Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06COLOMBO111, Special Media Reaction: Further Reaction to

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06COLOMBO111.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06COLOMBO111 2006-01-17 11:44 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Colombo
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 000111 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR S/ES, INR/MR, PA 
SA/INS (CAMP, SIM, GOWER) SA/PD (SCENSNY, ROGERS, 
PALLADINO); SSA/PAS 
 
SENSITIVE SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:N/A 
TAGS: PHUM KPAO PTER EAID OIIP PREL CE LTTE
SUBJECT:  Special Media Reaction: Further Reaction to 
Ambassador's January 10 Speech to the American Chamber of 
Commerce on Peace Process 
 
REFS: A) Colombo 0054 B) Colombo 0072 C) Colombo 0089 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: The Sri Lankan media over the holiday 
weekend continued to analyze the Ambassador's January 10 
speech to the American Chamber of Commerce in which he 
expressed grave concern over LTTE violence and predicted the 
Tigers would face a stronger Sri Lankan military if they 
chose to abandon the Ceasefire Agreement. English and 
Sinhala media praised the statement but questioned its 
effectiveness, highlighting offers of U.S. military 
assistance.  Independent Tamil media claimed the Ambassador 
had overlooked abuses against Tamils by the Security Forces. 
The enduring reaction in the local media to a speech with 
little new content reflects the tense atmosphere prevailing 
now in the country, with observers focusing intently on the 
words of the international community.  End Summary. 
 
2. (U) Commentators in the government-owned media continued 
to express support for the Ambassador's statement, but 
inquired whether the LTTE would take it to heart.  The 
President's Media Advisor and veteran commentator Lucien 
Rajakarunanayake, in his weekly "On my watch" column (1/14), 
argued the LTTE had not, and would not, heed the message: 
"The latest warning, the toughest of its kind so far, has 
come from the United States Ambassador to Sri Lanka Jeffery 
Lunstead... The U.S. Ambassador's assurance about training 
provided to the Sri Lankan armed forces may give some 
satisfaction to those harboring doubts about the capability 
or preparedness of the Sri Lankan security forces to face up 
to the tactics and the vast fire power of the LTTE, but that 
is a small comfort in the current context." 
Rajakarunanayake contended repeated LTTE attacks following 
tough statements by the international community are "a 
bloody reminder of the contempt the LTTE attaches to such 
warnings." 
 
3. (U) Similarly, in the government-owned Sunday Observer 
(1/15) an op-ed titled "Government withstands provocative 
attacks," an unidentified "Special Defense Correspondent" 
argued the LTTE attack on a Naval bus on January 12 "looks 
like a tit for tat act against the United States warning the 
LTTE on the previous day...  Prabhakaran's decisions in 
defiance of America's warning are the best evidence for the 
international community to judge the LTTE's terrorism and 
non-commitment towards peace through negotiation...  [The 
attack] would no doubt open the eyes of the Co-Chairs 
including the United States to understand that the LTTE's 
sole aim is not freedom for the Tamils, but terrorism." 
 
4. (U) Mainstream independent English media drew attention 
to the seeming Tiger contempt for the international 
community's warnings against continued violence. Daily 
Mirror (01/17) columnist Thanuka expressed concern about an 
editorial appearing on an unspecified pro-LTTE website that 
argued in response to Ambassador Lunstead's statement, "The 
LTTE cannot be threatened by words or deeds.  The LTTE 
fought the Indians 18 years ago.  Just stop and think how 
far the LTTE has militarily progressed and what progress the 
Sinhalese have made in that period."  Thanuka contended not 
only would the LTTE ignore U.S. warnings, but that it would 
express spite against them. 
 
5. (U) The Sinhala nationalist press ranted against the LTTE 
but also chastised the United States and the international 
community for not doing more to pressure the Tigers.  The 
editors of the independent Island (01/14), in an editorial 
titled "Slapping Uncle Sam," argued, "Foreign powers may see 
an opportunity in Sri Lanka's conflict for them to pursue 
their hidden agendas in the region.  The defiance of the 
LTTE stems not from its capability to take on the US or any 
of its allies.  Instead it stems from the [LTTE's] 
confidence that whatever it does, they will not go to the 
extent of helping Sri Lanka militarily."  The editorial 
continued, "The LTTE is running an academy of terrorism, 
training terrorists in other countries like the Maoist 
guerillas in Nepal.  The way it is running rough shod over 
the US and other foreign powers must be inspiring to the 
terror-minded in the world.  Even bin Laden must think he 
has a lesson to learn from the LTTE... It is time for the Co- 
Chairs to tell the world whether they are for the sovereign 
state of Sri Lanka or the LTTE.  President Bush told the 
world after the 9/11 attacks, `either you are with us or 
with them [terrorists]!'  Now that the LTTE has asked the US 
to go to hell, the Co-Chairs must make up their minds what 
to do with the LTTE."  The Sinhala-language Diviana, sister 
paper to the Island, ran a very similar editorial, arguing, 
"Mr. Ambassador, you should be better informed.  The Tigers 
respond only with bullets and Claymore mines.  Don't waste 
your words on their behalf." 
 
6. (U) The independent Sinhala press exaggerated the United 
States' intention to provide resources and engagement to the 
Sri Lankan forces if the LTTE decides to return to war. 
Independent Sinhala Sunday Lakbima (01/15) quoted political 
affairs analyst Mohan Samaranayake contending "The U.S. has 
shown the Tigers that if they won't cease their violence the 
US is ready to control them." Independent Sinhala Sunday 
Lankadeepa (sister paper to the mainstream Sunday Times and 
Daily Mirror) claimed: "America's warning sets example to 
other countries too.  We salute the American Ambassador who 
emphasized the US is not prepared to mollycoddle the Tigers. 
Now the other countries also should speak up for peace.  All 
should realize the LTTE poses a danger to the region and the 
world." 
 
7. (U) Independent Tamil media harped on the Sinhala press's 
emphasis on U.S. military assistance against the Tigers. 
Independent Tamil daily Thinakkural (1/14) carried a 
statement by the Buddhist monk-led, Sinhala nationalist 
Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU) stating: "The U.S. must assist 
Sri Lanka with arms and training of our military."  In the 
Sunday Thinakkural (1/15), Tamil defense analyst Vidhuran 
(pseudonym) contended: "At a time the country's security 
situation is weak, U.S. Ambassador Jeffrey Lunstead's 
statement raises doubts whether the chances for peace talks 
are fading.  By implying the United States would support the 
Sri Lanka Military in a war against the LTTE, the Ambassador 
may not have realized his words could jeopardize chances for 
peace talks and cripple Norway's efforts.  America has 
failed to realize that Tamil civilians are killed everyday 
in the North and East by the security forces in retaliation 
to the grenade attacks on them. The Sinhala and English 
media give maximum publicity to attacks on the security 
forces [and] try to pin the killings of innocent Tamils onto 
the LTTE."  Flagship Tamil paper, Virakesari (1/15) also 
emphasized the promise of U.S. military support in an op-ed, 
arguing: "U.S. Ambassador Jeffrey Lunstead's speech has made 
the government and the Sinhala extremists happy. He has 
confirmed the U.S. government would provide training and 
military assistance to the Sri Lankan forces but has said 
very little about the peace process." 
 
 
8. (U) Pro-LTTE media emphasized Foreign Minister Managala 
Samaraweera's alleged failure in Washington to blacklist the 
Tigers and misconstrued the Ambassador's strongly worded 
speech.  In an op-ed titled, "India and the U.S. trying hard 
to stop the resumption of war," pro-LTTE Tamil daily Sudar 
Oli (1/16) political analyst M. Thirunavukarasu argued: "The 
U.S. did not promise anything big when Sri Lankan Foreign 
Minister Mangala Samaraweera visited the U.S.  Then, the 
U.S. Ambassador made a speech the day after the attack on 
the SL Navy boat that killed 13 soldiers.  The Ambassador 
made three important contentions in his speech, but the 
Sinhala and English media prioritized only one issue out of 
the three. That is that the LTTE would have to face stronger 
Lankan forces.  But the Ambassador also mentioned `what kind 
of leaders are those who oppose the rights and aspirations 
of its people' and aiming his comments at President Mahinda 
Rajapakse."  (Note: In the speech, the Ambassador questioned 
the leadership of the LTTE. End note) 
 
9. (SBU) Comment: As in previous commentary, English and 
Sinhala media argued the Ambassador's warnings to the Tigers 
were toothless in the face of the organization's 
intransigence.  Sinhala and Sinhala nationalist media over- 
emphasized the promise of U.S. military support.  Tamil and 
pro-LTTE media decried this misrepresentation by sections of 
the pro-Sinhala press, but polarized the issue with 
distortions, including redirecting the Ambassador's 
criticism of the LTTE's lack of responsible leadership to 
President Rajapaksa.  Among the Tamil press, the speech 
generated defensive Op-Ed's and letters to the editor 
arguing the U.S. statement, while correctly denouncing 
violence, overlooked legitimate grievances of the Tamil 
population.  The enduring and sharp reaction to the 
Ambassador's speech is interesting given that the address 
contained nothing new in terms of U.S. policy or attitudes. 
However, the current tense climate and daily attacks have 
heated up the war of words as well, and media pundits are 
looking closely at what the U.S. says and does.  End 
Comment. 
 
Lunstead