Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06SEOUL491, KOREA LAUNCHES SPECIAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SEOUL491.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06SEOUL491 2006-02-13 22:43 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Seoul
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHUL #0491/01 0442243
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 132243Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5965
INFO RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0500
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO CITY 0290
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0153
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0069
UNCLAS SEOUL 000491 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/K AND EB/TPP/BTA 
PASS USTR FOR CUTLER AND KI 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD PREL KS IN MX
SUBJECT: KOREA LAUNCHES SPECIAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH 
INDIA AND MEXICO 
 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) Korea added to its rapidly lengthening list of 
trade negotiations by announcing on February 7 the launch of 
Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) 
negotiations with India during the visit to Seoul of Indian 
President Abdul Kalam.  The same week, Korea and Mexico held 
a first round of talks aimed at concluding a "Strategic 
Economic Complementation Agreement" (SECA).  According to 
contacts at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 
(MOFAT), both agreements are less ambitious in terms of 
liberalization than more comprehensive free trade agreements 
(FTA's), although MOFAT claims to plan on striving for 
getting as close to real FTA's as it can.  Both initiatives 
will require the partners to hold rounds every two months, 
and take approximately two years to conclude.  End summary. 
 
2. (SBU) Econoff met on February 10 with MOFAT FTA 
Coordination Division Deputy Director Noh Won-il to discuss 
Korea's plans for a CEPA with India, and with Deputy 
Director Park Tae-young to discuss the negotiations with 
Mexico. 
 
INDIA: SHALL I COMPARE THEE TO AN FTA? 
-------------------------------------- 
 
3. (SBU) According to Deputy Director Noh, the decision to 
launch CEPA negotiations grew out of a bilateral joint study 
group composed of government, business, and academic 
representatives that convened four times between January 
2005 and January 2006 to analyze the feasibility of a Korean- 
India free trade agreement.  The group came back with a 
positive response.  According to an economic impact analysis 
done as part of the joint study by the state-affiliated 
think tank Korea Institute for International Economic Policy 
(KIEP), an FTA with India would boost Korea's exports to 
India by 80 percent, and imports from India by 30 percent, 
as well as have smaller but positive impacts on national 
income.  Korea agreed to term the agreement a Comprehensive 
Economic Partnership Agreement at India's behest, as India 
claimed there would be too much domestic Indian opposition 
to a "free trade agreement." 
 
4. (SBU) Noh said that the CEPA would cover the "traditional 
FTA aspects" of trade in goods and services, but would also 
include coverage of investment promotion and development 
cooperation projects that are dear to India.  The Korea- 
India joint statement announcing the negotiations states 
that the agreement will cover trade in goods; trade in 
services; trade facilitation measures; promotion, 
facilitation, and liberalization of investment flows; and 
measures for promoting bilateral economic cooperation in 
identified sectors.  He commented that the full framework of 
what will be included in the final agreement is not yet 
certain.  Korea is pursuing the inclusion of chapters on 
intellectual property rights, government procurement, and 
competition policy, but the outcome of this drive is not yet 
clear.  Noh said that Korea was pleased that India accepted 
a line in the joint statement stating that the agreement 
could be expanded to include "other areas." 
 
5. (SBU) Noh was less forthcoming about the degree of 
liberalization that could be expected from the CEPA.  While 
he maintained that the scope of sectors covered would be 
broad, he implied that the liberalization may not be too 
deep in many sectors.  Noh said that since India's average 
tariff for industrial goods is over 30 percent and Korea 
already has a trade surplus with India, Seoul does not 
expect India to lower many industrial tariffs significantly. 
He predicted that "slightly less" than 90 percent of trade 
will be liberalized as a result of the CEPA.  For example, 
he did not expect India to liberalize automobile imports, 
but maintained that Korea's auto makers would not be 
concerned, since their India strategy was already focused 
more on local production than exports. 
 
6. (SBU) According to Noh, the first round of CEPA 
negotiations will take place in mid-March in New Delhi. 
 
MEXICO: WOULD AN FTA BY ANOTHER NAME STILL SMELL SWEET? 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
 
7. (SBU) According to Deputy Director Park, the Strategic 
Economic Complementation Agreement (SECA) with Mexico is in 
 
some ways the structural antipode to the CEPA with India. 
Whereas the CEPA looks to be broad in scope but shallow in 
liberalization, the SECA will cover a much narrower range of 
goods, but liberalize trade in those sectors more fully. 
 
8. (SBU) Korea has long sought an FTA with Mexico to counter 
trade diversion from Mexico's FTA's with Japan and others, 
which Seoul believes is siphoning off its exports.  However, 
despite the conclusion of a joint feasibility study, Mexico 
refused to negotiate a free trade agreement due to strong 
opposition from domestic industry, which (as Mexico told 
Korea) was already too busy digesting Mexico's existing 
FTA's to be able to handle another. 
 
9. (SBU) Park said that Korea consented to a less ambitious 
agreement in order to get its nose under the tent and to at 
least liberalize those sectors that Mexico is willing to 
open.  However, the scope and depth of coverage is still 
under negotiation.  The initial idea is that it would cover 
trade in goods (including agriculture), services, 
investment, and competition policy, as well as perhaps 
intellectual property rights and economic cooperation. 
According to Park, Mexico has already informed Korea that it 
wants autos, steel and chemicals excluded from the 
agreement. 
 
10. (SBU) The SECA negotiations, like the talks with India, 
are on a two-month rotating schedule, although the SECA 
talks have no notional end date. 
 
COMMENT: WHAT'S IN A NAME? 
-------------------------- 
 
11. (SBU) Based on the information currently available, it 
is clear that neither of these agreements constitute an FTA 
according to U.S. definitions.  It was also clear from the 
discussions with MOFAT that Korea does not have firm 
preconceptions of what it wants out of these negotiations, 
and that these agreements are primarily targets of 
opportunity.  Seoul is entering into the talks without set 
goals, but rather with a general approach of seeking to get 
as much as can now while laying the institutional groundwork 
for being able to gradually expand coverage and 
liberalization over time.  In the case of India, MOFAT also 
considers the CEPA to be a fundamental building block for 
defining the economic aspects of its relationship with a 
country it views as a future Great Power. 
 
VERSHBOW