Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05SINGAPORE3468, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH REPORT ON SINGAPORE'S DOMESTIC

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SINGAPORE3468.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05SINGAPORE3468 2005-12-09 11:02 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Singapore
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SINGAPORE 003468 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
INL/CTR 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KCRM PHUM ELAB KWMN SN
SUBJECT: HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH REPORT ON SINGAPORE'S DOMESTIC 
WORKERS CAUSES A STIR 
 
1.  (U) Summary. The government of Singapore reacted 
immediately and briskly to Human Rights Watch's (HRW) 
exhaustive December 6 report on abuse of foreign domestic 
workers (FDWs) in Singapore.  The government-linked media has 
covered the report and reactions from the government and 
local community extensively, echoing the growing national 
debate on treatment of FDWs and the labor laws governing 
them.  The report makes an important contribution to 
Singaporean reformers' efforts to effect change.  End summary. 
 
2.  (SBU)  On December 6, HRW released its 126-page report, 
which detailed the actual and potential abuse of FDWs (i.e., 
maids) in Singapore, identified the gaps in Singapore's 
regulatory system for FDWs, and recommended specific actions 
for the GOS, source country governments, employment agencies, 
and international organizations and donors.  (The full text 
of the report can be found at www.hrw.org.)  The Ministry of 
Manpower published a two-page press statement on the morning 
following the report's release, reiterating its stand that 
the GOS does not tolerate abuse or exploitation of foreign 
domestic workers and citing its efforts over the past few 
years to address the concerns highlighted in the report.  The 
MOM noted, for example, that in the first three quarters of 
2005, the GOS had prosecuted four employers for failure to 
pay their maids and jailed three of them.  Minister for 
Manpower Ng Eng Hen gave an interview with BBC Radio to 
refute the allegation that maids are not adequately 
protected, saying, "Obviously, I think there is room for 
improvement for every country... We have never claimed there 
are no abuses.  What we said is that our laws are transparent 
and we follow through with enforcement with great vigor." 
Local NGOs expressed surprise at how vehemently the 
government responded; Braema Mathi of the local advocacy 
group Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2) granted the 
government's point that most maids are not abused, but 
praised HRW's report and welcomed its contribution to the 
local effort to lobby for greater maids rights and 
protections. 
 
3.  (SBU) Local advocacy and aid groups working with foreign 
workers welcomed the report, noting that it was 
well-researched and called public attention to many of the 
issues that they have been working on -- such as the need for 
more specific guidelines on the "adequate" rest periods, 
living quarters, and freedom of movement that the work permit 
regulations require, but do not define.  While local groups 
do not agree with all of HRW's recommendations -- TWC2 does 
not believe domestic workers should be dealt with under the 
Employment Act, for example, or that the government needs to 
set up an entirely new accreditation system -- several of our 
NGO contacts said they expect that the HRW report will 
positively affect public discussions of the issue.  Maid 
abuse and the rights of foreign workers have become a 
frequent topic of public debate in forums such as blogs, 
online chat rooms, and the write-in pages of the local 
newspapers, and the HRW report will provide new fodder for 
debate. 
 
4.  (SBU) Comment:  The GOS's initial response to criticism 
on any subject usually is brisk and defensive.  In this case, 
GOS officials may feel the criticism more acutely than usual, 
since they have been making a significant and sincere effort 
to address recognized problems with foreign maids, as 
documented in our 2005 TIP Report.  The concerns about labor 
standards for foreign domestic workers raised by the HRW 
report are real, however.  In a very small number of cases, 
employers' treatment of FDWs is probably severe enough to 
meet the definition of trafficking in persons.  More 
generally, the laws governing their working conditions and 
other labor matters are under increasing public scrutiny. 
The government and local NGOs track these issues closely, and 
reform efforts are ongoing. 
 
5. (SBU) Comment, continued:  Despite the current furor, the 
HRW report does not say anything that Singaporeans themselves 
are not already saying -- advocacy groups and private 
citizens here have been publicly calling for more 
well-defined legal rights and greater protection for foreign 
workers for some time.  The Ministry of Manpower has been 
introducing new or improved regulations every few weeks and 
appears to be cautiously moving toward more stringent labor 
standards and more active enforcement.  HRW's identification 
of the problems and proposed solutions will add impetus to 
this effort.  Despite the GOS's initial rebuttals, we have no 
doubt it will review the criticisms thoroughly and eventually 
move to address the problems identified.  In Singapore 
fashion, however, it will let some time pass before doing so 
to avoid the perception that it is merely reacting to the HRW 
report. End comment. 
 
HERBOLD