Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06LAGOS177, NIGERIA: FY 2006 PROJECT PROPOSALS FOR ESF

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06LAGOS177.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06LAGOS177 2006-02-08 10:32 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Lagos
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

081032Z Feb 06
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 LAGOS 000177 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR AF/W 
STATE FOR INR/AA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KWMN KCRM PHUM ASEC ELAB SMIG NI
SUBJECT: NIGERIA:  FY 2006 PROJECT PROPOSALS FOR ESF 
ANTI-TIP FUNDING 
 
REF: 05 SECSTATE 226696 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1.  Mission Nigeria submits the following proposals to help 
Nigeria increase its capacity, raise community awareness, 
build anti-trafficking outreach networks and support a local 
NGO with anti-trafficking capacity-building focused on 
trafficking in women.  These proposals focus on states with 
significant trafficking problems, either as source or 
destination locations.  All four proposals are new projects. 
The total amount requested for the four proposals is 
$149,912.  End summary. 
 
--------------------------------------------- -------- 
ONE:  COMMUNITY DIALOGUE IN ENDEMIC TRAFFICKING AREAS 
--------------------------------------------- -------- 
 
2.  Title of project:  Program of action for community 
dialogue in select critical local government areas (LGAs) of 
Edo, Ogun, Akwa Ibom, Cross River, and Imo States. 
 
3.  Name of recipient organization / government agency: 
NAPTIP 
 
4.  Duration of project:  Two months 
 
5.  Description:  The project will bring together all 
stakeholders, including NAPTIP officials, immigration 
officers, school leaders, victims, local government 
officials, youth associations, parents, teachers, faith-based 
organizations, market women and women's groups, community 
leaders, and traditional rulers in each of the selected LGAs, 
in an unfettered environment for an exchange of ideas and 
discussion of NAPTIP's anti-TIP programs, government 
direction, TIP causes, public perception, and rehabilitation 
programs.  All unscripted responses will be recorded for air 
on local radio stations in these states in their local 
languages. 
 
6.  Justification:  A review of states where TIP is prevalent 
shows community apprehension towards government policies, due 
in part to the manner in which the programs are formulated 
and delivered without stakeholder and/or community input. 
Rather than building a basis for mutual cooperation and 
interaction, the programs instead alienate the public.  This 
program seeks to eliminate this problem by sharing NAPTIP and 
government plans, actions, and policies geared towards TIP 
with the stakeholders to assess their goals, seek their 
collaboration, identify access, strengthen collaboration, 
share best practices, and build cells of 
anti-human-trafficking advocates.  These dialogues will be 
recorded and aired on local radio in each local government 
area. 
 
7.  Performance indicators:  The primary performance 
indicator will be the number of anti-human-trafficking 
advocacy cells organized as a result of these sessions and 
broadcasts.  Through this process anti-TIP awareness will be 
increased in the LGAs and communities and an effective 
feedback mechanism from stakeholders to government/NAPTIP 
will be established.  The program will also provide valuable 
experience in developing programs for broadcast media that 
will be applied in future efforts. 
 
8.  Evaluation plan:  NAPTIP will report on completed 
sessions, provide the resulting broadcasts, follow-up on 
interactive sessions, and encourage regular meetings to share 
best practices among local governments. 
 
9.  Budget breakout (eleven events): 
 
Transportation for participants...............$25,025 
 
Materials and airtime/production..............$22,429 
 
Total........................................ .$47,454 
 
 
10.  Type and amount of host government contribution: 
Supporting activities for eleven events valued as follows: 
 
Venue and setup for meetings...................$5,610 
 
NAPTIP transportation to meetings..............$9,064 
 
Total........................................ .$14,674 
 
 
11.  Proposed funding mechanism:  Obligation and disbursement 
through Post per state-by-state implementation progress 
payments. 
 
12.  Embassy point of contact:  Poloff Gary B. Applegarth 
 
13.  Other donors, if any:  None 
 
--------------------------------------------- -------- 
TWO:  PRODUCTION OF MEDIA MESSAGES IN LOCAL LANGUAGES 
--------------------------------------------- -------- 
 
14.  Title of project:  Production of radio and television 
jingles in regional languages anti-human trafficking campaign 
promotion 
 
15.  Name of recipient organization / government agency: 
NAPTIP 
16.  Duration of project:  Two months 
 
17.  Description:  This project will produce 
anti-human-trafficking campaign jingles for radio and 
television in the five main languages in the country.  The 
endemic nature of human trafficking in some parts of the 
country requires a grass-roots approach to the packaging and 
direction of messages.  NAPTIP feels that ignorance of both 
the law and the damaging effects of trafficking can be 
reduced if messages are developed in the different regional 
languages.  Activities will include concept development, 
script writing, casting, music development, and promotion and 
production. 
 
18.  Justification:  Some previous NAPTIP initiatives have 
suffered from poor messaging that fails to reach and/or 
convince the target, at-risk populations.  After three years 
of operation NAPTIP conducted an assessment with stakeholder 
analysis, including the message recipients.  NAPTIP learned 
their messages would be more effective if they were produced 
in the dominant language in use in the respective areas. 
 
19.  Performance indicators:  Project performance will be 
demonstrated by the successful production of anti-TIP 
messages in the five major languages.  Effectiveness will be 
measured via feedback collected at regional sensitization 
events in the respective areas. 
 
20.  Evaluation plan:  NAPTIP will report progress in the 
production of each message over the two month period, and 
provide copies of the finished products. 
 
21.  Budget breakout (five messages): 
 
Casting and collation of rushes........$1,569 
 
Production and editing................$13,726 
 
Total.................................$15,295 
 
 
22.  Type and amount of host government contribution: 
Supporting activities valued as follows: 
 
Concept and script development.........$1,765 
 
 
23.  Proposed funding mechanism:  Obligation and disbursement 
through Post at completion. 
 
24.  Embassy point of contact:  Poloff Gary B. Applegarth 
 
25.  Other donors, if any:  None 
 
 
----------------------------------------- 
THREE:  MOBILIZING STRATEGIC STAKEHOLDERS 
----------------------------------------- 
 
26.  Title of project:  Mobilizing strategic stakeholders to 
combat human trafficking. 
 
27.  Name of recipient organization / government agency: 
Women's Consortium of Nigeria (WOCON) 
 
28.  Duration of project:  Twelve months 
 
29.  Description:  Mobilize and build the capacities of 
strategic stakeholders in the targeted source communities in 
Ogun, Ebonyi and Edo States and the destination / transit 
urban center of Lagos to prevent human trafficking, 
especially of women, and rescue and integrate those already 
trafficked to the receiving state of Lagos.  This will be 
achieved through sensitizing and training key stakeholders in 
the targeted areas; consulting with key stakeholders to 
obtain their commitment and input for addressing their 
communities; establishing social contracts with target 
communities and task forces to monitor and enforce its 
provisions; production of posters, t-shirts, stickers, 
booklets, and other educational or promotional materials; and 
building economic capacity within the target communities 
through establishing cooperatives and providing technical 
training. 
 
30.  Justification:  Although many stakeholders including 
NAPTIP are rising to the TIP challenge with some success, TIP 
remains a critical problem.  Anti-TIP activities are 
complicated by the uncoordinated and untrained approach used 
by those stakeholders attempting to intervene.  These 
shortcomings stem from a lack of understanding of the 
elements that constitute human trafficking, and ignorance to 
a standard approach for TIP law enforcement and prevention. 
Ignorance is especially prevalent regarding trafficking of 
children, as most people are oblivious to the problem, 
holding the misguided belief that children need to work hard 
or "suffer" if they are to succeed.  Consequently, many do 
not see that it is wrong for parents to give up their 
children to traffickers to be sold into domestic servitude. 
 
31.  Performance indicators:  At the end of the project 
social contracts describing strategies and commitments to 
combat human trafficking will be in place in the targeted 
communities of Edo, Ogun, Ebonyi and Lagos States.  At least 
four task force committees will be in place in the targeted 
areas to monitor community compliance with the social 
contracts and commitments to the prevention of human 
trafficking.  At least six income-generating cooperative 
groups comprising of ten persons each will be operating in 
the rural communities of Edo, Ogun and Ebonyi States.  The 
final indicator will be rescue and reintegration of at least 
30 trafficked persons.  The program will inform targeted 
rural communities about the adverse effects of human 
trafficking.  200 representatives of stakeholders and opinion 
shapers of the targeted communities will be sensitized and 
educated on the harmful effects of human trafficking as well 
as preventive measures.  500 booklets with guidelines for 
prevention and reintegration of trafficked persons will be 
produced and tested in the targeted communities in the four 
States. 
 
32.  Evaluation plan:  The impact on participants will 
evaluated through the completion of questionnaires.  The task 
force committees in each of the targeted communities will 
monitor the activities, and records will be assessed every 
month.  These results will be reported to Mission at least 
quarterly.  Visits will be made by WOCON to the targeted 
communities to directly assess the impact of the 
sensitization of the people through post-assessment surveys, 
particularly of the women and children who are most 
vulnerable to trafficking, to determine their level of 
enlightenment on the anti-trafficking campaign.  Finally, an 
impact assessment will be conducted three months after the 
last consultative forum in the communities and compared with 
the pre-assessment conducted at the beginning of the project. 
 
33.  Budget breakout: 
 
Preliminary evaluations of targeted areas....$1,946 
 
Production of materials......................$5,726 
 
Production of local media ads................$3,530 
 
Community outreaches in target states........$5,381 
 
Consultative fora (including materials)......$5,800 
 
Education of downstream trainers.............$8,665 
 
Media campaigns and publicity................$4,408 
 
Targeted training in each State..............$6,902 
 
Equipment.................................... $1,318 
 
Post-event assessments.......................$5,843 
 
Total.......................................$ 49,515 
 
 
34.  Type and amount of host government contribution: 
Supporting activities valued as follows: 
 
Production of local media ads................  $118 
 
Equipment.................................... $2,745 
 
Post-event assessments.......................$4,549 
 
Total........................................ $7,412 
 
 
35.  Proposed funding mechanism:  Obligation and disbursement 
through Post per implementation progress payments. 
 
36.  Embassy point of contact:  Poloff Gary B. Applegarth 
 
37.  Other donors, if any:  None 
 
------------------------------ 
FOUR:  SCHOOL OUTREACH PROGRAM 
------------------------------ 
 
38.  Title of project:  Sensitization outreach to secondary 
school teachers, guidance counselors, and local education 
authority staff in Edo, Ebonyi, Cross River, and Akwa Ibom 
States. 
 
39.  Name of recipient organization / government agency: 
NAPTIP 
 
40.  Duration of project:  Four days over a one-month period 
 
41.  Description:  The project will train education sector 
stakeholders in Edo, Ebonyi, Cross River, and Akwa Ibom 
States on the strategies used by traffickers, to improve the 
stakeholders' ability to convey the anti-human trafficking 
message to their students.  The program will enable NAPTIP to 
plan for integration of an anti-trafficking message into the 
school curriculum.  300 participants from selected schools 
and Local Government Areas of each State will meet in their 
respective capital cities. 
 
42.  Justification:  Meaningful grass-roots intervention on 
TIP depends on identifying the individuals who relate with 
and influence the at-risk population on daily basis. 
Teachers, guidance counselors and local education authority 
personnel are an effective conduit for education, 
information, and communication to their students.  The 
project will generate awareness and sensitize the teachers, 
guidance counselors and other stakeholders on the effects of 
human trafficking and child labor and better prepare them to 
pass the message to their students. 
 
43.  Performance indicators:  Through this program 
foundations for community-based vigilante groups will be 
established in the four target states, as well as 
anti-trafficking awareness groups at the schools.  This 
sensitization and outreach will increase stakeholder 
awareness and community involvement. 
 
44.  Evaluation plan:  NAPTIP will follow up on all events to 
ensure the message is carried to the schools, and a general 
overview and evaluation will be developed via questionnaire. 
 
45.  Budget breakout (four events): 
 
Participant transportation..................$21,961 
 
Event meals and refreshments................$15,687 
 
Total.......................................$ 37,648 
 
 
46.  Type and amount of host government contribution: 
Supporting activities for four events valued as follows: 
 
Venue and materials..........................$5,961 
 
Media communication and audio/visual.........$5,020 
 
Total.......................................$ 10,981 
 
 
47.  Proposed funding mechanism:  Obligation and disbursement 
through Post at completion. 
 
48.  Embassy point of contact:  Poloff Gary B. Applegarth 
 
49.  Other donors, if any:  None 
BROWNE