Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06BUENOSAIRES419, NEW INSIGHTS INTO INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06BUENOSAIRES419.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06BUENOSAIRES419 2006-02-22 20:03 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Buenos Aires
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBU #0419/01 0532003
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 222003Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3568
INFO RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 2089
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 5355
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 5331
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 4956
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 5140
RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 2774
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 1880
UNCLAS BUENOS AIRES 000419 
 
SIPDIS 
 
PASS FED BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR PATRICE ROBITAILLE 
EX-IM BANK FOR MICHELE WILKINS 
OPIC FOR GEORGE SCHULTZ AND RUTH ANN NICASTRI 
PASS USTR FOR SUE CRONIN 
TREASURY FOR RAMIN TOLOUI AND CHRIS KUSHLIS AND OCC 
FOR CARLOS HERNANDEZ 
USDOC FOR ALEXANDER PEACHER 
USDOL FOR ILAB PAULA CHURCH AND ROBERT WHOLEY 
HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL FOR POLAD 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN ELAB ETRD AR
SUBJECT: NEW INSIGHTS INTO INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN 
ARGENTINA 
 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1.  Third quarter INDEC figures show that the average 
per capita income of the ten percent of families with 
the highest incomes in Argentina was 34 times higher 
than that of the ten percent of families with the 
lowest incomes.  That difference in average incomes is 
the highest since the 2002 crisis.  Income inequality 
in Argentina was eight percent below the average for 
the rest of Latin America in the late 1990s, but a 
number of reputable analysts have argued that 
Argentina no longer belongs to the low-inequality 
group in Latin America.  Income distribution within 
Argentina worsened in most regions in the last 15 
years.  At the same time, however, the purchasing 
power of both the highest and lowest-income brackets 
rose to its highest level since the 2002 crisis.  End 
Summary. 
 
-------- ----------- ----------- ----- 
RECENT FIGURES ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION 
-------- ----------- ----------- ----- 
 
2.  The average per capita income of families 
comprising the ten percent of the families with the 
highest incomes (I+) was 34 times higher than the 
average per capita income of families belonging to the 
ten percent of families with the lowest incomes (I-). 
That information came from third quarter 2005 figures 
from the 31 most important urban areas, home to two 
thirds of Argentina's total population.  This 34-fold 
difference in average incomes is the highest since the 
end of the 2002 crisis (see Table I).  However, 
President Kirchner said on February 13 that income 
inequality would decrease in the following quarter, 
although he did not specify why or cite any particular 
measures he was taking to that end.  Minister of 
Economy Felisa Miceli critized the National Statistics 
Bureau (INDEC) methodology to determine inequality, 
saying that INDEC calculations considered only 
monetary income, and therefore omitted free goods 
provided to the poor by the state, such as some 
medicines or food from soup-kitchens. 
 
Table I 
Per capita income in the highest income families (I+) 
divided by per capita income in the lowest income 
families (I-) 
 
  Period   I+/I- 
 
III Q 2005  34.2 
I H 2005    29.4 
II H 2004   31.0 
I H 2004    31.0 
IV Q 2003   32.1 
May 2003    33.8 
Oct. 2002   34.7 
May 2002    42.0 
Oct. 2001   34.5 
May 2001    33.1 
 
Source: INDEC 
 
3.  In the Greater Buenos Aires (GBA) area, home to 
one-third of Argentina's population, the average per 
capita income of the top ten percent of families (I+) 
was 31.5 times higher than the average per capita 
income of families in the bottom ten percent (I-). 
 
 
 
This difference has been decreasing since the 2002 
crisis, but it is still well above the average 21-fold 
difference of the 1990s.  (Note: Official figures on 
inequality could be underestimated due to income 
understatements by the surveyed, especially those with 
the highest incomes.  Income understatements should 
not affect comparisons throughout time.  End note). 
 
---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ----- 
GREATER INEQUALITY WITH GREATER PURCHASING POWER? 
---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ----- 
 
4.  A growing inequality does not necessarily result 
in a deterioration of economic welfare.  The high 
levels of inequality in 2005 coexisted with the 
highest purchasing power since the early 2002 crisis 
for both the highest and lowest ten percent brackets. 
The economic crisis of 2002 undermined the purchasing 
power of incomes in all sectors and groups.  This 
deterioration was only overcome in 2005 (see Table 
II).  The purchasing power of I+ was 11.1 percent 
higher in the third quarter of 2005 than what it was 
in May 2001, and the purchasing power of I- was 7.5 
percent higher in the third quarter of 2005 than in 
May 2001. 
 
Table II 
Changes in real per capita income for the lowest and 
highest income families 
(Percent) 
 
  Period     Lowest    Highest 
             Incomes   Incomes 
               I-         I+ 
 
III Q 2005        7.5      11.1 
I H 2005          3.0      -8.7 
II H 2004        -2.5      -8.7 
I H 2004         -6.9     -12.8 
IV Q 2003       -18.4     -20.9 
May 2003        -28.9     -27.6 
Oct. 2002       -34.8     -31.6 
May 2002        -40.7     -24.9 
Oct. 2001        -6.3      -2.5 
May 2001                    0.0 
(base)            0.0 
 
Source:  Embassy, based on INDEC statistics 
 
5.  National income distribution was surveyed sparsely 
before 2000.  Official surveys have covered GBA on a 
periodic basis since 1974, but were only extended to 
other important urban areas since 2001.  However, 
private studies show that countrywide inequality 
remained low and constant during the 1960s and the 
early 1970s.  Inequality increased in the second half 
of 1970s, remained stable in the first half of the 
1980s, and increased again during the macroeconomic 
crisis of the late 1980s.  After stabilization, 
inequality went down, but did not reach the same pre- 
crisis levels.  The 2002 crisis increased inequality 
once again. 
 
6.  A Foundation for Latin American Research (FIEL) 
report showed that inequality worsened throughout the 
1990s.  For example, the ten percent of families with 
the highest incomes in GBA received 43.5 percent of 
all incomes in 1991, whereas they received 48.3 
percent of all incomes in 1998.  Income distribution 
in the rest of the country followed a similar pattern. 
General economic welfare increased during the 1990s 
 
 
despite greater inequality. 
 
7.  Inequality in Argentina was eight percent below 
the average for the rest of Latin America in the late 
1990s.  At that time, Argentina was one of the Latin 
American countries with the most uniform income 
distribution, along with Costa Rica and Uruguay. 
However, the recent changes in Argentine income 
distribution differ from the regional pattern. 
Inequality has increased in many countries in South 
America but these changes have been small compared to 
the large changes that took place in Argentina. 
Reputable analysts subsequently argued that Argentina 
no longer belongs to the low-inequality group in Latin 
America. 
 
---------- --------- ------- 
FACTORS AFFECTING INEQUALITY 
---------- --------- ------- 
 
8.  The presence of a large middle-class helped to 
explain a more uniform income distribution in 
Argentina, but the middle-class has been decreasing as 
a percentage of the total population, and so has its 
impact.  Equis Foundation demonstrated that middle- 
class families were 78 percent of all households in 
1974, declining to 44 percent in 1985 and 29 percent 
in mid-2004.  Equis Foundation estimated that half of 
the poor in late 2004 had belonged to the middle class 
for at least some time in the past.  The Nueva Mayoria 
consulting firm estimated that the middle class is now 
only 20 percent of total population. 
 
9.  Income, as classified herein, takes the form of 
salaries, capital earnings and retirement payments. 
Analyses on the recent evolution of inequality show 
that inequality due to differing salaries is slightly 
influenced by sex, age or geographical location, and 
is strongly influenced by the education level, job 
skills and the economic sector in which the person 
works.  Inequality among the retired increased during 
the 1990s.  Capital earnings inequality in Argentina 
is not well captured by statistics, and there is 
little research on the issue. 
 
--------- ----------- 
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 
--------- ----------- 
 
10.  Analysts do not agree on differences in income 
distribution among Argentine regions or provinces due 
to problems related to the compatibility and 
comprehensiveness of the available data.  However, 
they all conclude that income distribution worsened in 
most of Argentina's regions in the last 15 years. 
There is evidence that provincial GDP growth coexisted 
with greater inequality within most provinces.  For 
some provinces, this development goes hand-in-hand 
with international evidence that inequality tends to 
increase with GDP growth for very low levels of per 
capita GDP, while inequality tends to decrease with 
GDP growth for higher levels of per capita GDP. 
Therefore, some researchers state that greater 
inequality in provinces with very low per capita GDP 
is inevitable in the context of growth. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
11.  Inequality increased during the 1990s, when the 
 
 
average annual growth rate was 5 percent.  Inequality 
increased again in 2005, when growth was estimated to 
be 9.1 percent.  General welfare and real income 
increased both in the 1990s and in 2005 as a result of 
high growth.  That correlation implies that, in 
Argentina at least, rising levels of income inequality 
do not necessarily mean that those on the lower end of 
the income spectrum are worse off. 
 
12.  To see more Buenos Aires reporting, visit our 
classified website at: 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/buenosaires 
 
GUTIERREZ