
¶27. (U) In January 2006, the Seoul Central District
Prosecutor's office declined to prosecute more than 13,000
individuals accused of illegal file sharing by a copyright
enforcement NGO (Ref A), even as it clarified that it would
pursue charges against individuals involved in online
copyright infringement for commercial gain. While the
Prosecutor's explanation for its decision did not
specifically establish thresholds for prosecution, the
Embassy is concerned that the prosecutors unintentionally
sent a mixed message to the public, especially young users
of popular Internet file-sharing services.
SOFTWARE PIRACY
---------------
¶28. (U) Korea has made significant progress towards
decreasing the rate of software piracy in recent years. The
Standing Inspection Team (SIT) of the Ministry of
Information and Communication continues to conduct raids on
commercial firms and other institutions suspected of using
illegal software. The total number of raids conducted by
the SIT in 2005 was 2,537, according to Korean authorities.
Of those inspected, some 1,556 were found to be using
pirated software.
¶29. (U) Despite these efforts, Korea's software piracy rate
in 2005 was estimated to be 46 percent by the Business
Software Alliance (Ref B) -- the same piracy rate as in
2004, but reflecting a slight decline in estimated losses
from USD 276 million in 2004 to USD 258 million in 2005.
The Seoul office of the Alliance reports that it has enjoyed
good cooperation in enforcement actions with Korean
authorities, including the Standing Inspection Team.
OPTICAL MEDIA PIRACY
--------------------
¶30. (U) While pirated audio-visual DVD's, sold on the street
by informal vendors, may not be as significant a problem as
in other countries, concerns remain about ineffective
enforcement efforts. The Korean government has not
routinely conducted enforcement actions against retail-level
operations, in order to focus their efforts on locating
large caches of pirated material, or large-scale copying
facilities. In 2005, the Korean police did conduct a
targeted campaign for a certain time against pirated goods
sold at the Yongsan Electronics Market, the most notorious
outlet, and this raid appeared to have some limited impact
on the trade. We will continue to urge the Korean
government to be more proactive at all levels of
enforcement, large and small, in order to reinforce public
perceptions of the criminality of copyright violations.
COUNTERFEIT GOODS
-----------------
¶31. (U) The Korea Customs Service kicked off a special
border enforcement initiative in February 2006 to focus on
intercepting counterfeit items -- especially garments and
high-end consumer goods, as well as pharmaceuticals and
automotive parts. This three month program consists of
nearly 100 inspection teams working with rightholders and
counterparts in KIPO and a number of international chambers
of commerce. This effort follows two similar initiatives in
2005, which resulted in 63 convictions and seizures worth
USD 23 million. By country, Korean firms are concerned most
about counterfeit auto parts, Europeans about fashionable
consumer goods, and both American and European firms suffer
from counterfeit pharmaceuticals. Many counterfeits appear
to be imported from China or Southeast Asia. Adequate
protection of trademarks also continues to be a problem of
concern in Korea.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND TRAINING
--------------------------------------
¶32. (U) Following up on an April 2005 meeting between Korean
government officials and a Strategy Targeting Organized
Piracy (STOP!) delegation, Korean customs, patent and other
officials have continued to discuss best practices and
enhanced efforts to fight the trade in counterfeited goods.
Since then, USG and Korean officials have continued that
dialogue in the customs, patent and enforcement areas.
Korean customs practices follow TRIPS requirements in cases
of suspect goods and the Korean Customs Service (KCS)
conducts inspections and raids using specially-trained IPR
task force teams.
¶33. (U) The generally high level of technical expertise in
Korea has allowed USG training to focus on trademark
adjudication, and judicial and administrative processes --
especially related to copyrights and patents. USG-funded
training took place on several occasions in 2005, both in
Seoul and in Washington, including a special State
Department-funded IPR Enforcement Workshop in Seoul which
was heavily attended by IPR-related judges and prosecutors.
KOREA's "IPR MASTER PLAN"
-------------------------
¶34. (U) The Korean government has reaffirmed its commitment
to the "IPR Master Plan," originally issued in early 2005,
and has assured us that the Plan will continue to evolve to
address new concerns as they arise. (Ref I) The Master
Plan, which is maintained and monitored by the Prime
Minister's Office, may serve as a useful way to ensure USG
concerns on IPR issues are recognized and remain on the
Korean government's agenda as priorities.
¶35. (U) In addition to the items already on the Master Plan
-- see last year's submission for a full listing -- we have
asked the Korean government to also include and consider
many of our other concerns, such as the following:
-- Renunciation of Program Deliberation and Mediation
Committee (PDMC) statement on software licensing;
-- Providing all rights under the Copyright Act on a
national treatment basis;
-- Codifying doctrines of secondary liability for copyright
infringement;
-- Providing for ex parte remedies;
-- Strengthening of technological protection measure
provisions;
-- Narrowing of library exceptions;
-- Avoiding over-broad exemptions for distance learning;
-- Extension of copyright terms;
-- Maintaining an efficient and fair system of ratings for
foreign works and sound recordings;
-- Effective enforcement actions, including enforcement
against textbook piracy, DVD piracy, and end-user software
piracy;
-- Application of sentencing guidelines to ensure deterrent
sentences;
-- Harmonization of the Copyright Act and Computer Program
Protection Act;
-- Continued cooperation on the STOP! Initiative;
-- Continued cooperation on the APEC Anti-counterfeiting and
Piracy Initiative.
CONCLUSION AND COMMENT
----------------------
¶36. (SBU) Korea's planned future growth is centered on its
acknowledged strengths in IT, and the country's stated
desire to serve as a regional leader in investment and
exports. This, coupled with an increasing need to protect
Korean IPR, provides us reason to believe Korea will
continue to be a cooperative partner in protecting American
IPR and rightholders. The overall IPR environment in Korea
is improving and there are signs that it will get better.
The year 2005 was particularly encouraging on the
enforcement front. While this is good news, there are still
a number of areas in both the legislative and enforcement
arenas where protections should be increased. Therefore, we
recommend Korea remain on the Special 301 Watch List for
¶2006.
¶37. (SBU) As a final point, the Embassy notes that in its
2006 Special 301 submission, the International Intellectual
Property Association (IIPA) suggests an out-of-cycle review
for Korea, particularly to assess progress on book and music
piracy during 2006. While we agree that it is imperative
that we signal to Korea how important it is for the National
Assembly to pass the pending Copyright Act amendments as
soon as possible, the Embassy believes that an out-of-cycle
review is unnecessary for both tactical and practical
reasons. Tactically, this year's Free Trade Agreement talks
already provide strong leverage to pursue additional changes
to Korean IPR law in 2006. In practical terms, any out-of-
cycle review could merely end up duplicating the effort to
negotiate the IPR Chapter of the FTA, since the out-of-cycle
review and FTA negotiations could end up taking place at the
same time.
VERSHBOW