Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06PARIS755, MITTAL STEEL RE-AWAKENS ECONOMIC PATRIOTISM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PARIS755.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06PARIS755 2006-02-06 14:36 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

061436Z Feb 06
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 000755 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
PASS FEDERAL RESERVE 
PASS CEA 
STATE FOR E, EB, EUR/WE 
TREASURY FOR DO/IM SOBEL, RHARLOW, LHULL 
TREASURY ALSO FOR DO/IMB AND DO/E WDINKELACKER 
LABOR FOR ILAB - WBRUMFIELD 
USDOC FOR 4212/MAC/EUR/OEURA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EFIN ECON ELAB PGOV FR
SUBJECT: MITTAL STEEL RE-AWAKENS ECONOMIC PATRIOTISM 
 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, NOT FOR INTERNET 
 
Ref: A) Luxembourg 31  B) Paris 357 
 
1.  (SBU) SUMMARY: French politicians, caught off guard at 
first, are finding it hard to resist evoking "economic 
patriotism" in response to Mittal Steel's surprise hostile 
takeover bid of Arcelor.  After Mittal preemptively assured 
it had no job cuts in mind, the latest salvos have shifted 
to disingenuous criticism regarding a perceived lack of an 
industrial plan.  END SUMMARY. 
 
A Week of Announcements 
----------------------- 
2.  (U) Immediately after Mittal Steel's surprise takeover 
offer for Arcelor (ref A), Finance Minister Thierry Breton 
led off initial negative GOF reaction, noting he was 
"shocked" by the way Mittal had announced its offer.  Mittal 
rushed to correct that "faux pas" by scheduling its first 
meeting on Monday January 30, among many others the first 
week after its announcement, with Breton.  At a later press 
conference, Indian-born CEO Lakshmi Mittal said he had 
explained the reason to Breton: a leak about the offer had 
forced the publicly traded company to go completely public. 
Mittal also stressed he had assured Breton that Mittal did 
not intend to close any plants or cut jobs. 
 
3.  (U) Prime Minister Dominque de Villepin in a radio 
interview on January 31 criticized the takeover bid, saying 
it was bad form because it was "very" hostile, and bad 
business because, to his knowledge, it lacked any industrial 
plan.  He evoked his "economic patriotism" agenda (ref B), 
describing it as requiring all actors, including 
shareholders and business leaders, to mobilize.  Noting that 
President Chirac would meet with Luxembourg PM Juncker on 
February 1, he said what he wants is to quickly develop a 
European industrial policy, to create great French, and 
European, industrial champions.  He argued the Americans, 
Chinese, the Japanese, etc. already practice economic 
patriotism, and he called for collective responsibility to 
face the challenge.  He asserted that the government role is 
to stand beside the movement for industrial champions with a 
true policy of "economic intelligence," which France is 
already doing.  Neither President Chirac nor Villepin made 
any comments after the meeting with Juncker regarding 
Mittal. 
 
4.  (U) We have seen press reports that the Indian Secretary 
of Commerce while in London on February 2 expressed his 
concerns about French opposition to the Mittal bid, and 
announced the Indian government would be looking closely at 
future GOF pronouncements for anti-Indian bias.  Other press 
reports indicate varying degrees of official concern about 
the bid. 
 
5.  (U) On February 2, Finance Minister Breton sought to 
correct what some may have viewed as France's protectionist 
stance, saying he has nothing against India and admitting 
that it is up to Arcelor's shareholders to decide whether 
Mittal has an industrial plan (although adding he still has 
not seen evidence of one).  In his strongest statement to 
date, Breton published a letter in the Monday edition of the 
Financial Times (released on Sunday, February 5), saying 
that protectionism has no place in modern economic 
governance.  The PM, on Europe 1 radio Sunday night, 
affirmed that the State has a responsibility to check the 
validity of the transaction, indicated he still wants to 
know more, and urged continued "mobilization". 
 
6.  (U) Arcelor, for its part, immediately rejected the 
offer.  Later comments by CEO Dolle that if Mittal made 
another offer, the board would of course consider it, 
prompted one analyst to comment that the issue is neither 
political nor economic.  What matters is the price. 
 
Regulatory Responses 
-------------------- 
7.  (U) French securities regulator AMF (Autorite de Marches 
Financieres) decided on February 3 to postpone deciding 
whether it would assert jurisdiction to review the proposed 
takeover, announcing simply that it recognized the probable 
primacy of Luxembourg law but that it would consult with its 
counterparts in Luxembourg, Spain, and Belgium.  Although 
neither company is French (Mittal headquarters are in 
Rotterdam, Arcelor in Luxembourg), both companies are traded 
on the Paris-based Euronext exchange.  Moreover, France has 
not yet implemented the EU takeover directive, which would 
have ruled out AMF review.  The AMF on February 2 released a 
brochure on EU financial sector directives, indicating it 
expected France would transpose the takeover directive into 
national law before May 20, 2006. 
 
8. (U) Mittal Steel presumably will be able to avoid GOF 
review under its new "strategic sectors" decree (ref B), 
since it can take advantage of the carve-out for companies 
based in the European Union, thanks to its Rotterdam 
headquarters. 
 
COMMENTS 
-------- 
9. (SBU) The evolution of the French position could be due 
to differences between the Prime Minister's office and the 
Finance Ministry, the former being much more insistent about 
its economic patriotism agenda.  Perhaps one explanation for 
the hemming and hawing is French concern about outsourcing 
or "delocalization."  On the one hand, the GOF nod to 
individual responsibility in creating industrial champions 
(as opposed to governmental responsibility) is encouraging. 
On the other hand, the PM's elaboration of the GOF role in 
securing "economic intelligence," and an insistence by the 
AMF to review the bid, cast an ominous shadow of state 
interference in the French concept of an open investment 
regime.  The latest charge that Mittal lacks an industrial 
plan is, in this context, striking for its ambiguity.  (We 
suspect that by "industrial plan", the GOF wants to know how 
French jobs will be preserved.)  President Chirac's silence 
is also striking, although it should be noted he plans to 
travel to India on February 19. 
 
10.  (SBU) Alternatively, the evolution in the GOF position 
could be due to the problem of fitting a round peg in a 
square hole: the Mittal bid is not the best test of economic 
patriotism.  While the Luxembourg and Belgium governments 
are shareholders of Arcelor, France is not.  Mittal is a 
company based in the Netherlands with plants throughout 
Europe (including France), is traded in Europe (and New 
York), and is 97% controlled by a family that claims London 
for its home.  If the acquisition succeeds, Mittal will 
become a larger European company.  If the French were truly 
interested in creating European champions, not just French 
ones, it seems curious that the takeover bid should have 
prompted GOF opposition. 
STAPLETON#